Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Food Myths Debunked: Why Our Food Is Safe” as Want to Read:
Food Myths Debunked: Why Our Food Is Safe
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Food Myths Debunked: Why Our Food Is Safe

0.0  ·  Rating Details ·  0 Ratings  ·  0 Reviews
This book goes through the most common food fears and myths and debunk them with some simple science. Told in readable story form, the book tackles HFCS, MSG, food colorings, raw milk, organic farming, GMOs and biotechnology, sugars, artificial sweeteners and honey. Every chapter ends with footnotes to actual papers that help reassure you that we have one of the safest ...more
Paperback, 290 pages
Published September 27th 2014 by Createspace (first published September 26th 2014)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Food Myths Debunked, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Food Myths Debunked

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-18)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Jeff
Nov 17, 2014 Jeff rated it really liked it
An excellent explanation of how the myriad fears over our food supply are largely based on fear mongering and pseudoscience.The book explains why these things are happening (often, it has to do with companies making a profit by spreading misinformation such as organic food producers and makers of various supplements making unfounded claims or supporting pseudoscience to bolster sales). The book contains a fair amount of science and, a bit more chemistry than the average reader may be comfortable ...more
Jeffrey Lee
Jul 12, 2015 Jeffrey Lee rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Really good book

I disagree with the author when he uses terms like "settled science", as there is no such thing. Otherwise, this is a great book. Where there is no evidence or contradictory evidence, he calls people on it.
Teddie Jordan
Teddie Jordan rated it it was amazing
Apr 07, 2015
Brett Guillory
Brett Guillory rated it really liked it
Jul 12, 2015
Bob Egan
Bob Egan rated it it was amazing
Sep 08, 2015
Linn Steward
Linn Steward marked it as to-read
Oct 13, 2014
S.m. Elliott
S.m. Elliott marked it as to-read
Oct 13, 2014
Alister
Alister marked it as to-read
Oct 13, 2014
Oberlin Alumni
Oberlin Alumni marked it as to-read
Jan 27, 2015
Timothy Jenson
Timothy Jenson marked it as to-read
Jul 07, 2015
Arianna
Arianna is currently reading it
Jan 05, 2016
Sébastien
Sébastien marked it as to-read
Mar 20, 2016
Marcas SOG
Marcas SOG marked it as to-read
Apr 04, 2016
Barbara Kessler
Barbara Kessler is currently reading it
May 08, 2016
Caleb
Caleb marked it as to-read
May 26, 2016
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Share This Book



“Ames applied this technique to any number of compounds, but one of the most interesting pieces of work was his 1990 paper on “Dietary Pesticides.”5 Ames recognized that most plants produced their own pesticides and compared their prevalence to the residues of synthetic pesticides. Surprisingly, they found that 99.99% of the pesticides in the American diet were from plants, and only .01% were from synthetic sources. They noted that only 52 of those naturally occurring pesticides had been tested for carcinogenicity, and that 27 of those were indeed carcinogenic. So, if more than half of the tested natural pesticides were carcinogenic and in far greater concentration than those applied by man, they then concluded that the hazards from synthetic pesticides were probably insignificant.” 0 likes
More quotes…