Best Book Titles
69 books |
17 voters
On Bullshit
by Harry G. Frankfurt
|
|
Sign in to Goodreads to see your friends' reviews of On Bullshit.
discuss this book
friend reviews (0)
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
lists with this book
other reviews (showing 1-20 of 1062)
Read in June, 2008
So I picked up On Bullshit by Harry Frankfurt at the thrift store on Friday and it is real philosophical reflection from a retired professor of moral philosophy at Princeton (printed by Princeton University Press). It is a brief and rambling little book and it would not rate higher than a three except for the conclusion to the book which I quote extensively from below.
Frankfurt asserts, quite reasonably, that bullshit is widespread in our society. He then goes on to differentiate between...more
Frankfurt asserts, quite reasonably, that bullshit is widespread in our society. He then goes on to differentiate between...more
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
bookshelves:
b-s-,
introduction-to-philosophy,
philosophical-analysis
Read in June, 2008
Sometimes a great way to learn how to philosophize is just to see it done. In this short monograph, talented philosopher, Harry Frankfurt, analyzes the concept of "bullshit" (B.S.). What do we mean, precisely, when we say of something that it is B.S.? Or that someone is a B.S.er? Frankfurt takes on this task and produces a fine piece of philosophy, with some helpful points along the way.
Frankfurt claims that the essence of B.S. is a lack of connection with truth, an indifference to...more
Frankfurt claims that the essence of B.S. is a lack of connection with truth, an indifference to...more
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
Read in June, 2007
recommends it for:
anybody
I read this book in Spanish as one of my course requirement. I love this book it's really philosophical; it delves on the issue of bullshit and the origin of the word.
This book is probably one of the least read book which even myself find it uninteresting at first. Frankfurt's little essay takes us where we desperately need to go even though .
Frankfurt defines "bullshit"
A truth-teller intends to tell the truth, and a liar intends to tell a lie, but a bullshitter doesn'...more
This book is probably one of the least read book which even myself find it uninteresting at first. Frankfurt's little essay takes us where we desperately need to go even though .
Frankfurt defines "bullshit"
A truth-teller intends to tell the truth, and a liar intends to tell a lie, but a bullshitter doesn'...more
Like this review?
yes
1 comments
bookshelves:
read_philosophy
Read in January, 2007
recommends it for:
everyone.
“One of the most salient features of our culture is that there is so much bullshit. Everyone knows this. Each of us contributes his share. But we tend to take the situation for granted. Most people are rather confident of their ability to recognize bullshit and to avoid being taken in by it. So the phenomenon has not aroused much deliberate concern, nor attracted much sustained inquiry.”
The remainder of this massive 67 page tome is equally on-point as the above opening paragraph. F...more
The remainder of this massive 67 page tome is equally on-point as the above opening paragraph. F...more
Like this review?
yes
2 comments
On first reading, this book/essay is enormously compelling and entertaining. But subsequent readings raise serious worries about Frankfurt's account. For example:
On Frankfurt's account, there are two necessary conditions for something to count as bullshit:
(1) The speaker must be indifferent to the truth of what he says.
(2) He must intend to deceive his audience about his indifference to the truth of what he says.
Who would count as such a producer of bullshit? Maybe the Fourth of ...more
On Frankfurt's account, there are two necessary conditions for something to count as bullshit:
(1) The speaker must be indifferent to the truth of what he says.
(2) He must intend to deceive his audience about his indifference to the truth of what he says.
Who would count as such a producer of bullshit? Maybe the Fourth of ...more
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
bookshelves:
nonfiction
Has a copy to sell/swap
—
Read in January, 2007
This is a tiny book -- really just an excuse to bind an essay and sell it for 5.99. It's an hour's engaging and thought-provoking reading.
"One of the salient features of our culture," says the author in his opening sentence, "is that there is so much bullshit." He goes on to point out that practically nobody has wondered why there is so much bullshit, or exactly what bullshit is. So he presents his thoughts on the matter: a preliminary philosophical description ...more
"One of the salient features of our culture," says the author in his opening sentence, "is that there is so much bullshit." He goes on to point out that practically nobody has wondered why there is so much bullshit, or exactly what bullshit is. So he presents his thoughts on the matter: a preliminary philosophical description ...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
philosophy
Read in April, 2008
recommends it for:
Everyone, especially Bullshitters
Can you tell the truth? Or are we all bullshitters? There are some very compelling questions opened to the reader in this quick read. But I see a reread in my near future to fully understand some of Frankfurt's arguement. On Truth by Harry G. Frankfurt is next up. Hopefully, it will tie up some of his arguements that are a bit exposed to criticism. But it was well worth the hour it ...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in July, 2006
recommends it for:
People interested in semantics, philosophy readers
Yes, the subject is a funny word. But the text is dry, and the substance is suspect. Frankfurt spends most of his (admirably few) pages examining causes for bullshitting, in very dry and highly speculative fashion. While it is interesting to read exactly how "bullshit" is different from "nonsense," "lies," and "deception," the term can be used to mean just those things. Like other popular swears, it's a broad word. Frankfurt is more interested in a phenome...more
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
bookshelves:
i-cant-go-on
Read in May, 2007
recommends it for:
super hard to bore people
I started to listen to this on audio CD and it was too dull for me. I asked Jeff if he'd ever read it and he said either that he'd read all of it or part of it and that it was far too dull for his tastes as well. The NPR personalities were talking about it on NPR for a while, back when it came out, so I was thinking I might like to check it out, but then I did not like what I heard when I listened to it (a little). Oh well. I am easily bored-out. Also, I am pretty stressed-out after I teach a...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Has a copy to sell/swap
—
Read in December, 2007
"On Bullshit" is a book that everyone should read the first few pages of. It mixes humor and semantics with an erudite flair. The author's primary concern is that our culture is being inundated by bullshit, yet we have no adequate theory of bullshit. Had Prof. Frankfurt the pensmanship of a Jack Kerouac or a Douglas Coupland, he might have spawned a new a generation of discontents with this book, or at least a new area of specialization in Comp. Lit. departments.
The problem...more
The problem...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in November, 2007
I once took pride in my ability to bullshit without ever taking care to define the art. As it happens, neither has anyone else. Frankfurt asserts, "...We have no clear understanding of what bullshit is, why there is so much of it, or what functions it serves (p 1)." Especially fantastic in his subsequent investigation into what bullshit is and what functions it serves are the comparisons to actual shit. A must read for those keen to keep their shit healthy and strong (i.e. "well w...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
personalfavorites
Read in August, 2006
recommends it for:
people who like bullshitting
This book is written by a very educated professor. He uses some very large words and can write a sentence that has ten or twelve commas and then some semi-colons. So you read the sentence and have to go back and figure out what the sentence started.
Anyway, its a great short book about how lies and bullshit are different. It examines the role of representation in our society. How we represent ourselves, and how so many of us misrepresent ourselves. its very inriguing and enlightening a...more
Anyway, its a great short book about how lies and bullshit are different. It examines the role of representation in our society. How we represent ourselves, and how so many of us misrepresent ourselves. its very inriguing and enlightening a...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
currently-reading
Read in March, 2008
On Bullshit is an essay. The author winds into a discussion of bullshit that goes far deeper than I cared to journey. But when paging through the first few pages, this is what made me buy it for my mantle:
"One of the most salient features of our culture is that there is so much bullshit. Everyone knows this . . . Most people are rather confident of their ability to recognize bullshit and to avoid being taken in by it. So the phenomenon has not aroused much deliberate concern . . . Even ...more
"One of the most salient features of our culture is that there is so much bullshit. Everyone knows this . . . Most people are rather confident of their ability to recognize bullshit and to avoid being taken in by it. So the phenomenon has not aroused much deliberate concern . . . Even ...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in April, 2006
Frankfurt capitalizes on the potential for absurdity inherant in 'philosophical' texts. What philosophy sometimes comes down to, or rather, what critiqing it comes down to, is how well you can dissect what someone is actually saying, moving past all of the bullshit of language. The language used in this book is so dense at times that you might find it to be bullshit. The funny thing is, that's the point. He uses the language against itself. He describes how something can be bullshit if it s...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
currently-reading
Bought for $2 at the used bookstore, and worth about that much. It's a short little philosophical piece about what *exactly* bullshit is, and how it's different than humbug.
What do I have to say to that?
Humbug.
My mother says: poppycock!
It's amusing and a short, albeit at times dense, reading that makes you reconsider what the effects of a slip of the tongue or minor embellishment has on yourself, the person you're talking to, and all other aspects of your life and how you are percei...more
What do I have to say to that?
Humbug.
My mother says: poppycock!
It's amusing and a short, albeit at times dense, reading that makes you reconsider what the effects of a slip of the tongue or minor embellishment has on yourself, the person you're talking to, and all other aspects of your life and how you are percei...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
non-fiction
Read in May, 2008
One of the things that I love about On Bullshit is the fact that Frankfurt could have easily written something long enough to be published as a book, but didn't. He cut through the bullshit to get to the point on, well, bullshit. Or does he?
It's an interesting read, and humorous, though I suspect that it won't be as funny as some people would like. It's thought-provoking and brings up some interesting points on exactly what defines bullshit and why people are so disposed to doing it, ...more
It's an interesting read, and humorous, though I suspect that it won't be as funny as some people would like. It's thought-provoking and brings up some interesting points on exactly what defines bullshit and why people are so disposed to doing it, ...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
I was wondering how this book ever got published but then I read the "About the Author" section. Turns out Harry Frankfurt is a "renowned moral philosopher." I didn't know I was reading a renowned moral philosopher. I'm guessing he went to the publishers and was all like, "I'm a renowned moral philosopher, bitches, and I got this here essay on bullshit. Now are you gonna publish it or am I gonna have to get all categorically imperative on your asses. Respeck." ...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in January, 2005
Bullshit! Am I wrong?
Update: I read this again today after posting my above review earlier. My previous recollection is true but ammended. 1 star if this truly is an attempt at serious (or even 'pop') theory. 5 Stars if it is indeed - as I think it must be - a joke. A joke that nobody else, appropriately, seems to get. So I ask again, "Am I wrong?" All good bullshit, ironic or otherwise, leads to that question.
Update: I read this again today after posting my above review earlier. My previous recollection is true but ammended. 1 star if this truly is an attempt at serious (or even 'pop') theory. 5 Stars if it is indeed - as I think it must be - a joke. A joke that nobody else, appropriately, seems to get. So I ask again, "Am I wrong?" All good bullshit, ironic or otherwise, leads to that question.
Like this review?
yes
3 comments
remember the scene in "history of the world" where our protagonists pass themselves off as philosophers by saying the word "bullshit" repeatedly to each other? in a similar vein, here we have an examination of one of my favorite pastimes... observing and engaging in (as if there were a choice) the world's bullshit. no bullshit, this book cuts through the bullshit to get straight to the bullshit. bullshit.
Like this review?
yes
8 comments
"Her statement is grounded neither in a belief that it is true nor, as lie must be, in a belief that is not true. It is just this lack of connection to a concern with truth - this indifference to how thing really are -that I regard as of the essence of bullshit. " p 33-34
I appreciate the author's sharpness in differenciating concepts and the clarity in expression. FWIIW, I felt a little bit repetition.
I appreciate the author's sharpness in differenciating concepts and the clarity in expression. FWIIW, I felt a little bit repetition.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
book data (includes all editions)
avg rating (all editions): 3.36 (744 ratings) avg rating (this edition): 3.36 (740 ratings) number of reviews: 112popular shelves
other editions
quote
"The contemporary proliferation of bullshit also has deeper sources, in various forms of skepticism which deny that we can have any reliable access to an objective reality and which therefore reject the possibility of knowing how things truly are. These "anti-realist" doctrines undermine confidence in the value of disinterested efforts to determine what is true and what is false, and even in the intelligibility of the notion of objective inquiry. One response to this loss of confidence has been a retreat from the discipline required by dedication to the ideal of correctness to a quite different sort of discipline, which is imposed by pursuit of an alternative ideal of sincerity. Rather than seeking primarily to arrive at accurate representations of a common world, the individual turns toward trying to provide honest representations of himself. Convinced that reality has no inherent nature, which he might hope to identify as the truth about things, he devotes himself to being true to his own nature. It is as though he decides that since it makes no sense to try to be true to the facts, he must therefore try instead to be true to himself.
But it is preposterous to imagine that we ourselves are determinate, and hence susceptible both to correct and to incorrect descriptions, while supposing that the ascription of determinacy to anything else has been exposed as a mistake. As conscious beings, we exist only in response to other things, and we cannot know ourselves at all without knowing them. Moreover, there is nothing in theory, and certainly nothing in experience, to support the extraordinary judgment that it is the truth about himself that is the easiest for a person to know. Facts about ourselves are not peculiarly solid and resistant to skeptical dissolution. Our natures are, indeed, elusively insubstantial -- notoriously less stable and less inherent than the natures of other things. And insofar as this is the case, sincerity itself is bullshit."
more quotes »























