49th out of 383 books
—
281 voters
Hedda Gabler
One of Ibsen's most powerful plays, providing a a richly coloured and brilliantly detailed portrait
Paperback, 112 pages
Published
June 30th 2006
by Echo Library
(first published 1890)
Friend Reviews
To see what your friends thought of this book,
please sign up.
Community Reviews
(showing
1-30
of
3,000)
Feb 21, 2013
Mariel
rated it
4 of 5 stars
Recommends it for:
now I am burning your child
Recommended to Mariel by:
Sean
I want for once in my life to have power to mould a human destiny.
People are in other rooms, people sitting on sofas and people behind desks. Voices from other rooms and voices carry. People have their destinies as their children in hearts cold ashen wombs worth nothing until it thrown away. I don't want to call it human. I don't see arms and legs and feet.
I felt the tragedy of the loss of Hedda Gabler's life to her own colorless lightning when the speed stopped. Big eyes in a head and I don't k...more
Dark, intriguing, mysteriously ambiguous, and an eponymous heroine that leers away from the 19th Century female stereotype. This work of Ibsen's strips his characters of anything spiritual and focuses intently on the society in which they find themselves in. Hedda's character is, I believe, trapped in an era which she is too modern for. She is trapped in an unhappy marriage simply to keep the middle class lifestyle that a 19th Century woman wouldn't have been able to uphold on her own. Although...more
Hedda Gabler is truly an intelligent, unpredictable, self-centered, manipulating woman. She enjoys the luxurious lifestyle and has found some poor sap, Jurgen Tesman, to marry her. The play begins with their arrival home from their 6 month honeymoon. Tesman's aunt Julie, arrives at their home to meet the newlyweds with a gift of slippers for Tesman from his sickly aunt Rina. It appears that Hedda's clothing is loose fitting and she seems to be "showing" (pregnant). Hedda insults both her husband...more
Read via DailyLit in 47 parts. (Edmund Gosse and William Archer translation.) I read this in college in a very bad class, and I was curious about NYC's new revival so it was time for a reread. Thank goodness! I only remembered what happens at the end, and not at all why.
This read was much more thought-provoking. And somehow, though it is key, I didn't recall the theme of Hedda's pregnancy at all. (It was a really bad class.) And that's not a spoiled revelation; though she only (barely) admits it...more
This read was much more thought-provoking. And somehow, though it is key, I didn't recall the theme of Hedda's pregnancy at all. (It was a really bad class.) And that's not a spoiled revelation; though she only (barely) admits it...more
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it,
click here.
Dark is probably not the adjective to describe it. I've seen it mentioned in one of the descriptions. Nor is Hedda evil. But the drama definitely holds a certain coldness to it (the same coldness one meets in Bergman's films, I'm tempted to say) and I cannot admit I understand Hedda entirely; she starts as a master of puppets, seems mischievous and always plotting but ends up alone and misunderstood. And makes you think she was alone and misunderstood all along.
I'm definitely looking forward to...more
I'm definitely looking forward to...more
This book left me thinking for a while.
I have to admit that I am not sure I understood it completely.
There are three female characters in the play. Each of them represents an entirely different personality. Firstly, there is Miss Tesman. She gives meaning to her life by taking care of others. I guess she has the role of the mother. Second comes Mrs Elvsted. She is a weak character, completely dependent on others. She seems unable to understand what is going on around her. She is a pretty little...more
I have to admit that I am not sure I understood it completely.
There are three female characters in the play. Each of them represents an entirely different personality. Firstly, there is Miss Tesman. She gives meaning to her life by taking care of others. I guess she has the role of the mother. Second comes Mrs Elvsted. She is a weak character, completely dependent on others. She seems unable to understand what is going on around her. She is a pretty little...more
There are three great heroines of nineteenth century literature whose tragedy is that they are denied the dramatic and inspiring lives to which they feel entitled: Emma Bovary, Anna Karenina and Hedda Gabler.
All three are married to men who are certainly adequate from the point of view of ordinary people, but perhaps no more than that; and from the point of view of the life not ordinary, because it belongs on the noble heights of tragic aspiration, adequate is simply not enough.
Of the three, Hed...more
All three are married to men who are certainly adequate from the point of view of ordinary people, but perhaps no more than that; and from the point of view of the life not ordinary, because it belongs on the noble heights of tragic aspiration, adequate is simply not enough.
Of the three, Hed...more
I don’t read plays often - I’m most inclined to read a play in anticipation of seeing a live performance of it. (I have numerous happy memories of sitting in line outside the Public Theatre in New York on a summer morning, reading a Shakespeare play while I waited for the free tickets to see an exquisite production at the Delacorte Theatre in Central Park that night.) When I do read plays, I am struck by the way most of them require more proactivity than most literature. One must infer an unders...more
I suppose in the long run, I prefer Hedda Gabler to Doll's House, if only because Hedda is such an amazing protagonist to watch when you think of the social context of the play being performed in 1890. Today, she seems like a cold, heartless bitch. And even back then, people may have thought that. But she also bucks the trend of the "well made play," by becoming an anti-hero of sorts. And really, who is the one to follow in this play in the first place? George? Eilert? Mrs Elvsted? No one seems...more
Since I had to read it for class I entered the play knowing what to look out for; however, even without a set goal in mind this is a very thought-provoking piece. Strange enough I could sympathize with Hedda although she was very unstable and manipulative. The lifestyle she married into seemed like a nightmare, having a husband who found the excitement in old documents and organizing. Of course, she shouldn't have married into that lifestyle if she knew she wouldn't be happy, but I digress.
A th...more
A th...more
This is undoubtedly a play to be performed if one ever existed. Hedda is a brilliant female character - Lady Macbeth meets Betty Draper. She must be applauded as a female character who is not a hero or a villain, not a bitch or a crone, but a cruel, neurotic, charismatic presence. I was surprised by the almost feminism of Ibsen's play, how he manages to serve Hedda so well, with fantastic dry wit - the subtlety of the scene between her and Judge Brack would be spine-chilling on stage - and glori...more
I read the 1972 translation (or "adaptation") by John Osborne, but also checked out the original 1890 English translation by Edmund Goose as a comparative reference. It didn't appear that Osborne really changed much except making the language simpler and clearer. I did take note of Goose's explanation of the differences in the use of the familiar versus formal "you," a shade that doesn't translate well (for his version, he used "thou" as a substitute, but today that just seems overtly stilted)....more
From the title of the play, it becomes obvious what the play is going to be about: a woman named Hedda Gabler. This woman has an extremely complicated personality. It is hard to guess what is going on in her head at any moment in time. Even her husband, George Tesman, hasn’t really figured out his own wife. The first step in understanding Hedda is to understand how she feels about her life.
From the beginning of the play, Hedda clearly expresses a sense of boredom in everything that she says and...more
From the beginning of the play, Hedda clearly expresses a sense of boredom in everything that she says and...more
I liked this one more than A Doll's House - it was longer, expanded into a greater cast of characters, and was infinitely more complex. It was also more difficult to understand (not in terms of what happens, but in the ways that the characters relate to each other). I probably missed all the allegories/symbolism/stuff English papers are made of, but that's alright for me (even though I wouldn't mind discussing this play with a knowledgeable teacher or two).
Enter Hedda Gabler - bored, fallen, he...more
Enter Hedda Gabler - bored, fallen, he...more
Harold Bloom has called this play Shakespearean in scope and character, and I think he is correct. The central enigma is Hedda herself, a character of erotic self-destructiveness, fascinating and frightening simultaneously. Is she the embodiment of pure and inexplicable evil, as Iago would seem to be, or is she a victim of her time and culture, a woman of profound aspirations and ability trapped in a constricted and unimaginative marriage and role from which she tries desperately to escape? Her...more
Ibsen captured the horror of the limited options available to women of propriety in 1890 with violence and virtuosity. It is irrelevant whether you like Hedda or not. She was not cut out to live within the straight jacket of society. None of the available options -- and Ibsen brilliantly explores them all (marriage, affair, manipulation of men) -- were a hell to her.
This play shook the world of "women's" lit long before women could vote. Originally performed only for women, it surprised the the...more
This play shook the world of "women's" lit long before women could vote. Originally performed only for women, it surprised the the...more
Hedda, she with husband that longs to write a great deal about the domestic industries of Brabant during the middle ages, she with husband that encompasses correctness and respectability beyond all question, after first firing General Gabler's pistols, after then answering "I know of no reason why I should be" to the observation "You are not really happy," after agreeing with the judgmental one who opined "The triangle ought, if possible, be spontaneously constructed," after once dwelling upon,...more
Since my first days at university, as one of the few women in a male-dominated program, I've enjoyed the power to control the actions of the men around me. While I certainly don't take it to the extremes that Hedda would like, I've not always been the kindest person, though I've hopefully mended my ways lately. In reading Hedda Gabler I was startled to recognize so much of myself in a piece of classic literature. I suppose this speaks to the timelessness of Ibsen's work.
However, I wasn't overwhe...more
However, I wasn't overwhe...more
I loathe this play. I loathe it because I hate being reminded how ugly some people are. I love to read and go to a happy place where people think before they talk, they love deeply and honestly, and they aren't narcissistic. Needless to say, I read to get away. This is my second time reading this play... I thought that maybe now that I'm out of high school I might gain better insight. I did gain better insight as much of the confusing points from before had greater clarity to me now. But I'm sti...more
There was a time I would have given this story of an unhappy but manipulative shrew a lower rating for being so pointlessly unpleasant. I have now read widely enough in Ibsen to realize that he usually wrote about people learning to take responsibility for themselves and do what is right when that is the hardest thing to do. I now see this play as subverting that, since it is about a woman who takes responsibility for hurting others, destroying two of them (if you know the story, count carefully...more
I think I liked this one better than "A Doll's House": it is more developed and you get a better taste of the characters, so you can understand their twists and turns even if they're not explained. Even though I would've liked to read this after a more thorough study of the Norwegian society and its problems, I liked they way he portrays society and deals with its hypocrisy. Hedda may seem terrible, but she was also condemned to be because she couldn't choose. It really made me think. I believe...more
Hedda is a play by Henrik Ibsen about a young woman, Hedda Gabbler. When we meet Hedda she is recently married to Tesman who she all but detests. She is the type of character you love you hate . She is completely self involved. Her favorite past time includes playing with guns!
She flirts with men and one in particular, young Eibert. Hedda tries to exert control over him, stemming from a brief romance before she was married. Hedda advises him to commit "beautiful" suicide.
She is a different coo...more
She flirts with men and one in particular, young Eibert. Hedda tries to exert control over him, stemming from a brief romance before she was married. Hedda advises him to commit "beautiful" suicide.
She is a different coo...more
I'd never read any Ibsen before and was astonished by this - its psychological depth compared to its economy was amazing, even for drama. Hedda Gabler, the ferociously intelligent, dangerously cruel, yet ultimately pitiable protagonist defies easy categorisation.
I can't imagine why I've waited till now to read it - I saw that there was a new production of it on in London and thought, ooh, I should give that a go. It was another of those "to read" books that's been on the pile for years.
It's a...more
I can't imagine why I've waited till now to read it - I saw that there was a new production of it on in London and thought, ooh, I should give that a go. It was another of those "to read" books that's been on the pile for years.
It's a...more
This book is powerful and memorable. Hedda Gabler paints a portrait of one of the most disturbed people ever depicted in literature I've read. Ibsen does this very skillfully and yet not too caricaturistically. I found myself thinking about the story after I read the book and have a feeling I will be thinking about it for time to come. Ibsen succeeds in creating an unforgettable character. Though, I must admit, I don't completely understand Hedda as a character, she sounds so irrational and, rea...more
Mar 21, 2013
Hayley
rated it
3 of 5 stars
·
review of another edition
Shelves:
adult,
school-mandated
Thinking there's a high probability that Hedda's actually mentally ill/something of a sociopath. Her inability to keep things under wraps/to herself could be seen as that or just a way fro Ibsen to give us what she's thinking without going into soliloquies, which he avoids, or both.
Grape leaves? Wine? Death by alcohol poisoning? Why would this be considered a beautiful death though?
The husband would have been more likable if he wasn't so stupid. The only character worth sympathizing over would b...more
Grape leaves? Wine? Death by alcohol poisoning? Why would this be considered a beautiful death though?
The husband would have been more likable if he wasn't so stupid. The only character worth sympathizing over would b...more
I think it's extremely interesting that a Norwegian man and a woman from Louisiana could have so much in common as far as societal observation goes. Because, seriously, I just read "The Awakening" and...yeah.
As far as that goes, though, I think I prefer Hedda Gabler. I just like Ibsen's writing better, I think (and I read two translations at once, which was a REAL trip.) Also, Ibsen's characters were kind of hilarious. I'm not saying that I didn't poke fun at everyone in "The Awakening" (because...more
As far as that goes, though, I think I prefer Hedda Gabler. I just like Ibsen's writing better, I think (and I read two translations at once, which was a REAL trip.) Also, Ibsen's characters were kind of hilarious. I'm not saying that I didn't poke fun at everyone in "The Awakening" (because...more
There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
Be the first to start one »
Henrik Johan Ibsen was a major Norwegian playwright largely responsible for the rise of modern realistic drama. He is often referred to as the "father of modern drama." Ibsen is held to be the greatest of Norwegian authors and one of the most important playwrights of all time, celebrated as a national symbol by Norwegians.
His plays were considered scandalous to many of his era, when Victorian valu...more
More about Henrik Ibsen...
His plays were considered scandalous to many of his era, when Victorian valu...more
Share This Book
3 trivia questions
1 quiz
More quizzes & trivia...
1 quiz
“It’s a release to know that in spite of everything a premeditated act of courage is still possible.”
—
14 people liked it
“It's a liberation to know that an act of spontaneous courage is yet possible in this world. An act that has something of unconditional beauty.”
—
3 people liked it
More quotes…

Loading...












Saturday Drama























5 de Mar 09:23
I don't un...more
6 de Mar 11:15