14th out of 173 books
—
129 voters
Heretics / Orthodoxy: Nelson's Royal Classics
This Nelson Royal Classic includes two famous classical works by G.K. Chesterton, Heretics and Orthodoxy. In response to the wrong doctrinal teaching of many of his contemporaries, G.K. Chesterton takes readers back to the "fundamentals" in Heretics. In the compelling work,Orthodoxy, Chesterton provides a look at what some have described as his own spiritual auto...more
Hardcover, 311 pages
Published
February 15th 2000
by Thomas Nelson Publishers
(first published 1905)
There is a good chance some of your friends read this book. Sign in to see!
sign in »
Friend Reviews
To see what your friends thought of this book,
please sign up.
Community Reviews
(showing
1-30
of
914)
Within a very short length of time, Chesterton went from "a famous writer I'll get around to reading one of these days" to "that writer I'm always bringing in to conversations and trying to get other people to read," and this bundled edition of Heretics & Orthodoxy is largely at fault.
Orthodoxy is the better book of the two, by far, but Heretics lays extremely helpful groundwork for it: Heretics is more work to read and understand, but it can be valued by its own we...more
Orthodoxy is the better book of the two, by far, but Heretics lays extremely helpful groundwork for it: Heretics is more work to read and understand, but it can be valued by its own we...more
G.K. Chesterton's prose is always great. The man was a rather brilliant individual, and his ideas are some of the most interesting - and most challenging - I've run into. He turns the world on its head, and you find you enjoy it... Aside from a few minor impracticalities anyway.
If you read these books, or even just one of them, prepare to have your mindset examined, rearranged and then put together again in a completely different way. Don't worry though, 90% of the time the result will be ...more
If you read these books, or even just one of them, prepare to have your mindset examined, rearranged and then put together again in a completely different way. Don't worry though, 90% of the time the result will be ...more
G. K. Chesterton’s Heretics ended up at the head of my slightly non-deterministic reading queue. It was a quick read, due in equal parts to fascination and frustration.
Chesterton’s lament is that “everything is important, except everything” – that we had come to care more about the tiny details and positions one might hold rather than one’s overarching and all-encompassing philosophy of life. Furthermore, we have ceased to care about being right, about being orthodox. He argues that th...more
Chesterton’s lament is that “everything is important, except everything” – that we had come to care more about the tiny details and positions one might hold rather than one’s overarching and all-encompassing philosophy of life. Furthermore, we have ceased to care about being right, about being orthodox. He argues that th...more
A common hesitation in our day touching the use of extreme convictions is a sort of notion that extreme convictions specially upon cosmic matters, have been responsible in the past for the thing which is called bigotry. But a very small amount of direct experience will dissipate this view. In real life the people who are most bigoted are the people who have no convictions at all. The economists of the Manchester school who disagree with Socialism take Socialism seriously. It is the young man in...more
Sandra
rated it
·
review of another edition
Recommends it for:
Nicola
Shelves:
christian,
philosophy
This was the first book I read from Chesterton and I have to admit that, even though it was a bit difficult to follow, I found it genius. It is very difficult to classify this book, but I believe it is a great source of criticism to some modern addictions such as progress, beauty, democracy and anti-religion. I liked it very much by the fact that he manages to criticize in a very respectful and objective way. He destroys the ideals of several important novelists and philosophers by using charact...more
I love reading Chesterton both for his ability to turn ideas upside down and for the fact that he was the archetypal happy warrior. He could argue vigorously with a George Bernard Shaw and then film a silent western with him.
Heretics consists of Chesterton's commentary on the heretics and heresies of his day. He considers figures like George Bernard Shaw, Rudyard Kipling, George Moore, Lowes Dickinson and others. He had a wonderful ability to see both what was commendable in others...more
Heretics consists of Chesterton's commentary on the heretics and heresies of his day. He considers figures like George Bernard Shaw, Rudyard Kipling, George Moore, Lowes Dickinson and others. He had a wonderful ability to see both what was commendable in others...more
Chesterton, let's face it, is thematically ataxic. He can't keep to one idea; in the words of an acquaintance of mine, he sidesteps issues by making sense. Reading Orthodoxy was an experience analogous to hearing an inebriated genius swerve through celestial ideas. The book's only lack is that its subject demands a structure it doesn't provide.
Heretics is a different story. Here Chesterton is truest to his form. He's free to roam the world of his improvised ideas as he surveys...more
Heretics is a different story. Here Chesterton is truest to his form. He's free to roam the world of his improvised ideas as he surveys...more
I listened to this book on LibriVox.org.
But in order that life should be a story or romance to us, it is necessary that a great part of it, at any rate, should be settled for us without our permission. If we wish life to be a system, this may be a nuisance; but if we wish it to be a drama, it is an essential. It may often happen, no doubt, that a drama may be written by somebody else which we like very little. But we should like it still less if the author came before the curtain every hour or so, and forced on us the whole trouble of...more
Being a collection of essays, some struck me with more force than others. But overall, this is a wonderful representation of how Chesterton functioned as a debater: each essay "slams" either a single person or a group of people for their thinking, but Chesterton slams so good-naturedly, and with such respect for his opponents, that in the end it doesn't feel like a slam at all. If only today's thinkers would be so gracious and generous with each other! Chesterton always points out his ...more
This is a re-read for me, though it has been over thirty years since I first encountered it. G. K. Chesterton makes the point that the most important thing about a person is his philosophy, whether it is spurious or sustaining. "We think that for a general about to fight an enemy, it is important to know the enemy's numbers, but still more important to know the enemy's philosophy. We think the question is not whether the theory of the cosmos affects matters, but whether, in the long run, an...more
G.K. Chesterton was such a genius. He blows my mind repeatedly in his books, and gets me thinking about things in a completely different light from that which I am used to thinking about them. Amazing. Here are the greatest hits from this book, at least as far as I'm concerned:
-- For with the removal of all question of merit or payment, the soul is suddenly released for incredible voyages.
-- And this gay humility, this holding of ourselves lightly and yet ready for an i...more
-- For with the removal of all question of merit or payment, the soul is suddenly released for incredible voyages.
-- And this gay humility, this holding of ourselves lightly and yet ready for an i...more
Paula
rated it
·
review of another edition
Recommends it for:
G.K. Chesterton fans
Recommended to Paula by:
C. S. Lewis
G. K. Chester was one of the most influential writers of his time. Yet, few have ever heard of him. Why is that? Well, it is because he defended what has come to be considered indefensible--Orthodox Christianity. His writings have enormously influenced the great Christian appologetics of our time like C. S. Lewis and Peter Kreeft, who have each publically acknowledged their great debt to him. As Dale Alquist has said, "G.K. Chesterton was the best writer of the 20th century." If you ar...more
I really like Chesterton and i like to read him write chapter after chapter dedicated each to some of my favorite people. He is a Christian apologist and I like to hear him eloquently craft arguments against some of the foremost minds of the time. I usually end up on the other side of the wall from him, but i always feel like i get a well reasoned perspective from the process of following him down the path.
I actually read an early US edition of this book, but I'm too lazy to look for the exact match edition. I mention this because there may be an edition that has what makes the final star fall off for me: explanatory notes or a gloss to help this reader look back a century and understand certain allusions to persons and events that would have been clear to Chesterton's contemporaries.
Note: This is the copy of Orthodoxy I own. This review is not for Heretics.
An excellent exploration of the Christian faith. Chesterton is a master of the English language, in my opinion, and it is evident here. Witty and intelligent writing that shows Chesterton's strongly Catholic-leaning views (Anglican, officially, when he wrote it) without displaying disrespect for his philosophical opponents (e.g. Mr. George Bernard Shaw.) The book is not one for those seeking a complete logical e...more
An excellent exploration of the Christian faith. Chesterton is a master of the English language, in my opinion, and it is evident here. Witty and intelligent writing that shows Chesterton's strongly Catholic-leaning views (Anglican, officially, when he wrote it) without displaying disrespect for his philosophical opponents (e.g. Mr. George Bernard Shaw.) The book is not one for those seeking a complete logical e...more
This isn't the edition I read. Mine was the from the Barnes & Noble Library of Essential Reading, which I recommend. And I commend them for including Chesterton in their publications. I also recommend his books "The Everlasting Man" and "Orthodoxy" as well as his biographies of Sts. Thomas Aquinas and Francis of Assisi.
Same with Orthodoxy... Chesterton has a wit and imagination that are killer combos in arguing for his theological position. Even for those who disagree with him, as I do on some points, his insatiable use of analogies that are easy to understand offers excellent debate points, and shorten the book considerably. If you've ever read a book, especially a book on philosophy or theology, and thought, "it was ok, but it could have been a lot shorter," then Chesterton is your guy. The anal...more
What I love about Chesterton is not that he is always right (nobody is), but that he is always perfectly clear. In addition, if he is going to bother making an argument, he will not only offer magnificent support, but also state his points in a series of hugely quotable (and often chuckle-worthy) rapier-like sentences.
Heresy: Well it had some chapters that I liked and some that I did not. Heresy critiques Chesterton's contemporaries of his day, writers, poets and play writes, such as H.G. Wells, George Bernard Shaw & Kipling. There were bits of wisdom here and there that I jotted down. Overall, the book didn't grab me like some. I'd give this a 2 star rating
Orthodoxy: Much better than Heresy. I'd give this a 4 star rating. Chesterton seems to get to the point a little quicker in this book, still h...more
Orthodoxy: Much better than Heresy. I'd give this a 4 star rating. Chesterton seems to get to the point a little quicker in this book, still h...more
This is a book of philosophy. It is not an easy read as it addresses a number of issues that were contemporary to the time of its writing (early 1900s). But Chesterton does a good job of laying out his position. Certainly made me think.
This collection of essays was more of a mixed bag for me and nowhere near as wonderful as Orthodoxy. (Much of that probably had to do with my failure to catch turn-of-the-twentieth-century references.) However, the chapters I liked were indeed wonderful (such as "On Certain Modern Writers and the Institution of the Family"), and I'll be able to reread Orthodoxy now with a better appreciation of what he was about. I'd certainly still call it essential reading for any Chesterton fan.
"Never has there been so little discussion about the nature of men as now, when, for the first time, anyone can discuss it. The old restriction meant that only the orthodox were allowed to discuss religion. Modern liberty means that nobody is allowed to discuss it. Good taste, the last and vilest of human superstitions, has succeeded in silencing us where all the rest have failed...Emancipation has only locked the saint in the same tower of silence as the heresiarch...But there are some peo...more
I really enjoyed this. It is easier to read than Everlasting Man.
I enjoyed the insights Chesterton gives on contemporary issues...which amazingly remain contemporary to us.
I enjoyed the insights Chesterton gives on contemporary issues...which amazingly remain contemporary to us.
I really got into this book, despite the age becoming apparent with the references to figures more known in Chesterton's days.
Some excellent essays which really make you think about the reaility of what others say and do.
Chesterton had a gift for turning things on their head to show you waht they really should be.
Some excellent essays which really make you think about the reaility of what others say and do.
Chesterton had a gift for turning things on their head to show you waht they really should be.
A terrific entry into the Chesterton oeuvre. When he sets his pen on dismantling a viewpoint as he does here, he does it like no other. While his opponents views have quietly faded into obscurity, Chesterton still stands supreme.
Funny and flamboyant. Quotable and often Quixotic. Chesterton is one of those writers (I think of Christopher Hitchens) I read not because I agree with him always, but because he forces me page after page to pick up, look at, and sharpen my beliefs. He is like a literary gypsy, who quoting parables about fairies and singing odd paradoxes about the Universe, comes into my room and offers to sharpen the edges of all my dogmas. After finishing his books most all my doctrines are wickedly sharpe...more
see my review of "orthodoxy" by g.k. chesterton for my opinion of this book.
Wisdom from Chesterton. Refreshing in an age of conflict avoidance.
Hate to do this to a Chesterton book...Perhaps I would've enjoyed this more if I truly delved into this one and pushed myself to better understanding...and no, I didn't finish this.
However...Heretics seemed less organized than Orthodoxy, and it was really hard for me to concentrate on Chesterton's paradoxical points. Maybe someday I'll come back and give this book all the attention that it truly deserves, but for now...I've satisfied my inner Chesterton craving by just reading Orthodoxy (...more
However...Heretics seemed less organized than Orthodoxy, and it was really hard for me to concentrate on Chesterton's paradoxical points. Maybe someday I'll come back and give this book all the attention that it truly deserves, but for now...I've satisfied my inner Chesterton craving by just reading Orthodoxy (...more
There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
Be the first to start one »
Gilbert Keith Chesterton (1874-1936) was an English writer. His prolific and diverse output included philosophy, ontology, poetry, play writing, journalism, public lecturing and debating, literary and art criticism, biography, Christian apologetics, and fiction, including fantasy and detective fiction.
Chesterton has been called the "prince of paradox". Time magazine, in a rev...more
More about G.K. Chesterton...
Chesterton has been called the "prince of paradox". Time magazine, in a rev...more
Share This Book
1 trivia question
More quizzes & trivia...
“Drink because you are happy, but never because you are miserable.”
—
158 people liked it
“Truth, of course, must of necessity be stranger than fiction, for we have made fiction to suit ourselves.”
—
17 people liked it
More quotes…















view all 3 comments





































