Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “On the Ruin of Britain (Parts I and II)” as Want to Read:
On the Ruin of Britain (Parts I and II)
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

On the Ruin of Britain (Parts I and II)

3.47  ·  Rating Details ·  57 Ratings  ·  7 Reviews
Saint Gildas (c. 494 or 516-c. 570) was a prominent member of the Celtic Christian church in Britain, whose renowned learning and literary style earned him the designation Gildas Sapiens (Gildas the Wise). He was ordained in the Church, and in his works favoured the monastic ideal. Fragments of letters he wrote reveal that he composed a Rule for monastic life that was a ...more
Paperback, 48 pages
Published June 1st 2007 by Dodo Press (first published 540)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about On the Ruin of Britain, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about On the Ruin of Britain

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
You can tell how dire the state of analyzing/researching post-Roman Britain is if this work is one of the most important primary sources for the "history" of what happened during this time. I put that in quotes because there is little to no objective history at all, and much of it is Gildas sounding a lot like one of those fire and brimstone Book of Revelations dudes you sometimes see in subway stations....

(and btw my kind of low rating doesn't have to do with thinking I was going to get a hist
Daniel Bristow-Bailey
I've seen quite a few reviews on Goodreads and Amazon complaining that On the Ruin of Britain is inaccurate, or biased, or pro-Christian propaganda. It's all three of these things, but to mark it down as such is ridiculous. It's like digging up a sixth-century British helmet and complaining that it's rusty, and the horns look stupid, and it doesn't offer adequate protection against rifle bullets.
If you're looking for a reliable overview of British History in the Sub-Roman period, you're in the w
Jonathan Farley
The work is somewhat interesting, but is not an intellectual appraisal of the destruction of Romano-Britain, rather one christian's rant about Britain's return to paganism. Most of the information provided is clouded with a one-sided 'christian = good, non-christian = evil' viewpoint, which leads Gildas to accuse every pagan king that he mentions of all manner of immoralities, such as uxoricide and incest. Accusations which are not borne out by other contemporary histories and in one case is ...more
" No sooner were they gone, than the Picts and Scots, like worms which in the heat of the mid-day come forth from their holes, hastily land again from their canoes, in which they had been carried beyond the Cichican valley, differing one from another in manners, but inspired with the same avidity for blood, and all more eager to shroud their villainous faces in bushy hair than to cover with decent clothing those parts of their body which required it."

" And again a little further, thus:—"The barb
Aug 08, 2012 Terri rated it liked it
I feel that when Gildas walked into the room the other monks rolled their eyes and said to each other "Ugh, here comes crazy old Gildas."

Seriously, though. There's a whole lot of crazy ravings going on in this book. As the title says, it's about ruin of Britain and the many faults of the many sinners, with some helpful reminders about what happens to sinners. Some of it is highly entertaining, especially his descriptions of the five "kings" of Britain and their shortcomings. But since Gildas is
Flint Johnson
Jan 02, 2014 Flint Johnson rated it really liked it
This thirty-five year old translation is still the best out there. Latin on one page, translation in the next, a detailed index at the end which is referenced by chapter and line. The book has little discussion and that is the only real flaw. However, there has always been plenty of discussion about Gildas and his writings to be found elsewhere.
Jul 28, 2015 sologdin rated it it was ok
early anti-immigrant jeremiad furthermore laments its own inability to foresee the importance of naming dux bellorum arturus rex directly.
Kay rated it it was ok
Jul 06, 2012
Wesley Fiorentino
Wesley Fiorentino rated it really liked it
Sep 01, 2016
Noah rated it liked it
Jul 29, 2013
Andrea rated it it was ok
Jan 06, 2013
Tim rated it liked it
Apr 27, 2014
Jarno Liedes
Jarno Liedes rated it liked it
Feb 28, 2016
Julia rated it liked it
Dec 15, 2015
Nick rated it liked it
Mar 16, 2012
Abigail rated it really liked it
Feb 17, 2016
Anthony Emmel
Anthony Emmel rated it really liked it
Aug 09, 2015
Anastassia rated it really liked it
Feb 04, 2015
Robin rated it really liked it
Sep 02, 2013
Mark Noce
Mark Noce rated it liked it
Dec 06, 2013
Thomas rated it it was ok
Jun 16, 2013
Samuel rated it liked it
Dec 03, 2016
Grimmthorny rated it it was ok
Aug 01, 2013
P J rated it really liked it
Oct 03, 2011
Mary Jo Malo
Mary Jo Malo rated it it was amazing
Sep 01, 2014
Anthony Morgan
Anthony Morgan rated it liked it
Oct 14, 2015
Markus rated it it was amazing
Sep 20, 2015
Tom Breen
Tom Breen rated it really liked it
Jun 18, 2013
Mark Grago
Mark Grago rated it it was amazing
Feb 09, 2013
ahorseandacarrot rated it liked it
Jun 13, 2016
« previous 1 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Share This Book