Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “On Being Certain: Believing You Are Right Even When You're Not” as Want to Read:
On Being Certain: Believing You Are Right Even When You're Not
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating

On Being Certain: Believing You Are Right Even When You're Not

3.86 of 5 stars 3.86  ·  rating details  ·  872 ratings  ·  81 reviews
You recognize when you know something for certain, right? You "know" the sky is blue, or that the traffic light had turned green, or where you were on the morning of September 11, 2001--you know these things, well, because you just do.

In On Being Certain, neurologist Robert Burton challenges the notions of how we think about what we know. He shows that the feeling of certa...more
Hardcover, 272 pages
Published February 5th 2008 by St. Martin's Press
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about On Being Certain, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about On Being Certain

Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality by Eliezer YudkowskyGödel, Escher, Bach by Douglas R. HofstadterThe Selfish Gene by Richard DawkinsThinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel KahnemanThe Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams
Ravenclaw's Rationality
16th out of 46 books — 29 voters
What's Behind Your Belly Button? A Psychological Perspective ... by Martha Char LoveThe Blank Slate by Steven PinkerStrangers to Ourselves by Timothy D. WilsonDescartes' Error by Antonio R. DamasioIn Two Minds by Jonathan St.B.T. Evans
Social Animal
35th out of 76 books — 15 voters

More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Dec 29, 2011 Richard rated it 2 of 5 stars
Recommended to Richard by: Lena Phoenix
It is always somewhat astonishing when an intelligent author manages to make an interesting topic dull.

The unassailable certainty exhibited by ideologues of many varieties lies behind many of the world's political and cultural problems. One would expect that an examination of how such certainty develops and how one might avoid the traps this entails.

Burton has one good punch: he hammers home that the feeling of knowing is a feeling like any other: not really very amenable to rational understandi...more
I was totally in love with this book when I first picked it up. Just saw it on the shelf, started browsing it, and couldn't put it down. A neurologist who is also a novelist, who has a lifelong interest in existential questions and wrote essays on William James in college? Dude! It seemed like we should be BFF.
Unfortunately, I found myself increasingly irritated with the book, and have gone from recommending it to everyone I see to only giving it 3 stars.
The author starts with a fascinating pre...more
I'll start this review with a quote from the back of the book, since it explains the premise better than I can:

"In On Being Certain, neurologist Robert Burton challenges the notions of how we think about what we know. He shows that the feeling of certainty we have when we "know" something comes from sources beyond our control and knowledge. In fact, certainty is a mental sensation, rather than evidence of fact. Because this "feeling of knowing" seems like confirmation of knowledge, we tend to th...more
Jacob J
I really thought I was going to like this book because I enjoy epistemology and cognitive science. And yet, I only made it about 2/3 of the way through the book before I gave up. It was not so much that it was boring as that it was frustrating. The main problem I had was that this book does not present scientific evidence and talk about implications or possible interpretations. Rather, it presents the author's theory about the existence and function of what he calls "the feeling of knowing" and...more
In the words of the author:
The message at the heart of this book is that the feelings of knowing, correctness, conviction, and certainty aren't deliberate conclusions and conscious choices. They are mental sensations that happen to us.
Unfortunately, once one understands this point, the rest of the book is rather less inspiring than promised. Although the discussions concerning the neural basis of experience is well-written, once the author turns to more speculative areas such as evolutionary ps...more
This was given to me for Christmas, perhaps as a dig at my joked-about intensive defense of my own ideas.

Burton's thesis that there is an innate biological feeling of knowing, i.e. of certainty, that is separate and distinct from reason and actual fact, is not so hard for me to swallow. Our ability to believe that we are right about something is a useful but not always failsafe attribute. And reasoning itself is beset by bias that will never be entirely eliminated. So what, one might ask, is th...more
Robert Burton has written a very accessible book that ends up spanning a much wider range of the biological limitations of the human mind than the title implies.

Robert shows evidence that feelings of rightness or certainty are one of our basic emotions, and the role that emotion plays in our decision making. But he also does a great job of discussing how much of our brain's work happens in parts of the brain inaccessible by our perceptual mind.

I'd highly recommend this book to anyone with an int...more
This is one of the best books I've read in a while. I was doubtful it would be much good, but the more I read the better it got. If you're interested in understanding why it is that we think we know what we know and how our minds really work when it comes to the feeling of certainty, this is a great book. If you're familiar with Landmark technology, this explains some of the biology and neurology behind our overconfidence in our own knowledge. Great to read if you're a religious fanatic or a fer...more
عبدالرحمن عقاب
الكتاب يطرح فكرة (الإيمان) بمعناه القلبي. هذا الإيمان الذي يولد قناعة راسخة ويحمل كمسلمات لا جدال فيها.
هل يسبق هذا الإيمان اقتناع عقلي ؟ أم هو حالة نفسية وعصبية تتولد نتيجة تفاعلات كيميائية في الجهاز العصبي. ثم يأتي العقل ليجد لها ما يفسرها وما يبررها؟!
السؤال على هذه الشاكلة خطير وعميق ومقلق.
يمضي الكاتب في هذا الباب بتطرف حقيقة؛ ولا أجده يحشد الأدلة الدامغة وإن أتى ببعضها.
أسلوب الكاتب أيضا مشوش وغير جذاب. مما يجعلك تفقد الاستمتاع وترابط الأفكار بسهولة .
Jason Meinig
This book really triggered a lot of thoughts. I don't agree with every point the author makes, but I do appreciate the constant barrage of ideas that forced me to think and re-think brain mechanisms and "how I know what I know" -type questions. A couple of things I took away from this book - Science & Religion, at their core, are really aimed at the same thing - knowledge of a mystery; everyone on this planet, even though they might claim otherwise, takes things on faith - for most people it...more
I very much enjoyed On Being Certain: Believing You Are Right Even When You're Not. Robert Burton‘s ideas, theories and meditations on the ways in which we become certain of what we “know” provide an interesting insight into how our brains receive and process information. I did find some of the theories less convincing than others (e.g., the feelings of familiarity and certainty, although certainly related are not interchangeable, and the fact that one can be created [or removed] by direct brain...more
I liked it even though there was a lot I disagreed with. Burton shows how tenuos our knowledge is , but he glossed over one of his stated goals, to clearly distinguish scientific knowledge from other kinds of knowledge. His excerpts from Darwin's autobiography made the point, but he seemed to ignore the significance of Darwin's ability to know likely truth and to recognize likely self-deception. He could have spent a lot more time and effort showing how scientific knowledge is substantially diff...more
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
David Bradley
YAWN. This book could have been presented in the length of a blog post, not a full-length book. The central point of the book -- that the feeling of certainty is separate from the content of that certainty -- is very well-taken, though, and for that reason it gets 2 stars. It's a deep insight. However, the vast majority of the book is spent in unrelated tangents about ways of knowing. I ended up skipping about half the book, in the middle, once I realized it was an off-topic repetition of things...more
Nov 16, 2009 Igor rated it 5 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: rcj
Do you know that feeling of being certain about something? Having a hunch? Having something no the tip of your tongue? Imagine a world without that feeling at all. Everything is a purely reason driven cost/benefit analysis. Do emotions or intuitive emotions driving you to make a decision. You would be paralyzed. Unable to decide what to do because you had no feelings that something is more important or desirable than something else. Imagine getting dressed in such a case. Having no inclination o...more
Michael Brady
An area of deep interest to me is the nature of strongly held belief. Understanding how we come to know we're right and that others are wrong speaks to some very human impulses. It may also hold the key to moving beyond our current fixation with red state, blue state, conservative, progressive, abortion, gun control, religion, global warming, and other inflammatory topics playing out on the battle lines of the Culture War.

Robert A. Burton, MD came to my attention by way of Dr. Ginger Campbell's...more
This is just okay. There were some thought-provoking questions (p.ix, "What does it mean to be convinced?" and p.2, "What kind of knowledge is "I know myself and what I would do?" Is it a conscious decision based upon deep self-contemplation or is it a "gut feeling?" But what is a gut feeling..." and p.70, "When does a thought begin?"). There are also a lot of examples in the book to clarify the intangible topics discussed. Some of the examples are great and some are less so. There are some fasc...more
There are some interesting ideas in this book, all of which can be summarized as follows: The feeling of knowing or meaning is a sensation of the brain that serves an evolutionary function and that is often unrelated to external, objective, rational factors (similar to, as I told M., the feeling of love!). Thus, feeling like we know something for certain doesn't mean that it's true - it's just a cute little sensation that our brain makes up.

Okay, sure, great, but the book fails to make sense in...more
This book took me a long time to read because I borrowed it from the library and couldn't renew it, so I had to return it and then borrow it again. Even so, it was worth it. Burton, an acclaimed neurologist, asks what's going on in our brains when we believe we know something (he calls this the feeling of knowing). He makes a strong case for the biological weirdness of that feeling, and its disconnection from actual knowledge. A few highlights:

Burton highlights my two favorite perception stories...more
What do we know about what we know? "Metaknowledge," knowledge about knowledge, is addressed in this book under "the feeling of knowing," into which Burton collapses the feelings of certainty, rightness, conviction and correctness.

You know what he's talking about: The sense that you know the answer, that the answer is "on the tip of your tongue," in the seconds, minutes, or hours before you are actually able to access the correct information. The conviction that you've found the same street you...more
Janet Eshenroder
The author carefully lays out current research showing that certainty is a mental sensation, rather than evidence of fact. "Because this 'feeling of knowing' seems like confirmation of knowledge, we tend to think of it as a product of reason." It rapidly becomes evident that true wisdom requires a willingness to challenge what makes us think we are certain. Could we be ignoring other options? Most fascinating is why people will chose conclusions based on the feeling of certainty despite all fact...more
Darin Stewart
Burton makes a compelling argument for the impossibility of absolute certainty and the need to be comfortable with uncertainty in all aspects of our lives. He quotes Richard Feynman at one point and I think the Nobel Laureates view nicely summarizes the end goal.

"I have approximate answers and possible beliefs and different degrees of certainty about different things, but I’m not absolutely sure of anything. For many things I don’t know anything about, such as whether it means anything to ask w...more
There could be a really good book on the subject, but this is not it. Partly because there is a lot of more recent research - such as how people can become even more convinced of something by hearing evidence it is wrong, that doesn't really get covered and partly because he seems to take against some work without really justifying it. Malcom Gladwell's Blink for example, comes in for criticism, but not for the content, which he basically ignores, but for some of the implications of the conclusi...more
Aug 04, 2011 Leah rated it 5 of 5 stars
Shelves: neuro
I did my duty as a citizen and amassed library fines in order to finish this they way it deserved: slowly, with thought.

Burton addresses a confusing neurological issue with as much clarity as could be expected when language limits mandate a preface mostly explaining what the author means by italicizing "feeling of knowing", defining "know" as it will be used, and cautioning the reader about the actual, biological meaning of assumptions, intuition, and gut feelings.

Amazing. Mind blowing. For me....more
There are a lot of interesting ideas in this book. I was a little disappointed because I felt like the chapter on Faith, which was actually quite fascinating, was almost a tangent from which the book really didn't come back. I started reading the book hoping to find something about the affective domain that would help with my work in teaching and learning, and the first part of the book seemed like it was going to go there. So perhaps my frustrations with the book were a little unfair because my...more
Overall, this was a well-researched book about a very interesting topic. I wish I liked it better, because I certainly was prepared to. However, I finally found myself skimming through it to just be finished.
An intriguing and challenging book that will stay with me a long time, I think. The basic premise is that we are biologically incapable of "being certain." The being certain is actually a mental sensation that is not necessarily connected with rational decision making or evaluation of verifiable evidence. There is much to be learned here about how our minds work and what certitude means (or doesn't mean), yet at the same time there are areas where it seems the author is over-reaching for some of...more
Quite a good book, except that he veers off course at the when discussing faith and science. Burton seems to think that the scientific method is that which individual scientists do in their labs; in reality it is the cumulative process of many individuals working separately. Thus, science is analogous to the emergent consciousness in the human brain that Burton describes ably earlier in the book, so it is surprising that he doesn't make the connection later on. Still his argument that the limita...more
When your author is not only a neurologist, but also a novelist and avid poker player, it makes for a highly entertaining book. Burton's writing is at once analytical and conversational as he discusses the feeling of certainty, its biological basis, and its influence on our (illogical) actions.

Unfortunately, his transitions are a bit meandering, which would be less of a problem if the book didn't trail off towards the end without reaching a satisfyingly strong conclusion. Though this would have...more
The author takes on a topic that I've always taken for granted and surveys a wide expanse of investigation into his topic. Unfortunately, he muddles his definitions and makes statements more in accord with his assumptions than the evidence he presents. The certainty of a person in a psychotic episode, the certainty I feel when I misplace my keys, and the certainty of a researcher referencing articles for a journal paper all deserve serious inquiry. But just because the paucity of our language la...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Don't Believe Everything You Think: The 6 Basic Mistakes We Make in Thinking
  • A Mind of its Own: How Your Brain Distorts and Deceives
  • Blind Spots: Why Smart People Do Dumb Things
  • How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life
  • Why We Make Mistakes: How We Look Without Seeing, Forget Things in Seconds, and Are All Pretty Sure We Are Way Above Average
  • On Second Thought: Outsmarting Your Mind's Hard-Wired Habits
  • Kluge: The Haphazard Construction of the Human Mind
  • Making Up the Mind: How the Brain Creates Our Mental World
  • What Makes Your Brain Happy and Why You Should Do the Opposite
  • The Optimism Bias: A Tour of the Irrationally Positive Brain
  • SuperSense: Why We Believe in the Unbelievable
  • Mirroring People: The New Science of How We Connect with Others
  • 50 Great Myths of Popular Psychology: Shattering Widespread Misconceptions about Human Behavior
  • The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making
  • Iconoclast: A Neuroscientist Reveals  How to Think Differently
  • Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious
  • The Invisible Gorilla: And Other Ways Our Intuitions Deceive Us
  • Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me): Why We Justify Foolish Beliefs, Bad Decisions, and Hurtful Acts
Robert Burton, M.D. graduated from Yale University and University of California at San Francisco medical school, where he also completed his neurology residency. At age 33, he was appointed chief of the Division of Neurology at Mt. Zion-UCSF Hospital, where he subsequently became Associate Chief of the Department of Neurosciences. His non-neurology writing career includes three critically acclaime...more
More about Robert A. Burton...
A Skeptic's Guide to the Mind: What Neuroscience Can and Cannot Tell Us About Ourselves Cellmates Final Therapy Doc-In-A-Box

Share This Book

“Dawkins conveniently illustrates the rationalist's dilemma: How do you articulate a personal sense of purpose when you intellectually have concluded that the world is pointless? What is the purpose of pointing out pointlessness? What does it mean to find purpose in understanding pointlessness? Once again we are back at the conflict between Dawkins' intellect (the world is pointless) and his mental sensation of purpose (I will show others that faith is irrational). To understand the intensity of this felt purpose, Google Dawkins' bio and speaking engagements. His near-evangelical effort to convince the faithful of the folly of their convictions has the same zealous ring as those missionaries who feel it is their duty to convert the heathens.” 2 likes
“How different the science-religion controversy would be if we acknowledged that a deeply felt sense of purpose is as necessary as hunger and thirst — all are universally necessary for survival and homeostasis.” 2 likes
More quotes…