Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Communist Manifesto” as Want to Read:
The Communist Manifesto
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview read book* *Different edition

The Communist Manifesto

3.47 of 5 stars 3.47  ·  rating details  ·  47,974 ratings  ·  1,789 reviews
Originally published on the eve of the 1848 European revolutions, The Communist Manifesto is a condensed and incisive account of the worldview Marx and Engels developed during their hectic intellectual and political collaboration. Formulating the principles of dialectical materialism, they believed that labor creates wealth, hence capitalism is exploitive and antithetical ...more
Paperback, 304 pages
Published August 27th 2002 by Penguin Classics (first published 1847)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Communist Manifesto, please sign up.

Popular Answered Questions

Haritharan Suppaiah I feel very sad when young readers like you only look into a book like this superficially. That's what happens when you have to read a book rather…moreI feel very sad when young readers like you only look into a book like this superficially. That's what happens when you have to read a book rather than wanting to read it. Reading a material of this nature you need some amount of maturity. Maturity comes from what you read and there is also some element of culture and our basic fundamentals. Before reading it once and giving your views on a serious work of intellect like this, I would recommend reading who Karl Marx was and please do include Engles, and also the political history of Europe at the the time it was written. I may not agree totally with its implementation in today's world but knowing the history of the person who wrote it and the history around the time it was written will help you seen the meaning of the author.
You can never fill a cup which is already full. Keep all your preoccupied thoughts elsewhere before starting a masterpiece like this. (less)

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
This book has a bad rating on here only because of old fucks who have no time so they hang out on good reads. So we can conclude, that all these old fucks, also sit at home and watch political tv all day, and have a strong (close minded) opinion.

They all saw what happened to the Soviet Union and will blabber for fifteen hours about the genocide that happened. Capitalism though has killed millions so their pulling this genocide b.s. too. (Native Americans, War on terror, south america, Africa in
Jun 23, 2013 Jeremy rated it 2 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: People who wonder why Communism fails
Long overdue update (2013): I read this book five years ago and in almost every respect, I have mellowed considerably.

You can read my review below. It's unchanged. You can read the comments below that. Also unchanged.

I never seriously expected anyone to read this review, much less love or hate it so strongly. I am not apologizing for my view of the book or Marx. He put his entire life into this slender and influential book, and I respect that. I understand a bit more about where he was coming fr
This tract by Marx and Engels is too enormous in implication to review fully in the small little space that GR allows, so what I'll do for now is take extracts from it and comment on them, piece by piece.

Per the Maifesto:"
"Abolition of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists. On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form this family exists only among the bourgeois
Jun 13, 2008 Jason rated it 5 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: Anarchists!!
Read this and understand why your imperialist capitalist government spent the better part of a century playing hot potato with ICBMs, invading and incinerating peaceful, peasant countries, and making your mom and dad piss themselves under school desks.

The elite were scared shitless and by no means would they allow their slaves, errr labor force, a fraction of freedom or equality or means to resist. The 60 year propaganda campaign against Communism and the virtual disappearance of strong labor u
Its awful fun to grow up marxist in the US. You get to go to meetings where you, as a kid, soon realize there's no point in paying attention so off you go with the other rowdy tots into the ghetto to make trouble with whatever you find to hand.

And you get to read this novella and if you're bored and underchallenged but over bothered you can begin to argue against american capitalist imperialism and the growth of consumerist doctrine using your new found propaganda skills til you bait a teacher i
EH. You know. Marx. Reading Marx is like fucking a microwaved squash -- everyone's got to do it eventually, but you probably shouldn't get so into it that you start joining a club. Because the next thing you know you'll be standing on the back of a personnel transport humorlessly waving a huge flag and screaming through a bullhorn at a bunch of people who made the fatal mistake of not agreeing with you, while your comrades herd them through barbed-wire-lined corrals with rifle butts and... wait, ...more
It has drowned the most heavenly ecstasies of religious fervor, of chivalrous enthusiasm, of philistine sentimentalism, in the icy water of egotistical calculation. It has resolved personal worth into exchange value, and in place of the numberless indefeasible chartered freedoms, has set up that single, unconscionable freedom—Free Trade. In one word, for exploitation, veiled by religious and political illusions, it has substituted naked, shameless, direct, brutal exploitation.

What can or should
Riku Sayuj

The history of all hitherto existing society* is the history of class struggles.

* That is, all written history.


We read the same written history and read it as progress, as stories, etc. The real history, on the other hand, is something else. Played out differently. Yeah, that is the catch.

This was a reading of only the bare text (along with the many prefaces!). It was very powerful and I am now reading the Penguin edition with the really long introduction next. Will write more about this imp
It is an error to assume that the problem with humanity is an inability to recognize our own problems. While it's true that we constantly look outside for answers, this is just because we are unhappy with the answers we have. We know that success requires hard work and knowledge, but we want something easier. We will accept an easier answer even when it isn't true. We are not motivated by what is true or likely, but by frightening or enticing stories.

We are driven away from the necessary and the
Steve Evans
No one should feel the need to agree with this short polemic to realise that it is one of the most important books ever written. It should be required reading in schools really, but anyone who hasn't read it should nip out and get a copy straight away, and put her or his nose in it. Most though not all of Marxism is summed up in it, and unless one is really dedicated, very little else is needed for an understanding of "Marxism". I was one of those people and have read a lot of Marx and Engels an ...more
Barry Pierce
What can I say? Marx was right. Almost.
Riku Sayuj

An introduction to a historical work (or any work for that matter) should not be a thorough deconstruction, undertaken from an ideologically opposite standpoint. The reader should be given an introduction and in fact (as much as possible) a defense of the work. This introduction sets out to do the opposite.

I don't have a problem with Marx being critiqued but it should have been done in an independent book. This is like making a reader buy something for the value he attributes to the main work a
Rough, muscular verses from Mr. Marx over here. There are a bunch of good one liners in this well written work. Most of the ideas in it rub me the wrong way, but it explains the theory's political side pretty well. Even this would be a poor introduction to Marxism though. I remember trying to read this without any background knowledge and it came off as bald assertions. The lack of much economics in here sort of limits its explanatory power.

The most interesting part of this is part III wherein h
Very important work, one that obviously influenced history dramatically and helped to define the dynamics of the twentieth century and beyond. In fact, some of Marx's ideals resonate throughout not only "communist" and "socialist" countries (including former ones, such as the most famous "Marxist" experiment, the Soviet Union), but throughout all collectivist political socioeconomic systems. These range from Hitler's Nazi Germany (national socialism) to the twentieth century "welfare state" that ...more
Ken Moten
Well when thinking of a read over the Christmas holidays I usually go for A Christmas Carol. Forsaking that this year I decided to instead read this manifesto of the 19th century political-economic system known as Communism. Now Communism is older than Marx or "Marxism" but this pamphlet is what most people know as the genesis of Communism (despite Marx himself alluding to Communism pre-existing him) and I found a lot of interesting things in it. I don't have to tell you how practical it is in o ...more
Fei Fei
The terms Marxism and Communism are so misused nowadays that it is difficult to hold an intellectual conversation with people about this deeply fascinating political and economic theorist. It is partly the fault of the school curriculum, I fear. For whenever schools teach Marx, they inevitably always start with this book, the Communist Manifesto. But this is precisely the worst place to begin understanding Marxist philosophy. The Communist Manifesto is an anomaly in Marx's work. Strictly speakin ...more
Ben Loory
wow, this was just amazing. i expected it to be long and dry and boring but instead it's like a pamphlet, it's a stirring infomercial, and the writing is incredible, like walt whitman or tennyson's "ulysses"-level rhetoric. i mean when you get to the list of the changes they actually want to make, you go OH JEEZ NO I DON'T THINK THAT'S GONNA WORK!!! but you can't help but see how this would've moved people to action (and probably still continues to do so to this day). it's electrifying and mesme ...more
Jeanette  "Astute Crabbist"
Somehow it just seemed right and fitting that I should read The Communist Manifesto over Fourth of July weekend.


2.5 stars

Marx has some valid points, and some of his ideas are actually in use in the U.S.(gasp!). A prose stylist he was not. This is very convoluted and overwrought. The introduction of this version is very good and helped my understanding, hence the extra half star.
Lynn Beyrouthy
Karl Marx. The founder of communism and the instigator of copious communist revolutions around the world most notably the Bolshevik revolution of 1917. This man, whose theories changed the course of history, has begun The Communist Manifesto with the famous sentence: "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles"

exposing the historical existence of a fatal social scale which condemned those unfortunate enough to be at the bottom to eternal servility to those wh

Oct 06, 2014 Jack rated it 4 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Politically-minded readers
Shelves: marxism
Regarding one of the most misunderstood political systems of our time (arguably along-side that of capitalism), the Communist Manifesto written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels is also in itself as misunderstood as communism, and is one of the most undervalued and shunned pieces of literature in history.

Communism, as Marx and Engels put it beautifully in the Manifesto, is anything but Stalinist. It is also devoid of prophetic nonsense. Instead, Marx and Engels treat the reader to their scienti
One could say the entire reading of The Communist Manifesto hinges around a delicious lesson on dramatic irony. Little more is needed in a social experiment than a prophet and a considerable amount of time. We've had both in this instance, and now enjoy a world where to even align oneself with Marxism/Communism is a staple of shame in most reasonable circles.

Occasionally in an argument you find a single line, moment, or statement that allows you the ability to summarily dismiss the whole. Recen
Raditya Dika
I bought this book from my campus' bookstore. it was an impulse buy, i saw it standing besides these other manifesto books and decided to buy it immediately. i always have been a big fan of marx, and this book makes me wonder.. what have gone wrong in communism? i guess, the manifesto's solid, strong positioning is being offheld by those who try to implement it "the human way", i guess this book is for angels.
One word review: disgusting.

There is so much I could say, and there isn't the space to say it in a review... Where do I even begin?

For starters, the book began on a whining note. There were basically two main thrusts: first that free trade was so unfair to the poor proletariat; second, that the communistic movement had only the interests of the proletariat at heart. It was unhindered by nationality or any other interests and existed solely to make the working class successful.

What started out
Dec 30, 2007 Ryan rated it 3 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: politica scientist students
A good read on nonsensical political theory. Easy to understand, impossible to continue in real world conditions.

I find it funny that the people who talk about him being a such a great philosopher are the ones he wanted to dethrone. The majority of which have been raised in american excess and have never picked up a shovel and used it for more than backyard gardening. All of you who say they truely believe in collectivism really ought to try it out just like the hippies did in the 70's, how many
Amber Tucker
Dec 30, 2010 Amber Tucker rated it 3 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Everyone should read this at least twice.
Recommended to Amber by: The Amanda in my head
(This ended up much longer than I expected it to. If you like, skip over paragraphs nine through twelve, which are less review than one-sided debate. I published them anyway to make provision for two-sided debates. Jump in.)

Hmmm. I don't feel right about reviewing this, considering I read it immediately after Christmas, which can no longer (if it ever did) hold deep meaning in itself for anyone except a) the bourgeoisie or b) devout Christians, who tend to be misled if well-meaning folks, brainw
Felisberto Barros
Este livro é essencial para se compreender o mundo político atual. Apesar das ideias desviadas da realidade que o acompanhou na época de criação, faz todo o sentido ler este clássico se for desejo compreender a História e a Política mundial.

Seguidas à linha, a ideologia e doutrina que este livro enaltece são limitadas e limitadoras (e em excesso violentas) para a vida humana – como parte da História mundial comprova. Claro que a luta de classes ainda continua a ser muito desigual – o que abomin
If you've done any units on economics or have read quite a bit of European literature from the 1800's to early 1900's, probably you won't take that much from this. It's certainly aged well and there are many concepts that individually can be taken and related to workers rights, the ownership of property etc. even to this day.

Unless you have no background at all in the study of economics, don't expect your mind to be blown.
Literary Ames {Against GR Censorship}
It's been a while since I studied Marxism at school, a refresh of my memory was required, and having never read The Communist Manifesto, I thought I might as well try it.

My views have changed. When I studied Marxism as a teenager I was enamoured with its idealistic belief that capitalism would inevitably end in revolution and somehow result in a more utopian and equal society. No one could ever accuse me of being an optimist, even back then, but I think perhaps Marx's revolutionary philosophy p
Bueno, otro leído en español y otra review en español que va, con sus faltas.

El manifesto comunista no es de Marx, es de Marx & Engels. Vale que las ideas principales son de Karl pero es un libro de dos autores.
Es un minilibro, un pamfleto de hecho, de unas 46 páginas y escrito en 1848, cuidado es mucho tiempo y han pasado muchas cosas. Lo que me ha encantado de mi edición es que tuviera detrás prefacios de varias ediciones, porque ibas viendo la evolución histórica del manifesto de la man
Having recently read the introductory lectures of Sigmund Freud preceding my reading of The Communist Manifesto, I realize that Marx has most probably suffered the same fate as Freud in the modern age: they are both dismissed as radical idealists who expired in the infancy of their sociological/psychological breakthroughs. This faulty appraisal is reinforced by the most people's ignorance of what these two thinkers really had to say, or by the extrapolation of their most abrasive phrasing of, mu ...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
The Communist Manifesto 20 179 Dec 22, 2014 02:48PM  
Yahweh and Marx 2 95 Dec 21, 2014 11:51AM  
Goodreads Librari...: Please combine 5 29 Nov 20, 2013 09:18AM  
The Most Awesome ...: The Communist Manifesto 2 10 Feb 05, 2013 01:46AM  
Goodreads Librari...: 0011841788 - (ebook) 3 34 Oct 23, 2011 09:00AM  
  • The State and Revolution
  • Socialism, Utopian and Scientific
  • Reform or Revolution
  • History of the Russian Revolution
  • Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci
  • The Social Contract
  • History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics
  • Black Liberation and Socialism
  • A Companion to Marx's Capital
  • The Meaning of Marxism
  • An Essay on the Principle of Population
  • On Liberty
  • Anarchism and Other Essays
  • Why Marx Was Right
  • What Is Property?
  • The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism
(Arabic: كارل ماركس)
In 1818, Karl Marx, descended from a long line of rabbis, was born in Prussian Rhineland. Marx's' father converted to Protestantism shortly before Karl's birth. Educated at the Universities of Bonn, Jena, and Berlin, Marx founded the Socialist newspaper Vorwarts in 1844 in Paris. After being expelled from France at the urging of the Prussian government, which "banished" Marx in
More about Karl Marx...
Capital, Vol 1: A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Production The Marx-Engels Reader Das Kapital The German Ideology The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte

Share This Book

“A specter is haunting Europe—the specter of Communism. All the powers of old Europe have entered into a holy alliance to exorcise this specter; Pope and Czar, Metternich and Guizot, French radicals and German police spies.

Where is the party in opposition that has not been decried as Communistic by its opponents in power? Where the opposition that has not hurled back the branding reproach of Communism, against the more advanced opposition parties, as well as against its reactionary adversaries?

Two things result from this fact.

I. Communism is already acknowledged by all European powers to be in itself a power.

II. It is high time that Communists should openly, in the face of the whole world, publish their views, their aims, their tendencies, and meet this nursery tale of the Specter of Communism with a Manifesto of the party itself.”
“The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.

Freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guildmaster and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one another, carried on an uninterrupted, now hidden, now open fight, that each time ended, either in the revolutionary reconstitution of society at large, or in the common ruin of the contending classes.”
More quotes…