My rating:

add to my books

The Waste Land: Facsimile Edition

by T.S. Eliot, Valerie Eliot (Editor), Ezra Pound (Adapted by)

4.08 · rating details · 9,301 ratings · 224 reviews

Each facsimile page of the original manuscript is accompanied here by a typeset transcript on the facing page. This book shows how the original, which was much longer than the first published version, was edited through handwritten notes by Ezra Pound, by Eliot Preface by Ezra Pound.

Paperback, 184 pages

Published March 20th 1974 by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (first published 1922)

more details... edit details

Get a copy:

More…

There is a good chance some of your friends read this book. Sign in to see!

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Lists with This Book

This book is currently not featured on any Listopia lists. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 13,372)

filter | sort: default (?) | rating details

Sep 01, 2009

Manny rated it

Shelves: strongly-recommended, too-sexy-for-maiden-aunts, why-not-call-it-poetry

You know, one of the greatest poems of the 20th century and that kind of thing. I must know a fair amount of it by heart.

Here's a story about "The Waste Land" that some people may find amusing. Many years ago, when I was an undergraduate in Cambridge, a friend of mine asked me for advice on how to impress female Eng Lit majors. Well, I said, you could do worse than use The Waste Land. Just memorise a few lines, and you'll probably be able to bluff successfully.

...more

like 30 likes

· see review

Apr 24, 2009

Madeline rated it

· review of another edition

Shelves: poetry, assigned-reading

I'm trying to write a term paper on this poem (key word is "trying") and then I realized, hey, I should waste some time by writing a review of the poem on Goodreads! So here we are.

Here's my thing about T.S. Eliot: the man is ungodly brilliant and I love almost everything he's written. Does this mean I understand a single goddamn word of it? Of course not. But (and this is the great part) that doesn't matter. Eliot has been quoted as saying he's perfectly aware that no one...moreI'm trying to write a term paper on this poem (key word is "trying") and then I realized, hey, I should waste some time by writing a review of the poem on Goodreads! So here we are.

Here's my thing about T.S. Eliot: the man is ungodly brilliant and I love almost everything he's written. Does this mean I understand a single goddamn word of it? Of course not. But (and this is the great part) that doesn't matter. Eliot has been quoted as saying he's perfectly aware that no one has any idea what his poems are about, and he's perfectly cool with that. Understanding Eliot's poems is not the point; the point is to recognize that he writes with incredible skill and to just lose yourself in the words. My Lit book, How to Read a Poem, said it best:
"Eliot is often see as an intellectually difficult, fearfully elitist writer, and so in some ways he was. But he was also the kind of poet who put little store by erudite allusions, and professed himself quite content to have his poetry read by those who had little idea what it meant. It was form - the material stuff of language itself, its archaic resonances and tentacular roots - which mattered most to him. In fact, he once claimed to have enjoyed reading Dante in the original even before he could understand Italian...In some ways a semi-literate would have been Eliot's ideal reader. He was more of a primitivist than a sophisticate. He was interested in what a poem did, not what it said - in the resonances of the signifier, the lures of its music, the hauntings of its grains and textures, the subterranean workings of what one can only call the poem's unconscious."

Translation: in Eliot's eyes, we are all uncultured idiots, and he wouldn't have it any other way.

So, for those of you struggling to get through the wordy, allusion-tastic, multiple-language maze that is The Waste Land, I can only tell you this: Relax and just enjoy the ride. You have nothing to fear. T.S. Eliot loves you.

Read for: Perspectives on Literature(less)

like 15 likes

· see review

Sep 22, 2009

Hannah Eiseman-Renyard rated it

· review of another edition

Shelves: 20th-century-classics, avoid-this, had-to-read-it-for-work-or-a-class, i-don-t-get-it, nearly-didn-t-finish-it, poetry

This Pisses Me Off and Makes Me Feel Like a Moron

I've had to read this twice in the course of my education, and I don't like it one bit, though I thoroughly appreciate its status and importance. Sort of like my attitude to atomic weapons. You wouldn't dismiss atomic weapons as 'crap', but you could legitimately say 'I appreciate their significance but I don't like them at all.'

I don't think there has ever been more literary masturbation about any other piece of literature tha...more

like 5 likes

· see review

Feb 16, 2008

Steph rated it

· review of another edition

Shelves: poetry, canon

i think this might make me an anti-intellectual, but i enjoyed this poem so much more when i read this outside of the classroom and infused it with my own tenuous understanding of what was going on in the poem. in class, explicating every single obscure reference effectively killed it. still such a powerful opening though. his poems have lines you want to taste in your mouth, and repeat over and over like magical intonations, or write down covertly in a secret book of quotes.

like 4 likes

· see review

Jun 29, 2011

Emily O added it · review of another edition

Recommends it for: poetry lovers, English majors

Recommended to Emily by: ENG 252 (American Lit Post-1800s)

Shelves: poetry-and-plays, american-lit, college, anthologies-and-collections

What can one say about The Waste Land that hasn't already been said? It's disjointed, difficult, long, and brilliant. Parts of it are confusing and grotesque (I'm looking at you, carbuncular young man) while other parts are strikingly painfully beautiful. It is laden with symbolism and references to everything under the sun. The only interpretation people can agree on is that something is terribly broken, though no-one can seem to agree on exactly what that thing is. If you like poetry, and are ...moreWhat can one say about The Waste Land that hasn't already been said? It's disjointed, difficult, long, and brilliant. Parts of it are confusing and grotesque (I'm looking at you, carbuncular young man) while other parts are strikingly painfully beautiful. It is laden with symbolism and references to everything under the sun. The only interpretation people can agree on is that something is terribly broken, though no-one can seem to agree on exactly what that thing is. If you like poetry, and are up for a challenge, I can definitely recommend The Waste Land. I promise, the only greater satisfaction than being able to brag to other people that you've read The Waste Land is the satisfaction that comes from reading it. It really is quite beautiful and immensely satisfying.

If you aren't as lucky as I am, and you don't get to read this in a classroom setting with people to help you sort through all of the rich symbolism and literary references, then I highly suggest you read the Norton Critical Edition or some other similar edition. What I like about this edition is all the extra stuff in the back. It has excerpts from every work that Eliot quotes or refers to, which is very helpful if you're like me and haven't actually read The Inferno or don't know of the top of your head who Philomela is. It even has a copy of the sheet music for the Shakespearean Rag. Now that is just cool. It also contains lots of critical essays written by other people about The Waste Land. Each has a slightly different interpretation, so reading them can really help you see the poem from lots of different angles and decide for yourself what interpretation makes the most sense.

I suggest that everyone at least tries to read The Waste Land at least once in their lives, if only so you can say that you have. It's really quite an experience. If you are as scared of this poem as I was and you don't have a class to help with the interpretation, then I suggest getting The Norton Critical Edition, or some similar edition, to help you through it. But no matter what edition you can get your hands on, just read it. Spend some time with it. Don't let the intimidation keep you from enjoying the language. I promise you won't regret it.(less)

like 2 likes

· see review

Jan 24, 2012

Chiara Pagliochini rated it

· review of another edition

Shelves: classici-inglesi, poesia

“Ho i nervi a pezzi stasera. Sì, a pezzi. Resta con me.
Parlami. Perché non parli mai? Parla.
A che stai pensando? Pensando a cosa? A cosa?
Non lo so mai a cosa stai pensando. Pensa.”

Penso che siamo nel vicolo dei topi
Dove i morti hanno perso le ossa.

Mi sento sola stasera. Le lacrime premono sulla punta degli occhi. E c’è un piccolo nodo di nausea là in fondo, che non si vuol sfogare in nessun modo. Forse è la stanchezza, è tutto il giorno che sto s...more

like 7 likes

· see review

Sep 23, 2009

Joshua Nomen-Mutatio rated it

· review of another edition

Shelves: poetry, from-ages-past

I read this a decade ago. It didn't do much for me. I think I enjoyed Four Quartets more, but I'm not much of an Eliot fan on the whole.

Oh, and an annotated version can be read here:

http://www.bartleby.com/201/1.html

like 2 likes

· see review

Aug 21, 2009

Jason Gignac rated it

· review of another edition

Original Review

To be perfectly honest, I really expected not to like this poem. I was really kind of expecting to hate it, in fact. I've read a little bit of Ezra Pound, a jillion years ago, didn't like it, and I guess just figured this would be the same. Here's the thing - I didn't hate it. And I don't know why. It was obtuse, it made no sense at times, it deliberately obscured itself, it had all the things I hate in modern poetry.

Except for one little, tiny thing: It wa...more

like 2 likes

· see review

Apr 20, 2008

John Wiswell rated it

· review of another edition

Recommends it for: Poetry readers who've read everything else

Random, eclectic, failing to achieve emotional rhythm, largely hopeless, uninteresting, unappealing - this, which I'm told is a classic, strikes me as the kind of tripe I'd hear at a 10:00 at night in a bad coffee house. It's a crushing letdown after the ponderous Four Quartets, which is much more worth your time. That poem (or four poems) by this same poet contains all the meaning of this obnoxious thing, and wraps them up in a far greater scheme of humanity's relationship to time. The heart of...more

like 1 like

· see review

Oct 21, 2008

Steve rated it

Shelves: poetry

I read this about 30 years ago, but have since revisted it because of my son's school project on Conrad's "Heart of Darkness." For an Eliot fan, it's a must-have. Like most here, I agree with Pound's edits. Still, I've always liked the first major "cut" from the poem: "He Do the Police in Different Voices, Part I." But more importantly, I've always wanted to know the backstory behind Eliot's interest in Conrad's "Heart of Darkness." I'm fascinated by the ...more

like 2 likes

· see review

Feb 06, 2012

Noah Luster rated it

· review of another edition

This is one of the most brilliant depictions of the modern society as we see it today(and as Eliot himself prophesied); a barren wasteland were we look not on memory and desire as passionate and meaningful, but only wish to forget the human element of our lives. Or at least, this is what I've taken from it; and does this not show that this poem in itself bears multiple meaning on whomsoever reads it. The language is beautiful and elegant (full of French, Italian and other languages within the po...more

· see review

Jan 31, 2012

Mariah rated it

· review of another edition

Eliot's ''The Waste Land'' represents his concept of tradition and impersonality in poetry, in which the use of allusions and quotations in the poem enables it to achieve its Modernist impersonality.
Modernist writing uses myths as a structuring technique to replace the connected sequence of narrative.

The poem is written in free verse which is one feature of Modernist poetry along with its dense of allusions and fragmentary images. The structure of the poem suggests a sha...more

· see review

Oct 30, 2011

Charmaine Vannimwegen rated it

· review of another edition

I've read The Waste Land a few times over the course of my education. I would love to state that I have a profound understanding of it after so many reads, but I don't. I can say that until this last reading I had relegated the work to brilliant but not anywhere near my taste of literature category. It's funny how one idea, one line, can change your view of a larger piece. What's even more intriguing is that it isn't the line or the idea that is new but you. The you who is reading right now is d...more

· see review

Sep 26, 2011

Ruby rated it

· review of another edition

I'm doing a line by line close reading of The Wasteland, because I have the utter gall and audacity to think that I may do some kind of review here. I don't know what that will look like, yet -- but I reckon if I make this note, some of the goodreaders might actually hold me to it.
I'm through sections I and II. I love this edition, which has copious annotations including Eliot's own, an excellent introduction that discusses some of the more important and interesting text changes over the ...more

· see review

Apr 17, 2011

Maggie rated it

· review of another edition

Duh. Five stars, of course. I'm not a huge poetry buff. In fact, I don't really like poetry. Why? Because most of the time I have no idea what the poet is talking about. There are so many mythological and biblical allusions, etc., that there's no way to understand all of it. Unless, of course, you've read everything that's ever been written and devoted your life to studying poetry.

But, this poem is one of my favorites, and even though I don't understand every allusion, the important th...more

· see review

Mar 20, 2011

Ashley Logan rated it

· review of another edition

Shelves: books-read-in-2011

I really enjoyed this poem and the footnotes that went along with it. It was very engaging, knowledge filled, and a good read. It was easier to read than I thought it would be because many of these poems can be hard to decipher. It encompassed Christianity, mythology, and other ideas all in the same respect and I really liked that. I thought it connected the dots very well.
The introduction explained very well how it is about spiritual dryness and references to Sir James Frazer's "...moreI really enjoyed this poem and the footnotes that went along with it. It was very engaging, knowledge filled, and a good read. It was easier to read than I thought it would be because many of these poems can be hard to decipher. It encompassed Christianity, mythology, and other ideas all in the same respect and I really liked that. I thought it connected the dots very well.
The introduction explained very well how it is about spiritual dryness and references to Sir James Frazer's "Golden Bough" in which Frazer deals with ancient vegetation myths and fertility ceremonies, which along with other writers, such as Miss Jessie L. Weston, and other anthropologists have traced the relationship of these myths and rituals to Christianity and most especially to the legend of the Holy Grail. Another significant general source for the poem is composer Richard Wagner with some of his operas such as "Twilight of the Gods" and "Tristan and Isolde". The Fisher King story is also drawn upon and referenced which deals with "(his) death, infirmity, or impotence (there are many forms of the myth) which brought drought and desolation to the land and failure of the power to reproduce themselves among both humans and beasts. This could only be brought to an end by a "questioning knight" going to the Chapel Perilous and asking certain ritual questions about the Grail (or cup) and the Lance-originally fertility symbols, female and male, respectively. The proper asking of these questions revives the king and restores fertility to the land." The poem is dedicated to Ezra Pound in which the poem's publishing owed a great deal to the severe pruning of Ezra Pound. The intro explains that the original manuscript, with Pound's excisions and comments, provided fascinating information about the genesis and development of the poem. It was reproduced in facsimile in 1971 and edited by Eliot's widow, Valerie Eliot, who also supplied notes supplementing those that Eliot himself added when the poem was first published in book form in 1925 and that are included with the present editors' footnotes to the poem.
All in all a great and interesting read and a good source of knowledge in all things mythological and literary. (less)

· see review

Jan 10, 2012

Annie rated it

· review of another edition

Shelves: 2012-challenge-list, poetry

This is a poem that grew on me after a few readings, for I not only had to re-read the entire poem but also research stanzas as I went along. Unless the reader is highly erudite and versed in multiple languages, I strongly recommend having the patience to look up translations and references - it makes the poem much richer.

So, what is my personal takeaway of The Waste Land? On some level, I believe Eliot saw the role of a poet as also one of a prophet, and The Waste Land is his epic p...more

· see review

Nov 19, 2011

Heather Mize rated it

· review of another edition

T.S. Eliot is one of my favorite poets, and everything he writes is so endlessly beautiful and quotable.
My favorite quote of all time (Ok, tied for 1st with a Pablo Neruda quote) is in Wasteland.
"These fragments I have shored against my ruins."

But there are so many other good lines.

Here's some of the lines I love most from The Wasteland:

-Your shadow at morning striding behind you, or your shadow at evening rising to meet you

...more

· see review

Jan 03, 2012

Cheryl rated it

· review of another edition

Shelves: poetry

Reading THE WASTE LAND by T.S. Eliot is like sitting in a French cafe without the benefit of the language. Among the characteristics of the French is the allusion to their nihilism, yet they are said to be great lovers of language, art and diverse culture.

You sit under an awning, sipping cafe au lait, listening to the beauty of feelings expressed by higher or lower intonations. Without understanding any of the words, you have absorbed the wonder of related expressions of being human...more

· see review

Mar 23, 2009

Jane rated it

· review of another edition

Shelves: poetry

This is possibly too much information but when I was in labor 25 years ago, I listened to a record of TS Eliot reading this. i'd wander in and out of listening to hear profound phrases that spoke to me in my current situation. I can still hear his droning voice saying "My nerves are bad to-night. Yes, bad. Stay with me." and "HURRY UP PLEASE IT'S TIME"

like 1 like

· see review

Aug 04, 2007

Lorraine rated it

· review of another edition

Shelves: essentialformymentalhealth

GEE. Why the hell are the comments for Eliot's Prufrock listed here? I'm sure that's because of some classification thing, because when I click on Eliot's Selected Poems I see the same reviews. What's wrong with this thing? I have this particular book and it's ONLY The Wasteland so this stupid website is deluded.

like 1 like

· see review

Dec 31, 2010

Nicky rated it

· review of another edition

Shelves: school-days

This is not for the faint of heart. It is a poem laden with references to older works and probably should be read in a class which is how I read it years ago in school. I believe the early versions contain Eliot's notes with sources so any edition read should be one that has those which will be a help. It's well worth tackling as it is a great work. There are many lines from it that have made their way into the vernacular and many iconographic elements that have made their way into popular cultu...more

· see review

Sep 14, 2011

Chris rated it

· review of another edition

In summary: the poem is aptly titled if ‘waste’ is the colloquial ‘to poop on’, and ‘land’ means ‘my time’.

Okay, so this has been on my reading list for a while. It was supposed to be so good. Its legend preceded it, and it had a lot to live up to, judging from many literature buffs . Some have referred to this poem as an embodiment of the zeitgeist of the 20th century. Besides being a poet and writer, T.S. Eliot was a literary critic whom any author of his time would have begged on ...moreIn summary: the poem is aptly titled if ‘waste’ is the colloquial ‘to poop on’, and ‘land’ means ‘my time’.

Okay, so this has been on my reading list for a while. It was supposed to be so good. Its legend preceded it, and it had a lot to live up to, judging from many literature buffs . Some have referred to this poem as an embodiment of the zeitgeist of the 20th century. Besides being a poet and writer, T.S. Eliot was a literary critic whom any author of his time would have begged on all fours to have him supply a forward for their work.

Much like it’s literary twin, Joyce’s Ulysses (which I tried to read but realized after reading a quarter of the book that the hours I spent on it was flushed down Time’s shi’uh), Wasteland is already, and will continue to increase as positively useless to the majority of us. Apparently Eliot wrote it after reading Ulysses, and it seems he couldn’t vomit it out of his head in any form other than this poem. I was glad it was short so that I could say I read it (which, I’m guessing, is probably the only reason anyone ever read it), but what it loses in brevity of content, it makes up for in…complete nonsense. I’m sure there’ll be some brain out there that will remind me that it is only nonsense to the pedestrian mind, but I’ll remind him/her that if they actually enjoyed burning through life researching every metaphorical nuance, literary allusion and rephrasing (plagiarism?...!), personal life reference, and inside joke to Ezra Pound and his friends (oh C’MON!!) like I DID, then they are a zombie who likes to eat brains.

While reading this, I also read the companion A Guide To the Selected Poems of T.S. Eliot by B.C. Southham. In it Southham tells us that even James Joyce, feeling that parts of Wasteland paralleled his Ulysses, went a step farther to accuse Eliot of mimicry and even mocked Eliot in one of his stories. When Sir James Frazer, whose widely celebrated history of mythology, The Golden Bough, was cited by Eliot as one of the prime resources and another inspiration for his poem, read Eliot’s poem, he ‘soon gave up in bewilderment’. To give an idea of the impossibly cryptic nature of the poem: it is well known that Eliot’s notes to the poem are mostly a spoof to poke fun at the pedantic nature of ultra-annotated, scholarly works. They were added as an afterthought when a publisher needed more ‘volume’ to thicken the short work to publish as a book. Sort of funny…I guess.

It may be a great puzzle to solve, but it isn’t beautiful. There was hardly a line that could stand on its own. Well, maybe two: “That corpse you planted last year in your garden,/ Has it begun to sprout? Will it bloom this year?” and, “A current under the sea/ Picked his bones in whispers.” Now that was nice. Very nice. But it doesn’t get much prettier than that. And it definitely gets more boring and obscure.

One star Eliot!! That’s for making me feel stupid!!
(less)

like 2 likes

· see review

Feb 19, 2009

Ayu Palar rated it

· review of another edition

Shelves: poetry, research-corpus

As an English literature student, I stumbled upon this poem a bit late. It was during Pokok dan Tokoh Sastra Inggris with Mrs. Retno I got a chance to read the poem.
It is rich with imagery. A bit confusing perhaps but no doubt it is a masterpiece and a breakthrough at its age.

like 1 like

· see review

Feb 02, 2011

Zach Lancaster rated it

· review of another edition

This poem is little more than "a practically meaningless collection of phrases, learned allusions, quotations, slang, and scraps in general." This poem is joke on the literary world that continue to imbue meaning and greatness into this meaningless potpourri on the main theme of disillusionment with modern life. It is really only meaningful in that it provides insight into a mind that was on the verge of a nervous breakdown and incapable of coherent expression. Though some say the g...more

like 1 like

· see review

Aug 30, 2010

Gary rated it

· review of another edition

the facsimile edition (published around 1969) of the original draft, with valerie eliot & ezra pound's mark-ups, indispensable : you get an impression of how much of the final was pound's edit ... fascinating study.

like 1 like

· see review

Jul 23, 2011

David rated it

· review of another edition

Shelves: 2011

Not having a degree in English...I'm sorry, but I just don't know what this epic poem was about. The language is beautiful, and T.S. Eliot is heck of a lot more educated than me. His own annotations are not only highly varied in their references, but he fully explains a passage by quoting an entire untranslated portion of the source (Dante, I think) in Italian...like I'm supposed to jump up and say, "Oh, now I get it!" Anyway, I am just cultured enough to recognize a brilliant piece...more

· see review

Jan 09, 2012

Goodacre rated it

· review of another edition

The General Manager of the bookstore where I worked making coffee (the defunct Borders), who happened to ring me up for this slim book, told me that he'd studied The Waste Land for a whole semester in college and not fully understood it. I knew it had a reputation. From one reading I agree it was almost a hypertext, albeit without the connections made convenient. The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock is very beautiful, more beautiful certainly at first, but I won't knock The Waste Land, I'll just ...more

· see review

Aug 20, 2011

Kate rated it

· review of another edition

This poem is long, confusing, and cryptic... but my god, is it beautiful!!! T. S. Eliot really has a way with words, and even though I didn't understand a lot of this poem, I still enjoyed reading it very much. I actually read it twice, just to see if I would understand more the second time around. I didn't, but I figure that's just Eliot for you. And it's not just the Wasteland... the Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock is absolutely gorgeous, too. Eliot is a master, even if a confusing one. "...more

· see review

May 28, 2009

Chris Brimmer rated it

· review of another edition

Shelves: poetry

He changed everything.

like 1 like

· see review

« previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 … 445 446 next »

new topic
Discuss This Book

topics	posts	views	last activity
Brain Pain: * Questions, Resources and General Banter - The Waste Land	72	44	Feb 07, 2012 02:47am
Brain Pain: * Clues for reading The Waste Land	1	16	Feb 02, 2012 12:11am
The Waste Land as Grail Quest?	4	18	Jan 03, 2012 04:44pm
Brain Pain: * Schedule for Discussions - The Waste Land	1	37	Dec 18, 2011 08:00am

combine
Other Editions (46)

More editions...

Genres

Poetry

636 users

Classics

158 users

Literature

31 users

Literature > 20th Century

17 users

European Literature > British Literature

12 users

Literature > American

12 users

Academic > School

11 users

Academic > College

9 users

Academic > Read For School

8 users

Philosophy

6 users

See top shelves...

Readers Also Enjoyed

About T.S. Eliot

Thomas Stearns Eliot was a poet, dramatist and literary critic. He received the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1948 "for his outstanding, pioneer contribution to present-day poetry." He wrote the poems The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock, The Waste Land, The Hollow Men, Ash Wednesday, and Four Quartets; the plays Murder in the Cathedral and The Cocktail Party; and the essay Tradition and t...more

More about T.S. Eliot...

Books by T.S. Eliot

Collected Poems 1909-1962 (Centenary Edition)

The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock and Other Poems

More…

Share This Book

Facebook Twitter Your website

Pin It

Trivia About The Waste Land

8 trivia questions

More quizzes & trivia...

Quotes from The Waste Land

“April is the cruelest month, breeding
lilacs out of the dead land, mixing
memory and desire, stirring
dull roots with spring rain.” — 228 people liked it

“A heap of broken images, where the sun beats,
And the dead tree gives no shelter, the cricket no relief,
And the dry stone no sound of water. Only
There is shadow under this red rock,
(Come in under the shadow of this red rock),
And I will show you something different from either
Your shadow at morning striding behind you
Or your shadow at evening rising to meet you;
I will show you fear in a handful of dust.” — 56 people liked it

More quotes…

Groups That Shelved The Waste Land

Dark Fiction

595 members

last activity 1 hour, 59 min ago

shelf: read

The Bloomsbury Group & Fr...

10 members

last activity Feb 07, 2012 05:40am

shelf: read

Classics and the Western ...

921 members

last activity 6 minutes ago

shelf: to-read

title link	preview: The Waste Land: Facsimile Edition
avg rating	preview: The Waste Land: Facsimile Edition Goodreads rating: 4.08 (9301 ratings)
small image	preview: click here [close]
med image	preview: click here [close]
BBCode	[url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/34083.The_Waste_Land?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book][img]http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1168482020m/34083.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/34083.The_Waste_Land?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book]The Waste Land: Facsimile Edition by T.S. Eliot[/url]

The Waste Land: Facsimile Edition

Friend Reviews

Community Reviews

Readers Also Enjoyed

Share This Book

Share This Book on Your Website