by
3.12 of 5 stars
According to the renowned social critic and historian Paul Fussell, we are what we wear, and it doesn't look good. Uniforms parses the hidden meani... read full description

reviews

Jun 05, 2008
Guy rated it: 2 of 5 stars
Perhaps I should have read his "The Great War and Modern Memory" (for which he won various major awards) instead. This is not a book of scholarship... it is a book for fetishists. Amusing anecdotes at times, yes, and he can write well, but overall the book is principally a list of different uniforms described in dull (at least to this non-fetishist) detail.

Don't bother.
2 comments like (2 people liked it)
Feb 18, 2010
Joy rated it: 3 of 5 stars
I listened to this book on tape. Some of these recordings are not what
I would normally chose for reading, but they do prove to introduce new
topics and ideas. This was a "lighthearted look at the personal, cultural, and historical meaning of uniforms and what they reveal about class, gender, and the need to belong." It was written by a literature professor. I was particularly interested in the section on military uniforms, which included generals Patton and Eisenhower. More...
Dec 09, 2008
Karen rated it: 2 of 5 stars
If ever a book needed pictures, it’s this one. I had too Google “Army pink trousers” to see that they weren’t really even remotely what I think of as pink, and maybe it’s my fault my education didn’t cover what a “Sam Browne belt” is, but I was frequently distracted while reading this wishing I could see what the heck he was writing about. I finished it not feeling any more enlightened about “why we are what we wear” than I had been when I started, as the text was more a collection of observatio More...
May 12, 2008
Nikki rated it: 2 of 5 stars
This is a collection of very short meanderings on the subject of uniforms by someone who used to know what he was talking about. Paul Fussell's The Great War and Modern Memory was a really good book. book:Class] was a pretty good book. The only reason I gave this book two stars was that I did finish it, and it gave me a chuckle or two. Had it not been a library book, I might have thrown it across the room a time or two or three, because of simple errors of fact. For example, the Army has not tuc More...
Feb 22, 2009
Amberjean rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Entertaining, but disorganized. Reads a little more like discussions with a charming old fellow who likes to talk; entertaining in vignettes, but tiresome as a steady diet. The book doesn't seem to explore any one thing very deeply, but rather skips from point to point, always returning to discuss the Nazis and the US armed forces.
Jun 28, 2011
John rated it: 2 of 5 stars
A disappointment; pick one of Fussell's many other wonderful books, like "Class", before reading this collection of vague, fairly-charming rambles.
Dec 27, 2008
Ari rated it: 5 of 5 stars
This is a really wonderful read. Witty, insightful, and engaging.
Sep 02, 2011
Sarah rated it: 3 of 5 stars
I wasn't expecting this book to be rivetting but I was at least expecting it to be interesting and informative. The problem is that it's mostly "What We Wear" and very little of the Why.
Dec 17, 2009
Tracey rated it: 2 of 5 stars
Not quite as compelling as some other object-history nonfiction I've read; in fact, I don't remember a whole lot about the book at all.
0 comments like (1 person liked it)
Sep 03, 2009
mike rated it: 2 of 5 stars
I'm a fan of Paul Fussell, even of this light-hearted pamphlet.
Jan 31, 2012
David rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Jan 16, 2012
Dani rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Dec 28, 2011
Andrew rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Oct 24, 2011
Josephnovak marked it as to-read
Oct 19, 2011
Meredith rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Oct 06, 2011
Trina marked it as to-read
Sep 14, 2011
Jenna marked it as to-read
Sep 11, 2011
Jake rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Aug 22, 2011
S rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Aug 17, 2011
Milt rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Aug 14, 2011
Ruby is currently reading it
Aug 03, 2011
Ekigou rated it: 2 of 5 stars
Aug 02, 2011
Ron added it
Jul 31, 2011
Dachokie rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Jul 29, 2011
Herb added it
Jun 26, 2011
Peter added it
Jul 21, 2011
Donal marked it as to-read
Mar 08, 2011
Vivek marked it as to-read
Feb 28, 2011
Flat marked it as to-read
Feb 24, 2011
David rated it: 3 of 5 stars