Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Foundation Trilogy” as Want to Read:
The Foundation Trilogy
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating

The Foundation Trilogy (Foundation (Publication Order) #1-3)

4.37 of 5 stars 4.37  ·  rating details  ·  58,252 ratings  ·  753 reviews

FOUNDATION begins a new chapter in the story of man's future. As the Old Empire crumbles into barbarism throughout the million worlds of the galaxy, Hari Seldon and his band of psychologists must create a new entity, the Foundation-dedicated to art, science, and technology-as the
Mass Market Paperback, 225 pages
Published February 28th 1981 by Avon Books (first published 1951)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Foundation Trilogy, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Foundation Trilogy

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details

The Foundation Trilogy
By Isaac Asimov


In my life, there have been three science fiction books/series that will always hold special shelf space in my heart’s library. The first, and the subject of this review, is The Foundation Trilogy by Isaac Asimov. Yet, before I begin my history with this extraordinary story, let me briefly mention my other two great loves.

A. Dune:

The second of these pivotal SF relationships was with Dune, who I first met whil
When Isaac Asimov learned that the World Science Fiction Convention would be giving a special Hugo Award in 1966 for "Best All Time Series," he believed that the category had been created specifically to honor J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings trilogy. Indeed, for a modern reader, it's surprising to learn that Asimov's Foundation Trilogy was once so highly revered in the canon of speculative fiction that it beat Tolkien's masterpiece for the prize. Such are the fortunes of a genre built on the ...more
The Foundation trilogy is made up from a series of short stories published between 1942 and 1953. At the dawn of American dominance Asimov as a fiction writer was inspired to write about decline and fall, rather like Edward Gibbon but with science-fiction as his medium.

Asimov was fond of locked door murder mysteries and this technique of creating a seemingly impossible situation and resolving it cleverly is one that he used in the Foundation series. The resolutions are clever. The series is enjo
Foundation (1951): Gigantic brain-warping grand science-fiction, this is as big as it gets, so big it's difficult to fully comprehend. From the first page of Chapter 1, "The Psychohistorians", which begins with a quote from the "Encyclopedia Galactica", beginning in the 11,998th year of the Galactic Era, you know that Isaac Asimov is going to be writing on the largest possible scale. Let's take a look at what type of a man would dare write on such a staggeringly gigantic scale:

This is the most
Jun 05, 2007 Sedy rated it 2 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: anyone with mind-numbing patience.
Ok, let's begin with the fact that I tackled this trilogy when I was 12. I'm sure that, were I to pick it up once more, my appreciation would grow exponentially... HOWEVER, as wonderful as Asimov is, he writes like an engineer. He's careful and methodical, and the plot that weaves through the Foundation series is unbelievably complex. If you've got the time, and you enjoy Sci-fi, go ahead and pick up Prelude and follow Hari's awesome adventure.
Andy Wenman
I read some short stories by Asimov in High-School and although he never measured up to the likes Rohald Dahl or Kurt Vonnegut I seem to remember actually enjoying some of them, but there's no way I can pretend that this novel was anything other than awful. This is bad science fiction in every sense of the word, overly descriptive of irrelevant details, filled soulless characters all with the same emotionless analytical voice, events that seem to have no purpose and all take place in a world tha ...more
La verdad es que es un libro bastante extenso (900 páginas de nada) y hay que empezarlo con ganas porque de lo contrario es muy posible que dejes la historia. Lo que sí os digo es que el osado lector que se atreva con el tocho de libro no desmerecerá su esfuerzo ya que, a medida que avanzas en la trama, te vas enganchando y solo deseas saber cómo acaba la historia.
En cuanto al autor, lo considero un genio, solo hay que ver lo que escribió y cómo lo escribió. Esta saga es de los años 50 y le da
Sean Mooney
Aug 29, 2007 Sean Mooney rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Fans of Star Wars, Star Trek, Sci Fi or Roman History
Shelves: sciencefiction
I have to write about this trilogy as a whole instead of each book individually because I think it is imperative to read all three in succession to truly appreciate the depth of Asimov's tale. I had not read any Asimov books when I picked up 'Foundation' but was unable to put each book down until they were finished. The only way to preserve the accumulated knowledge of a dying empire rests in the foundation of a new colony on the outskirts of the empire devoted solely to mathematics and science. ...more
The Foundation Trilogy is widely considered one of the most influential science fiction series ever written - it even won a Hugo award for the best all-time series back in the 60's.

And I get it. I can see why it's so influential, mostly because I've read and seen the books and movies and television shows that have been influenced by it (I'm mostly talking about The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy and Futurama, but there are countless others). Isaac Asimov has so many fantastic, interesting idea
Stefan Yates
I can understand why Asimov's Foundation Trilogy is one of the building blocks of the genre of Science Fiction as we know it today and I can respect the quality of the material itself. This trilogy is well-written, grand in scope, and has a very interesting concept, however I found it to be very dull for long periods of time and took me much longer than usual to plod through.

Asimov has crafted his tale around a scientist who foresees the end the current structure of civilization and devises a p
The series consists of seven books. In order of internal chronology:

* Prelude to Foundation
* Forward the Foundation
* Foundation
* Foundation and Empire
* Second Foundation
* Foundation’s Edge
* Foundation and Earth

This is truly one of SciFi’s classics. The original trilogy (starting with Foundation) is widely considered to be one of the finest SciFi series ever written. The rest of the books are of equally high quality, except (in my opinion) for Forward the Foundation, which seems more like
i read foundation in 1970, but i didn't even know the other books in the series existed until i was well into my teens.

by today's standards these books might seem weak for science fiction, but they are the Foundation upon which all of today's sf authors fed as youths. asimov was a great story teller.
I don't understand how someone can write something like this, so epic in scope, so much imagination. It's staggering to me.
Am rereading these after 30+ years. The first still has the compelling ideas of psychohistory, although less developed than I had remembered, or would have liked. To Azimov's credit, the character of the Mule was still vivid enough in my memory that the second book lost most of its tension.

What I had forgotten was just how virulently misogynist and patriarchal these books are - it is kind of embarrassing given that he came of age when women had been working in factories, serving in war, and hold
I have to admit that I was only able to get through the first book of The Foundation Trilogy: Foundation.

This novel was not for me. It's obviously a highly revered, acclaimed novel in the science fiction genre - some say the BEST in the genre - and maybe it was too lofty a goal for my first sci-fi book.

On the plus side, I thought Asimov's ideas of what the future might be like were interesting: the study and application of psychohistory (using mathematics to predict how large numbers of people w
A great premise and a good read, but I think Asimov makes a wrong turn half-way through the Trilogy. Here's the set up: it is many thousands of years in the future, humanity has colonized the universe, and for 12,000 years, the Galactic Empire has reigned. A man called Hari Seldon, however, develops the science of psychohistory, and with it comes to predict the fall of the Empire and the coming of 30,000 years of chaos. He establishes the Foundation, a colony on the edge of the Empire, in such a ...more
No lean estos libros, en general es el clásico cliché de una profecía que tiene que ser cumplida y la mayor parte del libro se la pasan usando energía nuclear sin siquiera sufrir muertes significantes por cáncer, por si lo demás la prosa de Asimov realmente descriptiva y con increíbles personajes que todo el tiempo te mantienen la borde de suspenso pensando en sus acciones y con grandes rasgos de suma inteligencia, realmente no llena todo lo épico que puede realizarse en una galaxia.

Y Asimov se
An iconic sci-fi trilogy that no sci-fi fans should miss. For anybody who want to get into reading sci-fi novels this trilogy is one of the best starting points.

Below are links to my reviews of the individual volumes (I doubt this omnibus edition is still in print):

1. Foundation
2. Foundation and Empire
3. Second Foundation

La humanidad ha conquistado la galaxia entera. Millones de sistemas y planetas a lo largo de toda la espiral están bajo su dominio formando el Imperio Galáctico, cuya capital se encuentra en Trántor; un mundo destinado únicamente a la burocracia de toda la galaxia y residencia del emperador.

Pero no todo es hegemonía. Hari Seldon, el mayor psicohistoriador de la historia predice mediante dicha ciencia la caída del imperio y un período de barbarie que durará varias decenas de milenios hasta que se
I read the Foundation Trilogy when I was a kid, probably in late grade school or early high school. I loved it then. I was a hard science fiction fan, and this book was a classic when I bought it. At some point, I lost or gave away my beloved copy. About five years ago, I decided I wanted to read the book again. I didn't want a digital version and I didn't want to go to the library. I wanted to own a physical copy. I also wanted the edition, or as close to it as I could find, that I originally r ...more
Andrew Breslin
Asimov was a man so ahead of his time, I have to wonder whether he habitually showed up for trains and busses an hour, or maybe a few decades, early.

The Foundation stories were originally published beginning in the early 1940s, when everyone else writing science fiction was focused on gizmos and gadgets and space opera, envisioning a future full of flying cars, robots*, and ray guns (i.e.: variations on the Jetsons). Asimov, at the time little more than a brilliant, visionary child in his early
I'm not a historian. Not a lit major. Wasn't born in the pre-atomic era.

From an intellectual standpoint I can acknowledge that Asimov's Foundation and Robot series were, to pardon the pun, foundational works in the science fiction genre. That said, the series lacks the timeless quality of true classics.

The most positive thing I can say about Foundation is that it is within the realm of aspirational speculative science fiction writing - that is to say, it seeks to exam both human and sociologica
The first time I read this book, I was astounded and enthralled. The premise was interesting, and it was fascinating to watch as the struggle played out between the Foundation and the dying Empire, not to mention the mysterious hints of the 'Second Foundation' dropped here and there. There were also quite a few memorable quotes ('violence is the last refuge of the incompetent') and characters that I wanted to read about.

The second time I tried to read this book... I just didn't buy the premise a
At times this seemed more like a giant thought experiment than a fictional trilogy. Asimov's idea of a galaxy wide civilization that revolves around large social and economic pressures which are manipulated by an organization of social and physical scientists seems sort of like an academic wet dream. Yet in focusing on the workings of the Foundation's convoluted, (though always conveniently explained at the last minute) realpolitiking, he also shows that science fiction can do more than just be ...more
It's hard to review a book that spans 500 years of human history. In the introduction to the trilogy, Asimov writes that in the 1980s before he started writing the final Foundation story, he hadn't thought of the series in so long he went back and read the books again. "I read it with mounting uneasiness," he writes. "I kept waiting for something to happen, and nothing ever did. All three volumes, all the nearly quarter of a million words, consisted of thoughts and of conversations. No action. N ...more
Andy Cyca
El Ciclo de Trántor no se ganó el premio Hugo a la mejor serie de novelas por nada. Las 3 novelas cuentan la historia de los primeros siglos de un esfuerzo por salvar a la humanidad repartida en toda la Galaxia de una época de barbarie y casos. Sólo léanla. Es excelente, se los aseguro
I realize that these novels were written in the 40s/50s but if I'm not mistaken women did exist back then, so I can't figure out why there are so few female characters in this series. And they are all lovers, mothers or daughters, there for the smart men to manipulate or find comfort in.
Honestly the trilogy felt like a spy novel, too much politics and not enough science fiction for my taste. The Galaxy is the boys' playground and it doesn't really matter what happens to it, as long as these powe
An emanantly readable book in the science fiction genre. Of most Asimov's books, this one stands out as him at him best.
There are elements of this book which deal with behavioral science as regards group dynamics, and though the premise of being able to predict the future through this statistical means may not be realistic, I do think it holds relevance to some of the sadder elements of humanity - such as our propensity to repeat history, and likely our inability as a whole to change our path.
Eugene Caputi
Dullsville. I read it when I was 12 and didn't get a thing out of it. Then in my 20's I thought I missed something and so I read the trilogy again. Nope. It's just the work of a hoary old science nerd who didn't have to build tension, write interesting space battles, define characters or anything that makes a good, memorable read. Why not? Because in them days, all science fiction writers had to do was put science into a book and it was science fiction.

Anytime they bandy about the idea of makin
Calvin Taylor
An ambitions and complex tale of galactic culture and governance over hundreds of year of conflict. The central concept of "Seldon's Plan" (a mathematically predicted future and integrated plan to revive the fallen Galactic Empire) provides a clever tool for the unfolding of events, and for tracing the motivations of characters and societies; watching this pattern oscillate between 'rumour and 'fact' is fascinating. The world Asimov creates within these pages is richly realised, with a myriad of ...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Goodreads Librari...: This topic has been closed to new comments. Isbn disagreement 8 97 Jul 14, 2014 10:26AM  
New introduction by Paul Krugman 8 65 Jul 11, 2014 06:09AM  
Goodreads Librari...: Incorrect Page Count on ISBN 0385188307 2 14 Sep 30, 2013 06:30AM  
science fiction 6 33 Sep 14, 2013 07:58AM  
Hitchhiking Acros...: Psychohistory 4 32 Jun 27, 2013 12:20AM  
Dead Poets Society: The Foundation Trilogy 1 8 Feb 04, 2012 12:57PM  
Goodreads Librari...: 0 pages? 2 139 Aug 25, 2011 03:46PM  
  • The Great Dune Trilogy
  • Methuselah's Children
  • Foundation and Chaos (Second Foundation Trilogy, #2)
  • The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: A Trilogy in Four Parts
  • The Hyperion Omnibus: Hyperion / The Fall of Hyperion
  • Foundation's Triumph (Second Foundation Trilogy, #3)
  • Seven Novels
  • The Mote in God's Eye (Moties, #1)
  • The Sentinel
  • Blue Mars (Mars Trilogy, #3)
  • Cities in Flight (Cities in Flight, #1-4)
  • Mission of Gravity (Mesklin, #1)
  • The Science Fiction Hall of Fame: Volume 2A
  • Dangerous Visions
  • The Martian Chronicles/The Illustrated Man/The Golden Apples of the Sun
  • The Demolished Man
  • The Science Fiction Hall of Fame: Volume 1
  • To Your Scattered Bodies Go (Riverworld, #1)
Isaac Asimov was a Russian-born, American author, a professor of biochemistry, and a highly successful writer, best known for his works of science fiction and for his popular science books.

Professor Asimov is generally considered the most prolific writer of all time, having written or edited more than 500 books and an estimated 90,000 letters and postcards. He has works published in nine of the te
More about Isaac Asimov...

Other Books in the Series

Foundation (Publication Order) (7 books)
  • Foundation (Foundation, #1)
  • Foundation and Empire (Foundation, #2)
  • Second Foundation (Foundation, #3)
  • Foundation's Edge (Foundation, #4)
  • Foundation and Earth (Foundation, #5)
  • Prelude to Foundation (Foundation: Prequel, #1)
  • Forward the Foundation (Foundation: Prequel, #2)
Foundation (Foundation, #1) I, Robot (Robot, #0.1) Foundation and Empire (Foundation, #2) Second Foundation (Foundation, #3) The Caves of Steel (Robot, #1)

Share This Book

“–La violencia –fue la contestación– es el último recurso del incompetente.” 0 likes
“»Ahora bien, cualquier dogma, basado primariamente en la fe y el sentimentalismo, es un arma peligrosa usada sobre los demás,” 0 likes
More quotes…