Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Reading the Old Testament” as Want to Read:
Reading the Old Testament
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Reading the Old Testament

3.51  ·  Rating Details  ·  37 Ratings  ·  6 Reviews
John Barton's revised classic text is intended for students who have already learned some of the techniques of biblical study and who wish to explore the implications and aims of the various critical methods currently in use. Chapters include: form criticism, redaction criticism, canonical criticism, structuralism, reader-response criticism, and postmodern approaches.
Paperback, 256 pages
Published October 1st 1984 by Westminster John Knox Press (first published February 1st 1984)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Reading the Old Testament, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Reading the Old Testament

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 99)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
slaveofone
Feb 16, 2009 slaveofone rated it really liked it
If cognitive dissonance didn't formerly describe your state of mind, anyone who is at all interested in struggling through the perspectives and epistemological bases of literary methods of biblical study will find their mind not only being stretched, but given a thorough shakeup by Barton. The book is incredibly enlightening by showing the circularity of various arguments, the assumptions and contexts around which they are based, and their relation to one another, but also incredibly stupefying ...more
Greg Baughman
Apr 13, 2013 Greg Baughman rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This book is a useful and beneficial read, but for a relatively specialized audience. I would not recommend this book to anyone who does not have a solid background in hermeneutics. I certainly would not recommend it for a lay reader. It will make little sense without some background in Biblical interpretation. Taken straight and without a context, it will prove ponderous at best, and damaging to one's faith at worst. Without a background in some of the issues and history, it can feel as if read ...more
Robert Murphy
Mar 29, 2013 Robert Murphy rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: library
Worse than a rabid liberal who loves his methodology like an idol because it's new, or a conservative who loves his because it's old, is the moderate who never lands anywhere out loud. Barton decries every method of Biblical interpretation and ultimately lands nowhere with his support. But the man *reads* the Bible and things texts mean things, he just never shows his cards. For a book about how to read the Bible, you need a Ph.D in psychology to understand how to read Barton.
Alyssa
Oct 15, 2012 Alyssa rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
If you want an unbiased (ok, less biased) introduction to the classic Old Testament critical methods (source, form, redaction, canonical, etc.), John Barton is your man. He is less focused on the history of how they came about than he is on helping you know how they can be helpful in studying the Bible today. He explains how evangelicals fit into this arena, without being negative. Typical British scholar in that!
Nathan
Jun 15, 2015 Nathan rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Terrific book for conservative evangelicals wanting to understand the method behind the madness of critical biblical studies. Barton overplays somethings when he characterizes source and form criticism as primarily a literary undertaking, but he does effectively make the point that source criticism does not necessarily equal the Graf-Wellhausen hypothesis.
Tsun Lu
It is Barton who shows me what is the historical consciousness of modernity. Very informative and very inspiring. I admire his capacity of critical thinking in evaluating the different methodologies. He could have been equally critical of his own view.
Jacob Foster
Jacob Foster marked it as to-read
Jun 17, 2016
Laura Peichel
Laura Peichel marked it as to-read
Jun 03, 2016
Francis Deynu
Francis Deynu marked it as to-read
May 12, 2016
Dominick Degilio
Dominick Degilio is currently reading it
May 05, 2016
Michele
Michele marked it as to-read
Jun 19, 2016
Alex
Alex rated it it was amazing
Apr 05, 2016
David de la Torre
David de la Torre rated it really liked it
Feb 21, 2016
Joy Gonnerman
Joy Gonnerman marked it as to-read
Feb 05, 2016
Eli Voigt
Eli Voigt marked it as to-read
Jan 19, 2016
Steve Young
Steve Young rated it really liked it
Jan 02, 2016
Amy G
Amy G added it
Jan 01, 2016
Dahreen
Dahreen rated it liked it
Dec 16, 2015
Nicole
Nicole is currently reading it
Nov 06, 2015
Thomas Mcgraw
Thomas Mcgraw rated it really liked it
Oct 23, 2015
David
David marked it as to-read
Oct 19, 2015
Sara
Sara added it
Sep 19, 2015
Julie
Julie rated it liked it
Aug 10, 2015
Jack
Jack added it
Aug 10, 2015
Haley
Haley added it
May 16, 2015
Efi
Efi marked it as to-read
Apr 24, 2015
GaryK
GaryK rated it did not like it
Mar 09, 2015
Trey Benfield
Trey Benfield rated it really liked it
Mar 15, 2015
Leanne Bell
Leanne Bell rated it really liked it
Feb 18, 2015
« previous 1 3 4 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Share This Book