The Shakespeare Wars: Clashing Scholars, Public Fiascoes, Palace Coups
by Ron RosenbaumSign in to Goodreads to see your friends' reviews of this book.
discuss this book
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
friend reviews (0)
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
lists with this book
Where's the love? Add this book to your favorite list.
other reviews (showing 1-20 of 119)
Read in March, 2007
recommends it for:
ANYONE!
This book was pure joy from start to finish. Do NOT be intimidated by the title or the topic. I hadn't read Shakespeare since high school (though I have read many more plays since reading this book) and savoured every word. Rosenbaum (who is now one of my favorite living writers) is a savvy, chatty, often hilarious guide through the twists and turns of Shakespeare scholarship now and down the centuries. Anyone familiar with Biblical exegesis will recognize elements in the debates among academi...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Rosenbaum is a bit annoying, I find, and as taxing on the reader as he is on those around him (judging from his own narratives). And how can you write a book called The Shakespeare Wars and not devote any time at all to the authorship question (except in the most childish light). A strange read. I learned some things from this book while not really enjoying the author's company.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
unfinished
Read in February, 2008
After reading his intriguing introduction, a wonderful teaser, I truly hoped the author would be able to inspire in me something of the fascination he himself experienced when studying the Shakespeare wars. Unfortunately, it was not to be. I could not manufacture sufficient concern over whether Hamlet said "didst" or "diest." This sort of textual zeal makes some sense when discussing something one regards to be the Word of God, but here...it was too much detail on too many th...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
to-buy,
to-read
In nearly every review of Ron Rosenbaum's books I've ever read, people refer to him as a journalist, as if that fact is terribly relevant to his books. Explaining Hitler has a few interviews with people who shape current perceptions of the Third Reich, but overall it's a great work of historiography and synthesis, certainly not journalism. Except in the sense that poetry is news that stays news, I don't see how this can really be journalism, either. Curious.
Anyway, I can't wait to read it.
Anyway, I can't wait to read it.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in December, 2007
Ron Rosebaum can be a bit academic at times but the joy in reading this book comes from his detailed research and interviews with some of the greatest Shakespearean scholars and directors of the last 50 years.
The book can be difficult to read at times when Rosenbaum delves into the minutiae of that is academic Shakespeare, but the insights into Shakespeare's works and his legacy are well worth the investment.
The book can be difficult to read at times when Rosenbaum delves into the minutiae of that is academic Shakespeare, but the insights into Shakespeare's works and his legacy are well worth the investment.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
shakespeare
recommends it for:
Those interested in the world of Shakespeare scholarship
This is a fun and informative book for the someone (like myself) that never realized the complexities of Shakespeare textual scholarship. There is interesting investigations into authorship and into the disputes over authoritative texts (along with other issues). It is, at times, very informative and revealing while at other moments too anecdotal and boring. But definitely worth the read.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in August, 2008
Really enjoyed this, despite his bizarre personal enmity towards Harold Bloom (really a painful blemish on the book. Very strange.) I had no idea about the problems of Shakespearean texts, and the battles between ideological editors was really amusing. The chapters on stage/screen actors was really interesting. Overall, a fun look at the whole Shakespeare industry.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
He actually uses the word "post-postmodern" and thought it was a good thing ...so I'm not the only one, woohoo! The book is a look at the past oh, say, 40-50 years of Shakespeare scholarship with many personal thoughts and asides. It was a thick read but I mean that in a good way and the closing chapter on forgivness in Shakespeare is a perfect capstone.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in October, 2008
Assigned book for a class I took this semester entitled Shakespeare Wars; the premise for the course was based off of this book. My classmates had trouble with Rosenbaum's style -- his writing tends to be quite fragmented, and he can be long-winded at times. Despite this, I've enjoyed the chapters I've read so far.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in April, 2008
I love Shakespeare, frequently read the plays, and have been doing so since high school. I didn't know there were different endings for Lear and Hamlet. While the alternative ending for Hamlet isn't very important, the other ending for Lear is very different. The author describes it as shocking, I'm still trying to decide.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in February, 2007
The MUST read for any Shakespearean. It takes Shakespearean scholarship and turns it on its heels. Absolutely fascinating in its revelation that there are 3 Hamlet Texts and 3 Lear Texts. It is accessible to read and will actually make you appreciate Shakespeare if you feel he's become a bit stale and passe.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
I admire passion. This book lays bare passion about Shakespeare with some humor. It is also so much fun to see what might be seen as incidental academia blossom into importance. I really learned more about Shakespeare from this one book than any other. Not an easy read, but compelling.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in March, 2008
If you want to know why Ron Rosenbaum thinks he knows more about Shakespeare than you do, maybe you'll enjoy this. Otherwise, look forward to occasional insights about the plays, Greenblat bashing, Bloom bashing, and a lot of reminders about how long it took Rosenbaum to write this book.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
currently-reading
Read in March, 2007
recommends it for:
really intellectual people
While I love the idea of this book, I keep getting mired in the endlessly academic nature of it. It's picking up now that I'm reading about the wars actors and directors have over Shakespeare; I thought I was never going to make it if the whole book were about the in-fighting in academia!
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
shakespeare
Rosenbaum refights the battles over interpretation, sources and attribution in too finely wrought details. It is difficult to make academic conflicts seem exciting to anyone not involved in them and the author doesn't quite do it here. A noble failure.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
nonfictioniveread
Read in February, 2007
A very good book, very interesting and informative. I didn't know there was such tumult in the world of Shakespeare. It's too long and the author seems enamored with cute turns of phrase. Defintely worth one's time, though.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
currently-reading
When not pedantic and blasting scholars who have published before (specifically Greenblatt), its fascinating.
Very often it descends into puerile insults.
Very often it descends into puerile insults.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
















