Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court” as Want to Read:
The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court

4.05  ·  Rating Details  ·  11,785 Ratings  ·  1,851 Reviews
In The Nine, acclaimed journalist Jeffrey Toobin takes us into the chambers of the most important—and secret—legal body in our country, the Supreme Court, revealing the complex dynamic among the nine people who decide the law of the land. An institution at a moment of transition, the Court now stands at a crucial point, with major changes in store on such issues as abortio ...more
Paperback, 452 pages
Published September 9th 2008 by Anchor (first published 2007)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Dec 03, 2008 Jessica rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: young ladies thoughtlessly considering a thankless career in social work
Recommended to Jessica by: david giltinan; ginnie jones; paul glusman
WELL. How I wish I'd had the foresight, at a much younger and more capable age, to consult some kind of career counselor! If only, if ONLY someone back then had the wisdom and charity to inform me of the existence of something called "constitutional law," and advised me to study hard, behave myself, keep my mouth shut, make influential friends, and avoid leaving a drunken trail of scribbled opinions about all my personal and political views as I careened helter-skelter along a haphazard career p ...more
Jun 20, 2011 David rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
It’s certainly not outside of the realm of possibility that I am deluded. Completely and utterly deluded. Nevertheless, I have always held the American judiciary in much greater esteem than either the executive or legislative branches of government for several reasons—but most persuasive among them is my firm belief that the judiciary is the best situated to transcend workaday partisan politics.

Sure, judges are appointed by partisan politicians for partisan reasons. Therefore, they are functions
Feb 08, 2008 mike rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
"This book is based principally on my interviews with the justices and more than seventy-five of their law clerks," author Jeffrey Toobin writes in his notes that close the book. "The interviews were on a not-for-attribution basis -- that is, I could use the information provided but without quoting directly or identifying the source."

If you read the book back-to-front -- like the apocryphal politicos who look for their names in the index before reading a book -- you'll see the problem with this
Oct 02, 2008 Kate rated it liked it
Recommends it for: Chris Michaud
3.5 stars. This book is really about the political trajectory of the Supreme Court over the past 30 years. Toobin seeks to show a gradual, unlikely shift leftward over the years of the Rehnquist Court (followed by a striking and uncharacteristically - for the institution - speedy swing back to the right since the Roberts and Alito confirmations).

Not exactly a work of rigorous scholarship, so don't read it if you want a primer on important cases (though Toobin does a good job describing, in plain
Jun 01, 2012 Janice rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
In law school I had one of the most sadistic, demanding and universally feared professors in the entire school for Constitutional Law, which is probably the most important class in law school. The first day of class he called me an idiot and told me I didn’t know how to read. For the next few weeks of the semester, he regularly berated me for my ignorance and ineptitude (which in retrospect, I fully deserved), but I got off easy (he stopped abusing me after a few weeks once I adapted my schoolwo ...more
The author discusses the Court from about 1980 to 2007. He wants to show how politics influences the rulings of the Court, but while reading the book I was struck by the degree to which politics had influenced his writing. He wears his bias on his sleeve, which makes this book a less than reliable source of Court information. He portrays the justices with whom he disagrees as petty, rude ideologues, while portraying the justices with whom he agrees as compassionate, intelligent, and most importa ...more
Peggy bill
Aug 29, 2008 Peggy bill rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
In the past, whenever I have gotten sick or scared about the direction of politics in this country, I have comforted myself with the idea that our governmental balance of power mediates abrupt shifts to the right (I am not worried about abrupt shifts to the left, as the country is generally too far to right already). I didn’t have hope in the Supreme Court, but I did have faith in their moderating effect on law and society.

That was until the presidential election of 2000. I was disgusted by a st
Dec 02, 2012 Carol rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
You've got to love book group and you have to doubly love a non-fiction book group. If not for this group of wonderful people I might never have read The Nine. And I meant THE NINE... I'm mediocre when it comes to following our government. I'm not the worse when it comes to current events but I knew my reading group had it all over me. All the more fun as they had the background and could fill in questions that came up.

What I liked about The Nine was the way Jeffrey Toobin gave us snapshots of m
some editing and additions 7/22/10

Toobin does a great job in detailing the personalities of the justices and how they shape the court. Thomas is the most interesting, perhaps. A man obviously bitter about the cards he has been dealt, he holds grudges seemingly forever, even disdaining Yale Law School, his alma mater; yet, he is very well liked and has lots of friends on and off the court. (Scalia, asked once for the difference between himself and Thomas, replied, "I am an originalist; he's a nut
Jan 25, 2008 David rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: read-in-2008
This is an excellent book. Toobin exhibits all the qualities one could want in a guide to the Supreme Court: he is smart, knowledgeable, engaging, witty, and writes clearly and fluidly.

This is a well-organized, well-written book on a fascinating and important subject. Remarkably, it is never dull - parts I found particularly notable were his account of the Court's role in the 2000 election debacle, and his explanation of how Sandra Day O' Connor became the most influential justice on the court.
Sadly not the trashy gossip fest I was in the mood for. I wanted either another hundred pages discussing the court's role in the political system and propounding a new theory of case analysis, or I wanted some juicy judicial sexploits. Sadly, I got neither. The "revelations" in this book are nothing new if you pay a little attention to the court – Scalia and Ginsburg were besties, Thomas has a bizarre and alarming worldview, etc.

Still, the lay reader would probably enjoy this as a portrait of pe
Dec 30, 2009 Matt rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
This isn't The Brethren. That should be made clear from the start. Bob Woodward's book on the United State Supreme Court's 1969-75 terms is, in my mind, a classic. I've never read a better, more entertaining, more detailed book on the Supreme Court's inner workings. It also gives a glimpse of an interesting moment in legal history, as the progressive years of the Warren Court ended, and a gradual rightward shift began (despite, rather than because, of the incompetence of Warren Burger).

Jul 06, 2009 Seth rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Interesting survey of the modern supreme court's history and personalities. The author pretends to write balanced even handed biographical sketches of a number of supreme court justices during the Bush years. He has a hard time veiling his distaste for conservative ideology while praising "moderate" justices like O'Conner for her "diplomatic" and "pragmatic" judicial view. He seems to spend by far more time on her than all the others combined. He believes that she was the most influential justic ...more
Oct 04, 2007 Ira rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Toobin's book, as mentioned in some of the other reviews, is highly readable, captivating and contains very good summaries of many of the important Supreme Court cases of the last few decades. Perhaps as important is his ability to write about the Jurist's personalities and their judicial philosophy providing the reader with the thought processes that go to work behind the decision making.

The inner workings and day to day activity of the Court was something I found quite interesting. The Jurist
Dec 21, 2015 Alisa rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
I really enjoyed this audio book. Well-researched, relatively balanced, and an intimate look at the way the Supreme Court operates. Interesting to consider how this impacts (or doesn't) daily American life. It makes me wonder more about the clerking culture, and certainly will be interesting to see how the next iteration of the court, with Kagan and Sotomayor, will change the dynamics. The court will never be a microcosm of society, its functions and functionaries will always be part of our most ...more
Jul 24, 2008 Tracy rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
I had given this book to my partner, who hadn't read it. . . So I picked it up.

It feels really strange to say this was a guilty pleasure, but it was!

What, a non-fiction work about the Supreme Court a guilty pleasure??? Well, it was! It is extremely accessible (perhaps too accessible?), and the position Toobin takes on any issue coincides pretty closely to mine, so that made it even easier to read.

The general pictures of the book is an insider's look at the Supreme Court from roughly the mid 1980
Oct 13, 2007 Michael rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
The book offered some good (and at times, juicy) insights into the Court that I was not previously aware of. It is a compelling tale and analysis of the Court’s recent history from prominent cases to the nominations of the justices to judicial politics.

The unfortunate side effect of this was again feeling the anguish that accompanied some vile and lawless decisions; most of all, Bush v. Gore. The naked desire on the part of the five that made the majority in that case to act as speedily as poss
Oct 28, 2007 Jeff rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: everyone
Jeffrey Toobin’s The Nine is an incredibly well written book. If you’re a follower of the Supreme Court and acquainted with terms like Casey, Lawrence, or Hamdan you won’t be able to put the book down. If these cases are new to you, then you are in for quite an education on the true workings of the third coequal branch of the federal government. One criticism of Toobin’s style is that he doesn’t go into enough detail on the legal reasoning or merits of the cases. The book reads more like a novel ...more
Mar 05, 2011 Caroline rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: own
A fascinating look at the Supreme Court and its justices.

I learned a lot (not that I was too knowledgable to begin with) about the ins and outs of the modern-day Supreme Court, from the procedures to the personalities that make it up. Before reading it, I expected Toobin to begin his narrative early in American history, so I was pleasantly surprised that it dealt with the Court's most recent history. I also appreciated how Toobin constructed his narrative, with a good mixture of anecdotes about
Jun 28, 2015 Camille rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: history, politics
I guess I was expecting this to be more journalistic and less dramatic. While very interesting and well written you cannot say that this is an objective view of the Supreme Court, its members, or its role in our government. Written during the George W. Bush presidency, with hindsight it is humorous that the author was so concerned that the SCOTUS was becoming too conservative - ha!
Debbie "DJ" Wilson
May 03, 2014 Debbie "DJ" Wilson rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: non-fiction
Really well written. Not at all dry or boring, really gave me a look into our Supreme Court. This book was written in 2007, so two of the justices have changed, but still an awesome read. The different personalities, and cases, shed so much light on the inner workings of our highest court.
Kim Miller-Davis
This is an excellent book for helping non-lawyers understand the dynamics, judicial philosophies, and inner-workings of the Rehnquist court. Not only did I learn a lot about the justices themselves and the presidential selection process, I also feel like I now have a pretty good grasp of the ideological reasonings behind some of the most major decisions of the last 40 years. Since Toobin only briefly covers the 1st couple years of the Roberts' court, his follow-up book, The Oath, is probably a g ...more
Catherine Woodman
Apr 08, 2013 Catherine Woodman rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
The subtitle of the book is "Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court", and that is more or less true for the Rehnquist court, which began in the 1980's and goes to Rehnquists death, and the book more or less ends with the beginning of the Robert's court (which will warrent a whole other book, it seems like. That court was looking entirely predictable up until Roberts and the Affordable health Care Act decision, with Kennedy having returned to the conservative wing of the court, but with Oba ...more
Jul 23, 2011 Kurt rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
This book is fascinating, instructive, and entertaining. Since my first week as a Harvard Law student, I have had a deep skepticism about the Supreme Court. I have scowled with frustration while writing nasty notes in the margins of my casebooks because justices were babbling on and on about strict scrutiny and penumbra and other judicial nonsense when I had the distinct feeling that they were simply trying to justify the outcome that they believed was the most just. I am a political liberal, an ...more
Kevin Quinley
Toobin provides an informative if not provocative glimpse inside the inner workings of the Court, a branch sometimes overlooked but perhaps wielding the most power out of the three. Prior to reading, I could probably only name about half the justices and paint their ideology in broad strokes, so by interpolating major decisions with personal profiles Toobin dramatically increased my own familiarity with the Court. To be sure, Toobin writes for a popular audience by eschewing more technical cases ...more
Feb 28, 2008 Kirsti rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: nonfiction, politics
Fascinating (though left-leaning) explanation of how the backgrounds and personalities of the nine Supreme Court justices affect American life and culture.

Probably the most interesting part, unsurprisingly, is about Roe vs. Wade. Justice Blackmun wrote the opinion based on viability of the fetus and on a Constitutional right to privacy. O'Connor believed Roe was sound based on the privacy argument but contended that technology would change the viability issue. (So far, it hasn't.) Ginsberg (who
Jun 16, 2008 Andrew rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: history-skim
More of a liberal rant about the Roberts Court than an impartial history or analysis. It is aggravatingly and stupendously biased. When my blood cools perhaps I will read some more.

(For the record, I am neither a knee-jerk liberal nor an arch-conservative; I am an independent with libertarian leanings. However, in the realm of the law, my feelings align much more with "conservatives", in that I believe that judicial restraint must be the sine qua non of the legal system. The unelected judiciary
Oct 20, 2009 Judy rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
This is a fascinating history of the Supreme Court from the Reagan administration on. Toobin covers the appointment of each justice and the background of most of their major decisions. He discusses the ideological shifts that have occurred during the last 30 years, and expresses what I thought was a fair and balanced opinion on each justice's role.

I now have a better understanding of why abortion has been such a pivotal concern ever since Roe v. Wade, along with other issues such as desegregati
Feb 11, 2009 Stewart rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
A juicy must-read for any SCOTUS buff. Toobin presents a wonderfully entertaining and titillating portrait of the nine justices that graced the Reinquist Court from the early 1990s to the mid-2000s, while simultaneously weaving throughout his book the more sober legal implications at stake in the many high profile cases that this Court took on over those years. And they are all here, the culture war cases of abortion rights, gun rights and gay rights; the First Amendment cases of freedom of spee ...more
Dec 13, 2010 Josh rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
I can't say the SCOTUS comes off looking great in this. Toobin has a great narrative voice that makes the book read nicely. Kennedy's ego driven flourishes, Scalia's unwillingness to contemplate a 20th century, make for some depressing if not fascinating reading. At the end of the day perhaps only Justice Souter makes me proud to be an American. Bryer and Ginsberg come off pretty well too although I think that might partly because of my liberal bias for my view of the Court as an institution to ...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
  • The Brethren: Inside the Supreme Court
  • Becoming Justice Blackmun: Harry Blackmun's Supreme Court Journey
  • Scorpions: The Battles and Triumphs of FDR's Great Supreme Court Justices
  • A People's History of the Supreme Court: The Men and Women Whose Cases and Decisions Have Shaped Our Constitution
  • Supreme Conflict: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Control of the United States Supreme Court
  • Justice for All: Earl Warren and the Nation He Made
  • The Majesty of the Law: Reflections of a Supreme Court Justice
  • The Dark Side: The Inside Story of How the War on Terror Turned Into a War on American Ideals
  • Closed Chambers: The Rise, Fall, and Future of the Modern Supreme Court
  • The Supreme Court: The Personalities and Rivalries That Defined America
  • Justice Brennan: Liberal Champion
  • Gideon's Trumpet
  • Making Our Democracy Work: A Judge's View
  • Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America's Struggle for Equality
  • Supreme Power: Franklin Roosevelt vs. the Supreme Court
  • A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law
  • The Roberts Court: The Struggle for the Constitution
  • Contempt of Court: The Turn-of-the-Century Lynching That Launched a Hundred Years of Federalism
Lawyer, author, legal correspondent for CNN and The New Yorker magazine.
More about Jeffrey Toobin...

Share This Book

“on the government” 0 likes
“Rehnquist was just reflecting his shifting role, from outsider to the institutional embodiment of the Court.” 0 likes
More quotes…