Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Separation of Church & State: What the Founders Meant” as Want to Read:
Separation of Church & State: What the Founders Meant
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Separation of Church & State: What the Founders Meant

4.32  ·  Rating Details ·  187 Ratings  ·  18 Reviews
This new book is very timely for one of the most frequently debated issues in America: the separation of church and state. Where did this phrase originate? Was it always meant to prohibit expressions of religious faith in public settings as many claim today? Learn the answers to these questions and discover the Founding Fathers own words and intents in this book! With all ...more
Paperback, 25 pages
Published May 1st 2007 by Wallbuilder Press
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Separation of Church & State, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Separation of Church & State

Godless by Ann CoulterGuilty by Ann CoulterDianetics by L. Ron HubbardIf Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans by Ann CoulterTwilight by Stephenie Meyer
1001 Books I'd Rather Die than Read
284th out of 513 books — 796 voters
Common Sense by Thomas PaineIf You Were There When They Signed The Constitution by Elizabeth LevyThe 5000 Year Leap by W. Cleon SkousenThe Constitution of the United States of America, with the Bi... by Thomas JeffersonThe Founders by Dennis Brindell Fradin
BOOKS FOR CONSTITUTION DAY
70th out of 81 books — 14 voters


More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
J.D. White
A great, short little book about the history of the complete misconception and twisting of the phrase 'separation of church and state' which originated from a short letter from Thomas Jefferson. (and, in context of the whole letter, Jefferson was actually stressing that the government has NO RIGHT OR AUTHORITY TO PROHIBIT ANY FORM OF RELIGIOUS EXPRESSION IN ANY PUBLIC SPHERE - except where it breaks decent moral and/or civil law, i.e. human sacrifice, child abuse, etc... - and thus he was statin ...more
Erin
Sep 06, 2012 Erin rated it it was amazing
I liked its emphasis on the importance of religion as it pertains to education. A very well written pamphlet...it's not exactly a book.
Kimmie
Jan 27, 2014 Kimmie rated it it was amazing
Do your research! I am thankful I collect books because I won't have to depend on today's Internet for my history.
Jack Hansen
Apr 18, 2013 Jack Hansen rated it it was amazing
This important issue of separation of Church and State has become a hot topic and battleground for Atheists vs Christians. David Barton explains why the meaning has been turned upside down so that the few decide for the many in a miscarriage of justice.
John F.
Oct 12, 2016 John F. rated it it was amazing
Mr. Barton draws upon history, to tell the truth, that there is no such thing as "separation of church and state." He shows how the courts misinterpreted the First Amendment. He also instructs America how to work to bring morality back to America. Great book.
C.A. Davidson
Oct 04, 2016 C.A. Davidson rated it it was amazing
Too many people are confusing the roles of church vs. state today. We are seeing people literally get away with murder in the name of freedom of religion. If a member of any religion steals or commits murder, they are subject to civil law, and are not protected by freedom of religion, because that member has violated the constitutional rights of another person and is a threat to the safety of others.
Stephen Matlock
May 17, 2015 Stephen Matlock rated it did not like it
Untrustworthy nonsense, from start to finish.

I rated this as low as I did because the author is not qualified to write about this topic so as to be trusted as an authority. This is a polemic, not a scholarly article. "Barton, in his book The Myth of Separation, argues that Christians were the ones who were intended to hold public office and that Jews and members of other sects were not."

Here are some further extracts of his views about church and state from his book "The Myth of Separation":

[Bar
...more
Ed
May 14, 2012 Ed rated it liked it
A good essay. Would have loved for him to have expounded more on the subject. Also felt the need for him to address counter arguments.
Joe N.
Aug 04, 2011 Joe N. rated it it was ok
A good short read. really it's a pamphlet not a book but it's straight to the point in twenty pages.
G
Oct 20, 2010 G added it
I'm guessing this extends on the subject from what he gave in the Godly Heritage video. Especially considering recent current events (ever increasing) I would love to read this one.
Michelle Teerlink
Michelle Teerlink rated it really liked it
Aug 26, 2014
Anna Murray
Anna Murray rated it it was amazing
May 12, 2013
Janet Skiles
Janet Skiles rated it it was amazing
Jul 17, 2014
Jason Griswold
Jason Griswold rated it it was amazing
Dec 22, 2012
Randy
Randy rated it it was amazing
Apr 05, 2012
David
David rated it it was amazing
Sep 20, 2010
Mark Eidel
Mark Eidel rated it it was amazing
Mar 31, 2010
Cori
Cori rated it it was amazing
Apr 19, 2012
Heather
Heather rated it really liked it
Jun 12, 2013
Sven Medina
Sven Medina rated it it was ok
Mar 01, 2016
Donald Harwick
Donald Harwick rated it really liked it
Jan 02, 2016
Nimboo
Nimboo rated it it was amazing
Nov 26, 2016
David Willmore
Jun 19, 2011 David Willmore rated it it was amazing
The establishment clause was to protect religion from the government, not the other way around.
Cate Neuhauser
Cate Neuhauser rated it it was amazing
Feb 03, 2013
American Revolution
American Revolution rated it it was ok
Mar 15, 2008
NeiL Monnig rox
NeiL Monnig rox rated it liked it
Oct 12, 2016
Laurie
Laurie rated it liked it
Oct 02, 2014
Barbara
Barbara rated it it was amazing
Jul 09, 2014
Melissa
Melissa rated it it was amazing
Aug 02, 2011
Mardi
Mardi rated it it was amazing
Jul 11, 2014
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against America's Enemies
  • The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Constitution
  • 33 Questions About American History You're Not Supposed to Ask
  • The Real Benjamin Franklin (Vol. 2 of the American Classic Series)
  • The Path to Tyranny
  • Seven Events That Made America America: And Proved That the Founding Fathers Were Right All Along
  • Wives of the Signers: The Women Behind the Declaration of Independence
  • The Shadow Party: How George Soros, Hillary Clinton, and Sixties Radicals Seized Control of the Democratic Party
  • The End of Racism: Finding Values in an Age of Technoaffluence
  • Comeback America: Turning the Country Around and Restoring Fiscal Responsibility
  • We Still Hold These Truths: Rediscovering Our Principles, Reclaiming Our Future
  • The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Founding Fathers
  • The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Presidents: From Wilson to Obama
  • The Second Civil War: How Extreme Partisanship Has Paralyzed Washington and Polarized America
  • Liberty's Blueprint: How Madison and Hamilton Wrote the Federalist, Defined the Constitution, and Made Democracy Safe for the World
  • The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Vietnam War
  • New Deal or Raw Deal?: How FDR's Economic Legacy Has Damaged America
  • Crisis and Command: A History of Executive Power from George Washington to George W. Bush
58232
David Barton is the Founder and President of WallBuilders, a national pro-family organization that presents America's forgotten history and heroes, with an emphasis on our moral, religious and constitutional heritage.

WallBuilders is a name taken from the Old Testament writings of Nehemiah, who led a grassroots movement to rebuild the walls of Jerusalem and restore its strength and honor. In the sa
...more
More about David Barton...

Share This Book



“Yet, if the phrase “separation of church and state” appears in no official founding document, then what is the source of that phrase? And how did it become so closely associated with the First Amendment? On October 7, 1801, the Danbury Baptist Association of Danbury, Connecticut, sent a letter to President Thomas Jefferson expressing their concern that protection for religion had been written into the laws and constitutions. Believing strongly that freedom of religion was an inalienable right given by God, the fact that it appeared in civil documents suggested that the government viewed it as a government-granted rather than a God-granted right. Apprehensive that the government might someday wrongly believe that it did have the power to regulate public religious activities, the Danbury Baptists communicated their anxiety to President Jefferson.36 On January 1, 1802, Jefferson responded to their letter. He understood their concerns and agreed with them that man accounted only to God and not to government for his faith and religious practice. Jefferson emphasized to the Danbury Baptists that none of man’s natural (i.e., inalienable) rights – including the right to exercise one’s faith publicly – would ever place him in a situation where the government would interfere with his religious expressions.37 He assured them that because of the wall of separation, they need not fear government interference with religious expressions: Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, . . . I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should “make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,” thus building a wall of separation between Church and State.38 In his letter, Jefferson made clear that the “wall of separation” was erected not to limit public religious expressions but rather to provide security against governmental interference with those expressions, whether private or public.” 2 likes
“When the First Amendment was finally approved, it contained two separate clauses on religion, each with an independent scope of action. The first clause (called the Establishment Clause) prohibited the federal government from establishing a single national denomination; the second clause (called the Free Exercise Clause) prohibited the federal government from interfering with the people’s public religious expressions and acknowledgments.” 1 likes
More quotes…