Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court” as Want to Read:
The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court

4.06  ·  Rating Details ·  13,047 Ratings  ·  1,942 Reviews
In The Nine, acclaimed journalist Jeffrey Toobin takes us into the chambers of the most important—and secret—legal body in our country, the Supreme Court, revealing the complex dynamic among the nine people who decide the law of the land. An institution at a moment of transition, the Court now stands at a crucial point, with major changes in store on such issues as abortio ...more
Hardcover, 384 pages
Published September 18th 2007 by Doubleday (first published 2007)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Dec 03, 2008 Jessica rated it really liked it
Recommends it for: young ladies thoughtlessly considering a thankless career in social work
Recommended to Jessica by: david giltinan; ginnie jones; paul glusman
WELL. How I wish I'd had the foresight, at a much younger and more capable age, to consult some kind of career counselor! If only, if ONLY someone back then had the wisdom and charity to inform me of the existence of something called "constitutional law," and advised me to study hard, behave myself, keep my mouth shut, make influential friends, and avoid leaving a drunken trail of scribbled opinions about all my personal and political views as I careened helter-skelter along a haphazard career p ...more
Jun 20, 2011 David rated it it was amazing
It’s certainly not outside of the realm of possibility that I am deluded. Completely and utterly deluded. Nevertheless, I have always held the American judiciary in much greater esteem than either the executive or legislative branches of government for several reasons—but most persuasive among them is my firm belief that the judiciary is the best situated to transcend workaday partisan politics.

Sure, judges are appointed by partisan politicians for partisan reasons. Therefore, they are functions
Feb 08, 2008 mike rated it it was ok
"This book is based principally on my interviews with the justices and more than seventy-five of their law clerks," author Jeffrey Toobin writes in his notes that close the book. "The interviews were on a not-for-attribution basis -- that is, I could use the information provided but without quoting directly or identifying the source."

If you read the book back-to-front -- like the apocryphal politicos who look for their names in the index before reading a book -- you'll see the problem with this
Oct 02, 2008 Kate rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Chris Michaud
3.5 stars. This book is really about the political trajectory of the Supreme Court over the past 30 years. Toobin seeks to show a gradual, unlikely shift leftward over the years of the Rehnquist Court (followed by a striking and uncharacteristically - for the institution - speedy swing back to the right since the Roberts and Alito confirmations).

Not exactly a work of rigorous scholarship, so don't read it if you want a primer on important cases (though Toobin does a good job describing, in plain
Jun 01, 2012 Janice rated it really liked it
In law school I had one of the most sadistic, demanding and universally feared professors in the entire school for Constitutional Law, which is probably the most important class in law school. The first day of class he called me an idiot and told me I didn’t know how to read. For the next few weeks of the semester, he regularly berated me for my ignorance and ineptitude (which in retrospect, I fully deserved), but I got off easy (he stopped abusing me after a few weeks once I adapted my schoolwo ...more
Peggy bill
Aug 29, 2008 Peggy bill rated it really liked it
In the past, whenever I have gotten sick or scared about the direction of politics in this country, I have comforted myself with the idea that our governmental balance of power mediates abrupt shifts to the right (I am not worried about abrupt shifts to the left, as the country is generally too far to right already). I didn’t have hope in the Supreme Court, but I did have faith in their moderating effect on law and society.

That was until the presidential election of 2000. I was disgusted by a st
Jul 31, 2008 Nate rated it it was ok
The author discusses the Court from about 1980 to 2007. He wants to show how politics influences the rulings of the Court, but while reading the book I was struck by the degree to which politics had influenced his writing. He wears his bias on his sleeve, which makes this book a less than reliable source of Court information. He portrays the justices with whom he disagrees as petty, rude ideologues, while portraying the justices with whom he agrees as compassionate, intelligent, and most importa ...more
Dec 02, 2012 Carol rated it really liked it
You've got to love book group and you have to doubly love a non-fiction book group. If not for this group of wonderful people I might never have read The Nine. And I meant THE NINE... I'm mediocre when it comes to following our government. I'm not the worse when it comes to current events but I knew my reading group had it all over me. All the more fun as they had the background and could fill in questions that came up.

What I liked about The Nine was the way Jeffrey Toobin gave us snapshots of m
Feb 25, 2016 Mahlon rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: read-2016
The Nine offers the reader a peek behind the curtains at the latter days of the Rehnquist court. The book is a good combination of pen portraits of the justices combined with explanations of the landmark cases they decided during this time, and often the legal sparring behind those decisions. The centerpiece is the most elucidating account of Bush v. Gore that I've read! This section elevates The Nine to one of the cornerstone books on the Supreme Court. It may feel dated now that many of the Ju ...more
some editing and additions 7/22/10

Toobin does a great job in detailing the personalities of the justices and how they shape the court. Thomas is the most interesting, perhaps. A man obviously bitter about the cards he has been dealt, he holds grudges seemingly forever, even disdaining Yale Law School, his alma mater; yet, he is very well liked and has lots of friends on and off the court. (Scalia, asked once for the difference between himself and Thomas, replied, "I am an originalist; he's a nut
Apr 26, 2016 Matt rated it liked it
This isn't The Brethren. That should be made clear from the start. Bob Woodward's book on the United State Supreme Court's 1969-75 terms is, in my mind, a classic. I've never read a better, more entertaining, more detailed book on the Supreme Court's inner workings. It also gives a glimpse of an interesting moment in legal history, as the progressive years of the Warren Court ended, and a gradual rightward shift began (despite, rather than because, of the incompetence of Warren Burger).

Apr 28, 2013 Lightreads rated it liked it
Sadly not the trashy gossip fest I was in the mood for. I wanted either another hundred pages discussing the court's role in the political system and propounding a new theory of case analysis, or I wanted some juicy judicial sexploits. Sadly, I got neither. The "revelations" in this book are nothing new if you pay a little attention to the court – Scalia and Ginsburg were besties, Thomas has a bizarre and alarming worldview, etc.

Still, the lay reader would probably enjoy this as a portrait of pe
Jan 25, 2008 David rated it really liked it
Shelves: read-in-2008
This is an excellent book. Toobin exhibits all the qualities one could want in a guide to the Supreme Court: he is smart, knowledgeable, engaging, witty, and writes clearly and fluidly.

This is a well-organized, well-written book on a fascinating and important subject. Remarkably, it is never dull - parts I found particularly notable were his account of the Court's role in the 2000 election debacle, and his explanation of how Sandra Day O' Connor became the most influential justice on the court.
Jul 06, 2009 Seth rated it liked it
Interesting survey of the modern supreme court's history and personalities. The author pretends to write balanced even handed biographical sketches of a number of supreme court justices during the Bush years. He has a hard time veiling his distaste for conservative ideology while praising "moderate" justices like O'Conner for her "diplomatic" and "pragmatic" judicial view. He seems to spend by far more time on her than all the others combined. He believes that she was the most influential justic ...more
Oct 04, 2007 Ira rated it really liked it
Toobin's book, as mentioned in some of the other reviews, is highly readable, captivating and contains very good summaries of many of the important Supreme Court cases of the last few decades. Perhaps as important is his ability to write about the Jurist's personalities and their judicial philosophy providing the reader with the thought processes that go to work behind the decision making.

The inner workings and day to day activity of the Court was something I found quite interesting. The Jurist
Dec 21, 2015 Alisa rated it it was amazing
I really enjoyed this audio book. Well-researched, relatively balanced, and an intimate look at the way the Supreme Court operates. Interesting to consider how this impacts (or doesn't) daily American life. It makes me wonder more about the clerking culture, and certainly will be interesting to see how the next iteration of the court, with Kagan and Sotomayor, will change the dynamics. The court will never be a microcosm of society, its functions and functionaries will always be part of our most ...more
Debbie "DJ"
May 03, 2014 Debbie "DJ" rated it it was amazing
Shelves: non-fiction
Really well written. Not at all dry or boring, really gave me a look into our Supreme Court. This book was written in 2007, so two of the justices have changed, but still an awesome read. The different personalities, and cases, shed so much light on the inner workings of our highest court.
Jul 24, 2008 Tracy rated it it was amazing
I had given this book to my partner, who hadn't read it. . . So I picked it up.

It feels really strange to say this was a guilty pleasure, but it was!

What, a non-fiction work about the Supreme Court a guilty pleasure??? Well, it was! It is extremely accessible (perhaps too accessible?), and the position Toobin takes on any issue coincides pretty closely to mine, so that made it even easier to read.

The general pictures of the book is an insider's look at the Supreme Court from roughly the mid 1980
Oct 28, 2007 Jeff rated it it was amazing
Recommends it for: everyone
Jeffrey Toobin’s The Nine is an incredibly well written book. If you’re a follower of the Supreme Court and acquainted with terms like Casey, Lawrence, or Hamdan you won’t be able to put the book down. If these cases are new to you, then you are in for quite an education on the true workings of the third coequal branch of the federal government. One criticism of Toobin’s style is that he doesn’t go into enough detail on the legal reasoning or merits of the cases. The book reads more like a novel ...more
Oct 13, 2007 Michael rated it really liked it
The book offered some good (and at times, juicy) insights into the Court that I was not previously aware of. It is a compelling tale and analysis of the Court’s recent history from prominent cases to the nominations of the justices to judicial politics.

The unfortunate side effect of this was again feeling the anguish that accompanied some vile and lawless decisions; most of all, Bush v. Gore. The naked desire on the part of the five that made the majority in that case to act as speedily as poss
Mar 05, 2011 Caroline rated it really liked it
Shelves: own
A fascinating look at the Supreme Court and its justices.

I learned a lot (not that I was too knowledgable to begin with) about the ins and outs of the modern-day Supreme Court, from the procedures to the personalities that make it up. Before reading it, I expected Toobin to begin his narrative early in American history, so I was pleasantly surprised that it dealt with the Court's most recent history. I also appreciated how Toobin constructed his narrative, with a good mixture of anecdotes about
Jun 04, 2016 Regan rated it really liked it
Ostensibly this is a book about the Supreme Court's most recent era of stability--the 10 year long period in which no new Justices were appointed (approx 1994-2005). Even for those familiar with major court rulings during the period this is a helpful text, as it situates the Justices politically and personally within the context of the rulings, and provides sharp and (generally) fair analyses of the same.

But the real claim of the book goes much deeper, and builds slowly: Toobin calls into questi
Mar 19, 2012 Matt rated it really liked it
This wasn't what I thought it was going to be; rather than some sweeping history of the Supreme Court, the author opts for an in-depth telling of the slice of time where the Rehnquist court became the Roberts court. Probably a wise choice, and you get the sense that, by telling the story of this court and several appointments, you have pretty much heard most of the history, in some sense.

I probably shouldn't have been reading this at the same time as Keith Richards' autobiography since there wer
Jul 26, 2016 Cami rated it liked it
I guess I was expecting this to be more journalistic and less dramatic. While very interesting and well written you cannot say that this is an objective view of the Supreme Court, its members, or its role in our government. Written during the George W. Bush presidency, with hindsight it is humorous that the author was so concerned that the SCOTUS was becoming too conservative - ha!
Jun 16, 2008 Andrew rated it liked it
Shelves: history-skim
More of a liberal rant about the Roberts Court than an impartial history or analysis. It is aggravatingly and stupendously biased. When my blood cools perhaps I will read some more.

(For the record, I am neither a knee-jerk liberal nor an arch-conservative; I am an independent with libertarian leanings. However, in the realm of the law, my feelings align much more with "conservatives", in that I believe that judicial restraint must be the sine qua non of the legal system. The unelected judiciary
Sep 10, 2008 Armand rated it really liked it
I’m not sure exactly what it says about me that the first book I picked up post-Bar Exam was Toobin’s accounting of the modern Supreme Court; regardless, I’m glad that I did. This well-researched accounting of Rehnquist’s reign is a fun survey of the politically and socially significant cases over the last thirty years. All the issues are here: abortion, the death penalty, affirmative action, privacy, Congress’s power to regulate commerce, the role of foreign law, the war on terror, and, of cour ...more
Emma Deplores Goodreads Censorship
This is an informative and engaging account of the recent history of the U.S. Supreme Court. Perhaps not a subject that holds 340 pages' worth of interest for the general public, but those who have an interest are almost certain to find this one worth their while.

The Nine takes the form of a narrative, starting in the Reagan years and ending in 2007; Toobin discusses major cases that reached the Court during that time, as well as the individual justices' decision-making processes and personaliti
Sep 07, 2016 Bruce rated it really liked it
This book is a highly readable look at mostly the Rehnquist Supreme Court. It was interesting to me that former Justices retain office space and still have an effect on current justices and cases. Toobin is very sympathetic to the personalities on the Court, and it was interesting to hear about Sandra Day O’Connor, David Souter, and Anthony Kennedy. Even Clarence Thomas gets a sympathetic look. These people could be faulted for individual decisions but the author wants us to know that they are t ...more
Sep 24, 2016 Mitchell rated it it was amazing
This was a extraordinary read. It is a bit dated, but most of the cases discussed like abortion, campaign finance, religious freedom and affirmative action will surely be argued anew in the near furture. Mr. Toobin writes well, and he engages the reader with his anecdotes. For the lay person, this is a perfect book for a overview of the modern Supreme Court. Reccomended.
Jul 23, 2011 Kurt rated it it was amazing
This book is fascinating, instructive, and entertaining. Since my first week as a Harvard Law student, I have had a deep skepticism about the Supreme Court. I have scowled with frustration while writing nasty notes in the margins of my casebooks because justices were babbling on and on about strict scrutiny and penumbra and other judicial nonsense when I had the distinct feeling that they were simply trying to justify the outcome that they believed was the most just. I am a political liberal, an ...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
  • Becoming Justice Blackmun: Harry Blackmun's Supreme Court Journey
  • The Brethren: Inside the Supreme Court
  • Supreme Conflict: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Control of the United States Supreme Court
  • Justice for All: Earl Warren and the Nation He Made
  • Scorpions: The Battles and Triumphs of FDR's Great Supreme Court Justices
  • A People's History of the Supreme Court: The Men and Women Whose Cases and Decisions Have Shaped Our Constitution
  • The Dark Side: The Inside Story of How the War on Terror Turned Into a War on American Ideals
  • Making Our Democracy Work: A Judge's View
  • The Supreme Court: The Personalities and Rivalries That Defined America
  • Closed Chambers: The Rise, Fall, and Future of the Modern Supreme Court
  • Supreme Power: Franklin Roosevelt vs. the Supreme Court
  • Gideon's Trumpet
  • The Majesty of the Law: Reflections of a Supreme Court Justice
  • Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America's Struggle for Equality
  • Angler: The Cheney Vice Presidency
  • The Supreme Court
  • Justice Brennan: Liberal Champion
  • Five Chiefs: A Supreme Court Memoir
Lawyer, author, legal correspondent for CNN and The New Yorker magazine.
More about Jeffrey Toobin...

Share This Book

No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »

“He denounced self-pity and pitied himself.” 1 likes
“on the government” 0 likes
More quotes…