by
2.86 of 5 stars
Gordie Hatch is twenty-two, charmingly naive, and certain that his first job as a writer for the ST LOUIS INDEPENDENT'S obituary page will be a ste... read full description

reviews

Dec 26, 2011
Trish rated it: 1 of 5 stars
This book just isn't quite right. I think the problem is, it begins as one type of story, and then veers into melodrama; the proper foundation hasn't been established, so the whole thing crumbles. I think too many disparate elements are swirling in the novel without being brought to any satisfactory resolution (or even a thorough exploration). Is the book about Gordie's vague dreams and unfocused aspirations? Is it about his excessive jealousy? Or is it suddenly, inexplicably, about psychosis an More...
0 comments like (1 person liked it)
Jul 15, 2011
Derek rated it: 3 of 5 stars
A sprightly thriller that wastes no time in getting the reader to the core mystery, Porter Shreve's The Obituary Writer is a first-person narrated novel about an up-and-coming journalist (relegated now to writing the obituaries) who becomes entangled in an ill advised affair with a recent widow. The plot twists and turns in quite a few surprising convulsions, and more importantly, aims to be a little more than a simple genre exercise, wisely bringing in the political issues that color its late 1 More...
Apr 13, 2010
Vicky added it
Zero stars! Will I ever read a decent novel about obituarists? The narrator is an insipid (sorry, "charmingly naive") wet blanket, and the young and mysterious widow he falls for is another Manic Pixie Dream Girl, with alternately "small" and "heavy" breasts, who flits around unrealistically and ends up to be (SPOILER ALERT) a lifelong murderer who is also batshit. Shreve uses the book's setting of 1989 to show how well he read the newspapers that year (Tiananmen Sq More...
Mar 31, 2010
Petra X rated it: 2 of 5 stars
I hate to give a book this well-written only 2 stars, but it was tedious reading. In a way, it was the opposite of a Jodi Picoult novel (to which I am addicted despite myself). Apart from the already-mentioned fine writing, the book started off on a low note, never got as high as middle C until the very fine ending, not just an ending, but after that big surprise, another one! Picoult, I find, starts on a high note, never drops beneath that middle C and runs out of steam just before she writes More...
Jan 09, 2012
Rachel rated it: 2 of 5 stars
This story was okay, but not great. The character development for the male lead worked, but was slow to take off. The character development for the love interest was confusing and lacked clear motivation. The twists were interesting, but it wasn't until the twist that I realized the main point of the book. There were many times along the way that I thought I was noticing something interesting, but those turned out to be accidents or red herrings. The back of the book makes you think it is a More...
Feb 14, 2008
Kelley rated it: 1 of 5 stars
I want my time back. This book sucked.
0 comments like (1 person liked it)
May 29, 2010
Jennifer rated it: 2 of 5 stars
The book started off interesting enough and I was enjoying it. About 3/4 of the way through, it was like the author had gotten sick of writing it and just wanted to tie up loose ends. The plot was thin, the characters were annoying at best and the ending wasn't satisfying at all. As someone else had put it, I want my time back! Don't bother reading this book.
Sep 02, 2009
Jeanne rated it: 2 of 5 stars
A mildly amusing, first person narrative story of a very young aspiring newspaper man who has been raised on falsehoods. He then falls for the falsehoods given to him by a seductive older widow who contacts the obituary writer after her husbands death.
Oct 03, 2009
Doris rated it: 2 of 5 stars
A slow starter, but it keeps your attention. Good writing with well drawn characters and a surprise ending. The author is the husband of the author of Eating Buddha's Dinner. He is the better writer.
Apr 12, 2009
Erin rated it: 2 of 5 stars
While the plot line had some surprises and the writing wasn't bad, I thought the book overall lacked anything fantastic. With so many other great books out there, I'm not likely to recommend this one...
Aug 02, 2011
Alisha rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Porter Shreve is the current head of the Creative Writing program at Purdue. And his writing is great.
Oct 14, 2010
Joan rated it: 1 of 5 stars
I was bored by this book, so finally gave up on it.
Nov 06, 2009
Linda rated it: 3 of 5 stars
this is a very strange book. Easy read but strange
Jan 05, 2009
Marguerite rated it: 3 of 5 stars
A good yarn from the newsroom, though it might give obituary writers a bum rap. A couple of details (Packed weekend news meetings?--Please! And, no reporter would allow beat "poaching" to go unchallenged.) rang false to this longtime journalista, but they didn't detract from the overall reading experience. A quick read. I did see a couple of major details of the plot coming.
0 comments like (1 person liked it)
Aug 14, 2008
Michelle rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Clever, though there are some contrivances. I do believe this is Shreve's first effort, so leverage is bestowed there.
Oct 17, 2008
Karen rated it: 4 of 5 stars
Nice writing, good for a first book but the plot was a little strange. I will read another by this author.
Aug 10, 2008
Fredsky rated it: 3 of 5 stars
This book did not continue to engage me.
May 10, 2007
Casey rated it: 4 of 5 stars
Nothing deep, but quietly funny.
Jan 31, 2012
Jenna rated it: 2 of 5 stars
Jan 27, 2012
L. rated it: 4 of 5 stars
Jan 12, 2012
Jason marked it as to-read
Jan 07, 2012
Anna marked it as to-read
Jan 03, 2012
Ed rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Jan 31, 2012
Bonnie rated it: 4 of 5 stars
Nov 22, 2011
Lora added it
Nov 18, 2011
Norma marked it as to-read
Nov 09, 2011
Jodi rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Nov 01, 2011
John added it
Oct 13, 2011
Annie rated it: 4 of 5 stars
Oct 10, 2011
Cam rated it: 3 of 5 stars