Michael St. James is something of a cad, and now he's paying for it, banished to a backwater, post-colonial Virginia town for his sins. Happily, he...
read full description
reviews
Mar 23, 2009
Daisiemae
rated it: 
This has been in my TBR files forever. I admit I put it off because I was unsure about reading about two men who fall in love in post-colonial Virginia having a happy ending. Finally my curiousity got the better of me, and I gave this book a try. I am glad I did.
Michael St. James is a rogue. Banned by his father for his scandalous behavior to a podunk town in Virginia, he believes he has been trapped in one of the four corners of Hell. Always fashionable and living in the now, he More...
Michael St. James is a rogue. Banned by his father for his scandalous behavior to a podunk town in Virginia, he believes he has been trapped in one of the four corners of Hell. Always fashionable and living in the now, he More...
8 comments
like
(15 people liked it)
Apr 10, 2009
Jack
rated it:
I was excited to read this book because there aren't many gay historical romances. I wanted to see how the author would somehow give the heroes a happy ending.
I thought the story was very well paced. I even liked Michael St. James who is a snob, a sodomite, (god forbid) and a rake. His sarcasm and willingness to be outrageous at times to get a reaction out of others, made him a very interesting hero, and I loved him!
Michael and Daniel's relationship was so much fun to watch devel More...
I thought the story was very well paced. I even liked Michael St. James who is a snob, a sodomite, (god forbid) and a rake. His sarcasm and willingness to be outrageous at times to get a reaction out of others, made him a very interesting hero, and I loved him!
Michael and Daniel's relationship was so much fun to watch devel More...
5 comments
like
(9 people liked it)
Oct 13, 2010
Brita
rated it: 
Overall, this story was a good one. I thought it was a bit slow in the beginning but it picked up about page 50 and from there it was engaging. I enjoyed Michael and Daniel.
I did find quite a few glaring editorial problems, words that were misspelled, words not taken out when they should have been, leaving some awkward sentences, but they didn't detract from the story at all.
Period language was appreciated, as were the descriptions of the settings, clothes, etc. Good m/m More...
I did find quite a few glaring editorial problems, words that were misspelled, words not taken out when they should have been, leaving some awkward sentences, but they didn't detract from the story at all.
Period language was appreciated, as were the descriptions of the settings, clothes, etc. Good m/m More...
Jul 29, 2008
Matimate
rated it:
I picked this book for two reasons, the first was men in breeches and the second was those men doing it together in very hot way. The plot is not the thing which should be taken as the golden piece of literature, but it is surprisingly smooth and there is also some hint of characters development. The historical accurancy is practically none. But it is porn, right?
Michael St. James was rascal to the bone, who was banished to the backwater town in order to ger out of the sight of the society More...
Michael St. James was rascal to the bone, who was banished to the backwater town in order to ger out of the sight of the society More...
0 comments
like
(1 person liked it)
Jan 01, 2012
Gianthogweed
rated it: 
The "not too much" part in my historical label is too pronounced.
The transitions from contempt -> attraction -> love -> concern are, wanting to put it mildly, abrupt.
The transitions from contempt -> attraction -> love -> concern are, wanting to put it mildly, abrupt.
Feb 10, 2012
Jan 28, 2012
Jan 27, 2012
Feb 06, 2012
Jan 10, 2012
Jan 05, 2012
Jan 01, 2012
Dec 29, 2011
Dec 28, 2011
Dec 09, 2011
Nov 29, 2011
Nov 21, 2011
Nov 20, 2011
Nov 04, 2011
Nov 04, 2011
