How Judges Think
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating

How Judges Think

3.7 of 5 stars 3.70  ·  rating details  ·  113 ratings  ·  9 reviews
A distinguished and experienced appellate court judge, Richard A. Posner offers in this new book a unique and, to orthodox legal thinkers, a startling perspective on how judges and justices decide cases. When conventional legal materials enable judges to ascertain the true facts of a case and apply clear pre-existing legal rules to them, Posner argues, they do so straightf...more
Hardcover, 387 pages
Published April 1st 2008 by Harvard University Press
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 388)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
I had read some of Richard Posner's How Judges Think in draft last year, but have resumed reading the book now that it has appeared. Every member of the United States Senate should read it, so that we might have meaningful confirmation hearings on federal judges. Our public discourse about what judges really do proceeds at an infantile level; Judge Posner's bracing book could help it grow up. His criticisms of the self-serving and often delusional rhetoric of current members of the U.S. Supreme...more
Nov 08, 2008 Vladimir rated it 3 of 5 stars
Recommended to Vladimir by:
This passage from page 287 is insightful, and although I disagree with Posner I appreciate his position. While referring to the Constitutionality of Federal laws and actions can be used to advance a particular partisan agenda (think about every time somebody has mentioned their first amendment right), that doesn't prevent somebody who believes in the rule of law to consistently cite the Constitution. With all due respect to the legalists in the Bush administration (none), they're as wrong as the...more
I might be a bit more pre-disposed to the material than were I, say, an electrical engineer, hence that might have something to do with the rating. But he's a fantastic writer, the material is very articulate, and yet straightforward. nutshell observations: Posner discusses at length the inherent limitation of textualism/originalism as a legal/constitutional theory in a non-civil law system (that is, our statutes are not comprehensive to provide for every conceivable situation, it is thus left t...more
Posner, a federal judge, wrote this book outlining how he thinks judges make decisions - a process he dubs 'pragmatism.' They don't actually base decisions on precedent or even on the Constitution or the statute much of the time, he claims, they make political judgments instead and then look for evidence to justify their decisions. That may be true, and I did learn a lot from this book, but I also got the sense that Posner is a bit full of himself and that grew tiring. No one would be interested...more
Very interesting book about the way judges work and think. It was a little above my head in parts, and I think I'd like to read it again down the road one day. It took a while to read, as it didn't exactly flow well from point to point. But it definitely made me think.
Mary Ann McGrail
This is Posner at his best - engaging, informative, a quick read. He takes on the heavyweights in the field, and fellow members of the judiciary - in particular Justice Kennedy. It's a realistic account of aspects of the judging process.
A more accurate title would be: "How Posner Thinks."
Craig J.
How Judges Think by Richard A. Posner (2008)
Major Doug
under-paid, but under-worked
Noah marked it as to-read
Apr 14, 2014
Noah added it
Apr 14, 2014
Jeremy Russell
Jeremy Russell marked it as to-read
Apr 13, 2014
Alli marked it as to-read
Apr 06, 2014
Anna Butenko
Anna Butenko is currently reading it
Apr 03, 2014
Nick Jackson
Nick Jackson marked it as to-read
Apr 01, 2014
Rohit Patnaik
Rohit Patnaik marked it as to-read
Mar 22, 2014
Justice Ibrahim
Justice Ibrahim marked it as to-read
Mar 13, 2014
Setenay is currently reading it
Mar 12, 2014
Muy Channphaktra
Muy Channphaktra marked it as to-read
Mar 11, 2014
Kayla marked it as to-read
Mar 08, 2014
Kevin added it
Mar 04, 2014
Cory Crawford
Cory Crawford marked it as to-read
Mar 02, 2014
Ryan marked it as to-read
Feb 27, 2014
Abby marked it as to-read
Feb 22, 2014
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 13 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
Richard Posner is Senior Lecturer in Law at the University of Chicago Law School.

Following his graduation from Harvard Law School, Judge Posner clerked for Justice William J. Brennan Jr. From 1963 to 1965, he was assistant to Commissioner Philip Elman of the Federal Trade Commission. For the next two years he was assistant to the solicitor general of the United States. Prior to going to Stanford...more
More about Richard A. Posner...
A Failure of Capitalism: The Crisis of '08 and the Descent Into Depression The Little Book of Plagiarism Economic Analysis of Law Overcoming Law Law and Literature

Share This Book

“But the fact that judges follow precedent regularly even though not invariably does not support the legalistic theory as strongly as one might expect. The original precedent in a line of precedents could not have been based on precedent.” 1 likes
“I do not apologize for these terms or, more generally, for discussing judicial thinking in a vocabulary alien to most judges and lawyers. Judicial behavior cannot be understood in the vocabulary that judges themselves use, sometimes mischievously. (11)” 0 likes
More quotes…