Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Idea of History” as Want to Read:
The Idea of History
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Idea of History

3.82 of 5 stars 3.82  ·  rating details  ·  265 ratings  ·  22 reviews
The Idea of History is the best-known work of the great Oxford philosopher, historian, and archaeologist R. G. Collingwood. Published posthumously in 1946, it examines how the idea of history has evolved from the time of Herodotus to the twentieth century, and offers Collingwood's own view of what history is. This revised edition has a substantial new introduction which di ...more
Paperback, 576 pages
Published September 1st 1994 by Oxford University Press, USA (first published January 1st 1946)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Idea of History, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Idea of History

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows by J.K. RowlingHarry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone by J.K. RowlingTwilight by Stephenie MeyerHarry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince by J.K. RowlingHarry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban by J.K. Rowling
Best Books to Obsess Over
294th out of 301 books — 365 voters
Candide and Philosophical Letters by VoltaireThe Social Contract by Jean-Jacques RousseauThe Enlightenment by Peter GayThe Wealth of Nations by Adam SmithThe Confessions by Jean-Jacques Rousseau
The Enlightenment and its Impact
150th out of 200 books — 47 voters

More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 923)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
A book anyone who is - or pretends to be - a historian must read. That is not to say it will be easy for many historians to read, or that they will agree with its conclusions. It is a difficult work, a work of genuine philosophy; and Collingwood's conception of history seems to contradict much of what historians think about their craft and their subject.

The first part of the book is taken up with Collingwood's account of the development of history as an entity in its own right, that is one with
PM Richard
As emotional and subjective beings we never simply look to raw history, rather, we look to history and think about history through our own presuppositional lenses. Collingwood calls this the second degree of reflective philosophy. We typically think about the thoughts that we are having about history. In other words, we tend to interpret history through our cultural environments. What we highlight and what we see in history is dictated by our cultural, anthropological and philosophy of history.

Mark Bowles
Genesis of the book
1. During the 1st 6 months of 1936 Collingwood wrote 36 essays on the philosophy of history. These essay's fell into 2 parts;
a) The historical account of the modern idea of history from Herodotus to the 20th century
b) Metaphysical epilegomena: philosophical reflections on the nature, subject-matter, and method of history.
2. He began to work on the book epilogemena in 1939 during his stay in java.
3. In 1940 he began to revise a part of the 1936 manuscript and renamed it The Ide
Brett Green
Need to read this again. A lot of good food for thought for people just getting started in philosophy, esp philosophy of history. A quarter of the text or so covers developments in how older periods/cultures conceived history, ending up with the Germans/Hegel. He then dives into prominent 19th and 20th century thought on the matter, divvying up English, German, and French thought in the process. There are then a few essays of his own where he explicitly covers his own "idea" of history.

I read th
Reads much more modern than 1936 in my opinion... well, until you get to the parts where C recommends getting into your chosen people's heads to reenact the past.

The historical part is kind of a fun philosophical and wooly ride, and so's the murder mystery in the epilogue.
This book changed my apprehension of the historical process. Collingwood's presentation is an architecture in thinking about history as a philosophy, as a craft and as an idea. His presentation of the major thinkers in the realms of history and of philosophy has him fitting the forebears of thought into a larger geometry of which functions as a set of records in the architecture of the past. This past so designed presently and actively is descended to us by forming a structure for history to res ...more
As emotional and subjective beings we never simply look to raw history, rather, we look to history and think about history through our own presuppositional lenses. Collingwood calls this the second degree of reflective philosophy. We typically think about the thoughts that we are having about history. In other words, we tend to interpret history through our cultural environments. What we highlight and what we see in history is dictated by our cultural, anthropological and philosophy of history.

Nov 03, 2010 Sam rated it 4 of 5 stars
Recommended to Sam by: Dr. Gamble's Philosophy of History
Incredibly heady analysis of what history is. Only read the three essays at the end. Lots of good thoughts on what it means to "recapture" history and what the limits of history are. Interesting concept that the past is not actual, merely ideal, and that to study the past we must study the present, whether in the form of sources, archaeology, etc. We can only work our way closer to a more ideal version of the past...we never have "the past as it actually was." All history is the history of thoug ...more
While the main text of this book - a history of historical thought in "the western world" - really serves as an extended prequel to the epilogema, it's still worth reading if only to get used to Collingwood's style and lingo.

The epilogema is where the real fun begins, as Collingwood puts forward his main argument, namely that history is only concerned with the actions of specific agents (either individuial or collective), and more than that real history (as opposed to pseudo-history or cut-and-p
My favorite excerpt...
"To quote Kant: 'Man desires concord; but nature knows better what is good for his species.' Man wants to live easy and content; but nature compels him to leave ease and inactive contentment behind, and throw himself into toils and labours in order that these may drive him to use his wits in the discovery of means to rise above them. Nature, that is to say, does not care for human happiness; she has implanted in man propensities to sacrifice his own happiness and destroy th
This is pretty interesting. Collingwood seems like on of the first historians to really utilize ideas from evolutionary theory and modern psychology in his ideas about history. He manages to create a view of history that is centered on the individual attempting to inhabit and understand the mental states of the past, and while I have some major issues with that, the way he structures it feels nuanced and genuine instead of cheaply nostalgic. And sometimes out of the blue he will just throw out a ...more
Sinan Öner
I read Collingwood's book, wonderful!
"history is historically contingent" -- surely a revolutionary thesis in it's time (1946) -- now feels a bit like old news.

The writing is exceedingly clear and analytical, which maybe says something interesting about the necessity of high-falutin syntax for the promulgation of said revolutionary thesises.
Do they still require undergrads in history to read this? I thought it wasn't too great in 1988, and even reading it again more than a decade later, I'm still not impressed. I would have benefitted so much more from a solid research "how to" text than this jargon.
I identified with this bit: "The work of collecting sources is as endless as is the work of interpreting them, and therefore every narrative that we can at any given moment put forward is only an interim report on the progress of our historical inquiries."
Bethany Stoelting
Intriguing to analyze, albeit tedious and slow to read. Well worth the effort, but remember to keep an open mind and explore other history philosophies, too, in order to gain a thorough appreciation of Collingwood.
When I read this as a junior in college it made me want to go to graduate school. One of these days I'll return to it and see if I still think it deserves five stars...
A great articulation for the Study of History. And he does not divorce History from other studies.
María Eugenia
antiguo pero necesario a la hora de ordenar algunos conceptos.
I did not find his views or arguments convincing; not very practical.
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
David marked it as to-read
Sep 01, 2015
vic marked it as to-read
Aug 30, 2015
Likhitha marked it as to-read
Aug 29, 2015
Evgeniy marked it as to-read
Aug 29, 2015
Mary Pace
Mary Pace marked it as to-read
Aug 28, 2015
Shfat added it
Aug 24, 2015
Katie marked it as to-read
Sep 01, 2015
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 31 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • The Historian's Craft: Reflections on the Nature and Uses of History and the Techniques and Methods of Those Who Write It.
  • What Is History?
  • Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe
  • New Science
  • The Whig Interpretation of History
  • In Defence of History
  • Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History
  • An Essay on Man: An Introduction to a Philosophy of Human Culture
  • A Study of History, Abridgement of Vols 1-6
  • History as a System and other Essays Toward a Philosophy of History
  • Historiography: Ancient, Medieval, and Modern
  • On History
  • History and Social Theory
  • Historians' Fallacies: Toward a Logic of Historical Thought
  • Pursuit of the Millennium: Revolutionary Millenarians and Mystical Anarchists of the Middle Ages
  • The Birth of Purgatory
  • The Greeks and the Irrational
  • The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures
Robin George Collingwood was an English philosopher and historian. Collingwood was a fellow of Pembroke College, Oxford, for some 15 years until becoming the Waynflete Professor of Metaphysical Philosophy at Magdalen College, Oxford.
More about R.G. Collingwood...
The Principles of Art An Autobiography The Idea of Nature Roman Britain An Essay on Metaphysics

Share This Book

“Thus natural science is not a way of knowing the real world; its value lies not in its truth but in its utility; by scientific thought we do not know nature, we dismember it in order to master it.” 2 likes
More quotes…