Gideon's Trumpet
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating

Gideon's Trumpet

3.78 of 5 stars 3.78  ·  rating details  ·  1,309 ratings  ·  122 reviews
A history of the landmark case of James Earl Gideon's fight for the right to legal counsel. Notes, table of cases, index. The classic backlist bestseller. More than 800,000 sold since its first pub date of 1964.
Paperback, 288 pages
Published April 23rd 1989 by Vintage (first published 1964)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
The Pelican Brief by John GrishamThe Nine by Jeffrey ToobinThe Brethren by Bob WoodwardThe Runaway Jury by John GrishamBecoming Justice Blackmun by Linda Greenhouse
Supreme Court (History & Fiction)
9th out of 79 books — 98 voters
The Devil in the White City by Erik LarsonFreakonomics by Steven D. LevittIn Cold Blood by Truman CapoteA Short History of Nearly Everything by Bill BrysonGuns, Germs, and Steel by Jared Diamond
Best Non-Fiction (non biography)
440th out of 2,776 books — 4,728 voters


More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 2,185)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Matt
A lot of different things helped push me down the road to law school. There's that scene in The Verdict when Paul Newman tells Charlotte Rampling about justice("See, the jury believes. The jury wants to believe...All of them...say, 'It's a sham, it's rigged, you can't fight city hall.' But when they step into that jury box...you just barely see it in their eyes..."). There's also the (as yet unrealized) promise of financial security. Maybe the most noble motivator I had was Anthony Lewis's Gideo...more
Russell
I read this book before I went to law school. It was supposed to be the inspiring story of how we all came to have the right to an attorney.

I thought it was dull and was actually the story of how a florida redneck who was arrested for burglary got in touch with a bunch of high powered attorneys with an agenda.

Appellate law is not interesting even when it is novelized.
Kressel Housman
For those who don't know, Gideon v. Wainwright was the landmark Supreme Court case that established the federal requirement for criminal courts to provide defense attorneys for the indigent. In other words, it's the reason we have public defenders today.

The case began when Clarence Gideon, a poor white man sitting in a Florida prison for petty larceny, wrote to the Supreme Court that his 14th Amendment right to due process of law had been violated because the court that convicted him didn't prov...more
Tom
A very good read. Definitely gets one all rah-rah democracy and rah-rah constitution yet with nuance and thoughtfulness. Also, not one-sided as Lewis does a good job of showing Ass’t Attorney General Jacob as a sympathetic guy who really did believe that everyone has a right to counsel but ultimately believed more in states’ rights. I felt bad for the guy sending out a letter to all 50 states asking for an Amicus Brief to support Betts v. Brady but ending up getting Amicus Briefs from many of th...more
Roger
May 27, 2010 Roger rated it 5 of 5 stars
Shelves: law
"...Gideon is something of a 'nut,' [and:] his maniacal distrust and suspicion lead him to the very borders of insanity. Upon the shoulders of such persons are our great rights carried."

I'm a public defender for prison inmates. When I read the statement above in the epilogue, I was amused and relieved to learn that Gideon was a lot like many of my own clients.

zltg
There is no illusion at all that Gideon is a hero or he did not owe his victory entirely to the legal and social momentum, which were outside of his control and already pointing to overturn Betts. But it is also worthwhile to remember the facts here, that man like him, an outcast at the very bottom of the society, had the tenacity and courage to pursue what he deemed just and not gave up hope. My eyes got wet when first looked at Gideon's pencil-written petition for cert on prison mail paper. Th...more
Catherine Woodman


I have always been a reader, and whenever possible, I have tried to read what my children are reading. It started out with 'The Hungry Caterpillar', progressed to the Harry Potter series and now I am immersed in British Victorian novels and socio-political classics (which it turns out that I am no better at deciphering in my 50's than I was in my 20's) . So when my eldest son decided to go to law school, my husband and I encouraged him to read some of the recommended classics in the history of l...more
Judy
The news this week of the death of Anthony Lewis at age 85 was enough to send me scurrying to the bookcase to dig out my copy of Gideon's Trumpet and reread it. Clarence Earl Gideon was arrested in Florida on a charge of breaking and entering and he was forced to represent himself at his trial because he couldn't afford an attorney. Gideon felt that this was a violation of his constitutional right to be represented by counsel and while he was in a Florida prison he sat down and wrote a petition...more
kimberly
Nov 30, 2007 kimberly rated it 4 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: lawyers, those fascinated by justice and the mysterious supreme court
Shelves: law-books
Often, I am discouraged with my profession. The slow-moving machinary of the judiciary is not perfect, but both Gideon and To Kill a Mockingbird remind me why I'm a lawyer. I wish I had read Gideon before starting my clerkship. For one reason, we had an entire right to counsel issue that I would have understood better after this book. Additionally, it discusses the role of a law clerk and how the judicial system works. Dude, this is more helpful than my staff attorney manual!
But most of all, I...more
J
No one today would argue against the fact that Gideon v. Wainwright had a positive impact on the legal system. People should have the right to an attorney and this book explains not only why, but also celebrates the fact that a poor prisoner could affect our law. In fact, "How one man, a poor prisoner, took his case to the Supreme Court-- and changed the law of the United States" sits over the title on the wonderfully designed cover of my edition of the book.

However, I got a strange feeling whil...more
Ted
Terrific book. I had never read anything about our Supreme Court and this turned out to be a great start. This is a pretty incredible story about one man who, without the help of a lawyer, appealed his case to the highest court in the land and eventually won. The accused's right to a lawyer, and thus due process, would be considered as fundamental as any other. However, up until this case, states had a free hand to decide when an indigent defendant would be afforded one by the state. The author...more
Denise
I read this because I'm trying to keep my post-law-school, pre-bar-exam brain from turning into gorgeous, laid back mush. It was great. It's very, very readable, with lots of relatively interesting descriptions of the facts leading up to the Gideon v. Wainwright case, and it includes lots of great information about how the inner gears of the Supreme Court turn. Some parts get a little turgid, but it's a book about a legal decision; what do you expect? I kind of wish they'd done a second edition...more
Diane
Jun 16, 2009 Diane rated it 4 of 5 stars
Shelves: legal
I read this in preparation for a continuing legal education class which will involve discussion of the book. I was not looking forward to reading it as I suspected it would be very dry and difficult to plough through. It was actually a very easy read. The author wrote in a manner which would allow a lay person to understand the Supreme Court appellate process, and effectively personalized the Gideon v. Wainwright decision. I think this would be a great book for law students to read, and is also...more
Stefani
The first book I have read for law school since A Civil Action in 1L that wasn't a case book or supplement.

Whew. Law school should require more books like this. It is the story of how the right to representation for the indigent in all criminal cases was codified by the Supreme Court.

Somewhat uplifting, somewhat depressing.
Amanda
Had to read as research for a loved one who's considering law. Recommended to me by a lawyer I respect. A great read for anyone considering law. Terrific story. If the reader is not a lawyer, it gets dry in the middle, but definitely plow through to the ending of the tale. All true. All heartening.
Joe
The Supreme Court and its place in our government is solidly taught. Interesting discussion of its place in the system; ex, why should nine ex-lawyers have such incredible power?

I found myself searching for spirituality, humor, passion, or something. This book could have been written by Sgt Joe Friday.

Recommend for future lawyers or SS teachers only. He tosses around Supreme Court case titles like "Powell vs Alabama" like they're common knowledge. As a non-lawyer, I don't know what "amicus cu...more
Adam
Beautiful!

I've long known of this book and likely long avoided it presuming that I knew the entire story of Clarence Earl Gideon. He was a poor man convicted of a crime without an attorney, whose case resulted in the Supreme Court decision expanding the right to counsel that we presume is part and parcel of our criminal legal system. But that is only a small piece of the full story.

Anthony Lewis brings Gideon to life, both the case and the person. The book beautifully recounts Gideon's tale, bri...more
Lauren
An excellent account of the famous Supreme Court case that mandated a defendant’s right to counsel, Gideon’s Trumpet also provides background on the Supreme Court and its procedures and traditions to help set the stage. For a book about a Supreme Court case that delves into some of the nitty-gritty legal arguments, it’s remarkably readable.

My one (tiny) complaint: How I wish there was an updated edition of Gideon’s Trumpet with an afterword about the current state of American criminal law and th...more
Tung
This book discusses the significance of a single case: Gideon v. Cochran, a 1962 case that overturned an earlier case (Betts v. Brady) and established that everyone had the right to an attorney for criminal cases, and if you couldn’t afford an attorney, it was the court’s obligation to provide you one. The book details the judicial context during which the case was argued, how it was argued before the Court, and why the particular arguments mattered. Overall, it’s a nice primer on how the Suprem...more
Alice
A dry, dated (think Warren Court, with issues of racial equality still in the center of national consciousness) account of the Supreme Court case Gideon v. Wainwright, regarding the right to counsel for the indigent.

The book was very informative - not hard to do, since I knew next to nothing about the case - but the author made arguments in the vein of The Inevitable Tide of History Was On Gideon's Side, so I was a bit skeptical. The book also ends with a high-falootin', shmaltzy chapter - misp...more
William
There are times when you pick up a book not what to expect and you discover an unexpected treasure. This is one such book.

There are so many good things about this book. First, it restores your faith in our system. It provided great insights into how the Supreme Court works.

It also shows that even the people who are down and out in this country can have the system work for them.

The story told in this book shows one of the many reasons why the United States is truly an exceptional nation.
lamesalmon
Great overview of the history of the constitutional right to counsel. Engagingly written, with a good balance of storytelling narrative and exploration of fundamental legal principles.

Since this was published in 1964, it's also somewhat dated in some of its language and commentary. It was particularly striking to me to read the casual references to "the men of the court" and "the men who are clerks". This was, of course, wholly accurate for the time, but it was also subtly alienating for me, re...more
Laura
Really important content. I really liked the story of Gideon himself - I think, given both the importance of the case and the sparse language of the Gideon opinion, sharing his background adds a lot to what the lawyers and the judges were thinking about when this case was litigated. And I appreciated that they told the story of Gideon's second trial - it explains why counsel is important in all cases, not just those where the accused is obviously incapable of defending himself from criminal char...more
Bryan
A good look at the landmark Supreme Court case, Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) (that all defendants in major criminal cases deserve the right to counsel), not long after it was decided. Anthony Lewis really humanizes Gideon and the lawyers who argued the case in front of the Supreme Court. It is also very interesting to see Lewis's perspective on Justices still alive who today are merely history, especially Justices Hugo Black and Felix Frankfurter. In addition, it is funny to see which predictions...more
Len Vlahos
I had the opportunity to see Anthony Lewis speak recently and found him fascinating. So fascinating that I went back and read this now classic of Supreme Court literature. Written in 1964, it's the story of how one indigent man brought his case all the way to the highest court in the land. But it's much less the story of Clarence Earl Gideon than it is of Civil Liberties, particularly as they relate to criminal law and the Supreme Court. With accessible and compelling writing, Gideon's Trumpet i...more
Michael Wheatley
A pretty good discussion of federalism, stare decisis, and judicial review.

But I didn't care much for the final chapter describing what the author viewed as the Court's role as policy maker. I thought it was oversimplified and at times lacking in impartiality. For example, in disagreeing with the Lochner decision on p. 231, the author says "A Court that thought it knew best . . . said that a state could not limit bakers' work to ten hours a day." But then on the same page, the author praises Jus...more
William
Probably as good a tale of the inner workings of the Supreme Court and one mans fight for legal justice as your going to get. It is an accessible but legalistic story of a man who could be said to have beat the system. The book is rather dated, that being the system in place in the early sixties when Blacks were Negroes and the mentally challenged, morons. But the story is gripping. I found some parts slow because of the oft cited precedents and court cases and the author unnecessarily enamored...more
Chase
Jun 25, 2012 Chase rated it 2 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: Those interested in the legal proccess of the Supreme Court system
Recommended to Chase by: My teacher, It was a summer assignment...
To be honest, I'm only reading this out of obligation to my AP goverment class I'm taking for my senior year of high school.

So far, I'm squatting on page 94, and its due on the first day of school. In addition to reading, there are 23 terms to be defined (As in Powell v. AL, Amicus curiae, judical restraint, ect..) and nine questions to be answered (The first being a summary of 3 to 5 paragraphs, and then a one paragraph minimun for the others)on this book.

So, I'm not to crazy about it. This wo...more
John Heyhoe-Griffiths
Fascinating book about the history of Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court decision that required the States to provide counsel to indigent defendants. The author delves deep into the legal and factual history behind the case, and discusses well the constitutional issues involved in the case. The book is fifty years old and yet is still readable today. Unfortunately, the author devotes an entire chapter to preaching the gospel of a progressive Supreme Court. Lewis believes the Supreme Court s...more
Lubna
Aug 07, 2007 Lubna rated it 2 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: those interested in law
A book discussing the landmark Supreme Court case, Gideon v. Wainwright, which guaranteed the indigent a right to counsel in all criminal cases. It discusses the people behind the case, such as Gideon - the man accussed, the method & process of bringing the case to the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court decision. I think this book is best for those who have not gone to law school - if you have any knowledge of Con Law/Crim Pro/Supreme Court litigation, then this book is really really slow...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 72 73 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • A People's History of the Supreme Court: The Men and Women Whose Cases and Decisions Have Shaped Our Constitution
  • The Buffalo Creek Disaster: How the survivors of one of the worst disasters in coal-mining history brought suit against the coal company--and won
  • Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America's Struggle for Equality
  • Becoming Justice Blackmun: Harry Blackmun's Supreme Court Journey
  • A History of American Law
  • The Brethren: Inside the Supreme Court
  • Supreme Power: Franklin Roosevelt vs. the Supreme Court
  • Flagrant Conduct: The Story of Lawrence v. Texas
  • Making Your Case: The Art of Persuading Judges
  • The Supreme Court: The Personalities and Rivalries That Defined America
  • Ultimate Punishment: A Lawyer's Reflections on Dealing with the Death Penalty
  • Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution
  • Closed Chambers: The Rise, Fall, and Future of the Modern Supreme Court
  • Lincoln's Code: The Laws of War in American History
  • Actual Innocence: When Justice Goes Wrong and How to Make it Right
  • Law 101: Everything You Need to Know about the American Legal System
  • John Marshall: Definer of a Nation
  • Defending the Damned: Inside Chicago's Cook County Public Defender's Office
Freedom for the Thought That We Hate: A Biography of the First Amendment Make No Law: The Sullivan Case and the First Amendment Written into History: Pulitzer Prize Reporting of the Twentieth Century from The New York Times The Burger Court Portrait Of A Decade: The Second American Revolution

Share This Book