Nausea (New Directions Paperbook)
by Jean-Paul Sartre
|
|
Sign in to Goodreads to see your friends' reviews of Nausea.
discuss this book
friend reviews (0)
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
lists with this book
Where's the love? Add this book to your favorite list.
other reviews (showing 1-20 of 2946)
Read in August, 1997
I've reread Sartre's diary of Antoine Roquentin a dozen-odd times since high school, and still it sends chills along my skin, horripilation rent up in bone-rooted furrows...read it, with his few plays.
"And then all of a sudden, there it was, clear as day: existence had suddenly unveiled itself. It had lost the harmless look of an abstract category: it was the very paste of things, this root was kneaded into existence. Or rather the root, the park gates, the bench, the sparse grass, all th...more
"And then all of a sudden, there it was, clear as day: existence had suddenly unveiled itself. It had lost the harmless look of an abstract category: it was the very paste of things, this root was kneaded into existence. Or rather the root, the park gates, the bench, the sparse grass, all th...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in November, 2006
recommends it for:
someone who is more emotional stable than me.
I put a longer review of this book / a journal entry that I wrote while I was reading it in "my writing" since it was too long for this page.
6.9.07
Nausea is not a good thing to have as the only thing that belongs to you, and even worse as the only thing that you belong to. It is sickening and dark and so terribly everyday that it gets inside you if you let it. Sartre writes beautifully and describes the physical world in such incredible detail, that if you are a reader, and eve...more
6.9.07
Nausea is not a good thing to have as the only thing that belongs to you, and even worse as the only thing that you belong to. It is sickening and dark and so terribly everyday that it gets inside you if you let it. Sartre writes beautifully and describes the physical world in such incredible detail, that if you are a reader, and eve...more
Like this review?
yes
(5 people liked it)
add a comment
Read in December, 2007
I picked up this book out of fascination with Sartre's existentialist thoughts - Nausea here means, one's angst, anxieties with life and Sartre believes, this is a condition humans can never escape. The book takes the reader through journey of discovery through the thoughts and feelings of the main character,Antoine Roquentin - who was a writer and his seemingly insignificant relationships with various other characters in the book. At times, as you delved deeper into the dark, moody depths of Ro...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
philosophy
Read in February, 2007
recommends it for:
Those with patience and interest in existentialism
This was a tedious read, and though a short novel, it took me a couple of months on and off to get through it. Sartre sets out to illustrate/explore existentialism in the narrative form. I liked his similar attempt in the play "The Flies" better, as it had a lot more humor and story going on. If you liked Nadja by Andre Breton, you might be insane but you will probably like the writing style of this novel also. I sometimes wondered if the novel flows better or is more poetic in its nat...more
Like this review?
yes
(2 people liked it)
add a comment
bookshelves:
to-read
This was our plan before Mrs. Dalloway. We still might read it...?
"La Nausée is a novel by the existentialist philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, written in 1938 while he was a college professor. It is one of Sartre's best-known novels.
The Kafka-influenced novel concerns a dejected historian in a town similar to Le Havre who becomes convinced that inanimate objects and situations encroach on his ability to define himself, on his intellectual and spiritual freedom, evoking in the protagonist ...more
"La Nausée is a novel by the existentialist philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, written in 1938 while he was a college professor. It is one of Sartre's best-known novels.
The Kafka-influenced novel concerns a dejected historian in a town similar to Le Havre who becomes convinced that inanimate objects and situations encroach on his ability to define himself, on his intellectual and spiritual freedom, evoking in the protagonist ...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in May, 2008
recommended to Erin by:
Roryrecommends it for: entry-level existentialists with a lot of patience
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Like this review?
yes
1 comments
Read in January, 1999
recommends it for:
anyone who loves the smiths, anyone over the age of 18
i found this book at a salvation army when i was 17, i had no idea who sartre was, i just liked the description on the back and it sounded really depressing which i was into at the time. i kept trying to read it for the next five years but could never get past the first ten pages or so because it would just bum me out too much.
i finally read it when i had just graduated from college. i'm glad that i waited that long because i don't think i would have gotten the joke until then. in much the s...more
i finally read it when i had just graduated from college. i'm glad that i waited that long because i don't think i would have gotten the joke until then. in much the s...more
Like this review?
yes
(2 people liked it)
2 comments
bookshelves:
world-literature
سفر انسان از گذر زمان. "روکوانتن" زمان را آگاهانه تعقیب می کند و به این نتیجه می رسد که هستی هیچ توجیه و ضرورتی ندارد. تنها هست برای این که به وجود آمده است و همین امر بسیاری پدیده ها و چیزها را غیر ضروری نشان می دهد. از این که او هم تکه ای از این غیر ضروریات است، دچار تهوع می ش...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Jean-Paul Sartre's version of "Rebel Without a Cause" and like James Dean, Sartre himself became an icon. Written in the late 30's, Sartre's study of a man who analyze his feelings, bearings on a world that makes him sick. This book has so much identity to it, that it is almost a brand name for 'youth.' There is nothing better then to be caught reading this novel by a pretty girl in a coffee house. Unless it's Starbucks, and then it is just... pointless.
Like this review?
yes
(4 people liked it)
add a comment
Read in April, 2008
I have read and loved Sartre but somehow -- even after having this book on my bookshelves for 20 years now -- I've never read this and never realized what a pivotal book this is in terms of Sartre's output and of existentialism as a whole. Goodreads calls a five-star rating "It was amazing", and I have to say that, yup, this was amazing. There were many many passages that I wanted to drink up and swallow, re-read, take a bath in, copy down, read to others, anything I could to create a ...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
oldfavorites
Read in April, 2004
recommends it for:
Anyone sick of the mundane
After reading accounts of Sartre's highly unpleasant experiences with the then-infant compound LSD, this book made more sense on the whole, though taken as an independent perspective of one man's interior world (and a fictional world at that, severed from the corresponding reality of the author) I found it illuminating and full of abstract though vivid imagery. I read it in conjunction with a class on Existentialism while living in Copenhagen, so the atmosphere provided certain nuances to the ex...more
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
bookshelves:
literature
Read in November, 2005
recommends it for:
People who think philosophers make good novelists, but are sadly mistaken
Not much happens. The protagonist wanders around, sits in a library chatting it up with creepy library regulars, complains, worries, and gets in arguments about things that don't matter. There are a lot of passages that serve as useful illustrations of Sartre's philosophy, at least as it appears in Being and Nothingness, but aren't very compelling otherwise. The story reminded me a little too much of my life in university, while I was about the same age as Roquentin, a time that was for the most...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
The story is basically a mean for Sartre to explain his philosopihcal ideas about existentialism. Antoine Roquentin (the main character) is an isolated and depressed historian who feels a deep hatred towards everything and as a result he is stricken by some random nauseas which he doesn't recognize the reason of them at first but then, gradually, he realises that the existence itself, is the main reason of his agony.
Sartre is so much influenced by Kafka in La Nausée . It is of course one of t...more
Sartre is so much influenced by Kafka in La Nausée . It is of course one of t...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
finished
Read in June, 1997
recommends it for:
Philosophy Nerds
"And then all of a sudden, there it was, clear as day: existence had suddenly unveiled itself. It had lost the harmless look of an abstract category: it was the very paste of things, this root was kneaded into existence. Or rather the root, the park gates, the bench, the sparse grass, all that had vanished: the diversity of things, their individuality, were only an appearance, a veneer. This veneer had melted, leaving soft, monstrous masses, all in disorder—naked, in a frightful, obscene ...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
While this book is largely a philosophical treatise in disguise, aptly embodying Sarte's ideas about the distinction between existence and essence, and the role of radical, total human freedom in defining essences and thus oneself, its interesting stream-of-consciousness style and palatable Kafkaesque atmosphere made it a enjoyable read. Sartre's prose style is basic and thus somewhat monotonous, especially when he continually expounds upon philosophical ideas previously explained in great detai...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
recommended
Leer la náusea en el bachillerato me permitió definir hacia dónde quería escuchar lo que voces desconocidas me decían.
Es un libro que cambió mi concepto de vida en gran medida. Sartre es irónico, pero apesadumbrado y nostálgico a la vez, de ese tipo de nostalgia por el abrazo fraterno que alguna vez pudo sentir, pero que ahora, mientras está sentado y diserta sobre el hombre y su caos existencial, ha perdido por completo...y lo extraña.
De toda la obra de Sartre, creo que se pu...more
Es un libro que cambió mi concepto de vida en gran medida. Sartre es irónico, pero apesadumbrado y nostálgico a la vez, de ese tipo de nostalgia por el abrazo fraterno que alguna vez pudo sentir, pero que ahora, mientras está sentado y diserta sobre el hombre y su caos existencial, ha perdido por completo...y lo extraña.
De toda la obra de Sartre, creo que se pu...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in November, 2007
As far as Sartre's philosophy and literature are concerned, this is definitely from his youth. There is an undeniable optimism and beauty in his writing. He seems to recognize the ugliness in the world and admit its existence, but he himself continues to live, searching for his place in the world. As a young person in a very pivitol place in my life, I connected to this book. Sartre, I think is trying to figure out who he is and what he represents in this book... a hard thing to do. I think I'm ...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
books-for-amy,
books-for-erin,
to-read
Amy, in "Wreck" I just love how you materialize this strange reality by skirting by the names of things, whether they are characters or parades or parks or television shows. It’s a defamiliarization strategy, one reminiscent of fairy tales—which of course you are all over, with the Disney business. In this story, though, it is creepy. In a good way. Like the woman, we input things that are familiar but are hyper aware of their edges. It reminds me of Sartre’s novel, Nausea. And S...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
fiction
Read in August, 2008
I think the problem with Nausea are the self-indulgent passages of introspection that get long, tedious, and even a little embarassing after awhile. Sartre's does a much better job when he's portraying his lonely and alienated characters. Instead of creating an awkward hybrid that's a cross between abstract philosophical essay and story, I think Sartre should have committed more to the narrative and characters, and saved the rest for his non-fiction works.
I still prefer Camus... ...more
I still prefer Camus... ...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in October, 2007
recommended to Tamra by:
Collin
An amazing book. I read the back cover and thought I'd hate it. My brother, who bought it for me, thought I'd hate it. I was 20 pages into it and, though entranced, still thought I'd hate it by the end. But no, it's AMAZING!
I'm willing to bet, though, that most people out there will hate it. The book doesn't sell itself in the telling, so you have to read it and either you'll hate it or love it. And I loved it! It'll be one of the books I re-read throughout my life.
I'm willing to bet, though, that most people out there will hate it. The book doesn't sell itself in the telling, so you have to read it and either you'll hate it or love it. And I loved it! It'll be one of the books I re-read throughout my life.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
book data (includes all editions)
avg rating (all editions): 3.86 (2271 ratings) avg rating (this edition): 3.92 (334 ratings) number of reviews: 182popular shelves
other editions
quote
"I suppose it is out of laziness that the world is the same day after day. Today it seemed to want to change. And then anything, anything could happen."
more quotes »























