Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Crime Par Ascendant” as Want to Read:
Blank 133x176
Crime Par Ascendant
Barbara Vine
Rate this book
Clear rating

Crime Par Ascendant

3.48 of 5 stars 3.48  ·  rating details  ·  1,075 ratings  ·  106 reviews
The First Lord Nanther clearly hoped to be the subject of an admiring posthumous biography. Having built a name for himself as Queen Victoria's favoured physician?expert on blood diseases and particularly the royal disease of haemophilia?he fastidiously set about recording the details of his eminent life, carefully cataloguing every significant letter, diary and medical es ...more
Suspense, 522 pages
Published 2004 by Calmann-Lévy (first published January 1st 2002)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Crime Par Ascendant, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Crime Par Ascendant

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 1,735)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Bea Alden
The first time I read this book, I thought it a bit too clever. But this time - I liked it a lot. It's a mystery about the life of one man, now dead, woven amongst a complicated set of characters on a family tree, or rather, a couple of family trees. It is, in effect, a puzzle. If you're in the mood for solving puzzles, this is the book for you. And also, of course, it's written with Ruth Rendell/Barbara Vine's always skillful evocation of place, people and psychology.
Nancy (Hrdcovers)
All indications, when looking at the cover of this book, lead the reader to believe that this will be one of Vine's psychological thrillers. I figured that some surgeon, obsessed with blood, would be traveling the British Isles with scalpel in hand looking for his next victim. But the reader of this book must look a little closer at the two words following the title, THE BLOOD DOCTOR. Those two words are "A Novel." This changes everything.
More on the lines of Vine's A Chimney Sweeper's Boy, this
5/29/14: I've actually changed my rating of this book from ***** to **** - I am almost finished with a re-read and find it to be probably Vine's 'busiest' book, with multiple story-lines and a vast number of characters either present or referred to.

This is one of the Vines that Rendell/Vine readers are often divided on - many, like myself, love it, and others find it tedious going. I was engrossed by it from the get-go, though admittedly I find the historical sections of the book to be the more
3.5 stars

I thought this was interesting. Some parts are a bit overly technical, but it deals with a complicated process so that might have been unavoidable.

Martin is a journalist who starts researching his family history. Many people seemed to die around his great-grandfather - a Victorian physician and favourite with Queen Victoria, who seems to have a professional interest in Hemophilia. Martin's research leads to startling discoveries about his family history.

As well as the historical elemen
Martin Nanther is writing a biography of his great-grandfather Henry, a famous Victorian doctor and hemophilia expert, as the same time as he faces some large issues in his personal life: his wife is obsessed with having a baby, and his seat in the House of Lords is about to be abolished.

As in A Dark-Adapted Eye, I really liked how Vine weaves together the past and present history of a family. One would think that the connection would be less immediate here than in A Dark-Adapted Eye, where the
compellingly dull? is that a thing? the premise is somewhat interesting, i guess--a book about a writer trying to decipher his great-grandfather's past interwoven with his wife's desire for a viable pregnancy--but there's no decent payoff. you keep reading hoping something interesting will happen, but it doesn't. it's a bunch of family histories with unmemorable names and failed pregnancies. i only use the word compelling because i did keep reading.. but the writing isn't that particularly remar ...more
Aug 24, 2008 Lisa rated it 2 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommended to Lisa by: Janice @ esporta book club
This was confusing - so many names! I think the best way to read this book would be to photocopy the family trees at the front of the book and have them beside every page you read. Maybe even make notes. I didn't do either of these things (too busy this month and I didn't care that much) but I still persevered and at the end of the novel I don't think I was any worse off. I understood what was going on but it was a long (sometimes laborious) road to get there. I would only recommend this book to ...more
Nicole Hadaway
I loved The Minotaur by Vine, and though I never read A Dark Adapted Eye, I fell in love with the BBC version starring Helena Bonham Carter. These novels are more "whydunits" as opposed to 'whodunits", and it's definitely the characters and their motivations which drives the plot.

I had high hopes for this novel and let me say that it's certainly not bad. Her writing is definitely not for short attention spans or people who like everything all at once -- you have to wait for details, revelations
Yet another book set in Victorian London, this one a historical mystery, that provides a great view of the attitudes and behaviour of the era. I don't usually bother reading books that have a family tree in the front, let alone two, but I so enjoyed Asta's Book, also by Barbara Vine, that I ignored my usual criteria -- I prefer reading to memorizing confusing detail when enjoying a novel.

I must confess, I skimmed over much of the House of Lords description (zzzzz) and often had to refer back to
Nancy Oakes
The Blood Doctor is an absolutely fine mystery, but it's not her best work. That distinction goes to (imho) A Dark-Adapted Eye, probably one of the best mysteries ever written and certainly the favorite of my British Mystery collection. I enjoy settling down with a novel by this author and watching all the secrets unfold within its covers. I thought this one was really good, as well, but I kind of figured out the basic secret some time into the book. Luckily while I had the "whys" figured out, I ...more
Paru sous le pseudonyme de Barbara Vine dans sa version originale “The blood doctor”, ce roman de la célèbre reine du crime Ruth Rendell vit sous un autre rythme, un autre ton que les thrillers psychologiques auxquels Ruth Rendell nous offre. La raison de l’existence d’un pseudonyme pour une auteur dont l’écriture a été cataloguée, classée, jugée.

Crime par ascendant raconte l’histoire de Martin Nanther, auteur de biographies, qui écrit la vie de son aïeul, le docteur Henry Nanther, médecin anobl
Mary Ann
10 stars; this is the best yet. Medical research, genetic science, hemophilia, more than 200 years of two families. There are a gazillion characters, as in A Dark Adapted Eye and The Chimney Sweeper's Boy, and they are all significant pieces of the puzzle; Vine has usefully provided family trees for reference this time. The Child's Child is simple in comparison. I've always enjoyed Ruth Rendell mysteries, but I don't know how I've reached my age without devouring her Vine books. Better late than ...more
The topic was certainly interesting and the book makes an attempt to thread the current age with the past, but the pacing is completely off. The book trudges along so slowly that it's hard to maintain an interest. A number of themes are very deliberately and unnecessarily repeated (blood blood blood!), every attractive female apparently resembles the narrator's wife, and a huge number of characters and names make it hard to keep up at times. If you are observant it isn't difficult to figure out ...more
I picked up this book because I wanted to read fiction, and this sounded interesting.

In many ways, it is a very surprising book. I hadn't read anything but Vine (or Rendell) before, but after reading this I have. The funny about this book is that the mystery is easily solved by an attentive reader. Anyone can figure it out before the narrator. I know it sounds strange, but that makes the book better. It allows for the characters to drive the plot and allows for the reader to care more about the
Really terrific book. It took me a little while to get into b/c the narrator is a biographer doing a lot of family tree research so a lot of names and relationships right off the bat, plus he's in the House of Lords so a lot of parlimentary procedure right off the bat, but once i got into it, i really could not put it down. BV (RR) has a way of sucking you into a story or several stories at the same time and this is her most complex and best yet. Utterly fascinating and compelling. The very endi ...more
Vine creates a wonderful story here. Even though I'd guessed the outcome before the ending, it did not detract from the interest of the story. Of particular (and surprising) interest were the details about the House of Lords and the life of the main character as a Lord. Who would've guessed that the author could make the House of Lords intriguing? The author does a superb job of making the tracing of family geneology into an interesting mystery rather than a boring paper trail. Overall, I enjoye ...more
Beth Donahoe
The very first paragraph got to me and got my attention. Ms. Vine wrote, "Blood is going to be its theme. I've made that decision long before I shall even begin writing the book. Blood in its metaphysical sense as the conduct or of an inherited title, and blood is the transmitter of hereditary disease. Genes we'd say now, but in the nineteenth century when Henry Nanther was born and grew up and achieved a kind of greatness, not then. It was blood then. Good blood, bad blood, blue blood, it's in ...more
Victor J.
This is one of Ruth Rendell's Barbara Vine books. Under her own name, Rendell writes some oftentimes very good mysteries. The Barbara Vine books are meant to be psychological thrillers. I couldn't find much psychology in this one, and certainly nothing thrilling. All in all, I'd have to say it's one of the more monumentally boring books I've ever encountered. I give it one star out of respect for ms. Rendell
Whether she's writing as Barbara Vine or Ruth Rendell, this author of British mysteries is one of my favorites, because her books are intelligent, many-layered, and gripping without being sensationalistic, and also because they are full of perceptive insights into human nature. The main plot about a 19th century physician specializing in hemophilia was fascinating on its own, but along the way I got a good glimpse of the complexities of the British Parliamentary system, especially the House of L ...more

This book went on and on and on.... Not the best Barbara vine choice - a mystery of genealogy and family link to hemophilia with a murder thrown in for good measure ... I didn't buy into the characters either . Trying this author? Catch a different title ...most r superior to The Blood Doctor.
Interesting in some ways but not particularly enjoyable. It's a carefully structured story with linked themes of inheritance - the House of Lords is changing and losing most of its hereditary peers of which the narrator is one, and as a biographer he is researching the history of his ennobled ancestor, a doctor with a specialist interest in haemophilia. Meanwhile, his second wife is desperate for a child and he, having a son already, is ambivalent.

Lots of contemporary detail here and I enjoyed t
Very good, but slow. Rendell is excellent as always. The House of Lords part was very interesting. All in all not my favorite.
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Kirsty Darbyshire

Vine seems to have changed her tune a bit over the years since she parted company with her alter ego Ruth Rendell. I'm not finding her books as spookily creepy these days but they are still very good. In fact I think this is probably my favourite story of hers.

Blood is the overarching theme of this novel in several ways. The narrator Martin Nanther, 4th Lord Nanther is losing his heriditary seat in the House of Lords reforms. He's also writing the biography of his great grandfather Henry, the 1

Jayne Charles
I think Barbara Vine plot twists are getting steadily more guessable as I had this one nailed by the halfway mark. That didn’t stop it being a highly entertaining read, though, as I still had to get to the end to make sure I was right, and the journey was highly enjoyable. The story of a biographer researching his great-grandfather’s life could easily come across as dull, but I loved the feeling of rummaging through old photos and papers, the cold-case element of it, and the complexity of the fa ...more
Helen Kitson
This book was not what I was expecting. I associate Ruth Rendell's work under the Barbara Vine name with psychological thrillers, but this book is rather different. It's the story of Martin Nanther, an hereditary peer who is also working on a biography of his ancestor Henry Nanther, who was a doctor specialising in the treatment of haemophiliacs. His peerage was bestowed upon him by Queen Victoria for his work in this field.

There are several main threads to the story - the modern-day story of Ma
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
What would you do if you found out that your great-grandfather was a monster? That's the question Martin Nanther is forced to answer as he probes into the life of the 1st Lord Nanther, Henry (physician to Queen Victoria, and expert on hemophilia). All his explorations are set against the House of Lords Act of 1999; fitting, in that Martin's place in the House is due to Henry's service and the Act banning most life peers from sitting somehow fits with Henry's fall from grace.

Vine is quite good at
It's been a while since I've read a Rendell/Vine book that I've found satisfying, and though I didn't find it as good as the best of them, it was engrossing enough, dark as all Vines but without all the adumbration that made some other of her books fascinating but rather dense. I do love stories about scholarly detective work and also about families, and this book had all of this so it had plenty to entertain me. I did guess the "terrible secret" halfway into it, though; after reading the blurb ...more
There were similarities to her earlier The Chimney Sweeper's Boy as the story is of someone investigating a member of their family and a mystery that surrounded them.
I personally found all the sub details about the House of Lords tedious in the extreme.
I actually worked out the secret almost straight away, where as in the Chimney Sweepers Boy it was more of a surprise.
However it was a good read and one can always skip the House of Lords sections.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 57 58 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
What's The Name o...: The House of Lords [s] 14 53 Sep 04, 2014 12:54AM  
  • The Rottweiler
  • Nido vuoto
A.K.A. Ruth Rendell.

Rendell created a third strand of writing with the publication of A Dark Adapted Eye under her pseudonym Barbara Vine in 1986. Books such as King Solomon's Carpet, A Fatal Inversion and Anna's Book (original UK title Asta's Book) inhabit the same territory as her psychological crime novels while they further develop themes of family misunderstandings and the side effects of sec
More about Barbara Vine...
A Dark-Adapted Eye Fatal Inversion, A The Chimney Sweeper's Boy Anna's Book Brimstone Wedding

Share This Book