Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Creative Evolution” as Want to Read:
Creative Evolution
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Creative Evolution

4.02 of 5 stars 4.02  ·  rating details  ·  580 ratings  ·  34 reviews
While intelligence treats everything mechanically, instinct proceeds, so to speak, organically. If...we could ask and it could reply, it would give up to us the most intimate secrets of life. -from Chapter II Anticipating not only modern scientific theories of psychology but also those of cosmology, this astonishing book sets out a impressive goal for itself: to reconcile ...more
Paperback, 472 pages
Published December 1st 2005 by Cosimo Classics (first published 1907)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Creative Evolution, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Creative Evolution

Thus Spoke Zarathustra by Friedrich NietzscheThe Republic by PlatoCritique of Pure Reason by Immanuel KantMeditations by Marcus AureliusBeing and Time by Martin Heidegger
Best Philosophy Book
85th out of 608 books — 741 voters
The Origin of Species by Charles DarwinHoly Bible by AnonymousThe Quran by AnonymousThe Communist Manifesto by Karl MarxThe Republic by Plato
The Most Influential Books in History
386th out of 842 books — 3,052 voters

More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 2,114)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Richard Fulgham
Aug 18, 2009 Richard Fulgham rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: those who need scientific rationale to believe in a creative God
Recommended to Richard by: My old friend and fellow philosopher Tim Browning
This book must be read slowly and deliberately -- do so and it will give you an insight into the brilliance of one of the most revolutionary and extraordinarily perceptive philosopher scientists of the 20th Century, IMO.
Bergson changed the way scientists see the world by introducing his conception of an "original impetus", which began simply (if "intelligently") and evolved matter into living, increasingly complex lifeforms and concurrently evolved an increasingly complex consciousness within
Bob Nichols
Evolution, Bergson argues, is characterized by the progressive development of freedom, which culminates in human consciousness and the capacity for choice about how interaction with the environment will occur. Bergson's second theme is that the impulse that underlies evolution's movement toward freedom is energy. All life is energy. Energy is activity and mobility. Energy is the push behind how that activity will occur. Energy and freedom come together. Energy matches up with instinct and intell ...more
Bergson's thesis is that Darwinian and Lamarkian evolution are only half the story and that there is a creative urge inherent in life that defines the direction of evolution. It is distinguished from Creationism in that his system does not posit and eschaton or final perfect form, nor an external agent (God).

It has some similarity with biologist Rupert Sheldrake's theory of morphic fields. In his theory, there is an energy field (as yet undetected by modern physics) that controls the shape of or
Eric Phetteplace
I should've read this book earlier, it would have helped lay a foundation for Deleuze (who leans heavily on Bergson's term "becoming") and I would have been more receptive to the optimistic tone. As it is, I enjoyed the it and the book has aged fairly well, as concepts like duration and the creative nature of life are still counterpoints to many prevailing theories.
That said, I've come to a point where unnecessary valorization of life and humanity just aren't compelling anymore. Bergson not only
Mahmoud Haggui
creative evolution, a philosophical theory espoused early in the 20th century by Henri Bergson, a French process metaphysician (one who emphasizes becoming, change, and novelty), in his Évolution créatrice (1907; Creative Evolution). The theory presented an evolution in which a free emergence of the individual intelligence could be recognized. It was thus wholly distinct from previous deterministic hypotheses that were either mechanistic or teleological and represented evolution as conditioned e ...more
Czarny Pies
Jan 04, 2015 Czarny Pies rated it 3 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Fans of Teilhard de Chardin
Recommended to Czarny by: Marcel Proust
Shelves: philosophy
I had been meaning to read something by Bergson for some time primarily because he was the cousin of Marcel Proust. L'evolutin creatrice proved to proving to be an unexpected delight. It contains the ideas presented by Teilhard de Chardin in le Phenomene humaine in an embryonic form. Bergson argues that evolution is not the result of accidents but due to the "elan vital" of living things. Essentially Bergson argues that species evolve because they choose to do so. Teilhard de Chardin modifies Be ...more
Drew Gordon
Jul 18, 2007 Drew Gordon rated it 4 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: the curious
Dense, but it's a good example of original thought. It is rewarding and makes you feel like you're climbing a ladder of smart; especially when all of the epiphanies are set out in italics. Although, like most French philosophers, the last chapter is incomprehensible because it is basically a personal statement to one of his contemporaries (see: Archeology of Knowledge by Michel Foucault).
♥ Ibrahim ♥
This book in its own way, like many of Bergson's works, is a work of apologetics to help those who don't believe in God or who eliminate the whole idea altogether. I would read the chapter on Bergson in Will Duran't Story of Philosophy first and then plunge into this masterpiece of his.
Paul Toth
Brilliant, if occasionally outdated. Don't read this for insight into evolution. Read it to learn how to see the world with a constant sense of renewal.
Hassan Barrak
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Robin Friedman
I wanted to reread Henri Bergson's "Creative Evolution" after reading William James. Although best known for his development of pragmatism, James had a highly speculative side late in his career, and he praised Bergson highly in his book, "A Pluralistic Universe." Although they have serious differences, both Bergson and James share an emphasis on a stream of consciousness view of the mind, and on the importance of freedom, chance, and indeterminacy.

Bergson wrote "Creative Evolution" in 1907. At
Dorian Neerdael
Un des livres principaux de Bergson où celui-ci tente de déployer son ontologie du devenir, avec l'importance qu'il accorde habituellement à la durée. La philosophie ne peut pas faire l'impasse sur les avancées scientifiques et doit admettre les conséquences de l'évolutionnisme darwinien. La philosophie doit abandonner la métaphysique traditionnelle d'un absolu fermé sur lui-même, au profit d'un monde dont la valeur principale est la création, c'est-à-dire la liberté, la croissance et le changem ...more
Roberto Rigolin Ferreira Lopes
This book is challenging like a high intensity workout, you better come with all you have. Bergson lost me several times in the first chapter; I had to adapt to his fancy prose and complex constructions. He was discussing adaptation anyway. I am on full sweat here, however, enjoyed the science discussion all the way up starting from instinct and intelligence at origin of life.
Rob Springer
This book was a turning point in my attempts to come to grips with the God of the Bible and evolution. Not that Bergson talks about the God of the Bible, but he does a good job destroying evolution as something that can happen on its own. What we see as creatures changing from one form to the other is really part of a continuous movement. To freeze it and say "this is a protohuman and this is a human" (and to do that with any life form) is to stop an arrow in flight and say "now it is here, now ...more
Nowhere near as important or relevant today as Matter and Memory, I'd say, but still the work of a sophisticated philosopher who easily outshines most of his fellows of the continental school of Philosophy.

The chapter on Nothing is interesting. I don't particularly agree with him, mostly because he fails to look at the concept with the precision of an analytic philosopher such as Meinong, whose category of "subsistence," if accepted by Bergson, would probably radically alter the chapter on Noth
Oct 13, 2008 Selena rated it 4 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: Science enthusiasts/philosophers
There is an almost indefinable line between instinct and intellect. The uneducated farm boy may teach himself extraordinary innovation, where the scholar may not be able to raise a fern, and vice versa. It's empowering to realize the difference, the similiarity, and the fine line in between because it helps us to better understand ourselves, each other, and our world.
Also, this book is very hopeful, as it plays into the philosophy of the seemingly random creations of chaos.
You will probably need
Apr 10, 2008 Andrew added it
Shelves: philosophy
Man, this was a bit of a buzzkill... when Bergson frees himself from trying to write about biology or physics, he makes sense. For most of the book, however, he just comes off as an irrationalist. While I appreciate his contributions to Deleuzean ideas (especially his metaphysics of difference), this was by and large a grim slog. If you're interested in the link between Bergson and later philosophies, read the brief section on the elan vital and the metaphysical and epistemological concepts in C ...more
Malini Sridharan
his discussion of bio evo makes the scientist in me want to puke. I don't buy into any impulse toward development of consciousness or realization of preexisting tendencies to store or release energy etc. in that arena. But his ideas about the abstract and duration wrt our existing consciousness and intelligence are pretty compelling. the bio evo thoughts can't really be teased apart from the rest, so mixed feelings overall.
Darran Mclaughlin
I feel like a bit of a philistine but I read the first 40 pages or so and found it so boring I decided to give up. I have no interest in philosophers theorising about science using logic and language games. I am interested in what philosophers have to say about the foundations of science, or the consequences of science, but not in developing their own scientific theories.
Aug 08, 2010 Lis marked it as to-read
Shelves: wish-list
henry miller states in tropic of capricorn that this book changed his life. i usually jot down books mentioned in other books, and seeing as how the other literary references henry makes (dante, dostoevski) are among my favorites, when he goes on for a few pages talking about the extraordinary impact of a book he barely understood, i figure i better check it out.
Mat Sletten
One of my favorite books, this is a fantastic meditation on how our visual experience informs our epistemology. It also works as a thesis on film language and the evolution of digitalism. Read this book if you have an interest in post-modern fiction, philosophy, or film.
Only read part. Time as Duration and crap like that. Kind of interesting. Use your Intuition. I could definetly see the spiritual, which was cool--didn't bring that up in class though. Easier to read than Time and Free Will
Ben Kearvell
A good introduction to phenomenology. Bergson explores the psychology of time, its effect on evolutionary theory and science in general. Well written.
Nobel prize in 1927, excellent italian translation. A philosophy masterpiece from one of the greatest 20th century thinkers.
Bergson preceds a lot of open systems and biological thinking. Not always formal or rigorous, but still an interesting read.
a thirsty bear could suckle from the juice therein
Daniel Rekshan
This is one of my favorite philosophy books.
Frank Spencer
has a chapter on The Idea of 'Nothing'
need a new copy of this.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 70 71 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
fans? 1 4 Jan 21, 2013 07:09PM  
  • Bergsonism
  • Process and Reality
  • Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living
  • Totality and Infinity:  An Essay on Exteriority
  • Essays in Radical Empiricism
  • The Three Ecologies
  • After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency
  • Deleuze: The Clamor of Being
  • A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation
  • On the Aesthetic Education of Man
  • The Accursed Share 2-3: The History of Eroticism and Sovereignty
  • Margins of Philosophy
  • Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy
  • Principles of Human Knowledge & Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonius
  • The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings Volume 1: 1867-1893
Henri Bergson (1859–1941) was one of the most famous and influential French philosophers of the late 19th century-early 20th century. Although his international fame reached cult-like heights during his lifetime, his influence decreased notably after the second World War. While such French thinkers as Merleau-Ponty, Sartre, and Lévinas explicitly acknowledged his influence on their thought, it is ...more
More about Henri Bergson...
Matter and Memory Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic Time and Free Will An Introduction to Metaphysics The Two Sources of Morality and Religion

Share This Book

“Pour un être conscient, exister consiste à changer, changer à se mûrir, se mûrir à se créer indéfiniment soi-même.” 6 likes
“psychical life is neither unity nor multiplicity, that it transcends both the mechanical and the intellectual, mechanism and finalism having meaning only where there is "distinct multiplicity," "spatiality," and consequently assemblage of pre-existing parts: "real duration" signifies both undivided continuity and creation.” 0 likes
More quotes…