Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Plato’s Parmenides” as Want to Read:
Plato’s Parmenides
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Plato’s Parmenides

4.5  ·  Rating Details ·  8 Ratings  ·  3 Reviews
Of all Plato’s dialogues, the Parmenides is notoriously the most difficult to interpret. Scholars of all periods have disagreed about its aims and subject matter. The interpretations have ranged from reading the dialogue as an introduction to the whole of Platonic metaphysics to seeing it as a collection of sophisticated tricks, or even as an elaborate joke. This work pres ...more
Hardcover, 205 pages
Published July 8th 2003 by University of California Press
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Plato’s Parmenides, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Plato’s Parmenides

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-26 of 26)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Barnaby Thieme
Dec 06, 2011 Barnaby Thieme rated it it was amazing
Shelves: philosophy, greece
This in-depth study should dispel the misguided belief that Plato's "Parmenides" is an exercise in spinning aporiae, or intellectual puzzles. Scolincov's penetrating analysis and exegesis excavates the battle of wits going on between these seminal figures in western philosophy, and illuminates their competing conceptions of what it means for things to exist. The metaphysical and epistemological issues at stake raise important methodological considerations, and in this dialog we can clearly see t ...more
Michael Ledezma
May 05, 2013 Michael Ledezma rated it it was amazing
This dialogue is amazing. The point is not to get frustrated with the lack of decisiveness in answers given, but to sit back and let Parmenides and Plato show you the heights to which conceptual thinking can aspire. The most interesting aspect of the dialogue is that the questions posed almost 2,500 years ago, are still questions that despite claims to the contrary by contemporary logicians, do offer a particularly fruitful exploration into the nature of thinking itself. I can see why Heidegger ...more
Jul 18, 2013 Jaydeep rated it it was amazing
Asu marked it as to-read
Mar 21, 2016
David Houston
David Houston rated it really liked it
Jan 22, 2016
Iztok rated it liked it
Dec 05, 2015
Amedine Amedine
Amedine Amedine marked it as to-read
Jun 09, 2015
Renan Virginio
Renan Virginio marked it as to-read
Apr 10, 2015
Blythe is currently reading it
Sep 24, 2014
José Osorio
José Osorio rated it it was amazing
Aug 23, 2014
Pixel marked it as to-read
Nov 24, 2015
Van Truong
Van Truong marked it as to-read
Apr 12, 2014
Jaime Roldán
Jaime Roldán marked it as to-read
Oct 16, 2013
Foxglove Zayuri
Foxglove Zayuri marked it as to-read
Sep 20, 2013
Sean Hogan
Sean Hogan marked it as to-read
Sep 02, 2013
Gisleine Vargas
Gisleine Vargas marked it as to-read
May 10, 2013
A Anders
A Anders rated it it was amazing
Mar 29, 2013
Chidi OKORO marked it as to-read
Nov 10, 2012
Colleen rated it really liked it
Sep 12, 2012
bdm marked it as to-read
Aug 19, 2012
Dana Léw
Dana Léw marked it as to-read
Jan 28, 2012
Keith marked it as to-read
Dec 07, 2011
Peeter added it
Mar 16, 2011
Inna Shpitzberg
Inna Shpitzberg marked it as to-read
Jan 22, 2010
topics  posts  views  last activity   
A non formal analysis out of Plato’s Parmenide excerpts 1 1 Oct 16, 2013 02:07PM  

Share This Book