Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Mortals” as Want to Read:
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview


3.7 of 5 stars 3.70  ·  rating details  ·  375 ratings  ·  52 reviews
Through lives lived ardently in an unforgiving land--Botswana--"Mortals" examines with wit and insight the dilemmas of power, religion, rebellion, and contending versions of liberation and love.
Paperback, 736 pages
Published July 13th 2004 by Vintage Books (first published May 27th 2003)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Mortals, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Mortals

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 1,087)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Oct 31, 2011 Lobstergirl rated it 2 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Betty Loren-Maltese
Shelves: own, fiction
Two stars because:
1. The author insists on using the term "pubic escutcheon" several times.
2. The book is 400 pages too long.
3. Lots and lots of cringeworthy sex and anatomy talk. Both our protagonist, Ray, and his wife, Iris, sometimes refer to her pubic region as her "shame."
4. Ray, a CIA agent in Botswana undercover as a college professor, is hopelessly, embarrassingly, relentlessly, exhaustingly uxorious.
5. Ray and Iris are obsessed with the cutesiness of their inside jokes, puns, and aphori
Apr 04, 2011 Sam rated it 4 of 5 stars
Shelves: novels
James Wood might argue that big books transcend their shortcomings - whatever that particular plea for ambition really means - but Mortals has a few, of which one is its sheer length. True, this novel about a small-time CIA agent/professor in Botswana and his long-suffering, possibly cheating wife does a great many things, but not enough to justify being 700+ pages long. The pages on religion, for instance, are great, especially a recorded debate between a militant atheist and an agnostic social ...more
Norman Rush is irrevocably added to my personal list of all-time great writers. For those who enjoy long, wandering pieces of dialog and introspection, I think Rush will endear himself to you permanently as well. The wonderful thing is, though his protagonists are wordy in their mental peregrinations, the plots of both of his novels (Mortals and Mating) kept me on the edge of my seat until the very end, at which point they both made me cry. Rush's genius, I think, is that he is concerned with tw ...more
Rossandra White
My daughter-in-law turned me on to this book; she thought I would enjoy it because it was set in Botswana. That was definitely part of my enjoyment. It took me back to my childhood, when Botswana was Bechuanaland. But it was Norman Rush's seductive writing that captured and entranced me. How does he do it, I kept asking myself, how is he able to just keep going inside a character's head, off on tangents not related to plot or to moving the story forward, making a point over and over again in dif ...more
One could be forgiven for picking up a 700+ page tome detailing a white CIA agent’s musings about, among other things, liberal guilt and the impenetrability of Botswanan culture to a western outsider and thinking, “You navel-gazing ass,” but it would be mistake to discard this book so quickly. This is an easier book to admire than to love, but I liked it very, very much.

While this is perhaps the single most masculine novel I’ve ever read – even aside from the guns and competition for labia rende
Welcome to the mind palace of Ray Finch. It is obsessive and intellectual and full of quotes that non-academics will find annoying. And it is utterly charming in its weaknesses, namely its abiding love for Iris, his wife, and in its strengths, its amusing combinations of curse words: "...anything like this hellfuckshit hell going on."

Norman Rush has a truly amazing gift of writing us deep into the minds and lives of hyper-intelligent, politically involved, and normally neurotic people. I thank h
Steve Mayer
The reviews were mostly correct: this is not as good as Mating. To me, at least, that's because one of its central subjects (for at least the first part of the book) is religion. Indeed, there are about twenty pages of dialog about Christ as a Jew that is the most boring interlude about religion since the Grand Inquisitor scene in The Brothers K. More fundamentally, the two halves of the book don't hang together very well. Once Ray goes into the wild the focus of the book changes from his intera ...more
Siddharth Manay
I didn't know what to think about this book; I still don't. I'm glad that I've read it, but I'm not in a rush to read more by Norman Rush, and I'd think a bit before recommending it to someone. It would depend on what you wanted from a book.

It's about a CIA contractor in Botswana; but Rush is not like Clancy or LeCarre at all. I think he belongs in a category with Wolfe, DeLillo, or maybe Updike, because he writes about modern Men... but unlike the others, his Men aren't unreconstructed jerks, a
Sheila Grinell
Rush's "Mating" took my breath away. Reading this book was like drinking at the well a second time--a good, long draft but not as refreshing.

"Mortals" immerses you in Ray Finch's head, and it's an interesting one--he's an American Milton scholar working as a teacher (and covertly for the CIA) in Botswana on the eve of revolution in neighboring South Africa. Finch perseverates endlessly. He worries that his beloved wife may be having an affair with her shrink, and he takes off across the desert
Al Sevcik
The writing and sentence structure is a bit unnerving at first until one realizes that most of what is going on is inside Ray’s mind. And Ray is a compulsive analyzer of detail. The story is placed in Botswana by an author who clearly knew the country well. Ray is a school teacher, but he also leads a secret life – that turns out not to be much of a secret. The plot develops too slowly for my taste, though there are interesting twists. The descriptions of the country, the land, the people, the s ...more
Perry Whitford
Ray Finch is a contracted CIA man called in Africa, working under cover as a school teacher in Botswana, neighbour to South africa and the communist ANC, the most significant communist battleground after the fall of the Berlin Wall and the dismantling of the USSR. Botswana is a country which "was working, in a continent where almost nothing else was." Things are about the stop working for him though, both in his work and his home life as he loses respect for the methods of his superior and start ...more
This book is both a psychological study of the break-up of a marriage and an action-thriller. Jay Finch is a spy and a teacher in Botswana but what he really wants to do is write poetry. Rush captures the feelings and conversations between husband and wife, a thousand changes of mood and feelings within each conversation.

The 'action' in the middle of the book moves it along well enough, and while there are some crazy scenes, it weakens the plot. Jay becomes more of himself - neurotic and paranoi
Ben Bush
There's some pretty great descriptions of being in love in here, both the good and the bad parts of it. Rush also has a habit of including more terrible puns than the plot necessitates. I found the book more emotionally engaging than I expected and also almost shockingly traditional in terms of literary style. Rush's depiction of Botswana is an interesting one but, with the exception of Kerekang, it mostly evades having to delve into much characterization of the locals. It's a fast read at 700 p ...more
Stephanie Henkel
This book might have been interesting for its insight into the politics and country of Botswana if it hadn't been filled with page after page of repetitive and boring discourse. How many ways can one say the same thing? Ask Norman Rush and he will give you a quick 25 page answer. I kept hoping that I'd like it better, but in the end my feeling was that it was not particularly interesting and not particularly entertaining. It's not often that I skip pages of a book, but in reading this book, I st ...more
Another interesting psychological exploration by Rush... however the plot really gets in the way, at times. There is a 300 page digression of questionable value and relevance. My impression of this section is that it was included to position the book to be made into a movie. It is possible I didn't appreciate this part of the book b/c I skimmed it so fast-- but it was very hard to get interested in it given the other things happening.

The portrayal of the breakdown of the marriage is compelling
Benjamin Siegel
Not nearly as good as Mating, but stunning writing at points, and a reasonably compelling intrigue at the center of the story. First half is tremendous, as is the coda at the end; action scenes towards the last third are less compelling.
Norman Rush is a tragic figure. In better times he would have been an American Maupassant, but now he is just a domesticated bear with a funny hat doing a stupid dance to amuse us.
I couldn't finish this book, but wish I could have - the premise is very interesting - a scholar in Botswana who is really CIA agent struggling with his career, philosophical issues about race, religion and life, his overwhelming love for his wife .... it is NOT a spy type thriller at all. Rather, it is very intellectual - and at times, the long-ish conversations between people on philosophy just seemed totally out of synch with rest of book's plot.... and it was just more than I could finish. B ...more
I gave up after 300 pages of this 700 page book. I might have become interested in the characters or even the plot if the characters had been explored at more depth and if there had been a plot that was not constantly interrupted by excessively long rants on everything from AIDS to religion (a full chapter of this one) to race relations.
I was a little skeptical about this one for a hundred pages or so. It seemed like the main character was self-absorbed and paranoid and lots of other things. And, it turns out, he is, which eventually makes this really enjoyable. Hard to read maybe sometimes but only because you have so much invested in the characters. It's sort of interesting how I didn't really like the main character all that much most of the time but I ended up being really attached to him anyway. Somehow the book manages to ...more
I'm not sure how I feel about this book. I finished it last night, but I skipped almost 200 pages in the middle. I just really needed to know whether the protagonist's wife was cheating on him.
There's a 300 page chuck in the middle where the relationship plot gets put on hold while 'things happen in Africa,' and I didn't have the patience. That part of the plot was just moving too slowly - and with little context.
On the other hand, the details of the dying marriage seemed to be just right - and
Forrest Link
Rush makes a man's love for his wife palpable.
Wendy Mathewson
I read Mating a few years back and thoroughly enjoyed it, so was looking forward to Mortals. I didn't make it. After 300-400 pages, I had to return it to the library. It's heft made it a bit of a drag to read in bed (my only reading place apres le bebe)--but I could have overcome that if the narrative had pulled me along. It had occasional amusing shades of Our Man in Havana (small time spy, expat experience, funny), but was mostly a lot more information than I needed to know about the protagoni ...more
Bob Reutenauer
Rush knows Botswana very well it is easy to see. He also knows the emotional world of long term marriage partners. And he knows the outlines of a low key LeCarre style plot setting a minor CIA officer among a shifting alliance of political and religious rebels in Southern Africa around the time of Mandela release. Long book 700 pages.. not a page turner. Heavyweight. This book will be read for a long time.
Gets silly halfway through.
Michelle Leberfeld
If you read Rush's "Mating" back in the day and absolutely adored it, you'll enjoy this followup. It's so many things but essentially a story about a love triangle among American expats in Sub-Saharan Africa just after the USSR crumbled and just before Mandela was elected. Warning: if you dislike characters who over think everything, run screaming.
Charles Finch
Some books are imperfect and you give them five stars anyway, because they're extraordinary enough that their imperfections don't ultimately reduce their impact. MORTALS is like that to me - aspects of its story of a marriage of two Americans in Botswana irritated me, but it's such an intelligent and interesting book that it didn't really matter in the end. I'll wanr people that it's slow in parts, though the last third goes by incredibly fast...
I was happy to see Mortals at the library, after enjoying Norman Rush's first novel, Mating, so much. The first 2/3 of Mortals took me forever to read - I couldn't relate to the characters and did not find them likeable. But I found myself thinking about them a lot in spite of that, so it seemed worth continuing on. When the plot finally picked up, reading the story became enjoyable. I love Rush's use of language and moments of absurd humor.
This was part of my reading in prep for my trip to southern Africa. The first third of the book was very slow reading with way too much philosophizing. It did not really connect well to the rest of the book. Once the protagonist got out into the bush and into some trouble it was much more interesting to me. It did provide me with some beginning understanding of the culture, politics and geography of the region.
Kimberly Uchimura
The story was good but way too long. The characters might have been engaging if it weren't for my boredom with the length of every description, which had too much interior dialogue and not enough about surroundings, reactions of others, etc. If the author's goal was to show how the protagonist was too wrapped up in himself, he nailed it. I did not like this book well enough to recommend it to anyone else.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 36 37 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • American Genius
  • Twilight of the Superheroes
  • Varieties of Disturbance
  • Your Face Tomorrow, Vol. 2: Dance and Dream
  • The Last Samurai
  • Zone
  • Imaginings of Sand
  • Running
  • Dancing Lessons for the Advanced in Age
  • The Year of Reading Proust: A Memoir in Real Time
  • Algerian White: A Narrative
  • Vera
  • The Return Of The Sorcerer: The Best Of Clark Ashton Smith
  • The Ruin of Kasch
  • The Darling
  • The Golden Age
  • The Maltese Manuscript (A Karen Pelletier Mystery #5)
  • David's Story
Norman Rush (born October 24, 1933 in Oakland, California) is an American novelist whose introspective novels and short stories are set in Botswana in the 1980s. He is the son of Roger and Leslie (Chesse) Rush. He was the recipient of the 1991 National Book Award and the 1992 Irish Times/Aer Lingus International Fiction Prize for his novel Mating.

Rush was born in San Francisco and graduated from S
More about Norman Rush...
Mating Subtle Bodies Whites Tropic Moon The Victim

Share This Book

“Small breasts are best for the long haul.” 3 likes
More quotes…