Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Man Who Knew Too Much” as Want to Read:
The Man Who Knew Too Much
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Man Who Knew Too Much

3.59 of 5 stars 3.59  ·  rating details  ·  3,048 ratings  ·  244 reviews
This is a pre-1923 historical reproduction that was curated for quality. Quality assurance was conducted on each of these books in an attempt to remove books with imperfections introduced by the digitization process. Though we have made best efforts - the books may have occasional errors that do not impede the reading experience. We believe this work is culturally importan ...more
Paperback, 160 pages
Published October 11th 2007 by BiblioLife (first published 1922)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Man Who Knew Too Much, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Man Who Knew Too Much

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Jonathan

G.K. Chesterton is an author who simply must be read by anyone fascinated by quality detective literature. Or literature in general for that matter. His insights into human nature, particular regarding morality, psychology and the soul or heart are profound. At the same time the mixture of wit, sarcasm, humour and paradox he weaves together is fascinatingly powerful.

To put it simply, Chesterton's writing is unique. Not unique as Mervyn Peake is unique in his word choice. Or unique in the way th
...more
[Name Redacted]
Amazingly cynical and subversive detective stories, of the sort I never would have expected from Chesterton!

The titular character gives himself that monicker because he is related to / friends with nearly all the important people in Britain, and therefore knows exactly how the country is REALLY run and how the legal system REALLY works. This inspires in him a sense of fatalism and resignation, as he sees the backroom deals, cover-ups and treachery which make the world go 'round, and he solves n
...more
James
An interesting collection of short story detective fiction. Very interesting, almost odd. But in a good way. They're short stories, so lighter on character development than a longer work, but you still pick up a pretty opinion on the main character after a couple of the stories. Almost likeable, but maybe with a little bit too much self-indulgent self-pity.

Horne Fisher is a man who knows too much. He wishes he didn't, but he does. And it's a curse. It's a curse because as he solves each case (wh
...more
Julie Davis
Who knew these were short mystery stories instead of a long, possibly lame novel that was made into an exciting early movie in 1934 with Peter Lorre or a definitely lame 1956 movie with Doris Day singing all the time?

Not me, at least until listening to B.J. Harrison's excellent narration on The Classic Tales podcast.

These stories are great fun to listen to and occasionally solve. And even when I know whodunnit I don't know why they dunnit. Which is just as much fun to find out.
Karo
I guess this is a book that is worth some deeper research than just downloading it for free because it sounds vaguely important. And since that's clearly one of those shoulda things that never actually happen, this is going to be a poor excuse for a review.

First of all, it quickly dawned on me that it's actually a collection of short stories. A proper book would have told me that on the sleeve (and I would have promptly put it back), but ebooks are a mysterious entity without sleeves. ("Wait a m
...more
Ozoneocean
This was a good book.
It's definitely NOT about a "sleuth" or detective or anything of the sort. Horne Fisher puzzles out various murders and mysteries incidentally, these are never his main concern, to imagine that they are would indicate the most superficial reading of the novel. He is a man mired in the politics and intrigues of his family and the upper-crust of England, each "crime" and mystery simply serves to illustrate Fisher's brilliance, the way he sees "behind" things because of his wea
...more
Sesana
Mixed feelings. On one hand, Chesterton's prose is often lovely (this is the first I've read from him) and a few of the mysteries are quite engaging. On the other hand, his detective character, Fisher, wasn't engaging for me, and I got tired of the collection's gimmick quickly: murders are intentionally covered up, or the wrong men charged with them, because of the political situation. And while that is a probably too realistic and chilling outcome the first few times, after awhile it makes the ...more
Joseph Rice
Although billed as detective stories, these are instead a collection of tales of political satire. The Man Who Knew Too Much is Horne Fisher, who is related to or knows most of the British ruling/political class. Although a series of murders take place, nothing is ever done about them because of who is involved with each of them, and the consequences of letting the public know what they have done.

Chesterton was not a socialist, but he did have a feel for the common man and his struggles, and it
...more
Darwin8u
A collection of Chesterton detective stories revolving around Horne Fisher and his companion, political journalist Harold March. These stories have a lot of the same late Victorian/Edwardian flavor of Sherlock Holmes and Chesterton's own Father Brown stories. The reluctant, and moral protagonist of The Man Who Knew Too Much, however, is often forced by greater-good circumstance or a need to protect the best interests of England from revealing the killer or the culprit.

The strengths of these sto
...more
Kevin
Not sure what I was expecting out of this one. I picked it off of Project Gutenberg's top 100 list thinking maybe it was related to the film of the same name. It's not, but since I've never seen the film, I'm not disappointed.

It's a series of "detective" stories that strike me as a little odd because there are very few of them that I think I might have been able to puzzle out on my own. Perhaps I'm coddled by modern authors holding my hand through every twist and leaving a phosphorescent trail o
...more
Evgeny
This is a collection of eight short stories about a self-proclaimed man who knew too much Horne Fisher. His analytical skills are rival those of Sherlock Holmes; he also has a trusted sidekick like a proper private investigator. His Dr. Watson is a journalist Harold March. What is the catch? Fisher stumbles upon crimes in high society and he really knows too much do try doing something against each culprit whose identity he is able to figure out all the time without failing. These people are unt ...more
Cphe
A collection of eight short mysteries, "whodunits", all connected by the same characters Horne Fisher and Harold March. Some of the short mysteries are better than others, a few quite defy belief and some are not politically correct by any means. The Face In The Target and The Vengence of the Statue were the two stronger mysteries in my opinion.

Not a great deal of characterisation, but wonderful for atmosphere, time and place.
Laurel Hicks
Eight stories featuring the title character, Home Fisher, a perceptive solver of crimes who does not indict his criminals, because he knows too much of the background story and the dangers into which the nation would fall if certain things were revealed. The stories:

"The Face in the Target"
"The Vanishing Prince"
"The Soul of the Schoolboy"
"The Bottomless Well"
"The Hole in the Wall"
"The Fad of the Fisherman"
"The Fool of the Family"
"The Vengeance of the Statue"
Perry Whitford
In these eight collected short stories about Horne Fisher, the eponymous 'Man Who Knew Two Much', he comes across as a languid, eccentric kind of amateur detective. Though he solves crimes and unravels mysteries with the best of them, this is not what distinguishes him.

What marks him out is the further knowledge he possesses about the wider context behind certain crimes:- the circumstances that will ensure a certain criminal is left unpunished, the scandal covered up to protect the career of a
...more
Sylvester
In the same vein as the "Father Brown" mysteries, only with Horne Fisher - the man who knows too much - as the super-sleuth. That idea of knowing too much - about human nature, and about certain humans in particular - is carried throughout, and adds depth to the otherwise lighthearted mysteries. I liked these more than the "Father Brown" stories, and am impressed by the diversity of Chesterton's writings.
Lorraine Ray
This book is a collection of short stories in which have two men, Harold March and Horne Fisher, seek solutions to various mysterious happenings around the British Isles. The author thought of a fun premise--to have the "detectives" not apprehend any criminals because they "knew too much about how the world really was run."

There are some vivid images and atmosphere in The Man Who Knew Too Much; G.K. Chesterton was an art student before he became a writer. I especially liked the first scene of t
...more
An Odd1
I'd rather be with a brave Sackett who fights for justice than a Fisher who throws back the big ones. Cannot push past rocky path to gem phrases. Quoted a few for your enjoyment.

In 8 short stories, Horne Fisher knows whodunit among jabber, some beautifully phrased, his "bald brow became abruptly corrugated" p 19. People drop in and out of the scene, chitchat, observe, gossip, more inconsequentials that sequentials, so facts are hard to ferret from impressions and feelings. Title subject Fisher k
...more
Todd
Overall, it might be more like 2 1/2 stars. It was basically eight short stories (each a stand-alone chapter) of who-done-its and other mysteries that were only linked by the common character of the Man Who Knew Too Much and his sidekick. The characters did grow on one throughout the telling, though the first two or three chapters seemed to have little point in and of themselves. The fourth chapter certainly had a point, that in support of Chesterton's own Little England convictions. It also con ...more
John Lucy
Essentially this book is a collection of stories about Horne Fisher, an Englishman who knew too much. He's fairly lazy in nature, and that may be because he knows too much. He's a lot like Sherlock Holmes, and Chesterton no doubt modeled Fisher on Holmes. The one difference is that Holmes helped solve crimes and bring criminals to justice, while Fisher solves crimes and then does nothing about it. Why does he do nothing about the crimes? Sometimes because he can't and other times because the rep ...more
Michael Nutt
This Kindle edition of G.K. Chesterton's 'The Man Who Knew Too Much' is a collection of eight stories linked by a central character - the oddly named Horne Fisher - who is a font of all knowledge, which enables him to solve crimes and mysteries in less time than it would take you or I to make a cup of tea.

On first publication in 1922, the book was originally a set of twelve stories, of which only the first eight featured the titular character. In the Kindle collection we have just those eight st
...more
Alyson
I went into this book blind; I had no idea what it was about, other than that someone may know too much of something or other. I think I enjoyed it even more that way. If it had been recommended, or if I knew all about it, I don't think it would have been as refreshing, surprising and original. If you want the same experience, stop reading reviews and just grab a free Kindle edition on Amazon :)

The book is made up of several brief accounts of strange and mysterious events witnessed/experienced
...more
Christian Leonard Quale
The Man Who Knew Too Much is a collection of short stories revolving around... well, the man who knew too much, Horne Fisher. The stories are short murder mysteries in which Mr. Fisher figures out what has happened. The murders are all of a political nature, and much of the time Horne comes to the solution by knowing more than he would like to know about many things, including the many shady aspects of British politics and politicians. Much of the time the true nature of the crime has to be conc ...more
Annie
Let's just say that this ends in such a manner where you wander about trying to collect your thoughts and wondering, "What do I do now?"

The second-to-the-last chapter made me furious, a sort of righteous anger at injustice and thwarted lives, and I had to stop reading momentarily so I could calm down (and also keep myself from taking out my emotions on the innocent book by flinging it across the room, but that's beside the point).

The last chapter? Perfect. It couldn't have ended in a better way.
...more
Eric Orchard
Reading any Chesterton book is like hanging out with a great friend. His writing is comfortable and companionable.

More of a meditation on the nature of mystery and the mysterious than a proper collection of detective or crime stories they are still tightly written and compelling.
Ea Solinas
G.K. Chesterton was happy to do some spoofery of the deductive detective genre -- his detectives seemed to depend more on the knowledge of human nature. One good example is Horne Fisher, the star character who solves bizarre little mysteries because he "knows too much... and all the wrong things."

The first story opens with a reknowned book critic stumbling across a dead man with his head bashed on. Fortunately Fisher is fishing nearby, and is able to deduce who killed the poor man, when, and cle
...more
Doug
This must have been a serialized series of crime stories with this non-detective who solved them. The edition (I read the 1922 original) also includes another series or perhaps a novella, called The Trees of Pride. There must be better stuff by Chesterton. These were facile and mostly uninteresting and written in a style largely unappealing to modern readers. They have little morals about patriotism and arrogance, but generally they're pretty uninteresting.
James Lowe
He really did know too much, didn't he? Chesterton's writing of this character is masterful. Not everything has to be stated explicitly, so by the end you really see how Horne Fisher was trapped in a cell. Chesterton also brings a lot more realism to the genre. Typically in detective kinds of stories the murderer is always caught and brought to justice. The Man Who Knew Too Much recognizes that this is often not the case in reality.
Josh Hamacher
I was expecting a collection of Holmesian mystery stories. Instead I was faced with what I assume is social satire, but of an age and a nation I'm not familiar with. The prose is dense, overly descriptive, and to my mind inelegant. The characters are one-dimensional and utterly unbelievable. I can't say I actively disliked this book, as parts of it were clever and entertaining, but finishing it definitely took a certain amount of willpower.
Joshua
What was so likable about this book of short mystery stories was the prose of G.K. Chesterton. Intelligent without the least sense of haughtiness. The words tripped along like a relaxed conversation among good friends. It is a good thing that the writing style is so pleasurable because I found the stories to be rather lightweight for mysteries. They seemed more curious narratives than challenging who-done-its.
Laura
Jan 18, 2014 Laura marked it as to-read  ·  review of another edition
Recommended to Laura by: Laurel Hicks
Free download available at Project Gutenberg.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • The People of the Mist
  • Myth Ritual and Religion Volume 1
  • The Lady of the Lake
  • Alaeddin And The Enchanted Lamp
  • The Man in Lower Ten
  • The Girl on the Boat
  • The Notting Hill Mystery
  • Romans de la Table Ronde: Erec et Enide, Cligès, Lancelot, Yvain
  • The Complete Poems of Henry Wadsworth Longfellow
  • Huntingtower (Dickson McCunn, #1)
  • Spirits in Bondage: A Cycle of Lyrics
  • The American Frugal Housewife: Dedicated to Those Who Are Not Ashamed of Economy
  • The Red House Mystery
  • The Leavenworth Case
  • Prufrock and Other Observations
  • Descent Into Hell
  • Intentions
  • The Equivoque Principle (Cornelius Quaint Chronicles, #1)
7014283
Gilbert Keith Chesterton (1874-1936) was born in London, educated at St. Paul’s, and went to art school at University College London. In 1900, he was asked to contribute a few magazine articles on art criticism, and went on to become one of the most prolific writers of all time. He wrote a hundred books, contributions to 200 more, hundreds of poems, including the epic Ballad of the White Horse, fi ...more
More about G.K. Chesterton...
Orthodoxy The Man Who Was Thursday: A Nightmare The Innocence of Father Brown (Father Brown, #1) The Complete Father Brown The Everlasting Man

Share This Book

“Modern intelligence won't accept anything on authority. But it will accept anything without authority.” 12 likes
“You know I always liked you," said Fisher, quietly, "but I also respect you, which is not always the same thing. You may possibly guess that I like a good many people I don't respect. Perhaps it is my tragedy, perhaps it is my fault. But you are very different, and I promise you this: that I will never try to keep you as somebody to be liked, at the price of your not being respected.” 2 likes
More quotes…