<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	
<book id="3189653">
  <title><![CDATA[The Best American Science Writing 2008]]></title>
  <isbn><![CDATA[0061340413]]></isbn>
  <isbn13><![CDATA[9780061340413]]></isbn13>
    <work>
  <best_book_id type="integer">3189653</best_book_id>
  <books_count type="integer">2</books_count>
  <default_description>&lt;p&gt;Edited by Sylvia Nasar, bestselling author of &lt;i&gt;A Beautiful Mind&lt;/i&gt; and former economics correspondent for the &lt;i&gt;New York Times&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;The Best American Science Writing 2008&lt;/i&gt; brings together the premiere science writing of the year. Distinguished by the foremost voices and publications&amp;#8212;among them Pulitzer Prize-winner Amy Harmon, Nobel Prize-winner Al Gore, and award-winning and bestselling author Oliver Sacks&amp;#8212;this anthology is a comprehensive overview of our most advanced and most relevant scientific inquiries.&lt;/p&gt;</default_description>
  <id type="integer">3222607</id>
  <media_type nil="true"></media_type>
  <original_language_id type="integer" nil="true"></original_language_id>
  <original_publication_day type="integer" nil="true"></original_publication_day>
  <original_publication_month type="integer" nil="true"></original_publication_month>
  <original_publication_year type="integer">2003</original_publication_year>
  <original_title>The Best American Science Writing 2008</original_title>
  <rating_dist>total:60|5:10|4:31|3:16|2:2|1:1|</rating_dist>
  <ratings_count type="integer">60</ratings_count>
  <ratings_sum type="integer">227</ratings_sum>
  <reviews_count type="integer">113</reviews_count>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">27</text_reviews_count>
</work>

  <average_rating><![CDATA[3.78]]></average_rating>
  <ratings_count><![CDATA[60]]></ratings_count>
  <text_reviews_count><![CDATA[27]]></text_reviews_count>
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3189653.The_Best_American_Science_Writing_2008]]></url>
  <authors>
        <author id="57657">
      <name><![CDATA[Jesse Cohen]]></name>
      <role><![CDATA[Editor]]></role>
      <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/57657.Jesse_Cohen]]></url>
      <average_rating><![CDATA[3.94]]></average_rating>
      <ratings_count><![CDATA[470]]></ratings_count>
      <text_reviews_count><![CDATA[117]]></text_reviews_count>
    </author>
        <author id="8644">
      <name><![CDATA[Sylvia Nasar]]></name>
      <role><![CDATA[Editor]]></role>
      <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/8644.Sylvia_Nasar]]></url>
      <average_rating><![CDATA[3.75]]></average_rating>
      <ratings_count><![CDATA[2097]]></ratings_count>
      <text_reviews_count><![CDATA[284]]></text_reviews_count>
    </author>
      </authors>
    <reviews start="1" end="20" total="113">
    <review id="35885180">
    <user id="216284">
    <name><![CDATA[Mark]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Pittsburgh, PA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/216284-mark]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>2</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="medicine" />
        <shelf name="non-fiction" />
        <shelf name="science" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 -0800 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Oct 21 15:50:04 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Jan 01 08:49:12 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[<br/>I tend to agree with Goodreads friend David Giltinan that this is not as strong a collection as in previous years. It relies too heavily on the New York mafia of the New York Times and New Yorker, and it includes articles that don't have the heft or nuance that a &quot;best&quot; collection sh...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/35885180">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/35885180]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="34675555">
    <user id="166376">
    <name><![CDATA[David]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[San Francisco, CA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/166376-david]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>3</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="disappointing" />
        <shelf name="read-in-2008" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sun Nov 02 00:00:00 -0700 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Oct 06 14:20:38 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sun Nov 02 14:52:19 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[In a series that's usually reliably interesting and intellectually stimulating, this year's collection was somewhat disappointing, due to an unusually narrow focus. In her introduction, Sylvia Nasar tells us that she gravitated to the stories that &quot;people were talking about&quot;. An idiosyncra...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/34675555">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/34675555]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="39393720">
    <user id="1725316">
    <name><![CDATA[Jon]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1725316-jon]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Mon Dec 08 14:02:10 -0800 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Fri Dec 05 14:37:22 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Dec 08 14:02:10 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[  I am very disappointed in this book. All of the articles are very interesting, but when I bought this I didn't realize just how narrowly focused it was going to be. I flipped through the book and took a tally. Of the nineteen articles - twelve of them are about medical science, three are about med...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/39393720">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/39393720]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="38824878">
    <user id="1755911">
    <name><![CDATA[Meg]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Chicago, IL]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1755911-meg]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Fri Nov 28 14:53:59 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Dec 17 11:51:34 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[<br/>i did notice the shocking lack of physics/math related essays  - however an abundance of medical and climate change stories.  After reading the introduction, she mentions it was a &quot;slower year for math and physics&quot;.  <br/>Slow year? What about the LHC particle collider's first test ...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/38824878">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/38824878]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="35445479">
    <user id="1626122">
    <name><![CDATA[Veach]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Beaverton, OR]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1626122-veach-glines]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>1</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Mon Sep 29 00:00:00 -0700 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Oct 16 03:41:09 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Oct 16 03:54:59 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[This collection of articles is for anyone who takes any medicine prescribed by a psychiatrist, anyone who fails to question their MD's, and everyone who has been told they or their child may have a 'disorder'.   ]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/35445479]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="35361325">
    <user id="119485">
    <name><![CDATA[Kirill]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Brooklyn, NY]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/119485-kirill]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Oct 15 06:09:27 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Oct 15 06:25:01 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Science in my view is the process of acquiring knowledge using scientific method. Somehow, though, in the recent literature medical litigation and rules for practicing medicine have taken a lion's share of &quot;science&quot; literature and this book in particular.  Maybe this has to do with the fac...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/35361325">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/35361325]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="49800195">
    <user id="391903">
    <name><![CDATA[Nick]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Corvallis, OR]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/391903-nick]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Wed Mar 18 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Mar 19 14:26:34 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Mar 19 14:32:31 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[The title of this book should have been &quot;Interesting Medical and Environmental Science Writing 2008.&quot; There was no astronomy, no chemistry, no physics, no math, no computer science, etc. At least half of the book was from the New York Times, New York Times Magazine or the New Yorker. I did...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/49800195">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/49800195]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="50710286">
    <user id="1343613">
    <name><![CDATA[Alex]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Ann Arbor, MI]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1343613-alex]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sun Jun 28 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Mar 28 09:44:31 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sun Jun 28 18:35:45 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[A lot of people rated this book low because of the focus on medicine. And, indeed, the book should not have been called the best &quot;science writing&quot; because the title does suggest something broader. However, what far too many reviewers left out is just how brilliant the essays in here are. T...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/50710286">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/50710286]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="46419375">
    <user id="365565">
    <name><![CDATA[Ms. Phinnia]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Seattle, WA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/365565-ms-phinnia]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="books-2009" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Tue Feb 10 00:00:00 -0800 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Sun Feb 15 10:33:08 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sun Feb 15 10:37:47 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[the al gore essay was seriously lacking in both content and style(proving once again that it's not what you know, it's how loudly you can claim to have invented <s>climate change</s> <s>the internet</s> John-Travolta style comebacks on the tails of a worldwide political issue, but the rest of the book was extreme...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/46419375">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/46419375]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="53763973">
    <user id="1255968">
    <name><![CDATA[Erin]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[San Francisco, CA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1255968-erin]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Fri May 01 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Apr 23 16:16:34 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sun May 03 14:18:44 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Good, engaging science writing. Some of my favorites were: the essay on doctors accepting money from pharmaceutical companies (one from a person who was a drug company shill for awhile), the essay about a rare disease that causes the afflicted to mutilate themselves, and the essay about how pain is ...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/53763973">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/53763973]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="41793272">
    <user id="1856047">
    <name><![CDATA[Jonna]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Cedar Rapids, IA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1856047-jonna]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Fri Jan 16 00:00:00 -0800 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Jan 03 20:31:27 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Jan 24 17:28:02 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Several of the essays were fantastic, but others were simply like solidly-written newspaper articles (which I suppose they originally were).  The first one, about a woman who decides to be tested for an inherited fatal gene, and how the results shaped her life, was incredible.  Atul Gawande's essay ...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/41793272">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/41793272]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="75570038">
    <user id="2089086">
    <name><![CDATA[Paul]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Princeton Junction, NJ]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2089086-paul]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Wed Jul 01 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Oct 24 04:35:15 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Oct 24 04:38:09 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Along with the other best of I got these last Chistmas and read them this year.  This volume has some very thought provoking topics e.g. when is a MD a drug pusher,  supply and demand for organs for transplants etc.]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/75570038]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="42512782">
    <user id="653611">
    <name><![CDATA[Karen]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/653611-karen]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="non-fiction" />
        <shelf name="to-read" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Fri Jan 09 16:54:06 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Fri Jan 09 16:55:18 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[I read and liked 2007, so I am interested in reading this volume, too. Of course, I probably won't get to it until the best science writing of 2009 comes out, but so it goes.]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/42512782]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="49701513">
    <user id="1055259">
    <name><![CDATA[Kyle]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[West Hartford, CT]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1055259-kyle]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="currently-reading" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Wed Mar 18 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Mar 18 15:15:18 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Mar 18 15:17:04 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[I prefer to read more about physical sciences than medical sciences.  I feel like this year's book is focused a bit too much on medicine. ]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/49701513]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="52650199">
    <user id="2217269">
    <name><![CDATA[susan]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[San Francisco, CA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2217269-susan]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="currently-reading" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Wed Apr 01 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Apr 14 10:41:09 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Apr 14 10:41:09 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Love this series! A must read for me every year. Always full of wonderfully written stories about everything from physics to medicine.]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/52650199]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="38607007">
    <user id="1726981">
    <name><![CDATA[Ron]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Grandville, MI]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1726981-ron]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Thu Mar 12 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Nov 25 06:23:55 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Mar 12 04:40:14 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[The 2008 version of this book though very good fell short of previous years version.  The lack of subject diversity made it not as enjoyable as previous years.  Three stories on the lack of ethics in the medical drug community was a bit repetitive.<br/><br/>My favorites were probably the two most ...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/38607007">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/38607007]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="67678798">
    <user id="75727">
    <name><![CDATA[sonia]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[San Francisco, CA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/75727-sonia]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="currently-reading" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Sun Aug 16 19:42:35 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sun Aug 16 19:43:15 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[this one is not as good as the others. too many medical doctor content. too little actual science. what happened?]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/67678798]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="21627332">
    <user id="705805">
    <name><![CDATA[Jennifer]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Cambridge, MA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/705805-jennifer]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>1</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Mon Dec 29 00:00:00 -0800 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Mon May 05 07:07:31 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Dec 29 10:26:03 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[After the 2007 collection, this was very disappointing. Individually, the articles were generally good, but as a collection they fall short. The collection was extremely lacking in diversity, both in subjects (two stories about genetic disorders, two about the drug industry, etc.) and sources....jus...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/21627332">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/21627332]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="40005065">
    <user id="445677">
    <name><![CDATA[Scott]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Overland Park, KS]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/445677-scott]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 -0800 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Dec 13 06:07:50 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Jan 17 10:46:27 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Another outstanding collection in this series. On other reviews I've read, this anthology came under criticism for being overly slanted toward the life sciences. This is true; however, each year the selections are a reflection of the interests of the celebrity editor. This year, it is Sylvia Nasar, ...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/40005065">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/40005065]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="41196378">
    <user id="1726206">
    <name><![CDATA[Jack]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Redwood City, CA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1726206-jack]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Dec 29 11:48:40 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Jan 13 08:07:32 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[i look forward to this collection every year. this year did not disappoint. ]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/41196378]]></url>
</review>
    </reviews>
  <popular_shelves>
        <shelf name="to-read" />
        <shelf name="currently-reading" />
        <shelf name="non-fiction" />
        <shelf name="science" />
        <shelf name="non-fic" />
        <shelf name="essays" />
        <shelf name="mind" />
        <shelf name="health" />
        <shelf name="government" />
      </popular_shelves>
  <book_links>
    <book_link id="8">
  <name><![CDATA[WorldCat]]></name>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book_link/follow/8?book_id=3189653</link>
</book_link>
  </book_links>
</book>
</GoodreadsResponse>