Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Euthyphro” as Want to Read:
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview


3.87 of 5 stars 3.87  ·  rating details  ·  3,739 ratings  ·  86 reviews
Plato (428/427 BC-348/347 BC), whose original name was Aristocles, was an ancient Greek philosopher, the second of the great trio of ancient Greeks - succeeding Socrates and preceding Aristotle - who between them laid the philosophical foundations of Western culture. Plato was also a mathematician, writer of philosophical dialogues, and founder of the Academy in Athens, th ...more
Paperback, 48 pages
Published September 11th 2007 by Dodo Press (first published -399)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Euthyphro, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Euthyphro

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Riku Sayuj

The Ominous Dialogue: Socrates aka, Josef K.

As I read The Euthyphro, I started to realize why it is considered one of the most dramatic of the Dialogues. Set as a prelude to the Grand Trial, Euthyphro is a disturbingly ominous dialogue.

So, instead of seeing this as one of the usual glib dialogues of Socrates, where he employs his sublime skill to teach his debating partner and thus help him ‘examine’ and gain more meaning out of his life, I tried to re-imagine it… and found it quite unsettling
Celebrity Death Match Special: Plato versus Isaac Asimov, part 3 (continued from here)

[A spaceport on Trantor. SOCRATES and R. DANEEL OLIVAW]

OLIVAW: I'm sorry, Socrates. I'm just going to have to send you back to Earth. You're too irritating.

SOCRATES: I understand, Olivaw.

OLIVAW: You know, you don't need to be so critical all the time. We robots are doing everything we can. We're trying our level best to find high ethical standards and become truly virtuous. It doesn't help to have people like
David Sarkies
Apr 16, 2015 David Sarkies rated it 4 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Everybody
Recommended to David by: David Hester
Shelves: philosophy
Socrates debates the essence of morality
24 April 2012

The scene of this dialogue is on the steps of the Athenian Courthouse (known as the King's Archon) as Socrates is preparing to answer the charges of being disrespectful to the gods and corrupting the youth. There is a discussion about this at the opening to this dialogue, however I will not go into too much detail as I will leave it for later commentaries to discuss (in particular the Apology, and also the book in which this dialogue is conta
Here's one for you, Plato:
Do people still read Euthyphro because it's a good book, or is it a good book because people still read it?
Quick and dirty,

Euthyphro: I'm so pious, I'm prosecuting my father for murder because he neglected a servant/possible murderer before he could face judgement. The God's love that shit!

Socrates: "Awesome! Quick... what is the nature of piety? Im being accused of being impious, and think they'll make me drink hemlock for corrupting the youth."

Euthyphro: "piety is what I'm doing."

socrates: "... that's not a definition."

Euthyphro: "It's what the Gods like."

Socrates: "the Gods are all over the
In this dialogue, Socrates argues with Euthyphro about the nature of piety and impiety, exploring whether a action or person is pious because it or he is loved by the gods or whether it or he is loved by the gods because it or he is pious. This is not mere hair-splitting but sets up what has been referred to as the Euthyphro Dilemma, involving the question whether there are arbitrary moral standards that are right because God commands them or whether there are independent moral standards that Go ...more
Ken Moten
I'm read this as a part of The Trial and Death of Socrates as reprinted in the Classics of Western Philosophy. Translated by G.M.A. Grube.

This will be my third Platonic dialogue after The Republic and the Apology.

This dialogue has Socrates awaiting his official indictment on impiety (among a litany of other things) and he runs into a friend who is a priest and is in the process of having his father charged with murder. As they talk, they decide to try and define what makes someone pious or impi
Euthyphro Dilemma: incredible contribution to classroom philosophy as well as associated drunken arguments or searching stoned contemplation. That thing about all of Western thought being composed of footnotes to Plato is pretty accurate; it's often not the case that Plato's stuff is very good or that the conclusions it reaches are impressively argued. It's that an incredible number of philosophy's most mind-bending and thoroughly absorbing problems have originally at least popped up in some for ...more
Erik Graff
Nov 22, 2011 Erik Graff rated it 3 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: everyone
Recommended to Erik by: Maurice Lieberman
Shelves: philosophy
Maurice Lieberman taught "Humanites 101: The Ancient World" at Grinnell College which I took, there being no choice in the matter, during the first semester. The first book read was Plato's Euthyphro, an ironic early dialog about piety. It was my first direct exposure to the philosopher.

The presentation was peculiar. Mr. Lieberman had hay fever. It was late summer. His nose ran continuously during the class, yet he proceeded to read aloud the entire text, pausing regularly to wipe his nose and m
Marts  (Thinker)
In conversation with Euthyphro, Socrates informs that a young man, Meletus, has accused him of corrupting the youth saying he is 'a poet or a maker of gods and that he invents new gods and denys the existence of old ones'. Socrates and Euthyphro expound on the issue of piety, with Euthyphro, a religious expert, presenting his definitions...
Viji Sarath (Bookish endeavors)

How to kick anybody's ass in 15 minutes.

Ha.. that was real fun, watching the master in action.He takes Euthyphro gently in the beginning like one removes the layers of onion and shows him that his arguments lack substance and then breaks the spine of the whole argument. The formulation of arguments was brilliantly logical and it was never hasty,it proceeded slowly from negating one statement and then moving on to other,seeking clarification when necessary and then proving that its not true or do
Rowland Bismark
The Euthyphro is a paradigmatic early dialogue of Plato's: it is brief, deals with a question in ethics, consists of a conversation between Socrates and one other person who claims to be an expert in a certain field of ethics, and ends inconclusively. It is also riddled with Socratic irony: Socrates poses as the ignorant student hoping to learn from a supposed expert, when in fact he shows Euthyphro to be the ignorant one who knows nothing about the subject (holiness).

Perhaps the most interestin
An interesting inquiry on the topic of holiness and piety. As with most of the Socratic dialogues, we don't really come up with THE answer, but are challenged to question common conceptions of what holiness and piety entail. The crux of the argument seems to be whether or not holiness is something approved of by the gods/God, or if what's holy is holy by its very nature. And if holiness involves service to the gods/God, what are we contributing to the gods/God by our service. Surely we're not ma ...more
Maan Kawas
A beautiful early dialogue by the master ancient Greek philosopher Plato! It demonstrates the Socratic method of dialogue in generating ideas as well as searching for definition. Although the general frame of the dialogue is related to Socrates’ call by the court (Meletus) for the hearing, regarding his accusation of corrupting the youth as well as inventing new Gods, but its main focus is ethics, in particular what is pious and what is impious. Euthyphro claims to know very well such things as ...more
Abdul-mohsen Al-Qasabi
The first of Plato's description of the man -fictional he may be or real- who only knew that he knew nothing and then actually adhered to his state of ignorance until convinced otherwise,Socrates!

Here he seeks the teaching of a younger man named Euthyphro who claimed to know the meaning of piety and impiety and it's relations to the gods, but ended up discovering the absence of any such understanding within this man grasp.
بسام عبد العزيز
المحادثة كلها يمكن اختصارها في جملة واحدة.. عندما يأمرنا الله بفعل ما فهل لأن هذا الفعل خير بذاته؟ أم أن الفعل خير لأن الله يأمرنا به؟؟
الأجابة على هذا السؤال تسبب حرجا للمسلمين.. بالرغم من الشعور المبدئي ببديهية الإجابة..

لو كانت خيرية الأفعال نابعة من أمر الله بفعلها.. بكلمات أخري.. الفعل أصبح خيرا فقط بعدما أمر به الله و ليس قبله..
حسنا.. سيظهر السؤال... ما الحاجة إذن للعقل البشري؟ فمادام الله يقول ما هو الصواب و الخطأ و مادام الله هو من يحدد ماذا نفعل.. أين توجد حرية الإرادة؟ سيقال أن حرية الإ
This was an amazing dialogue. The critique would be that the arguments were not enough, and the dialogue itself did not expand enough on the subject matter material. The good news is that the dialogue between Euthyphro and Socrates is fairly accurate to the religious debates that still rage on today. It is curious that this dialogue was not allowed to be expanded on, and also a shame. I really think that if Socrates was indeed a true person, in the form described by Plato, that their would surel ...more
Sidharth Vardhan
Socrates slaps religious moralist

Socrates was charged of being impious, and ignorant as he knew himself to be, he decided to learn the meaning of word from Euthyphro. As usual, Socrates is able to get Euthyphro (who repeatedly claims wisdom over the subject)eating his words. Euthyphro offers five different definitions, one after other, until the conversation runs the full circle and he conveniently remembers some other engagement and runs away. The dilemma remains unanswered as far as today, a
This dialogue was so much fun! Socrates is at his ironic and sarcastic best so far, completely reaming an oblivious Euthyphro.

What is piety? Euthyphro claims to know and offers to teach Socrates. But he cannot provide an answer. "Things pious are those things that are loved by the gods". But are they pious because the gods love them, or do the gods love them because they are pious inherently? Again, there is no answer, but again, good fun with Socrates.
Pretty short, but very interesting and relevant. Socrates is about to go to trial, accused of impiety. He runs into Euthyphro on the courthouse steps. Euthyphro happens to be the (self-proclaimed) leading expert on the gods and issues of piety and impiety. Socrates asks him for help, for a standard that would distinguish pious acts from impious. Euthyphro tries, but Socrates rejects each proposed rule on its own terms. In the end, Euthyphro implicitly admits that he doesn't know anything and aba ...more
"It's all in Plato.." is one of my favorite fictional characters refrains, and it is true. Nothing is new under the Sun. Socrates (or Plato, or both) made such a watershed in thought that history generally classifies anyone who thought before Socrates as "Pre-Socratic." That genre of philosophy is starting to breakdown as the wisdom of a Heraclitus and others. "Pre-Socratics" are becoming more and more popular for they marry well with mysticism and alchemy.

This was one of the first books that re
A Wild
A particularly interesting dialogue in which Socrates discusses with a young man (Euthyphro) what it means to be pious and impious. Euthyphro is prosecuting his father on behalf of a servant who has been killed in a drunken rage on the grounds that it is the pious thing to do. Conveniently, Socrates is headed to court himself to see charges of godlessness and disturbing the youth when he meets Euthyphro. Socrates seeks advice from Euthyphro in his great knowledge of piety so that he can answer t ...more
Rob Roy
Even on his way to court to be convicted, Socrates has time for philosophy.
May 16, 2012 L rated it 4 of 5 stars
Shelves: reviewed
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Buku ini menceritakan tentang dialog antara Socrates, yang saat itu akan dituntut ke pengadilan oleh Meletus (haha), dan Euthyphro, seorang ahli teologi di Yunani yang merasa sangat memahami berbagai hal. Socrates dituntut ke pengadilan atas tuduhan mencemari generasi muda Yunani. Cara Socrates berdialog ditiru oleh generasi muda di Yunani, sehingga mereka semakin banyak mempertanyakan pengetahuan yang dimiliki oleh para kaum sophis pada saat itu.

Tokoh Euthyphro dalam cerita ini adalah orang yan
A great introduction to two very important things. First, the Socratic method. This is short, but a delightful and easy-to-follow Socratic dialogue ideal for introducing the student to this famous method. Second, it introduces the Euthyphro Dilemma--a significant question in any theistic morality. The question is basically this (as cast in Christian theology): Is what is good good because God commands it, or is what is good commanded by God because it is good. On the one hand, one could argue th ...more
Jackson Cyril
MY FIRST PLATO!! And it didn't disappoint at all. Socrates here tackles the all important question of " Is something morally right because God commands it, or does God command it because it is morally correct?" Socrates asks his friend Euthyphro and shatters Euthyphro's understanding of the subject. Written with brilliantly simply prose, it's one of Plato's shortest dialogues but clearly addresses a very important dilemma.
People who are unfamiliar with the euthyphro dilemma have most likely encountered it unwittingly, either on their own or from someone else. I know I have spent a lot if time questioning whether something is moral because god says its moral, or if god says something is moral because it is. Well, this is essentially the argument in Euthyphro. Socrates asks for a definition of pious from his 'friend,' Euthyphro. When a definition is presented, Socrates analyzes it and ultimately both parties acknow ...more
Mia Boddington
Great little dialogue illustrating the (now-called) Euthyphro Dilemma. It's a really tough philosophical dilemma and sometimes I see this idea of all of Western philosophy being footnotes on Plato because he just wrote so elegantly, put across his ideas well and yet it's still relevant today. It's easy to read (I read the Kindle version, I'm not entirely sure which translation it was) and really thought-provoking. Hard to bash such a little text.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • De Anima (On the Soul)
  • Fragments
  • Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous
  • The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy
  • Letter to Menoeceus
  • The Origins of Greek Thought
  • The Persians
  • Clouds
  • The Presocratics
  • Monadology and Other Philosophical Essays
  • Conversations of Socrates
  • Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion
  • Early Greek Philosophy
  • Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics
  • Hecuba
  • A History of Philosophy 3: Ockham to Suarez
  • The New Organon
  • Confessions of a Philosopher: A Personal Journey Through Western Philosophy from Plato to Popper
(Greek: Πλάτων) (Arabic: أفلاطون)
Plato is a Classical Greek philosopher, mathematician, student of Socrates, writer of philosophical dialogues, and founder of the Academy in Athens, the first institution of higher learning in the Western world. Along with his mentor, Socrates, and his student, Aristotle, Plato helped to lay the foundations of Western philosophy and science.

Plato is one of the most
More about Plato...
The Republic The Trial and Death of Socrates The Symposium Apology Five Dialogues: Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Meno, Phaedo

Share This Book

No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »

“As it is, the lover of inquiry must follow his beloved wherever it may lead him.” 8 likes
“... because it is correct to make a priority of young people, taking care that they turn out as well as possible...” 7 likes
More quotes…