Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Disobedience and Democracy: Nine Fallacies on Law and Order” as Want to Read:
Disobedience and Democracy: Nine Fallacies on Law and Order
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Disobedience and Democracy: Nine Fallacies on Law and Order

4.23  ·  Rating Details  ·  107 Ratings  ·  9 Reviews
Howard Zinn’s cogent defense of civil disobedience, with a new introduction by the author. In this slim volume, Zinn lays out a clear and dynamic case for civil disobedience and protest, and challenges the dominant arguments against forms of protest that challenge the status quo. Zinn explores the politics of direct action, nonviolent civil disobedience, and strikes, and d ...more
Paperback, 148 pages
Published September 1st 2002 by South End Press (first published 1968)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Disobedience and Democracy, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Disobedience and Democracy

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 307)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Feb 20, 2011 B rated it really liked it
So basically, back in the 60's, an associate Justice of the Supreme Court wrote a pamphlet about Civil Disobedience in response to all the upheavals of the time. His name was Abe Fortas. His argument was essentially that disobedience was acceptable only if it didn't go directly against the laws of the country.

Another guy named Howard Zinn read it, got really pissed off, and wrote the book I am now reviewing.

It's pretty much 124 pages of Abe Fortas getting bitch slapped.

Zinn, though especially ra
Daniel Lightfoot
Apr 28, 2015 Daniel Lightfoot rated it it was amazing
"We are a nation of laws." Even in periods of acute social unrest in the United States, when government has played a dynamic role in stifling change and perpetuating and extending various inequities, it has not been uncommon to hear liberal social critics articulate a doctrine of loyalty to a state.

Such was the case in 1968 when Howard Zinn wrote his Nine Fallacies on Law and Order. Abe Fortas, justice of the American Supreme Court, had just published a book arguing for unflinching loyalty to t
David Bjelland
Apr 20, 2015 David Bjelland rated it really liked it
For being a response to a specific publication (Supreme Court Justice Abe Fortas' "Concerning Dissent and Civil Disobedience") in a specific time/place (the US circa 1968), Disobedience and Democracy is an impressively broad treatise on "civil disobedience" - taken by Zinn to encapsulate all the tools at the disposal of citizens to leverage their collective power and bring about a more just society. There is idealism at work here (Howard Zinn is Howard Zinn), but the content is rock solid. Histo ...more
Dec 13, 2009 blakeR rated it really liked it
Written as a critique of Supreme Court Justice Abe FortasConcerning Dissent & Civil Disobedience, this really serves as an excellent rebuttal to any critics of extra-legal civil disobedience, dismantling their arguments one by one. Zinn's language is precise, accessible, and utterly logical. One can sense the seething emotion behind his words even though he does well maintaining his argument dispassionate. I suffered a minor cringe within the first few pages upon seeing his "The time for act ...more
James Payne
A surprisingly robust, almost seething though dispassionate/cogent, tear down of quote/unquote liberal opinions regarding actual political change i.e. civil disobedience re: race, Vietnam, etc in the 1960s.

His defense of "violence" as a resistance tactic was AWESOME 2 SEE. Why don't more people talk about this book? He is young and angry and a smartie here, whereas he sometimes came off too Clintonville liberal in his later work.
Ryan Mishap
Sep 07, 2008 Ryan Mishap rated it really liked it
Written in 1968 as a rebuttal of Supreme Court Justice Abe Fortas's book on civil disobedience, this slim volume still holds important points that every activist should know about defending the practice of civil disobedience--then, after successfully defending it, we can move beyond it...
Feb 07, 2012 Dave rated it it was amazing
Finally, a book where I can feel the passion for a humanist cause through his words. I wish this was required reading in high school. A quick read and a GREAT introduction to Zinn.
Jeffrey Thiessen
Apr 27, 2014 Jeffrey Thiessen rated it really liked it
Obviously a little outdated, since the fallacies are all based on a Supreme Court Judge's position paper during Vietnam - but still incredibly thought provoking.
Jennifer Norton
Jan 25, 2015 Jennifer Norton rated it it was amazing
Shelves: non-fiction
I've been carrying this book around for months, savoring its contents. Now it has a permanent place in my bag.
Adam marked it as to-read
Feb 07, 2016
Sheikh Tajamul
Sheikh Tajamul rated it liked it
Feb 06, 2016
Tylan Bohman
Tylan Bohman marked it as to-read
Jan 31, 2016
Dave marked it as to-read
Jan 28, 2016
Sarfraz Lal Din
Sarfraz Lal Din marked it as to-read
Jan 18, 2016
Ami rated it really liked it
Jan 16, 2016
Marija Radoman
Marija Radoman marked it as to-read
Jan 11, 2016
Catherine Afanasyeva
Catherine Afanasyeva marked it as to-read
Jan 09, 2016
Janet marked it as to-read
Jan 04, 2016
Lisa Fowlkes
Lisa Fowlkes rated it did not like it
Jan 03, 2016
192 Fifth Avenue
192 Fifth Avenue marked it as to-read
Dec 26, 2015
Alex marked it as to-read
Dec 26, 2015
Casey marked it as to-read
Dec 11, 2015
Hasan marked it as to-read
Dec 11, 2015
Mary Grace
Mary Grace rated it liked it
Nov 25, 2015
Katie marked it as to-read
Nov 23, 2015
Eliana marked it as to-read
Nov 22, 2015
Alix rated it it was amazing
Nov 16, 2015
Gevia Kay
Gevia Kay marked it as to-read
Nov 15, 2015
Idil marked it as to-read
Nov 13, 2015
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • A People's History Of The Vietnam War
  • The Radical Reader: A Documentary History of the American Radical Tradition
  • The Economics of Innocent Fraud: Truth for Our Time
  • North Korea: Another Country
  • Terrorism: Theirs & Ours
  • Talking About a Revolution: Interviews with Michael Albert, Noam Chomsky, Barbara Ehrenreich, bell hooks, Peter Kwong, Winona LaDuke, Manning Marable, Urvashi Vaid, and Howard Zinn
  • Che Guevara
  • Floodlines: Community and Resistance from Katrina to the Jena Six
  • Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebellion in an Appalachian Valley
  • 9.5 Theses on Art and Class
  • Public Power in the Age of Empire
  • Racecraft: The Soul of Inequality in American Life
  • American Power and the New Mandarins: Historical and Political Essays
  • Fixed Ideas: America Since 9.11
  • Why Look at Animals?
  • Democracy: A Very Short Introduction
  • Black Liberation and Socialism
  • What Lies Beneath: Katrina, Race, and the State of the Nation
Howard Zinn was a historian, playwright, and social activist. He was a shipyard worker and Air Force bombardier before he went to college under the GI Bill and received his Ph.D. from Columbia University. He taught at Spelman College and Boston University, and was a visiting professor at the University of Paris and the University of Bologna. He received the Thomas Merton Award, the Eugene V. Debs ...more
More about Howard Zinn...

Share This Book

“La distinction traditionnelle entre guerres "justes" et guerres "injustes" est désormais obsolète. La cruauté des moyens dépasse aujourd'hui tout objectif imaginable. Aucune frontière nationale, aucune idéologie, aucun "mode de vie" ne peut justifier la disparition de millions de vies que la guerre moderne, nucléaire ou conventionnelle, entraîne inévitablement. Les prétextes classiques sont soit trop confus soit trop changeants pour que l'on meure pour eux. Les systèmes changent, les politiques changent. Les distinctions entre le bien et le mal proclamées par les politiciens ne sont pas assez évidentes pour justifier que des générations d'être humains meurent pour prouver leur caractère sacro-saint. Même une guerre de légitime défense, la plus moralement justifiable des guerres, perd tout caractère moral lorsqu'elle exige un sacrifice collectif si énorme qu'il frise le suicide.” 5 likes
“Aucun représentant ne peut exactement représenter les besoins d'autrui ; un représentant tend à devenir membre d'une certaine élite et jouit souvent de privilèges qui érodent l'intérêt qu'il doit porter aux revendications de ses mandants. Relayée par les élus du système représentatif, la colère des protestataires perd de sa force ; [...]. Les élus développent une certaine expertise qui tend à sa propre perpétuation. Les représentants passent plus de temps ensemble qu'avec les électeurs qu'ils représentent et forment vite un club fermé respectant ce que Robert Michels appelait "un pacte d'assistance mutuelle" contre le reste de la société.” 4 likes
More quotes…