Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “MLA Style Manual and Guide to Scholarly Publishing” as Want to Read:
MLA Style Manual and Guide to Scholarly Publishing
Reorganized and revised, the third edition of the MLA Style Manual offers complete, up-to-date guidance on writing scholarly texts, documenting research sources, submitting manuscripts to publishers, and dealing with legal issues surrounding publication.
Hardcover, 336 pages
Published January 1st 2008 by Modern Language Association of America
(first published January 1st 1985)
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
To ask other readers questions about MLA Style Manual and Guide to Scholarly Publishing, please sign up.
Be the first to ask a question about MLA Style Manual and Guide to Scholarly Publishing
(showing 1-30 of 235)
Of all the books I've ever read, or ever expect to read, this is the one that most took me by surprise. I expected to treat this as a mere reference for college essay writing, but found myself returning to it for clarity on specific formatting a bibliographic details so frequently that I eventually sat down and read it cover to cover. The example content was itself interesting enough to keep me occupied, but reading the book completely gave me a much greater appreciation for the goals of the MLA ...more
Jan 27, 2015 Erik Graff rated it 3 of 5 stars · review of another edition
Recommends it for: humanities professionals
Recommended to Erik by: no one
The first two parts of this manual, that on scholarly publishing and that on legal issues of scholarly publishing, are actually readable. The rest is best used as a reference for professionals in the humanities governed by Modern Language Association conventions. This is not a general style guide. Hold on to your high school grammar and style texts for that or purchase the University of Chicago Manual which is more extensive in its coverage of rules and conventions.
Chicago spoiled me I think. MLA has less than half the information Chicago does and it isn't as well organized. My boss and I spent half an hour trying to figure out a question about block quotes, and we ended up just following Chicago because MLA didn't tell us what to do. Lame.