Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Lolita: The Screenplay” as Want to Read:
Lolita: The Screenplay
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Lolita: The Screenplay

3.85  ·  Rating Details ·  242 Ratings  ·  14 Reviews
As it charts the hypnotized progress of Humbert Humbert, a hypercivilized and amoral European emigre, into the orbit of a treacherously lovely and utterly unimpressionable preteen, Lolita: A Screenplay gleefully demolishes a host of stereotypes - sexual, moral, and aesthetic. Not least among the casualties is the notion that cinema and literature are two separate spheres. ...more
Paperback, 240 pages
Published August 26th 1997 by Vintage (first published 1960)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Lolita, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Lolita

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Franc
Jul 19, 2015 Franc rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Why should one read VN’s screenplay of Lolita? First, because it’s an enjoyable 2-hour alternative to re-reading the novel — “purely as a vivacious variant of an old novel,” as VN puts it in his introduction.

Secondly, for the “deleted scenes” that Nabokov removed from the novel but reused for the screenplay such as a Humbert being given a grotesquely humorous guided tour of the ruins of the nonexistent McCoo home where Humbert was to have lived, but which has burned down before his arrival. Anot
...more
Ian
Nov 20, 2013 Ian rated it liked it
Novel, but not as novel as the novel. (How d'you like that wordplay, Mr. Nabokov?!)

I get the sense that Nabokov adapted the book to see if he could, whereas Kubrick adapted the book because he had a vision of how it would look on-screen.
Elisabeth
Aug 23, 2016 Elisabeth rated it liked it
Shelves: plays, nabokov
As it's Nabokov and it's his Lolita, there are inevitably a lot of great things about this screenplay, especially compared to Kubrick's Lolita, which is enjoyable but a different creature altogether. Nabokov is himself throughout the entire screenplay and is often quite witty in the stage directions -- for instance, a narrator for a commercial about peaches is "A FRUITY VOICE". Or Nabokov takes the time to be humorous: the collie that was supposed to be hit by the van, the van that instead struc ...more
Kate Savage
Mar 23, 2014 Kate Savage rated it liked it
Up until the final scene, I was actually more engaged with this screenplay than I had been with the novel. This was for the same reason that the novelic screenplay is normally criticized: so much is left out. While the novel is sunk deep in the folds of Humbert Humbert's mind, the screenplay has to stop short. The film requires detachment. And in the white space left by this detachment, you begin to see, for the first time, the ostensible subject of the book and the movie: Lolita. Dolly. She has ...more
Ben Benson
The screenplay of Lolita is in a similar structure to the Kubrick film in that it begins with the end, and then traces down the major stomping grounds of the novel, Ramsdale, the road, Beardsley, the road, Lolita's home, and for the screenplay it pretty much ends there whereas the Kubrick film replays the intro with a little more added.

The differences between the Kubrick film and the Nabokov screenplay are rather different outside of the major plot points that must be touched upon and Nabokov's
...more
Hamish
Jan 29, 2015 Hamish rated it really liked it
Shelves: drama
Given that this was his only screenplay, it's pretty incredible just how well-done this is. Granted, N had written several plays and was a cinephile, so he had a lot of the necessary skill set. But even with that in mind, I was amazed by just how well he spoke the language of the cinema and perfectly understood what needed to go into a good screenplay. The prologue is dazzling in how well it conveys information and exposition without being obvious about it. The whole thing is so artistically and ...more
Nova...
Oct 16, 2008 Nova... rated it liked it
pada awalnya, penulis mengatakan sesuatu yang memang bener akan terjadi pada pembaca..bahwa pembaca akan merasa aneh, bahkan jijik dengan perilaku pedophile yang di derita si pemeran utama, tapi pada akhirnya -penulis tetap yakin- pembaca akan jatuh cinta pada tokoh utamanya..
man, that's totally right..XD
pertamanya bener2 aneh ngebaca cerita ttg seorang pria tua yang jatuh cinta pada seorang gadis, bukan, anak kecil yang berumur 25 taun lebih tua..duh, aneh bgt si..sakit kali ni orang yak..gitu
...more
Richard F. Schiller
May 05, 2014 Richard F. Schiller rated it really liked it
Shelves: nabokov, plays, american
Not nearly as captivating as the virtuosic novel, but a fine work in itself. Lolita doesn't translate well as a screenplay because now all the events as shown from a camera-like omniscient view, instead of the fuzzy, multi-layered vision we get from Humbert Humbert. There were some elements of this screenplay I didn't like all that much, particularly the awkward narration of John Ray Jr. However, certain new phrases of classic Nabokovian genius are born here such as

"...solarizing your solar p
...more
Corey
May 23, 2014 Corey rated it it was amazing
Lolita is in my top five novels I’ve ever read. And I am a huge fan of Kubrick and his filmed version. So I don’t know why it took me so long to read Nabokov’s version of the screenplay, which differs greatly from Kubrick’s. It’s brilliant, of course. And, in an introduction, Nabokov says some pithy things about the 3 versions: original novel, Kubrick’s film and this screenplay. It’s interesting to read because, as he admits in the introduction, Nabokov did not know how to write a movie and this ...more
Julian Darius
Dec 11, 2011 Julian Darius rated it liked it
Read the novel first (preferably in the annotated edition). Then read Nabokov's fascinating screen adaptation of his celebrated novel. It's different, but the choices Nabokov makes are fascinating. They suggest that he didn't see his own novel as a sacred text, but rather something that could be adapted and changed for a different medium.

Plus, there's a wonderful metatextual moment, where Lo and Humbert Humbert meet a certain professorly character.

Well worth your time.
Vlad Gheorghe
Jan 27, 2016 Vlad Gheorghe rated it it was amazing
Libro etereo, di una raffinatezza mai vista, che tiene costantemente sospeso il lettore tra la bellezza e la repulsione, accompagnato da un personaggio poetico e splendidamente, profondamente maligno. Non trovo le parole adatte per definire quest'opera.
T G
Jul 25, 2007 T G rated it liked it
Shelves: in-my-library
No, it's not so perfect as the novel, but it's still Nabokov, so you could do a lot worse. You need only read it if you are a one of his true devotees.
Linda
Feb 20, 2009 Linda rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
It is all about the exquisite prose and fascinating characters!!
Suzysci
more readable than the novel itself, though less delicate
Karen
Karen rated it really liked it
Jan 30, 2017
Saritza Legault
Saritza Legault rated it really liked it
Dec 20, 2007
Chris
Chris rated it really liked it
Apr 21, 2015
William Alberque
William Alberque rated it really liked it
Jan 29, 2008
Ismael Schonhorst
Ismael Schonhorst rated it liked it
Aug 31, 2012
Iveta
Iveta rated it it was amazing
Jan 13, 2016
Charlie
Charlie rated it liked it
Oct 10, 2012
Sean
Sean rated it it was amazing
Apr 11, 2008
Steve
Steve rated it it was amazing
Jun 14, 2008
Romane
Romane rated it it was amazing
Apr 09, 2016
Shawn
Shawn rated it it was amazing
Sep 15, 2007
Finney
Finney rated it really liked it
Feb 24, 2012
Charlotte
Charlotte rated it liked it
May 23, 2009
Casey Parker
Casey Parker rated it liked it
Sep 20, 2012
Amanda
Amanda rated it liked it
Apr 17, 2008
Carrie Clark
Carrie Clark rated it it was amazing
Jan 02, 2016
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Clint Eastwood: A Biography
  • The Jaws Log
  • Iron Man and Philosophy: Facing the Stark Reality
  • Big Bosoms and Square Jaws: The Biography of Russ Meyer, King of the Sex Film
  • An Improvised Life
  • Insultingly Stupid Movie Physics: Hollywood's Best Mistakes, Goofs and Flat-Out Destructions of the Basic Laws of the Universe
  • The Art of the Moving Picture
  • American Beauty: The Shooting Script
  • The American Years
  • Life: The Movie: How Entertainment Conquered Reality
  • American Zombie Gothic: The Rise and Fall (and Rise) of the Walking Dead in Popular Culture
  • Anime and Philosophy: Wide Eyed Wonder
  • Quentin Tarantino and Philosophy
  • Hollywood Hellraisers: The Wild Lives and Fast Times of Marlon Brando, Dennis Hopper, Warren Beatty, and Jack Nicholson
  • The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo and Philosophy: Everything Is Fire
  • Documentary Film: A Very Short Introduction
  • Writing Movies for Fun and Profit: How We Made a Billion Dollars at the Box Office and You Can, Too!
  • Steve McQueen: A Biography
5152
Russian: Владимир Владимирович Набоков .

Vladimir Vladimirovich Nabokov, also known by the pen name Vladimir Sirin, was a Russian-American novelist. Nabokov wrote his first nine novels in Russian, then rose to international prominence as a master English prose stylist. He also made significant contributions to lepidoptery and had an interest in chess problems.

Nabokov's Lolita (1955) is frequently
...more
More about Vladimir Nabokov...

Share This Book