Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Case for Animal Rights” as Want to Read:
The Case for Animal Rights
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Case for Animal Rights

4.14 of 5 stars 4.14  ·  rating details  ·  295 ratings  ·  21 reviews
More than twenty years after its original publication, The Case for Animal Rights is an acknowledged classic of moral philosophy, and its author is recognized as the intellectual leader of the animal rights movement. In a new and fully considered preface, Regan responds to his critics and defends the book's revolutionary position.
Hardcover, 425 pages
Published October 1st 1983 by University of California Press
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Case for Animal Rights, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Case for Animal Rights

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 1,107)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Alexander
I know this book is supposed to be a classic, but I found it rather a chore to deal with. It's a big book, and it has a number of good features, but since everyone seems to be talking about those I will just list a couple of complaints.

My main dislike was the pondering way in which it handled certain topics, such as animal's mental life, which managed somehow to cover the terrain exhaustively while simultaneously misreading and therefore failing to engage with the alternative views we spend so
...more
Robert
Oct 01, 2007 Robert rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Humans
This book is the logical and moral conclusion to The Origin of Species. It is an excellent primer to moral philosophy in general, so that it is naturally an excellent primer to fun questions like, "What is consciousness?" Even if you have no interest in animal rights issues, most philosophy schools are finding AR to be an elegant lens through which to introduce these concepts.

The Case for Animal Rights finds a place in the world for this species of ours full of humility, dignity, and honor. Were
...more
Leonardo
Mar 05, 2015 Leonardo marked it as to-keep-reference  ·  review of another edition
...en la actualidad el debate sigue en buena medida los cauces abiertos por el Iluminismo en el siglo XVIII y, por tanto y en forma paralela al utilitarismo, no podía dejar de recorrerse el sendero idealista de la otra vertiente iluminista, o sea el de Kant, con las debidas correcciones. Esa es la tarea que llevó a cabo Tom Regan, entre otros libros en The Case for Animal Rights de 1983.

La corrección de Regan a Kant pega en el corazón mismo de la tesis de éste: afirma que todo viviente debe ser
...more
Earl Biringer
There is only one rational basis for thinking about ethics, and that is the reality of suffering. Regan does not realize that it is irrelevant whether his rights-based theory is internally coherent and sounds pretty - it has no basis in empirical reality. To refute him, all one has to say is "No, that's not true." An explanation of why it is not true isn't required - he gives no reasons for believing it is true.

Nonsense on stilts indeed! (and this is coming from a committed vegan!).
Heather Browning
Regan makes a solid case for the moral consideration of animals, though I find the discourse of 'rights' unnecessary. The book is long but thorough, covering many issues to do with ethics, moral principles and our treatment of animals, as well as engaging with some counter-arguments. Not always easy going, but a central text in the field.
Lisa Vegan
May 12, 2007 Lisa Vegan rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: people who care about animals, those interested in philosphy
Cogent and convincing (to me) arguments for the rights of animals and humans from a philosophy professor who believes in animal rights. I read an earlier edition after I heard him speak at a conference.
Nicholas
This book is deep, had to spend a lot of time re-reading portions. Helped me confirm my decision to not eat meat
Antiloquax
Incredibly well-argued. Don't think anyone could read this and continue to eat meat.
Rory Armstrong
A very good, but heavy read. The book covers the philosophical aspects of the animal rights movement, taking into consideration the awareness of animals, the complexity of animal awareness, animal welfare, ethical though and theory concerning animals, a breakdown of the various ethical views along with critisms, Regan's outline of the rights view, and finishing with the implications of his view.
The parts I really liked where Regan explained the various ethical theories and ideas. This was useful
...more
Dayna
I really enjoyed this book. I read it along with Peter Singers Book "Practical Ethics" a few years ago.
I began homeschooling my two daughters this year and I am using Peter Singers' "Practical Ethics" as a class in Debate/Ethics for a class for them. We've had some AMAZING discussions so far and it's been wonderful learning from them and teaching them - NOT what to think, but how to think!

I only wish I had kept this book several years ago!
Ike Sharpless
The deontological yin to Singer's utilitarian yang. I'm much more in the latter camp, so I'm unconvinced by his argument concerning inherent worth and subjects-of-a-life. Then again, I don't think it's useful to talk about inherent or intrinsic value even for humans, so I'm probably in the minority. I'm all for human rights, mind you, but I approach them primarily from a rule utilitarian perspective.
Lee
A comprehensively worked out theory of animal rights. Contrasts with Peter Singer's utilitiarian approach by defending the notion that animals have inherent rights to be accorded respect. The underlying moral theory is, ultimately, not completely persuasive (what moral theory is?), but it's an exhaustive look at the issues, and written clearly enough that a determined non-specialist could benefit from it.
Stephanie
I guess I have read enough AR literature for a lifetime, or at least for the time being.
Though I'm well used to reading theoretical philosophic literature, I couldn't manage to finish this one. I assume this is a very good book and I appreciate the critic of Peter Singer, but it takes far too long to finally arrive at the main topic, which is animal rights.

Kei
I wanted to give this book five stars, but it is pretty heavy reading although the author tried to make it non-philosopher friendly. Still it's a great book and definitely worth reading (although it may take you a little while! :))
Arturo Javier
Una alternativa al utilitarismo que por fin toma en cuenta a los animales, pero hay partes del libro que pueden resultar muy complicadas para el lector casual.
Nick
Couldn't make it through this book. To be specific, couldn't even finish the updated introduction. Skimmed the rest. Don't agree with any of the concepts in the book.
Remi Watts
The book teetered too awkwardly on the fence between being an introductory work, and being serious and academic.
Tully
sound Kantian arguments, coupled to a rich description of the higher mammals as "subjects to life". Very well-organized and lucid; perfect for undergraduate ethics debates
Tad
May 31, 2008 Tad rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: moral philosophers, animal rights activists, animal lovers, vegans and vegetarians
this book presents the most comprehensive and complete argument for the concept of animal rights to date. it is a large book (nearly 500 pages) which encompasses many topics in philosophy and applied ethics. the first quarter of the book is dedicated to establishing the mental lives of animals and refuting traditional and contemporary arguments against this hypothesis. he offers easy to follow common sense arguments mixed with arguments borrowed from evolutionary biology to help him in this task ...more
Amanda
Amanda marked it as to-read
May 23, 2015
Amanda Geissler
Amanda Geissler marked it as to-read
May 23, 2015
Elle
Elle added it
May 20, 2015
Kate Powell
Kate Powell marked it as to-read
May 17, 2015
Jessie
Jessie marked it as to-read
May 17, 2015
Rachel Hall
Rachel Hall marked it as to-read
May 15, 2015
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 36 37 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Introduction to Animal Rights: Your Child or the Dog?
  • Making A Killing: The Political Economy of Animal Rights
  • Eternal Treblinka
  • In Defense of Animals: The Second Wave
  • The Animal Activist's Handbook: Maximizing Our Positive Impact in Today's World
  • Striking at the Roots: A Practical Guide to Animal Activism
  • Terrorists or Freedom Fighters?: Reflections on the Liberation of Animals
  • Meat Market: Animals, Ethics, & Money
  • Thanking the Monkey: Rethinking the Way We Treat Animals
  • Dominion: The Power of Man, the Suffering of Animals, and the Call to Mercy
  • The Dreaded Comparison: Human and Animal Slavery
  • The Pig Who Sang to the Moon: The Emotional World of Farm Animals
  • Living among Meat Eaters: The Vegetarians' Survival Handbook
  • The World Peace Diet: Eating for Spiritual Health and Social Harmony
  • Being Vegan
  • Pleasurable Kingdom: Animals and the Nature of Feeling Good
  • That's Why We Don't Eat Animals: A Book About Vegans, Vegetarians, and All Living Things
  • Obligate Carnivore: Cats, Dogs, and What it Really Means to be Vegan
79036
Tom Regan is an American philosopher who specializes in animal rights theory. He is professor emeritus of philosophy at North Carolina State University, where he taught from 1967 until his retirement in 2001.

Regan is the author of numerous books on the philosophy of animal rights, including The Case for Animal Rights (1983), one of a handful of studies that have significantly influenced the modern
...more
More about Tom Regan...
Empty Cages: Facing the Challenge of Animal Rights Defending Animal Rights Animal Rights And Human Obligations The Struggle for Animal Rights Animal Rights, Human Wrongs: An Introduction to Moral Philosophy

Share This Book

“To be 'for animals' is not to be 'against humanity.' To require others to treat animals justly, as their rights require, is not to ask for anything more nor less in their case than in the case of any human to whom just treatment is due. The animal rights movement is a part of, not opposed to, the human rights movement. Attempts to dismiss it as anti human are mere rhetoric.” 40 likes
More quotes…