Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Choosing War: The Lost Chance for Peace and the Escalation of War in Vietnam” as Want to Read:
Choosing War: The Lost Chance for Peace and the Escalation of War in Vietnam
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Choosing War: The Lost Chance for Peace and the Escalation of War in Vietnam

3.72 of 5 stars 3.72  ·  rating details  ·  67 ratings  ·  8 reviews
In one of the most detailed and powerfully argued books published on American intervention in Vietnam, Fredrik Logevall examines the last great unanswered question on the war: Could the tragedy have been averted? His answer: a resounding yes. Challenging the prevailing myth that the outbreak of large-scale fighting in 1965 was essentially unavoidable, Choosing War argues t ...more
Paperback, 557 pages
Published February 9th 2001 by University of California Press (first published June 30th 1999)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Choosing War, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Choosing War

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 152)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Traditional scholarship and public memory of the Vietnam War associates it with grievous error. Historian Fredrik Logevall takes no exception to this. While many have pondered where in the course of America’s involvement in Vietnam it went wrong, Logevall pinpoints the timeframe. In Choosing War: The Lost Chance for Peace and the Escalation of the Vietnam War, he refers to “the Long ‘64” as a year which America altered its foreign policy from a supporting yet distancing role in Vietnam, to a pol ...more
Steve Simrin
Well researched and, while somewhat repetitive, well written history of how the US slid into the tragedy of Vietnam. One comes away from this book seeing that the fundamental reason for the misguided escalation of American involvement in the war was Lyndon Johnson's insecurity about being perceived as weak, as the first US president to lose a war. Because of that, more than 1 million Vietnamese and more than 58,000 Americans lost their lives. When it was over, the North Vietnamese got exactly wh ...more
Logevall’s examination utilizes an international perspective. French, German, Japanese, and British policymakers were all convinced that American efforts in the region were doomed (Australia was an exception). Johnson ignored international input. Domestically, he cites American support of LBJ, his overwhelming popularity after defeating Barry Goldwater (the hard line candidate), and the malleability of the American public, who did not yet hold firm opinions on American involvement in Vietnam. In ...more
This is hardly the kind of book one enjoys reading, but should. A clear demonstration of the short sighted, narrow minded, egotistical attitude of our political leadership, and it's hypocritical views of other countries and their ways of living. Why do we (the government) have to keep making the same mistakes over and over again? Are we never going to rid ourselves of the arrogant Anglo Saxon superiority belief?
James Mcneill
This should be required reading of any serious student of the war in Southeast Asia. I have a large collection of books on that tragic conflict and without question this is one of the best. Prof Logevall exposes in detail the flawed thinking and incompetence of US administrations when making decisions on Vietnam. When you have finished reading this turn your attention to Embers of War; quite superb.
I read this for a class--it was good. Definitely historically based (I think it was a doctoral dissertation) and critical of American policy in Vietnam...very informative on why the US goes to war.
Bekki Fahrer
Let's just suffice it to say that LBJ is not my favorite president.
This is an important book to get inside the mindset of any president who has to make the decision between war and peace. When its not a matter of life and death, a president can choose peace, but Kennedy and Johnson did not.
Filipa Pereira
Filipa Pereira marked it as to-read
Jan 21, 2015
Austin Converse
Austin Converse marked it as to-read
Jan 03, 2015
Melissa marked it as to-read
Dec 28, 2014
Anh  Le
Anh Le marked it as to-read
Dec 04, 2014
Matthew Jankowski
Matthew Jankowski marked it as to-read
Oct 24, 2014
Andy Caffrey
Andy Caffrey marked it as to-read
Oct 12, 2014
Noreen added it
Sep 21, 2014
Katherine marked it as to-read
Sep 07, 2014
Christopher Nieman
Christopher Nieman marked it as to-read
Aug 30, 2014
Dominique marked it as to-read
Jul 19, 2014
John Gazzelli
John Gazzelli marked it as to-read
Jan 23, 2015
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
Embers Of War: The Fall of an Empire and the Making of America's Vietnam The Origins of the Vietnam War Terrorism and 9/11: A Reader Nixon in the World: American Foreign Relations, 1969-1977 Logevall Terrorism Reader Plus Cigler Terrorism Reader First Edition

Share This Book