Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Nothing If Not Critical: Selected Essays on Art and Artists” as Want to Read:
Nothing If Not Critical: Selected Essays on Art and Artists
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Nothing If Not Critical: Selected Essays on Art and Artists

3.98  ·  Rating Details ·  721 Ratings  ·  17 Reviews
From Holbein to Hockney, from Norman Rockwell to Pablo Picasso, from sixteenth-century Rome to 1980s SoHo, Robert Hughes looks with love, loathing, warmth, wit and authority at a wide range of art and artists, good, bad, past and present.
   As art critic for Time magazine, internationally acclaimed for his study of modern art, The Shock of the New, he is perhaps America’s
...more
Paperback, 448 pages
Published February 1st 1992 by Penguin Books (first published April 1st 1990)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Nothing If Not Critical, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Nothing If Not Critical

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Glenn Russell
Oct 27, 2015 Glenn Russell rated it it was amazing

Such an outstanding collection of nearly 100 essays written in the 1980s, mostly for Time Magazine, on art and artists from Holbein, Goya, Degas, Whistler, van Gogh right up to the big names of the 50s, 60s, 70s and 80s, by the leading art critic at the time in America, outspoken, rough-and-ready tough-guy Robert Hughes (1938-2012). If you are familiar with his 1970s documentary “The Shock of the New” you know he has a hyper-perceptive eye for art as well as a thorough command of art history and
...more
Matt
Apr 22, 2007 Matt rated it it was amazing
The majority of this book, besides the introduction and the last few essays, consists of reviews of art shows that Hughes published in times magazine in the early-to-mid 80s. His style of criticism is perfect - it finds that wonderful balance of historical context, biographical information, and (the part that so many critics miss) astute observations in front of the work itself. One of the main themes of his writing is that great art is built on history, rather than (in the prevailing myth of mo ...more
Tony
Jul 14, 2010 Tony rated it it was amazing
Shelves: art
Hughes, Robert. NOTHING IF NOT CRITICAL: SELECTED ESSAYS ON ART AND ARTISTS. (1990). *****. I’m always amazed at what you can find on the remainder shelves at a bookstore. Here’s a real winner. I ‘discovered’ Hughes years ago when I read his book, “The Fatal Shore,” a one-volume history of Australia. It was a winner, too. In this book, he has collected many of his essays from the 1980s, when he was the art critic for Time Magazine. There are also several articles previously published in The New ...more
Lauren Albert
Oct 04, 2010 Lauren Albert rated it really liked it
I enjoyed this more than I expected to though I admit to skimming a few of the reviews towards the end since I didn't recognize the artist. With no images, his critiques don't mean much if you don't know the work and its context. Hughes doesn't seem to actively dislike a lot (Thomas Hart Benson, Julian Schnabel and Warhol are three) and does try to see what is good in the art that he doesn't otherwise like. I was surprised at how broad his interests were--assuming as I did that he was conservati ...more
Prooost Davis
Jun 02, 2011 Prooost Davis rated it it was amazing
Whether or not one agrees with Hughes's critique of the current art market (or that of the 1980s, when this book came out), I don't think one can find much fault with the depth and breadth of his knowledge of art history. "Nothing If Not Critical" serves as a very good survey of Western art. The book, unfortunately, has no illustrations, and a few artists whose work he didn't write essays about are probably missing, but, boy, the writing is wonderful, and Hughes's love of art is evident througho ...more
Rik
May 03, 2009 Rik rated it liked it
I love the vigour that Hughes brings to his criticisms, you feel like you're really reading someone that knows his stuff. It's a great way to pick-up insights about artists, and their work, that you may have missed yourself. Nevertheless, given the format (from Time magazine) the essays eventually become somewhat 'one-note.' His feelings about the New York art world start to become repetitive, and his sentences, whilst sometimes very clever, run on way too much.
Dave Holcomb
Feb 02, 2015 Dave Holcomb rated it really liked it
I find that the older I get, the more Robert Hughes. I'm not sure what that says, about him or me, but I enjoyed this book enormously. A collection of art essays and reviews about from the 1980's, this is Hughes at his best: literate, practical, clear, and frequently just a teensy bit vicious. He speaks clearly and directly about the artists he's reviewing, and he cuts through a lot of the clutter and hype to the bones of art. If you're interested in art, especially the art of the twentieth cent ...more
Cris
Jun 15, 2012 Cris rated it it was ok
Shelves: art
I have to say I am disappointed. There is more sensationalism in this book than there is critique. Yes, the essays were meant to amuse as much as to inform, but there is entirely too much name dropping and vague unnatributed references here. For the most part, I agree with his assessment of the artists and art events depicted, but I don't always trust his 'cultural facts'. He doesn't always accurately portray the mainstream opinions. Instead he passes off his imprecise information and opinions ...more
Cat Bennett
Sep 14, 2013 Cat Bennett rated it it was amazing
Recommends it for: Anyone interested in art.
Though I read this book in 1990, I love it still. Hughes discusses artists from Caravaggio to Degas, and Sargent, René Magritte, Picasso, Pollock, Hockney and more. Most of these pieces were written for Time Magazine and he brought a deep sense of history and visual memory to a discussion of art that reached masses of people. He looked with his eyes, his mind and his heart. He searched out authenticity and disparaged the phoney or contrived. He looked for meaning and beauty, found it where he co ...more
Ellyce
Jul 03, 2007 Ellyce rated it really liked it
Recommends it for: artists, for sure
I can't say I agreed with everything Hughes says in this collection of essays, but his occasional bias is easy to detect and his infrequently pompousness easy to forgive because he frequently has incredible insight into the artists, movements, and art markets that his essays examine.

As a BFA student, I think the book is an valuable glimpse at artists' work which every art student should be well versed in. And aside from all that, its truly interesting and an easy read!
F.j.commelin
May 24, 2015 F.j.commelin rated it it was amazing
Shelves: art
Robert Hughes is an enthousiastic writer and knows how to bring a subject in an engaging language.
Thomas
Jan 07, 2008 Thomas rated it it was amazing
Robert Hughes is such a great writer. He loves art and thinks it is important. He hates Robert Mapplethorpe.
Tara
Sep 10, 2008 Tara rated it really liked it
If you are art history knowledgeable this book will give you a good chuckle and increase your everyday cynicism. If you love smack-talking art reviewers, R.Hughes is your man.
Kevin Tole
Jul 26, 2011 Kevin Tole rated it it was amazing
THE best book of art criticism from a master critic
David
May 26, 2009 David rated it it was amazing
great.....
Nic
Mar 01, 2008 Nic added it
A terrrific sttraight up read about a collection of contemporary artists and the art market
Iain
Iain rated it really liked it
May 08, 2016
Santiago Galindo
Santiago Galindo rated it it was amazing
Jan 05, 2015
Travis
Travis rated it it was amazing
Apr 18, 2008
James
James rated it it was amazing
Aug 22, 2010
Abdullah Sakif
Abdullah Sakif rated it really liked it
Jan 14, 2015
Jennifer Presby
Jennifer Presby rated it liked it
Mar 02, 2015
Mark Richardson
Mark Richardson rated it really liked it
Sep 24, 2015
R.
R. rated it liked it
Jun 08, 2017
RunRachelRun
RunRachelRun rated it liked it
Dec 17, 2008
Taylor Anne
Taylor Anne rated it really liked it
Apr 09, 2015
Dan Delamarina
Dan Delamarina rated it it was amazing
Jan 09, 2015
Kathryn
Kathryn rated it it was ok
Nov 21, 2012
Jill
Jill rated it really liked it
Dec 29, 2014
Aplin
Aplin rated it liked it
Nov 10, 2014
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Off the Wall: A Portrait of Robert Rauschenberg
  • Art and Culture: Critical Essays
  • Pictures of Nothing: Abstract Art Since Pollock
  • A Life of Picasso, Vol. 2: The Painter of Modern Life, 1907-1917
  • The End of Art
  • The Lure of the Local: Senses of Place in a Multicentered Society
  • The Painting of Modern Life: Paris in the Art of Manet and His Followers
  • The Sense of Sight
  • After the End of Art: Contemporary Art and the Pale of History
  • Theories and Documents of Contemporary Art: A Sourcebook of Artists' Writings
  • Daybook: The Journal of an Artist
  • Mysteries of the Rectangle: Essays on Painting
  • The History of Surrealism
  • What Painting Is
  • Surrealist Women: An International Anthology (Surrealist Revolution Series)
  • The Nude: A Study in Ideal Form
  • Always Looking: Essays on Art
  • The Originality of the Avant-Garde and Other Modernist Myths
48890
Robert Studley Forrest Hughes, AO was an Australian art critic, writer and television documentary maker who has resided in New York since 1970. He was educated at St Ignatius' College, Riverview before going on to study arts and then architecture at the University of Sydney. At university, Hughes associated with the Sydney "Push" – a group of artists, writers, intellectuals and drinkers. Among the ...more
More about Robert Hughes...

Share This Book



“You had just read one of Tom Hess's discourses on how Newman's vertical zip was Adam, or the primal act of division of light from darkness, or the figure of the unnamable Yahweh himself. How could you disagree? On what could you base your trivial act of colonial dissent? A mere reproduction, two inches by three? But Yahweh doesn't show his face in reproductions. He shows it only in paintings.” 0 likes
More quotes…