Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Rise of the Novel” as Want to Read:
The Rise of the Novel
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Rise of the Novel

3.81 of 5 stars 3.81  ·  rating details  ·  412 ratings  ·  30 reviews
"The Rise of the Novel is Ian Watt's classic description of the interworkings of social conditions, changing attitudes, and literary practices during the period when the novel emerged as the dominant literary form of the individualist era. Erudite, yet gracefully written and often amusing, Watt's study examines the nature of the novel audience, the role of the book trade, ...more
Paperback, 319 pages
Published 1957 by University of California Press
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Rise of the Novel, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Rise of the Novel

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 948)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Paul Bryant
O unread novelists don’t stare at me so
I’ve every intention to give you a go

Now no one should be forced to
Read any Paul Auster
And I think Malcolm Lowry
Is a little too flowery
And I couldn’t give a duck
About Pearl S. Buck
But I should have read a heck of
A lot more of Chekhov
And I find myself inchin
Towards Thomas Pynchon
(But Chimamanda Adiche
Is she really that peachy?
And does Joyce Carol Oates
Still float all my boats?
Is there now a gulf
Between me and Tom Wolfe?)

My relatives frighten
Me with Michael C
This is Dale Spender talking about this book: ‘He devotes three hundred pages to male novelists and restricts his assessment of females to a single sentence: ‘‘The majority of eighteenth century novels were actually written by women.’’

This is the jacket blurb for Watt's book:

"The Rise of the Novel is Ian Watt's classic description of the interworkings of social conditions, changing attitudes, and literary practices during the period when the novel emerged as the dominant literary form of the in
The rise of the novel, according to Ian Watt, coincides with the arrival of philosophical realism, or more specifically the naïve realism generally associated with British empiricism. In the empirical-realist philosophy of John Locke, for instance, the notion of innate ideas (a priori, foundational knowledge) is cast aside in favour of an inductive method and knowledge founded exclusively on experience. This development, Watt explains, slowly filtered into the new economic and largely Puritan mi ...more
Justin Evans
In some senses, I guess this book is out of date. Watt deals with the most influential early English novelists, while taking care to show that they probably weren't 'Novelists' as we think of them today. He's not interested in expanding the canon, or arguing that less influential writers are better than his chosen three (Defoe, Richardson and Fielding). He doesn't focus on gender, or race, or class. He doesn't try to uncover inconsistencies within the novels he writes about. There's no political ...more
Some reasons for my ug-ness.

1. Anyone which makes some random comparison to D. W. Griffith's skill in moviemaking (when it doesn't really have that much to do with the subject at hand) to show off your knowledge just shows you're a racist.

2. I hate books which assume everything ends and begins with England and dead white men and ignores the rest of the world and the other genders.
It's a good reference book for those who are interested in the "rise of the novel" (in 18th century England to be precise). Even though it was written 50 years ago, it is still relevant in novel studies and also accessible for the non-academic. Watt focuses on three authors: Defoe, Fielding, and Richardson, and he also expands on the religious, economic, and social factors which enabled the popularity of the novel and the changes which the novel brought forth in terms of plot and characters. Whi ...more
In this book, Watt investigates the origins of the early British novel by combining the formalist methodologies of The New Criticism (in its heyday when the book was published) with historical analysis. He argues that the novel emerges as the consequence of a distinctly new set of social and economic conditions associated with the advent of Western Modernity: the individualist orientation initiated by the Reformation and the writings of Locke & Descartes (as opposed to the traditionalism of ...more
The Rise of the Novel by Ian Watt is a classical study of history of the novel, or it is better to say its genesis in England. Watt analyzes three main English novelists in the advent of narrative fiction: Samuel Richardson, Daniel Defoe, and Henry Fielding. He also explains different types of their narration type from historical, sociological, economical, and biographical aspects while comparing and contrasting their themes and techniques of narration. This book is a good beginning to study the ...more
A seminal (rather than ovular) text in the study of the origins of the novel. Watt ties the origins to boys and the emergence of what he calls formal realism. This linking lets him focus on Defoe as a slightly inept progenitor whose economic individualism allows him to write in almost granular detail about the lives of his protagonists, insofar as those lives are connected to material goods. So the big hits here are Crusoe and, especially, Moll Flanders. It is when Watt turns to Richardson, espe ...more
A very compelling take on the history of the novel, both readable and sophisticated, if a bit dated. It's not just for scholars, which is probably why its lost some of its once daring critical lustre.

Watt sees the prime feature of the early novel (he begins it in the 18th Century, as opposed to those who date it back to DON QUIXOTE) as formal realism, and that this is an epistemological shift from the earlier allegories and romances. Its clear his sympathies lie with Defoe and Richardson, partic
I think Watt is unfairly maligned. Sure, he didn't pay enough attention to women novelists. Sure, some of his theses are overstated. But, seriously, 50+ years after this was written, it is STILL inspiring and thought provoking. Watt is a towering grandfather of the field on novel studies, and the fact that we're still chasing down his hypotheses speaks to the power of this book. It is damn thought provoking, and I find myself wondering and thinking about the ways that he has constructed the rise ...more
finally finished this. main claim: lowest common denominator of the novel is its formal realism. this is what separates the novel from other literature (tragedy, comedy, poetry) : its emphasis on the ordinary. defoe, richardson, and fielding, as early progenitors of the novel, all have very different methods of reflecting the world, but they are not necessarily opposing methods, as all are realist approaches. as such, they can be seen as early exemplars/models of the variants of realism that hav ...more
Zachary Hudson
I read this book on the recommendation of a history professor to use in a paper I wrote on the effect of novels on society. Ian Watt brought some interested points to the table, but failed to satisfy all the possibilities of novel's emergence and impact.
The language is generally clear, but instead of making his points clear-cut he alludes to further expansions developed later in the text that end up leaving the reader slightly dismayed at a lack of coherency. By spreading out his arguments, Watt
Feb 26, 2015 Jeremy marked it as to-read  ·  review of another edition
See here for an argument that the novel is Protestant art.
First of all, this book is definitely out-dated; it's a little sexist and Robinson Crusoe's desire for only a male slave as company just demands a queer reading, I think. That said, I thought the analysis of the circumstances leading to the rise of the novel was interesting, and the historical perspective is still relevant (though actual statistics not so much). I was less convinced by Watt's readings of the novels of Defoe, Richardson, and Fielding, buuuuuut I haven't read a single novel by any ...more
Hannah Givens
This is an engaging book about three of the very first novelists: Defoe, Richardson, and Fielding. It's systematic and easy to follow, but with a lot of content.

It is somewhat out of date, and cluelessly blinkered as far as material outside the white male canon, but it's still a foundational work in the field. It's worth expanding and modifying by those who've come afterward, not throwing out altogether. Much of the following research has done just that - expanded and modified.

I just skimmed the
This book is surprisingly readable. I was a bit frustrated that he set out to argue why Richardson is a more influential writer than Fielding, but he's made me a convert. I still prefer Fielding, but his points are well-argued with clear examples. I wish he'd chosen to write more on Sterne as his thoughts there were fascinating and, as a big Austen fan, I of course loved his assertion that she was the first author to bring the different types of realism of Fielding and Richardson together into a ...more
Terrific introduction to the early novels, very readable ...
Very interesting stuff. Even if one disagrees with some of Watt's conclusions, the text is still quite valuable for its readable and brisk delivery of historical information and neat readings of three authors who, for all their importance, probably aren't on the top of anyone's 'to-read' list.
Pater Edmund
A really brilliantly insightful and balanced analysis of the modern novel and its connection to modern individualism--both economic/social and philosophical. Watts is obviously highly influenced by Max Weber; he is I suppose a materialist of sorts, but not aggressively reductionist.
Jul 01, 2008 Julie marked it as to-read  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: own-in-library
For a class on The English Novel. I don't know that I'll be reading this all the way through. Only a short part of it is assigned for the class, and I may dip through the rest of it now and again. These lit crit/theory/history books are interesting to me, but they're also very slow going.
Super useful for those who are not experts in 18th century lit, chock full of interesting social/historical information, and downright compelling in an old-school way.
Defoe is miserly.
Richardson is sentimental.
Fielding is rakish.
Sterne combined Richardson & Fielding.
Defoe reads like a deposition.
Andee Nero
This book is a classic, but, like Michael McKeon has also criticized, it could stand to be more steeped in historical context.
How the novel as genre came into being in western literature.
a very helpful reference for the rise of the novel
Kyle Muntz
maybe closer to 2 stars, i don't know
Dense and dry, but quite interesting.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 31 32 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Desire and Domestic Fiction: A Political History of the Novel
  • The Sense of an Ending: Studies in the Theory of Fiction
  • The Country and the City
  • The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition
  • Axel's Castle: A Study of the Imaginative Literature of 1870-1930
  • Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature
  • The Theory of the Novel
  • The Rhetoric of Fiction
  • The Oxford Companion to English Literature
  • The Liberal Imagination: Essays on Literature and Society
  • Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays
  • The Machine in the Garden: Technology and the Pastoral Ideal in America
  • Seven Types of Ambiguity
  • The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays
  • Sexual/Textual Politics: Feminist Literary Theory
  • The Pound Era
  • Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method
  • A Poetics of Postmodernism
نظریه‌های رمان: از رئالیسم تا پسامدرنیسم Myths of Modern Individualism: Faust, Don Quixote, Don Juan, Robinson Crusoe Conrad in the Nineteenth Century Jane Austen (20th Century Views) Nostromo

Share This Book