Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “De Verloren Wereld (Het Vervolg op Jurassic Park)” as Want to Read:
De Verloren Wereld (Het Vervolg op Jurassic Park)
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

De Verloren Wereld (Jurassic Park #2)

3.66 of 5 stars 3.66  ·  rating details  ·  73,119 ratings  ·  1,762 reviews
Het is zes jaar na de fatale mislukking van het Jurassic Park. De dinosauriërs zijn vernietigd, het park is ontmanteld en het eiland is voor onbepaalde tijd gesloten voor het publiek. Maar...er doen hardnekkige geruchten de ronde dat er op diverse plaatsen in Centraal-Amerika onbekende beesten zijn gesignaleerd. Aangelokt door het vooruitzicht van nieuwe wetenschappelijke ...more
Paperback, 400 pages
Published 1995 by Luitingh-Sijthoff
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about De Verloren Wereld, please sign up.

Popular Answered Questions

Zach Smith Ian Malcolm, Richard Levine, Jack Thorne, Sara Harding, Eddie Carr and two sneaky kids Arby and Kelly. And the biosyn crew.
This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Chelsea
I find a lot of people discuss the "resurrection" of Ian Malcolm in their reviews, and I'd like to throw in my two cents. It's true, Malcolm is mentioned as dead at the end of Jurassic Park. To be exact, Muldoon is telling Grant what's happened to everyone else as they're flying away in the helicopter:
"What about Malcolm?" Grant said.
Muldoon shook his head.

The epilogue mentions the Costa Rican government not permitting the burial of John Hammond or Ian Malcolm (amongst a list of other ways they
...more
Paul
The story goes that Steven Spielberg flush with the success of the first Jurassic Park movie, itself an adaptation of a Michael Chrichton novel, decided to try and repeat his success by commissioning the author to write a sequel to his original novel (which the first movie was based on) which they could then adapt into a movie.
Whether or not that's true I cannot say but I will say that do not base your initial judgement of this book or the prospect of reading it on the lacklustre utter turkey th
...more
Chris Friend
Mar 30, 2008 Chris Friend rated it 1 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: No living creature on earth. Except silverfish. They need the fiber.
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Peter Meredith
The Lost World is not a very good book. The story is a slog to start and the characters are very weak. So weak that if any of them had actually been eaten by the constantly hungry dinosaurs I would've been like: shrug.
As the story progressed and I waited impatiently to find out: would they actually solve the mystery of the missing Dr Levine and go to the island of dinosaurs--as if there was a chance of that not happening--I was introduced to a series of these weak characters and it then became
...more
Enrique
Well to be honest, I had watched the film adaptation before reading the novel. I loved the film especially with the Big Rex attacking my hometown. (Sadly the news never reported it). Now I had begun reading it kind of late, since I could only find a copy of it at Barnes&Nobels but I begun reading!

Now when I did read the novel I tried to clear my mind and not try to expect alot from it. However when I actually did get to reading the Lost World I was slightly dissapointed. To be frank I think
...more
Deslni01
Michael Crichton's The Lost World is an interesting piece of work. On the one hand, it is an exciting, page-gripping, edge of the seat thriller reminiscent of the first Jurassic Park novel. On the other hand, it is exactly that: reminiscent of the first Jurassic Park novel. In many ways, it is merely a rehash of the original. Ian Malcolm returns, as does Dodgson, there are other dinosaur and mammalian experts involved (of course, they are all considered the best in the world), and the story coul ...more
Wil
Sep 06, 2007 Wil rated it 1 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Masochists and the illiterate
What I learned from The Lost World: The only people worthy of surviving in Crichton's world are geniuses. Everyone else is destined to be fodder/feed for terrorizing thunder lizards.

The Lost World suffers from two things: First off, if you've ever read Jurassic Park, then you know that TLW's protagonist, Ian Malcolm, is, in fact, dead. That's right... he died in Jurassic Park, but since they couldn't convince Sam Neill to return for the movie, Crichton rewrote history so that Malcolm somehow sur
...more
Corey Tardif
The Lost World takes place six years after the Jurassic Park incident, and just like in the movie version, Dr. Alan Grant and Dr. Sattler did not return but Dr. Ian Malcolm does return for his role. The Lost World was an entertaining read, although I'll say not as good as Jurassic Park, for a number of reasons, but I won't go into all of them. I found myself skipping through some of the unnecessary parts that weren't really important to the story but when I came to some of the important parts I ...more
Brian
Jurassic Park was pretty good, but this book was rather poor. It reads like a bad movie. The author is so intent upon pushing Chaos Theory upon the reader that he often forces the characters to behave way, way, WAY out of their habits in order to force things to go wrong.

People suddenly do really stupid things. People forget that they have weapons. All attempts to prepare for a situation automatically fail, because it's completely impossible (not just improbable) for a prepared individual to act
...more
T. C.
A sequel to Jurassic Park that will once again put you on the edge of your seat. The Lost World does a great job making the reader feel like part of the environment through its in-depth description and thrilling characters as they work together to survive. I highly recommend this book and all of the movies. If you are a science fiction or dinosaur fan this is a must read.
Stacy
I know the saying, "It is a must read," is overused and often unworthy of the story it's applied to. However I can not think of a better way to describe this novel; you simply must read it. I had already the pleasure of watching and adoring the movie franchise. I was apprehensive about this series because it's a recurring issue that if you have seen the movie the the read is a slow one. That is absolutely not the case with this series. You get to discover your favorite characters in a deeper sen ...more
Laura V.
¡Ian Malcolm sigue vive! ¡Sigue vivo!

Mi matemático favorito ha resucitado :D

La principal diferencia con la película, es que al parecer nadie leyó el libro. Tiene una ideas vagas y creo que hasta UNA escena igual, pero el resto es imaginación del director. El libro es mejor en otros sentidos, pero me quedo con ambas versiones, así de leal soy.

Levine, un fanático paleontólogo, acarrea con su excentricidad a Ian, Throne y Eddie, y los niños Arby y Kelly hacia el El mundo Perdido, otrora copia de se
...more
Emily
I enjoyed The Lost World less than Jurassic Park. This was partly because of a less exciting plot-line, partly because what made JP exciting (living dinosaurs!) is old news by the time you get to TLW, partly because of an annoying feminist agenda embodied by one of the characters, and partly because the author makes frequent use of the f-word for the three antagonists' dialogue which apparently was no longer taboo by the time TLW was written unlike in JP. But I still enjoyed it because of the co ...more
Cait
Dec 27, 2014 Cait rated it 1 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Jeff Goldblum and people who like annoying children
Wow, this book was kind of the pits. I read it through my tablet, and I'm going back through little notes I made as I read it, and this is what I got:
Malcolm talks about how simpler societies have children that are "born into a network of adults responsible for helping to raise the child." I actually really liked this because it reminded me of how my dad always says it takes a village to raise a child.
When Dodgson and co. are trying to steal the tyrannosaurus' eggs and try standing completely st
...more
Lady
Malcolm, terrorised beyond belief by his experiences on Isla Nublar, decides that once is never enough and that it's high time he stopped, y'know, not almost dying all the time in his newly won civilian life. So he goes back to play amongst the dinosaurs. How'd he ever make it off Isla Nublar in the first place? It got bombed back to the Cretaceous period, and it is acknowledged in this puny follow-up to Jurassic Park that everything on the island was destroyed by said bombing, but Malcolm survi ...more
Ash
This book, just like Jurassic Park was AWESOME! I have seen all the 3 parts of the movie so many times that I have lost count of it. But still I loved this book. This book is very remotely related to the movie. Other than the T-rex couple attacking scene, nothing much was in the movie. The starting was little slow but towards the end it was jaw-dropping, nail-biting and too thrilling.
The last book made me get nightmares full of T-Rex chasing me and I am sure this book will get me attacked by ra
...more
Vicki Le Feuvre
Not that I am prone to speaking ill of Spielberg, but whatever calamitous decision led to him not having Michael Crichton co-write the screenplay of The Lost World alongside David Koepp as he did for the first Jurassic Park movie was obviously a big mistake.

In terms of plot, characterisation and carefully crafted atmosphere this novel is vastly superior to the movie that shares its name. Also there are a lot more raptors in it, which is just gravy.

Don’t get me wrong, I enjoyed watching a fully-g
...more
Jess
Disclaimer: This book and the corresponding movie have almost nothing to do with each other. The film sequel was inspired by the fictional events here but is not based on them. Lose that expectation now.

Compared to Jurassic Park, this book was slower to start out. It didn’t grab me right away like the first story. I think that was because several new characters and storylines came into play.

But once the pace picked up, it picked up PDQ. It goes from introducing the new characters and preparing
...more
Fizzgig76
Ian Malcolm is alive (!? don't ask) and goes to the mysterious Site B for Jurassic Park with some gung-ho people set of studying dinosaurs and plucky kids BUT they face dinosaurs and humans. Jurassic Park 2 (the movie) didn't use much of this book for its script...Having seen Jurassic Park 2 that would be a good thing one would think, but the book is possibly just as bad, if not worse for the fact that Crichton can write but chose to vomit up this story. The characters are flat, the action is ev ...more
Henrik
Feb 09, 2008 Henrik rated it 3 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: those who enjoy science-based fiction
Basically the usual good Michael Crighton stuff, interesting ramblings and speculations about science (in this case, the role of extinction in evolution). Certainly readable and enjoyable, but the plot line was not as solid as it could and should have been.

[Plot discussion follows]

1) Having the two kids come along was artificial and contrived, whereas in Jurassic Park it was natural. Did he include them here as a compulsory element in the case the book became a movie? (Note: having the kids alon
...more
Rade
Not as good as Jurassic Park IMO, but a sold sequel nonetheless. Looking at the other reviews, I realized that people are so hard to please. They find holes to poke even if they are nonessential and very small. Jesus people, just read the book and enjoy it for what it is; a solid page turning adventure that focuses on people running like crazy from huge dinosaurs who are hell bent on killing them because they are bred by a madman with a crazy dream of profiting from animals that should be left e ...more
Jocelyn
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Charity
I'm not sure sure if the author was trying to educate me or entertain me.

For awhile, he tried to do both and then I started skipping the extremely long and (to me) boring scientific explanations and evolutionary rants to get to the action scenes. The first half of the book was dull. The second half progressed into true horror-and-scares territory. I sat there late into the night, my stomach in knots, frantically turning pages, while muttering, "Oh, HELL" repeatedly so in that sense, it was good.
...more
Nick
The Lost World is a forced thriller, this much is clear very early on in Chrichton's follow-up to Jurassic Park. He had never written a squeal before this book, and while I can't blame him for commercial reasons, it's obvious the same creative spark normally found in his work is not present. The story does feel like a complete repeat of the first book, just with different names, and there isn't much to draw you to the new additions, though Sarah Harding was a welcome change of pace. I enjoyed re ...more
Sarah
Lush tropical island rife with painful ways to die? Check.
Scientists and high-powered rifles? Check.
Fixated, delusional troublemakers and greedy tycoons out to make a buck? Check.
Two insanely intelligent kids on an adventure they should have been nowhere near? Check.
An injured Ian Malcolm waxing philosophical while in the depths of a morphine-induced haze? Check.
Angry dinos? Check.


Looks like it’s “All Systems Go!” for another Michael Crichton dinosaur saga. Crichton basically recycled his formul
...more
William Redd
This is the third and final book of my cruise reading for 2015, even if I did only start the book on the last night on the ship.

Having seen the movie when it came out, I always enjoyed it. It wasn't as good as the first, but enjoyable. However, now that I've read the book, I really don't understand most of the changes made, especially the homage of the first film adaptation of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's Lost World (replacing a T-Rex stalking through Los Angeles with the Willis O'Brien Brontosaurus
...more
Michael Feeney
Michael Crichton never wrote a sequel to any of his novels until Steven Spielberg talked him into doing so following Jurassic Park. He never wrote another sequel after The Lost World, either. Make of that what you will…

That may sound like the buildup to a very negative review, but the truth is I mostly like The Lost World. The book, that is. The movie is crap, but we’ll get to that with the next review…

Sure, the biggest problem with the novel is that there is no pressing need for it to exist; it
...more
Juan Nieto Cano
Muy bueno el desenlace de Parque Jurásico, me lo he leído en nada, también ayuda mucho como está escrito, muy en la línea del primero, la historia avanza con rapidez y las descripciones las justas y precisas, aunque la verdad, al igual que el primero, creo que algunas teorías de uno de sus protagonistas están de más, ya que yo no soy científico ni nada eso, pues llega un momento en el que se me hacen un poco tediosas, aunque por suerte sus teorías también son las justas y precisas. En este libro ...more
Kerri
Ian Malcolm, presumed dead at the end of Jurassic Park, is alive and giving a lecture on Chaos Theory and Extinction when overzealous paleontologist Richard Levine shows up. Levine is tired of studying bones; he’s heard rumors about strange animals in Costa Rica and about Ian Malcolm’s extended stay there. He wants to put together an expedition to locate a “Lost World” where animals survived extinction and are still living in seclusion. Malcolm says no such place exists, but he’ll be happy to he ...more
Isaac
This book takes place on a island close to where Jurrasic park took place. The explorers enter the island to respond to a distress call from Richard Levine. The island is where all of the "defect dinosaurs" that were discarded from Jurassic Park. The main characters are Richard Levine, a scientist associate of Malcolm, who appears in the first book and is a specialist on the chaos theroy, and really does not like the idea of jurassic park. There are two students of Levine, Arby (a computer geniu ...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Which was better: Book or Movie? 30 223 Jun 18, 2015 10:37PM  
Jurassic World movie early reactions 1 26 Jun 01, 2015 01:32PM  
2015 Reading Chal...: The Lost World by Michael Crichton 4 28 May 19, 2015 02:40PM  
  • White Shark
  • Footprints of Thunder
  • Independence Day: Novelisation
  • The Trench (MEG #2)
  • Jurassic Park III
  • Far-Seer (Quintaglio Ascension, #1)
  • Raptor Red
  • The Experiment
  • 2061: Odyssey Three (Space Odyssey, #3)
  • Shadows of the Empire (Star Wars)
  • Tales of the Bounty Hunters (Star Wars)
  • Terminator 2: Judgment Day
  • Invasion
  • City of the Dead (Resident Evil, #3)
  • The Last Command (Star Wars: The Thrawn Trilogy, #3)
  • The Bear and the Dragon (John Clark, #3)
  • House Harkonnen (Prelude to Dune, #2)
  • Inca Gold (Dirk Pitt, #12)
5194
Michael Crichton (1942–2008) was one of the most successful novelists of his generation, admired for his meticulous scientific research and fast-paced narrative. He graduated summa cum laude and earned his MD from Harvard Medical School in 1969. His first novel, Odds On (1966), was written under the pseudonym John Lange and was followed by seven more Lange novels. He also wrote as Michael Douglas ...more
More about Michael Crichton...

Other Books in the Series

Jurassic Park (2 books)
  • Jurassic Park
Jurassic Park The Andromeda Strain Timeline Prey Sphere

Share This Book

“What makes you think human beings are sentient and aware? There's no evidence for it. Human beings never think for themselves, they find it too uncomfortable. For the most part, members of our species simply repeat what they are told-and become upset if they are exposed to any different view. The characteristic human trait is not awareness but conformity, and the characteristic result is religious warfare. Other animals fight for territory or food; but, uniquely in the animal kingdom, human beings fight for their 'beliefs.' The reason is that beliefs guide behavior which has evolutionary importance among human beings. But at a time when our behavior may well lead us to extinction, I see no reason to assume we have any awareness at all. We are stubborn, self-destructive conformists. Any other view of our species is just a self-congratulatory delusion. Next question.” 329 likes
“All your life people will tell you things. And most of the time, probably ninety-five percent of the time, what they'll tell you will be wrong.” 132 likes
More quotes…