Washington Burning: How a Frenchman's Vision of Our Nation's Capital Survived Congress, the Founding Fathers, and the Invading British Army
by Les Standifordbook data
16 ratings,
3.00
average rating, 5 reviews
(more data...)
edit
published
May 6th 2008
by Crown
binding
Hardcover, 368 pages
isbn
0307346447
(isbn13: 9780307346445)
description
The Riveting Story of the Federal City and the Men Who Built It
In 1814, British troops invaded Washington, consuming President Madison’s hastily aband...more
In 1814, British troops invaded Washington, consuming President Madison’s hastily aband...more
Sign in to Goodreads to see your friends' reviews of this book.
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
friend reviews
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
This book is currently not featured on any Listopia lists.
Add this book to your favorite list »
other reviews (showing 1-20 of 35)
All ratings
|
5 stars (1)
|
4 stars (5)
|
3 stars (5)
|
2 stars (3)
|
1 star (2)
|
avg 3.00
editions: all | this edition
editions: all | this edition
Read in August, 2008
Standiford, Les. WASHINGTON BURNING: How a Frenchman’s Vion for our Nation’s Capital Survived Congress, the Founding Fathers, and the Invading British Army. (U.S. – 2008). ****. As you might guess from the subtitle, the book is about more than the burning of Washington by the British in 1814. Standiford is a professor at Florida International University in Miami, where he directs the Creative Writing Program. I first hooked up with him when he was writing crime novels – all of w...more
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
Read in September, 2008
I enjoyed the subject matter, not a normally treated subject from that time period. I also didn't realize how much a hot political issue it was to locate the federal city where Washington is today and how much the decision shaped the political structure of compromise and give and take that symbolizes the American embodiment of government. The intrigue and the politics behind the building of the federal city, both the first time and then after the sacking by the British, as well as the many cha...more
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
Read in October, 2008
recommends it for:
dedicated history buffs - everyone else will be bored
The description calls it 'riveting.' I think that's being a little kind. At first I was interested in the story of Peter Charles L'Enfant, the architect who planned the city of Washington. But the story bogged down in detail pretty fast. Then the story would get so far ahead, then in the next chapter back up to some insignificant detail. I really found the story of the British invasion and destruction of Washington in 1812 to be great reading, but then the story slowed down again with more detai...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in July, 2008
recommends it for:
people who appreciate history but aren't hardcore readers of history
I wouldn't go so far as to claim what the book jacket does -- that "the narrative is as absorbing as that of any good novel" -- but I found the material interesting and think Standiford did a great job considering that the only verbatim dialogue came from diaries, letters, articles.
A few of the bits that made an impact on me -- 1. the notion that D.C.'s location was not a surefire thing, 2. that it had several names (incl. Federal City and Washingtonople) beside Washingto...more
A few of the bits that made an impact on me -- 1. the notion that D.C.'s location was not a surefire thing, 2. that it had several names (incl. Federal City and Washingtonople) beside Washingto...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in November, 2008
This book sounded promising but was boring until the last few chapters when it gets to the war of 1812 and the renewed interest of the cities architect 70 years after his death.
The author does a nice job at the beginning of tying the idea of the terrorism of 9/11 to the burning of Washington, D.C., and then he ties that back nicely at the end.
The rest of the book is like reading the minutes of Congressional meetings.
The author does a nice job at the beginning of tying the idea of the terrorism of 9/11 to the burning of Washington, D.C., and then he ties that back nicely at the end.
The rest of the book is like reading the minutes of Congressional meetings.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
03/20/09
Kennedy (kpow)
marked it as to-read
Read in December, 2008




















