Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Reason and Worldviews: Warfield, Kuyper, Van Til and Plantinga on the Clarity of General Revelation and Function of Apologetics” as Want to Read:
Reason and Worldviews: Warfield, Kuyper, Van Til and Plantinga on the Clarity of General Revelation and Function of Apologetics
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Reason and Worldviews: Warfield, Kuyper, Van Til and Plantinga on the Clarity of General Revelation and Function of Apologetics

3.71  ·  Rating Details ·  7 Ratings  ·  3 Reviews
After the challenges of the Enlightenment from philosophers such as David Hume, contemporary philosophers of religion tend to think that proof is not possible and that at best humans have arguments for the probability or plausibility of belief in God. But, Christianity maintains that humans should know God. This book explores attempts to respond to the Enlightenment ...more
Paperback, 152 pages
Published June 1st 2008 by Upa
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Reason and Worldviews, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Reason and Worldviews

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-24)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Paul
Oct 12, 2008 Paul rated it it was ok
Recommended to Paul by: pmanat@gmail.com
Some caveats: I don't like the pop up clarifications for what stars mean that goodreads has. You can take my stars (unless they are 5 or 1 (or none)) with a bit of a grain of salt. 3 stars says "I liked it." But I didn't, "like it." If there was no pop up window, I'd probably give the book three stars.

The book isn't the clearest or easiest to read. There's also some grammatical errors, for example, more than once he writes "Gospel" when he means "gospel." Some sentences are poorly worded, or lea
...more
Josiah DeGraaf
Nov 14, 2015 Josiah DeGraaf rated it really liked it
While I disagreed with the overall thesis of this book, this book did a really good job of laying out the basic apologetic philosophies of Warfield, Kuyper, Van Til, and Plantinga and also made some sophisticated arguments against presuppositional apologetics, even if I found them lacking. Anderson impressed me overall with his understanding of the nuances of the different apologetic principles he interacted with, and as someone who wasn't familiar with all the nuances of the different thinkers ...more
Steve
Steve rated it really liked it
Jun 07, 2012
Hermonta
Hermonta rated it it was amazing
Sep 09, 2008
David Gillespie
David Gillespie rated it really liked it
May 05, 2015
Ben Holloway
Ben Holloway rated it really liked it
Jan 29, 2015
Cory Spackman
Cory Spackman rated it liked it
Aug 23, 2012
Luke
Luke marked it as to-read
Mar 05, 2009
David
David marked it as to-read
Nov 16, 2011
Neil
Neil marked it as to-read
Jul 26, 2011
Zak Scholtz
Zak Scholtz marked it as to-read
Dec 11, 2011
Brandon
Brandon marked it as to-read
Jun 11, 2015
Vinnie Santini
Vinnie Santini marked it as to-read
Sep 18, 2012
Chidi OKORO
Chidi OKORO marked it as to-read
Jan 31, 2013
Kevin Snider
Kevin Snider marked it as to-read
Feb 01, 2013
Tony
Tony marked it as to-read
Aug 13, 2013
Dexter
Dexter marked it as to-read
Aug 18, 2013
Christopher Hutton
Christopher Hutton marked it as to-read
Dec 02, 2013
Jeremy
Jeremy marked it as to-read
Dec 08, 2013
Tom
Tom marked it as to-read
Nov 05, 2014
Stephen
Stephen marked it as to-read
Jul 26, 2015
Felipe
Felipe marked it as to-read
Dec 08, 2015
Ryan
Ryan is currently reading it
Sep 23, 2016
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Share This Book