Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Rise & Fall of the Great Powers” as Want to Read:
The Rise & Fall of the Great Powers
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating

The Rise & Fall of the Great Powers

4.03 of 5 stars 4.03  ·  rating details  ·  2,432 ratings  ·  103 reviews
About national and international power in the "modern" or Post Renaissance period. Explains how the various powers have risen and fallen over the 5 centuries since the formation of the "new monarchies" in W. Europe.
Hardcover, 0 pages
Published May 1st 1990 by Random House Value Publishing (first published 1987)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Rise & Fall of the Great Powers, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Rise & Fall of the Great Powers

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
William
Back when I was in college, I felt the need for a course that looked at how economics, politics and warfare all combined to form statecraft. I never got to take that non-existent course, but got what I wanted in "Rise and Fall of Great Powers."

Paul Kennedy wrote a 500-year history of grand strategy in world history, as first one European empire followed by another tried to achieve the perfect synthesis of absolute security and prosperity, and in the process scaring the hell out of smaller state...more
Harpal
Kennedy is the man. There's not much else to say. Sure, the thesis is "simplistic" or "schematic" or "deterministic" or whatever other bombastic term pseudo-intellectuals (and legitimate intellectuals alike) choose to use, but one has to understand that the project of this book is to make some sort of reasonably defensible generalization about what leads to the fall of great powers throughout history. That's not exactly easy. No single explanation will be perfect. But his thesis about imperial o...more
Steven Peterson
As Kennedy puts it in his "Introduction," "This is a book about national and international power in the "modern"--that is, post-Renaissance--period. It seeks to trace and to explain how the various great powers have risen and fallen. . . ." And, on the same page:

"The `military conflict' referred to in the book's subtitle is therefore always examined in the context of `economic change.' The triumph of any one Great Power in this period, or the collapse of another, has usually been the consequenc...more
Joel
While this tome is undoubtedly a seminal work of history, its arguments are fatally flawed and ultimately unsatisfactory. His attempt is really to determine why Europe emerged as the leader of the international system in the 20th century as opposed to other traditional power centers in Asia and the Middle East. In the end, he never gets to the "ultimate question," which was the enchanting goal of Jared Diamond's "Gun's, Germs, and Steel." Kennedy spends a lot of time harping on the miraculousnes...more
AC
The key determinant (@ Kennedy) is relative, not absolute decline). British GDP grew, in absolute terms, while it declined relative to the US and others. Thus do great powers ebb...

The US peaked in early 2000, though a debt bubble managed to keep things aloft for another few years.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story...

When China meets the US, China will be poorer on a per capita basis, but will FEEL richer as it is ascending; while the US, with a small population, will be richer on a per capi...more
Andrew Updegrove
Paul Kennedy’s exegesis on the intersection of economic capacity, extraterritorial ambition and political reality is what Monty Python might refer to as “a bloody big book.” Indeed weighing in at 677 pages, it is more than up to the task of putting down your budgerigar, if that’s on your to do list. Notwithstanding that fact and its subject matter, for a serious reader it is an accessible and readable treatment of subject that is often presented in quite the opposite fashion.This is not to say t...more
Philippe Malzieu
When it has been published, it was a sensation. Kennedy explain why the competition between the small European kingdoms obliged theit to innovate. It is this good principle of the competition which has constrained them to be exceeded. This liberal vision does not have to involve controversies so much the rigour of Kennedy is irreproachable. I read again récently. I advice my son who prepare political sciences to read it (he succeded in it) This book don't age.
Ben Sweezy
Dec 30, 2009 Ben Sweezy is currently reading it  ·  review of another edition
So far I've been pretty frustrated by Kennedy. His introduction lays out a fairly simplistic set of reasons purporting to explain why the West "rose" and the East did not.

China: Orientalist despotism, a unitary China, the decision to scrap the treasure fleets, persecution of merchants, an ethos not focused on competition or accumulation of wealth, state-directed investments.

Europe: political fragmentation, merchants could do their thing, embrace of competition and accumulation of wealth.

But then...more
Greg
This is a really important book to read for students of diplomacy, military history, and grand strategy. It covers the economic and military reasons for the rise and fall of great powers. It is Eurocentric and covers the rise of Elizabethan England, the decline of Spain, the rise of Napoleon, the rise of Germany, the decline of the Austrian and Ottoman Empires, the rise of the United States and Japan, and the Decline of the British Empire. The final chapter on the bipolar world of the USSR and U...more
Khalid
The book explores the politics and economics of the Great Powers from 1500 to 1980 and the reason for their decline. It then continues by forecasting the positions of China, Japan, the European Economic Community (EEC), the Soviet Union and the United States through the end of the 20th century. Kennedy argues that the strength of a Great Power can be properly measured only relative to other powers, and he provides a straightforward and persuasively argued thesis: Great Power ascendency (over the...more
Jacob
Densely loaded with economic, demographic, and other historical data makes this book's conclusions all the more solid and reasonable. The book has aged well since its publication, now decades old (The small exception being the final chapter, in which he proceeds to contemplate the "approaching" 21st century). Kennedy's explanation for why different empires have risen to power and then burned out and fallen by the wayside is not cheery when one looks at America now. If anything, we seem to be mo...more
Francisco
Kennedy sets himself a very haughty goal, and is unfortunately unable to meet it. His deterministic predictions fall short of being substantiated with a coherent theoretical model, and incongruities are clear. The concepts of relative power decline and the overcommitment of the primary state are worth reading, and the "fall" part of the argument for the historical sections are rather well constructed. However, the rise (or rather, not-rise of states who also seem to meet the qualifications) of a...more
Simon

I read this book when it first came out in the 1980's but has remained one of the books I remember best from that time, 25 years ago, and which therefore merits a retrospective review.

This book was one of the first "global histories" that I had read, that seek to address why some societies/nations/continents etc rise up and others fail. Meticulously researched, it documents the relative paths of the major nations over the last 500 years. The persuasive main thesis is that fiscal credibility was...more
Arturo
Este es un libro excelente. Un recorrido por 500 años de la civilización siguiendo el hilo común de las grandes potencias históricas y su ciclo vital nacimiento / auge / ocaso, investigando en la Historia intentando exponer los factores comunes de los respectivos procesos. Aún reconociendo la complejidad y la variabilidad de las respectivas situaciones históricas se puede observar que desarrollo económico y poderío militar son cara y cruz, es difícil encontrar el equilibrio perfecto, el círculo...more
Paul Sharpe
An absolutely stunning book! Thought provoking, intelligent, accurate, well thought out with a powerfully presented thesis that is well defended with incredible detail. The book is a sweeping overview of Great Power conflict & rivalry from 1500 through to the 1980s and tries to identify common themes that make countries and empires powerful relative to their enemies, and what relative weaknesses expose those powers to inevitable decline and collapse. Since it is a sweeping overview, don't ex...more
nanto
Secara populer, lebih berupaya melihat bagaimana AS dapat muncul pasca PD II sebagai kekuatan dunia. Peran Jepang sebagai junior partner AS di Asia Pasifik juga disinggung. Peranan industri otomotif Jepang yang diberikan oleh AS untuk memasok kebutuhan Perang Korea. Seingat saya, itulah saat pertama ada truk tentara bermerk Toyota. Juga sempat hadir di Indonesia truk serupa itu.

Point penting lainnya, ekonomi, dan pertahanan sangat bertalian, termasuk didalamnya R&D yang memungkinkan penguasa...more
Frederick J
Published in the mid 1980's Paul Kennedy observed that the United States was in the same position as other great powers from the last 500 years of world history. They had become overextended militarily and the diversion of economic strength to maintain the military supremacy necessary to preserve great power status ultimately threatened to (or did) undermine the economic stability required to maintain military strength. Thirty years ago it was already evident that the United States transforming...more
Luis
La historia ha demostrado ser un circulo perfecto donde las acciones generacionales se repiten por mas que tratemos de evitarlo. Naciones con historias sacras e imperios con ganas de controlar todo lo que este en el horizonte terrenal. Pero siempre quedan en corto por las capacidades politico/militares/industriales/tecnologico/sociales que demuestran como un pais puede en un momento a otro ser una potencia o ser una colonia. Recomendado para todo el que quiera un repaso de la geopolitica mundial...more
Shankar Rajesh
One of the earliest works I read on why Emoires rise and why / how they fall. Strategic overreach and debt have been the harbingers of doom for many an Empire. The case of the Hapsburgs immediately interested me and I got hooked on to reading this. A classic and must read any history / political science buff
Choong Chiat
This book has managed to, to borrow the words of a reviewer, "successfully combine the scope and sweep of 'popular' history with the discriminating rigour of professional historiography".



In addition, the author managed to achieve the above in an elegant, insightful, coherent and clear manner.



However, although it is understandable that the author would repeat his main arguments to place emphasis on them, the repeated reiteration of the arguments that a country's strengths & weaknesses should...more
Ladygorekitten
I used this book as a main source for my diplomatic history courses in university, but I would definitely read this book if I have known about it before the course.

The language is not so complicated to understand which iis the most important thing that I look for in the historical books. It did not make me feel like "What is he talking about, actually?". The nations, events, wars, consequences were all so clear and reasonable.

The only thing that I'm still concerned about is its objectivity but p...more
James
This isn't a light read; it's densely loaded with economic, demographic, and other historical data. That makes its conclusions all the more solid and reasonable, though, and the book has aged well since its publication, now decades ago. Kennedy's explanation for why different empires have risen to power and then burned out and fallen by the wayside is not cheery when one looks at America now. If anything, we seem to be moving faster than most along the path he described. I wish some of the polic...more
Phillip

I read this book years ago. It is an excellent account about how economics intersects with war. It might be a bit date now, but it is probably still worth a read.

Tom Schulte
This book covers from the Ottoman Empire to The Cold War; roughly 500 years in as many pages. This brisk pace makes the mostly military history come across like a zoetrope; animation through rapid motion. The approach to war is one of the logistics over strategy; technology and foreign cash reserves factor in more than geography and division count. The final chapter looking ahead is almost quanit as the 1987 work still has to consider East Germany and the USSR. However, even then there were stil...more
Hyrum
This was an interesting book arguing the thesis that national power normally corresponds with a nations economic power and that in a long coalition war the side with greater economic base generally wins. This thesis did not seem radical but that fact that it seemed common sensical did not prevent the book from being both interesting and instructive. The only problem with this book is that it slowly became less and less interesting as it progressed closer towards the modern day. This left the cha...more
Simon Mould
This is the basis for any of my classes on modern history. A clear analysis of how the interest surrounding power is the driving force of history.
Jabneel Mascarenhas
A FAIL OF NOSTRADOMIC PRÓ PORTIONS GIVE ME A PABST BLUE RIBBON PLEASE

-AND YOU LIKE A COKE WITH IT?
Edwin Ortega sevilla
PRESTADO POR MI ALM. JARAMILLO CUANDO HACÍA CURSO DE HR... MIS INICIOS EN LA CONSTANTE LUCHA DEL STATU QUO.
Jeroen
All time favorite since my student days. Highly readable and well researched, I still refer to it.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • The Tragedy of Great Power Politics
  • Theory of International Politics
  • The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919-1939
  • Politics Among Nations
  • Diplomacy
  • Nations and Nationalism
  • Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis
  • Special Providence: American Foreign Policy and How It Changed the World
  • Arms and Influence
  • The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money, and Power
  • Understanding International Conflicts: An Introduction to Theory and History
  • American Diplomacy
  • The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order
  • The Pursuit of Power
  • The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor
  • Eagle Against the Sun: The American War With Japan
  • The Great Game: The Struggle for Empire in Central Asia (Kodansha Globe)
  • The War of the World: Twentieth-Century Conflict and the Descent of the West
160215
Paul Michael Kennedy CBE, FBA, is a British historian specialising in international relations and grand strategy. He has published prominent books on the history of British foreign policy and Great Power struggles.

Kennedy was born in Wallsend, Tyne and Wear, and attended St. Cuthbert's Grammar School in Newcastle upon Tyne. Subsequently, he graduated with first class honours in history from Newcas...more
More about Paul M. Kennedy...
Engineers of Victory: The Making of the War Machine That Defeated the Nazis The Parliament of Man: The Past, Present, and Future of the United Nations Preparing for the Twenty-First Century The Rise and Fall of British Naval Mastery Grand Strategies in War and Peace

Share This Book