by
4.79 of 5 stars
Cultural criticism; on television, fiction (and fiction-writing), postmodernity and irony. read full description

reviews

Mar 13, 2011
Meredith rated it: 5 of 5 stars
"For 360 minutes per diem, we receive unconscious reinforcement of the deep thesis that the most significant feature of truly alive persons is watchableness, and that genuine human worth is not just identical with but rooted in the phenomenon of watching."

"Six hours a day is more time than most people (consciously) do any one thing."

low art, "the sort of art that tries too hard to please"

"Television is the way it is simply because More...
Aug 11, 2009
Kevin rated it: 5 of 5 stars
DFW argues that the things that are plaguing this generation - self-consciousness, loneliness, addiction - are reinforced by television, but he manages to do so without degenerating into hysteria about social decay, ect, and makes doing so seem quaint and unreasoned.

He also outlines fiction's response to television in the form of irony and postmodernism and how unfulfilling and unsuccessful these responses are.

I find myself thinking about television in a completely diffe More...
0 comments like (1 person liked it)
Jan 14, 2008
Mason added it
Very nice article - first piece of Wallace's nonfiction I've read.
Few piecfes of wisdom: TV appeals to lowest common denominator, which happens to be crude humor rather than our individual, sophisticated interstes.
Does not really condemn or attack TV that brutally - but expresses devout disapproval of this 6-hour a day addiction.
Perhaps the most intersting part as far as current trends in US fiction is his comments on irony and allusion in television. He is of the opinion that More...
Jan 04, 2012
Mark rated it: 5 of 5 stars
So good and thought provoking i felt sick by time i finished this essay
Feb 11, 2012
Jade added it
Feb 11, 2012
Yvonne added it
Feb 10, 2012
Sarcophagus rated it: 5 of 5 stars
Feb 09, 2012
Drew added it
Feb 02, 2012
Alexa marked it as to-read
Feb 02, 2012
Stephen is currently reading it
Jan 29, 2012
Carly marked it as to-read
Jan 26, 2012
Chiefyg added it
Jan 26, 2012
Anniev rated it: 4 of 5 stars
Jan 22, 2012
Dinah marked it as to-read
Jan 16, 2012
Jon rated it: 5 of 5 stars
Jan 12, 2012
Heather Marie marked it as to-read
Jan 11, 2012
Shawn Elise marked it as to-read
Jan 10, 2012
Kristin marked it as to-read
Jan 04, 2012
Sarah marked it as to-read
Jan 02, 2012
leslie marked it as to-read
Jan 04, 2012
J. rated it: 5 of 5 stars
Dec 27, 2011
tjd rated it: 4 of 5 stars
Dec 22, 2011
Jan-Erik rated it: 5 of 5 stars
Dec 21, 2011
K. rated it: 5 of 5 stars
Dec 19, 2011
Callie rated it: 5 of 5 stars
Dec 17, 2011
Sheila marked it as to-read
Dec 16, 2011
Ben rated it: 5 of 5 stars
Dec 13, 2011
Patrick marked it as to-read
Dec 09, 2011
Mark Thomas rated it: 5 of 5 stars
Dec 06, 2011
Renee rated it: 4 of 5 stars