Hannibal Rising (Hannibal Lecter #4)
IN ALL OF LITERATURE.
AT LAST THE EVOLUTION OF HIS EVIL
Hannibal Lecter emerges from the nightmare of the Eastern Front, a boy in the snow, mute, with a chain around his neck.
He seems utterly alone, but he has brought his demons with him.
Hannibal’s uncle, a noted painter, finds him in a Soviet orphanage and brings him to ...more
Popular Answered Questions
This has to be the worst pre-quel-sequel ever! There is no reason to read this book, or see the movie! But if you are a fan, like I am, don't feel guilty, do what you want.
This is my least favorite of Harris's "Hannibal Saga." His reasoning for Lecter's particular "taste" is, get this, REVENGE. How lame! It doesn't seem like any real ...more
I have been waiting, along with many others, for years to find out how Hannibal Lecter became what he became. I wanted to know what caused his transformation into one of the most frightening killers in literature (and the movies) known to man.
I was thrilled beyond words to hear that Harris was writing a new book and that a new movie based on the book was in production. I knew that Harris was writing the screenplay. Aside from that, I knew nothing. I ...more
That being said, it was fine as a novel and psychological thriller, but not so much as a continuation of a franchise. It might have been more enjoyable had it been a character of a different name.
You know how us readers can get. We want what we want and get ...more
Hannibal Lechter is one of the ...more
My interest level fluctuated with the story. At times Harris seemed too impersonal and dry with his writing style, while other times it flowed well and I wondered why I questioned his style before. When in the head of Hannibal, the story is at its most intriguing, not just because the character is done so well (he is), but because it seems Harris finds firmer footing. There's not much head hopping, yet it still feels a bit disconnected, especially when the author tells too much, explaining in ...more
I almost felt ready to give up on this one until I was about a quarter of the way through. Harris is telling the story of Hannibal's childhood/formative years through the veil of Hannibal's actual memories. Earlier memories are fragmented and as a result, the earlier part of the book is also very fragmented. It rambles a bit here and there, but once the memories become more fleshed out, the book does as well and greatly grows in appeal.
Not that the ear ...more
"No, Hannibal, of course not. The angel intervenes in time."
"Not always," Hannibal said.
In this book, we follow the infamous Hannibal Lecter through his childhood and adolescence. We witness the unspeakable act of deranged cruelty that had forever changed him and made him into the person he would eventually become. We see him begin to grow sane again in the home of his Uncle and step-aunt. We watch as he kills f ...more
To state it bluntly, this reads like a screenplay disguised as a novel. There is ...more
I have read the previous parts of this sequel and I really did love them. So there was no "but" if to read this book or not. Plus, there were parts in this book where the action took place in Lithuania, my native country, and that happens so rarely when your country is so small and foreigners barely know it, that this is basically a miracle! So I had to read this. I just had.
But... but. It was not what I expected. Well, not entirely, I should say.
First of all, the previous books were c ...more
- Thomas Harris, The Silence of the Lambs
Hannibal Lecter is the bogeyman - a dark and terrible figure from a child's nightmares who lurks in the shadows, waiting to pounce. A big part of what makes him scary is his mystery, the fact that you don't really know ...more
Really, how else to explain ? By introducing a nonsensical, ham-fisted backstory, rife with deliberate continuity errors and an implausible denouement at odds with the previous Lecter tales, Harris demythologized his best-known creation and de ...more
Let me start with what I felt was missing. There wasn’t anything I didn’t like about this book, but it was lacking in a few areas. There were some slow times but the flow of the writing made it seem ...more
There were things I liked and things I hated. Probably, had I read it before knowing who Hannibal Lecter was, I would've enjoyed it more, but his personality (unexpected, mysterious, but we did know a few traits of his) was established, only for this sorry excuse for a prequel to destroy all we knew about him, mess him up and offer no plausible explanation to why he ...more
I found myself having to go back over a few pages so I could grasp the story better from the start. There were als ...more
The book tells of Hannibal's beginning, his horrific experience as a child, what happened to his sister, then follows his life away from the war. It does actually work quite well, with lots of detailing of his first kills and why he makes them. Its by far better than the film, which even when I re- ...more
Ovo nije objašnjenje kakvo Hannibal zaslužuje, ovo je apsolutno mućenje i izmišljanje gluposti.
Jako loše i to valjda tako ide dok se polakomiš i želiš napisati još koji nastavak i da se ekranizira još koji nastavak, a ideja više nemaš i nemaš, pa razvlačiš neku polu -priču o ratu i ljudima koji su pojeli njegovu ljubljenu sestru.
Ocjena bi bila i manja da nisam toliko opsjednuta sa svim knjigama o Hannibalu , ovako je ocjena viš ...more
Part of the reason for its shortcomings is, of course, that it follows a trilogy that is near-perfect in its scope, writing and characterisation (whatever one's view of the controversial ending to Hannibal) but everything about the storyline just seems inadequate for a character as iconic and intriguing as Hannibal Lecter. The small revelations of Lecter's backstory in the previous novel were, in ...more
After the runaway success of Red Dragon (1981) and The Silence of the Lambs, Hannibal profoundly disappointed both literary and film critics, not to mention fans of the series. Harris returns with Hannibal Rising, to mixed acclaim. A sense of bafflement pervades the negative reviews, with critics puzzled by how a talent like Thomas Harris could turn out what they perceive to be a glorified screenplay (the film version of Hannibal Rising was released in early 2007) written purely to cannibalize t...more