1491: New Revelations of the Americas Before Columbus

by Charles C. Mann
1491: New Revelations of the Americas Before Columbus  
published August 9th 2005 by Knopf
binding Hardcover
isbn 140004006X   (isbn13: 9781400040063)
pages 480
description 1491 is not so much the story of a year, as of what that year stands for: the long-debated (and often-dismissed) question of what human civiliz...more
date added
03-13-07



Sign in to Goodreads to see your friends' reviews of this book.







discuss this book

There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

groups with this book

The Complete Idiots Guide to the Ultimate Reading List
Science and Inquiry
The American West
trenchant in seattle
Mr. Geopolitics




friend reviews (0)

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.



lists with this book




other reviews (showing 1-20 of 1148)



Douglas
Read in July, 2007
recommends it for: readers of history, ethnohistory, First Nations history
As someone who writes professionally in this area (unabashed plug: watch for God's Mercies, Doubleday Canada, in October 07) I have high praise for this title, a long-overdue assessment of native culture and civilization before (and at) contact with Europeans. I'm still reading it, but I've been impressed so far.[I've now finished, see below.:] Anyone who enjoyed it should also consider Elaine Dewar's Bones, which explores the archaeological controversy of how long people have been in the New Wo...more
Like this review?   yes   (2 people liked it)
  add a comment

Deborah
Read in January, 2008
Full Title: 1491: New Revelations of the Americas Before Columbus

Overall, 1491 provided a fascinating and fresh perspective on history as a lively, evolving field of knowledge--not the stuff of dry textbooks at all. My primary criticism of the book is that it is difficult to keep a sense of chronology without taking notes; the book is divided into different cultures and the research and theories behind their histories--not a chronological ordering of developments in the continents. Of the ma...more
Like this review?   yes   (1 person liked it)
  add a comment

Alex
06/30/08

What we think of when we think of the pre-Columbian Americas -- a wilderness lightly occupied by primitive tribes -- was in fact only the tiny remnants of a sophisticated and highly evolved society which had been ravaged by European disease, largely before Europeans could ever make contact with them.

That is the provocative thesis of this thoughtful and thorough look at what existed in this hemisphere before 1491, and what happened to it in 1492. While it sounds like a tired politically corre...more
Like this review?   yes   (1 person liked it)
  add a comment

Benjamin
Read in July, 2008
Excellent collation of research on Indian history that has sparked controversy not only in the discipline of history but sustainable ecology - it trenchantly organizes and presents evidence not completely unknown to myself, but not presented for collective impact on the knowledgeable generalist until now. Viewed as a whole, it cogently elaborates the controversies and agendas driving various parties, Indian and white, archaelologist and environmentalist, seeking to influence not only how people ...more
Like this review?   yes   (1 person liked it)
  add a comment

Dan
07/05/08

Read in July, 2008
1491 challenged my preconception of American life before it was “discovered” by Columbus. In school I was taught that Indians had minimal impact on the world we know today. The Indians I was told were few in numbers, they were weak as proved by how they were thoroughly conquered by opposing forces a fraction of the population of Indian, they were hunter/gatherers who had no impact on their environment and that as a whole they did not have much of an impact on European society.

The book ch...more
Like this review?   yes   (1 person liked it)
  add a comment

Kenny
07/24/08

Read in July, 2008
recommends it for: amateur historians
As a result of decades of revisionist history (as well as flat-out incorrect but sincere assumptions by scientists), most people have come to see pre-Columbian America as an Edenic wilderness inhabited by pure-hearted indigenous folk living lightly on the land, leaving nary a footprint outside their biodegradable sweatlodges.

Yet Mann shows us a densely populated, fiercely impacted hemisphere where no one was indigenous (they all came from somewhere else), much of the land repeatedly went up ...more
Like this review?   yes   (1 person liked it)
  1 comments

Brendan
Read in September, 2007
The survey of current thinking on the population of the americas via that Beringia land bridge and the subsequent summary of the evolutions of early american society is interesting.

But the repeated comparisons between american society and eurasian society are really fraught and often belabored. The comparisons between the two hemisphere's agriculture is fine, but the assertion that Aztec (apparently it's more politically correct to call them Mexica) philosophy was as rich as medieval europe...more
Like this review?   yes   (4 people liked it)
  1 comments

Micah
10/09/07

Read in October, 2007
recommends it for: History buffs, and anyone who is really really interested in maize
Here is a fine collection of the modern anthropological, sociological and historical scholarship concerning pre-Columbian America, well presented in one volume.
For about 200 pages. Sadly the book goes on for another 100 or so.
It is very informative, and presented well for those first 200 pages with only a few blips of the author’s agenda. To give him credit, he plays it very close to the middle for most of those pages. There are hints of the stretching to come. For example, he equa...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Aili
08/27/07

Read in August, 2007
So the major thing to note here is that this is a history of the inhabitants of pre-Columbian Western Hemisphere... written by a feature journalist. It has a lot of straight history, but also a lot of information gleaned from non-standard or new techniques, such as archaeology, forensic science, and linguistics. Oh, and actually talking to folks who identify as indigenous -- who are, lots of them, still around.

A fair amount of the material was familiar to me from taking Colonial Latin Americ...more
Like this review?   yes   (1 person liked it)
  add a comment

John
04/11/08

Read in June, 2007
recommended to John by: no one
recommends it for: History buffs and non-fiction fans
If your American paradigm includes an historical view of European settlers desecrating the "Forest Primeval," guess again! Recent archeological and anthropological discoveries have revealed that the Pre-Columbrian Americas were vastly more populated and civilized than we had previously believed. For example, Spanish explorers of the 1500s discovered a Mississippi River lined with villages trading up and down the river; French explorers of the 1600s, on the other hand, encountered a hea...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Mike
02/09/08

bookshelves: recently-completed
Read in March, 2008
For anyone who enjoyed "Guns, Germs, and Steel," this is an excellent follow-up. The author is a journalist, not an academic, and that's good for us laymen. What could have been a dry, scholarly treatise on current research into pre-Colombian America is instead a compelling first-person account of his exploration into the field. He explains some of the vicious debates going on over big questions, like when the Indians crossed the Bering land bridge, making sense of all the information ...more
Like this review?   yes  
  1 comments

Tripp
02/03/08

Read in January, 2008
recommends it for: Non-specialists
Author Charles Mann's purpose is to debunk three commonly held ideas about the Americas before Columbus: that the continents were sparsely populated, that the social and technical development was limited and that the locals left the environment untouched.

In discussing scholarly debates on these subjects, he convincingly argues that the population, before the decimation of disease, was quite high. The debate is just how many people there were rather than whether the continents were pristine u...more
Like this review?   yes   (2 people liked it)
  add a comment

Jason
08/25/07

Read in June, 2007
recommends it for: everyone
Very well written, a good mixture of factual evidence and narrative. The main take home point here should be known to everyone, especially Americans. There is a reason why there was a period of 128 years between Colombus' landing and a permanent European settlement in North America. Namely, there were millions of Native Americans there who thought Europeans were dirty, amusing creatures who had interesting objects but were not fit for being neighbors. Attempted European settlers were continuousl...more
Like this review?   yes   (2 people liked it)
  add a comment

Rocklynn
I listened to an abridged version of this, and even that was LONG. 1491 goes into great depth about the history of north and south america pre-Columbus. What I enjoyed: I learned a lot about native "history", and also the hows and whys of what is "known"; I was engaged and intrigued with the ideas presented, the comparisons with European culture in the same time frame, and the fact that so much of what has been assumed/presented as fact is highly disputable; and also I rea...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

John
01/19/07

Read in December, 2006
A very interesting look at pre-Conquest America, containing some relatively new (and far from established) academic theories. The main thesis of the book is that pre-Columbian American societies were far more advanced and populous than recorded by European colonists/invaders/priests. The successive waves of epidemics brought by European contact decimated the Americas to such an extent that these societies caved into anarchy and ruin, which was seen as their original condition by the new arriva...more
Like this review?   yes   (2 people liked it)
  add a comment

Ian
Ian rated it: 5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars
07/06/07

Read in January, 2006
recommends it for: anyone
Mann is not a historian, but rather is a journalist. And for that reason, this book does read like a history text (like Guns, Germs, and Steel). But it is exceptionally researched and fantastic.

Mann describes North and South America in a way that traditional textbooks and contemporary rhetoric never acknowledges. He combats the old-fashioned and anti-academic beliefs that pervade our Eurocentric version of world history (summed up in what he calls "Holmberg's Mistake," a rea...more
Like this review?   yes   (1 person liked it)
  1 comments

Nick
02/27/08

Confession: I never finished this, leaving about 50 pages (about 15%)on the table. With non-fiction books that are based around a particular theory I feel like as long as I read enough to internalize the argument and really understand some of the evidence I can stop reading when I get bored. If I missed some revelation on page 420 somebody let me know.

The key takeaway here: American societies were almost certainly older, larger, more technically advanced and more com