Nietzsche and the Vicious Circle
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating

Nietzsche and the Vicious Circle

4.34 of 5 stars 4.34  ·  rating details  ·  91 ratings  ·  4 reviews
<img src="http://www.continuumbooks.com/pub/ima...; align="left">'The greatest book of philosophy I have ever read, on a par with Nietzsche himself.' Michel Foucault<br/><br/>Pierre Klossowski (1905-) is the author of numerous philosophical works, as well as several novels. He published many translations...more
Paperback, 240 pages
Published June 5th 2005 by Bloomsbury Academic (first published 1969)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Nietzsche and the Vicious Circle, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Nietzsche and the Vicious Circle

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 229)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Bradley
Klossowski (although he never actually cites his sources) gives an interesting, yet marginal reading of Nietzsche's work. While most philosophers harp on Will to Power, Klossowski goes to the Eternal Recurrence/Vicious Circle as the crux of Nietzsche's philosophy. He even goes so far as to locate the origin of this idea in a liminal epiphany while Nietzsche is strolling through Sils-Maria in 1881, even pinpointing the exact date that Nietzsche began to formulate the concept, noting that he was o...more
Andrew
Hm. I know this was a major influence on both Foucault and Deleuze, but I find both of these guys to be far more charming interpreters of Nietzsche's philosophy. Klossowski's approach-- running through highly specific passages of the man's writing with a fine-toothed comb and then extracting a comprehensive, essential approach to Nietzsche's worldview-- seems somewhat hung-up on structuralist pedantry, and the attempt to ground the idea of the eternal return in the body reminds me altogether too...more
Ivan
To me it's an attempt on my side to make things clear. So I bought and read and re-read this book.
Tida Wilson
From Klossowski to Deleuze, and foremostly Nietzsche, with love.
Peter
Peter marked it as to-read
Jul 30, 2014
Ela
Ela added it
Jul 22, 2014
Alex Delogu
Alex Delogu marked it as to-read
Jul 07, 2014
Pawan Maruvada
Pawan Maruvada marked it as to-read
Jul 07, 2014
Taylor
Taylor marked it as to-read
Jul 06, 2014
Steven
Steven marked it as to-read
Jun 28, 2014
Paul
Paul marked it as to-read
Jun 26, 2014
Jordan Carroll
Jordan Carroll marked it as to-read
Jun 08, 2014
Arany Thiru
Arany Thiru marked it as to-read
May 15, 2014
Desi
Desi marked it as to-read
May 13, 2014
Sébastien
Sébastien marked it as to-read
May 11, 2014
wesley sandblom
wesley sandblom marked it as to-read
May 06, 2014
Alev I.
Alev I. is currently reading it
Apr 23, 2014
Matteo
Matteo added it
Apr 18, 2014
Orestis Antibiotic
Orestis Antibiotic marked it as to-read
Mar 27, 2014
wwdz
wwdz marked it as to-read
Mar 24, 2014
Jonathan
Jonathan marked it as to-read
Mar 10, 2014
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
The Baphomet Sade My Neighbor Roberte Ce Soir & The Revocation of the Edict of Nantes (French Literature) Diana at Her Bath/The Women of Rome Pierre Klossowski

Share This Book

“Such is the world as it appeared to Nietzsche under the monumental aspect of Turin: a discontinuity of intensities that are given names only through the interpretation of those who receive his messages; the latter still represent the fixity of signs, whereas in Nietzsche this fixity no longer exists. That the fluctuations of intensities were able to assume the opposite name to designate themselves - such is the miraculous irony. We must believe that this coincidence of the phantasm and the sign has existed for all time, and that the strength required to follow the detour through the intellect was 'superhuman” 1 likes
“There are many more languages than we think: and man betrays himself more often than he desires. How things speak! - but there are very few listeners, so that man can only, as it were, chatter on in the void when he pours out his confessions: he squanders his ‘truths’, as the sun does its light. - Isn’t it rather a pity that the void has no ears?” 0 likes
More quotes…