Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Witches of Eastwick” as Want to Read:
The Witches of Eastwick
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Witches of Eastwick (Eastwick #1)

3.28 of 5 stars 3.28  ·  rating details  ·  10,767 ratings  ·  836 reviews
"A great deal of fun to read...Fresh, consantly entertaining....John Updike remains a wizard of language and observation."
In a small New England town in the late 1960s, there lived three witches. Alexandra Spofford, a sculptress, Jane Smart, a cellist, and Sukie Rougemont,the local gossip columnist. Their supernatural gifts were intriguing, to say
Mass Market Paperback, 343 pages
Published May 12th 1985 by Fawcett (first published 1984)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Witches of Eastwick, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Witches of Eastwick

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
I'm suprised by all the reviews of this book that speak of Updike's ability to "get" and fully understand women ... because that seemed to me to be the most blatantly lacking part of this novel. There is not one redeemable female character in this novel. All of the women are vapid, vacuous and more often than not cruel, indifferent and self-absorbed.

I am not being prudish, I'm not suggesting that every female character should be a paradigm of female virtue - but what is Updike saying about wome
Karly *The Vampire Ninja & Luminescent Monster*

U, is for Updike.

1 I would like to go back and never purchase this Star

It’s not you it’s me! You know what?! It IS you, it is 100% YOU, Updike!! This book is AWFUL!!

There are so many attempts to make this book edgy that it came off entirely underwhelming. I mean, it took me over 2 months just to finish it for fuck’s sake! A 300 page novel… two months?! That is actually unheard of, for me!! I found every reason under the sun (of which there has been lots these last two months) to not read this

I read this book the way it ought to be read, or at least in the circumstances which are best suited for it.

I was away at a beach house for a weekend in the middle of summer and had pretty much nothing to do but lollygag around, smoke cigarettes, and read this book.

It's perfect for sunny clear skies and long hours drinking lemonade by the ocean.

The writing is crisp, quick and clear. Updike's pretty much encyclopedic when it comes to writing skills and he's doing everything pretty smoothly here:
High Hopes will almost always set a reader up for a fall. The excitement of chosing a book, THIS book, to begin my month... Witches and spells to celebrate the Halloween spirit of October.

Having never seen the film, or read any Updike novels before, I really did not know what to expect. I only knew that I expected great things. And sadly, this novel did not deliver many great things at all.

A little over two weeks spent trying to get into a novel that is only 306 pages long. That's an
I must confess that I was hoping that this book would be a light/fluffy/fun read. I really loved the movie and was looking forward to some light hearted revenge to ease the aching in my brain. Unfortunately for me and my brain, the only things from this book that made it into the movie were the three witches, the horrible rich man (wasn't Jack Nicholson just perfect in this role...totally disgusting but still gotta love him), and the game of tennis. Okay, maybe some other stuff too, b ...more
Luís Blue Yorkie
The book tells the story of three friends: Jane, Sukie and Alexandra, all living midlife crisis in a small town on the east coast of the United States. They are all separate, all are witches, but nobody knows.
The three have fun making small spells to demonize the lives of people (read women) from the city, and try to cope as best we can with the amorous difficulties and career in a society that lives with them but have some prejudice by being single.Until it appears an outsider from New York, Da
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
I love this book. Not only does John Updike write heavenly prose, but this book is quite the feminist manifesto. Jane, Sukie, and Alexandra are created by Updike with care and attention, and they are fun, well-drawn personalities to spend a little time with. Updike uses the natural setting of Eastwick, Rhode Island to great advantage. If you feel like getting away to one of those small hamlets on the eastern seaboard, watching a storm come in from the sea, this is the book that will take you the ...more
Jenny (Reading Envy)
I first picked this book up on one of my book speed-dating projects, and went back to it when I needed something to read before falling asleep. For John Updike, this really is quite fluffy. That's a good thing because I've abandoned Rabbit, Run at least twice - I just hate the characters so much that I can't even go along with the author on the journey.

I'm not really sure whose side to take on this book, because I have read that this was Updike's response to complaints of misogyny in his Rabbit
Having seen the movie first, the cast of characters was already set in my mind. I could not envision them in any other way. This didn't really get in the way, but some of the differences in premise and plot did disappoint.

(view spoiler)
Three witches, what's going through their heads, gossip and how they handle the new man in town, that's pretty ,much the plot. While I can't say I loved the story, the description, details and generally the way Updike wrote it was impressive.

"Driving home in her Subaru, whose interior smelled of dog, she saw the full moon with its blotchy mournful face in the top of her tinted windshield and irrationally thought for a second that astronauts had landed and in an act of imperial atrocity had spra
Roderick Vincent
A big disappointment after reading Terrorist. InTerrorist, Updike had such a firm grip on his characters, whereas here, I felt they fell through his fingers. The Witches of Eastwick proves that good writing doesn't necessarily equal good story. While some of the scenes were well done in terms of witchcraft (Alexandra on the beach conjuring up a storm), opportunities were squandered. Instead of pursuing the art of witchcraft and all sorts of potential conflicts with the characters, half of the ti ...more
I picked up this book because of a few great quotes I'd heard from it. I wasn't disappointed on that front: the prose was beautiful and intelligent.
However, the actual story was not. As so many people have said, this book reads like an old man trying to write a feminist book. While I love the idea of women being empowered by their bodies, the descriptions of this were sometimes cringeworthy - period cramps were exaggerated hugely, and the ability to give birth was portrayed as the be-all end-all
Amanda L
Initially I was extremely impressed with how well Updike crafted at least two of the three female leads. He seemed to be very in touch with female concerns and sensibilities and the characters, even though at times annoying, were on the whole quite likable because they felt very real.

These characters could only carry the story so far, however. Aside from the fact that their sensibilities became increasingly reminiscent of those we might expect men to impose on them, the story itself was really s
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Kylin Larsson
The Witches of Eastwick feels like John Updike's reaction to the phenomenon of feminism. The classic witchy features of the three divorced women felt familiar from other stories and films. The three witches unstick themselves from small town drudgery when a warlock (or demon) in the guise of Daryl Van Horne buys an old residence on the outskirts of town. I was sometimes conscious of a forced feeling to the writing, a sense of trying too hard and stumbling. That writing possesses a haunting rhyth ...more
A 2.5 really...

I was already really familiar with the film adaptation when I picked this up looking for a campy and fun pre-Halloween read, only to find myself somewhat disappointed at the very different tone of the book (not the only way in which this differs from the film, which also seems to have cast the lead actresses in the wrong roles as well as being in possession of a far more charismatic Darryl Van Horne than the one written). Usually I'm a book-first kind of girl, and I did admittedly
Karin Bengtsson
Ej läst klart. Språket är mer än en etta men boken är så förbannat kvinnohatande så att jag inte stod ut längre. Herregud.

"It was fundamental and instinctive, it was womanly, to want to heal - to appeal the poultice of acquiescent flesh to the wound of a mans desire, to gice his closeted spirit the exaltation of seein a witch slíp out of her clothes [...]"

Nej, Updike, kvinnor har ingen grundläggande instinkt att tröstknulla män. Det är dina jävla gubbsjuka fantasier.

Hade bokens huvudperson var
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
I just finished this as part of an online book club. The idea was to read something spooky heading into Halloween but I got a late start and finished by Christmas. I barely recognized the movie with Jack Nicholson, but he was a good choice for the part. I had never read an Updike novel before and have decided I'm not a fan. The first half of the book he definitely works too hard at being clever with his descriptions. The second half was more relaxed, not trying to impress the reader as much with ...more
I read Witches of Eastwick because it's said at the back cover that my favorite author Haruki Murakami likes John Updike's novels as well. So I gave it a shoot.

I must confess, Mr. Updike's subject matter (daily affairs of a bunch of middle class women in a quiet island community) and his writing style is not my favorite type. Still I found Witches of Eastwick riches with clever writing, and it's no feel-good chick-lit; those Witches of Eastwick are no harmless and likable creatures. I'm both sur
Eric Chappell
Read Summer 2010; Re-read January 2011

Summary: Wickedly entertaining. The Witches of Eastwick is about three divorced women in the New England town of Eastwick who discover that after being abandoned or divorced from their husbands, they have supernatural powers. Alexandra Spoffard, the sculptress, is the leader of the three. She makes little clay figurines (called "bubbies"), stores too much tomato sauce, and is carrying on an affair with Joe Marino, the town plumber. Jane Smart, the cellist, i
Lina K
I have just finished watching the last episode of short lived tv series "Eastwick" and it made me wonder about the ideas that the story explores.

I found some interesting reviews on this site and it brought back the memory of this book. I believe I read it a couple of years ago - I still remember how disappointing it was... In some way I could compare it to The Vanity Fair which I really didn't like - I am not sure I was able to even finish it (or maybe it was so disappointing that I don't even r
Why read: Considered a classic witch book and I really liked the movie.

What impressed me: It led to the creation of a great movie. It probably pushed the comfort level of many readers in the early 1980s.

What disappointed me: I watched the movie first. And the TV, now that I think of it. And I enjoyed both of those versions of the story better than the actual book. I went in with many preconceived notions (my own fault) but the book should have surpassed them and didn't. It read a little more "li
Characteristically Updike--bitter, poignant, and incisive. Three women find that their failed marriages have brought them not only freedom but also magic powers. They need each other for friendship and support but also can't help but put each other, and the other women in their small town, down from time to time. I think I would find this kind of misogyny trite and offensive if the characters didn't have the depth that they do, and if he wasn't even worse about men. The promiscuity had even me a ...more
Didn't get much of a feeling from this one either way. I had fond memories of the silly 80s movie with Cher, but the novel was just sort of there. It starts, it ends. I guess that's how I've felt about Updike in general, though.
I guess I knew what I was getting into with Updike, but some part of me was expecting a bit of charm and warmth like the short-lived TV show "Eastwick." This book is not charming nor warm, though a good number of charms and plenty of warm (naked, and nearly always hairy) bodies fill its pages. Do not read if you care not to imagine people having affairs with everyone.

One satisfying way to describe someone you find sheltered behind a "snobbery of ignorance":
"It was not that her brain was less eff
The abundance of John Updike obits and essays has inspired me to get around to reading the small percentage of his output (over 60 books!). I adored Witches of Eastwick. I have not seen the movie, but the way it has been described to me sounds so different tone and plot that my guess is you can read this book and have it feel completely fresh, without contamination from the movie.

I read Beck: A Book, and decided Updike was a brilliant male author at writing about men -- their existential crises
Carolina Dean
The Witches of Eastwick is another example of a great book being turned into a less than stellar movie. If you’re familiar with the movie, there’s a lot in this book that you’ll find familiar as well. Unlike the movie which was set in the late 1980’s, the book takes place in the fictional town of Eastwick, Rhode Island at the time of the Vietnam War. The story mainly concerns Alexandra, an artist; Jane, a cellist; and Sukie, a columnist. They are in the primes of their lives, each having either ...more
I really liked this in the eighties, and on rereading, Updike's language remains flawless. This early passage spoke to me, not only because my own tomatoes have been bounteously fruitful this summer.
ever since, two summers ago, Joe Marino had begun to come into her bed, a preposterous fecundity had overtaken the staked plants, out in the side garden where the southwestern sun slanted in through the line of willows each long afternoon. The crooked little tomato branches, pulpy and pale as if mad
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
I Read Therefore ...: October Spooky Read - The Witches of Eastwick 5 12 Oct 22, 2013 12:56AM  
  • Fireflies
  • The Dream Years
  • White Man Falling
  • The Adventures of Gil Blas
  • The Harpole Report
  • Mr. Blandings Builds His Dream House
  • The Wimbledon Poisoner
  • Augustus Carp, Esq. By Himself Being the Autobiography of a Really Good Man
  • Brewster's Millions
  • Memoirs of a Gnostic Dwarf
  • The Unbearable Bassington
  • The Mighty Walzer
  • Before Lunch
  • Mister Johnson
  • Craft of the Wild Witch: Green Spirituality & Natural Enchantment
  • How to Draw and Paint Fairies: From Finding Inspiration to Capturing Diaphanous Detail, a Step-By-Step Guide to Fairy Art
  • According to Queeney
  • Titmuss Regained
John Hoyer Updike was an American writer. Updike's most famous work is his Rabbit series (Rabbit, Run; Rabbit Redux; Rabbit Is Rich; Rabbit At Rest; and Rabbit Remembered). Rabbit is Rich and Rabbit at Rest both won Pulitzer Prizes for Updike. Describing his subject as "the American small town, Protestant middle class," Updike is well known for his careful craftsmanship and prolific writing, havin ...more
More about John Updike...

Other Books in the Series

Eastwick (2 books)
  • The Widows of Eastwick (Eastwick, #2)

Share This Book

“Some people find fall depressing, others hate spring. I've always been a spring person myself. All that growth, you can feel Nature groaning, the old bitch; she doesn't want to do it, not again, no, anything but that, but she has to. It's a fucking torture rack, all that budding and pushing, the sap up the tree trunks, the weeds and the insects getting set to fight it out once again, the seeds trying to remember how the hell the DNA is supposed to go, all that competition for a little bit of nitrogen; Christ, it's cruel.” 37 likes
“Wickedness was like food: once you got started it was hard to stop; the gut expanded to take in more and more.” 15 likes
More quotes…