Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Varney the Vampire; or, The Feast of Blood” as Want to Read:
Varney the Vampire; or, The Feast of Blood
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Varney the Vampire; or, The Feast of Blood

by
3.38  ·  Rating Details ·  1,077 Ratings  ·  63 Reviews
After 100 years of neglect, the potboiler Penny Dreadful Varney The Vampire; or, The Feast of Blood returns in this innovative critical edition to entertain a whole new generation of readers. Sold for a penny a chapter on the streets of London in 1845, Varney the Vampire is a milestone of Vampire fiction, yet ignored and overlooked for nearly 100 years, until now!

The Crit
...more
Paperback, 812 pages
Published October 31st 2007 by zittaw press (first published 1845)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Varney the Vampire; or, The Feast of Blood, please sign up.

Popular Answered Questions

Tracie it is also a novel of manners and so would be inexplicable to sixth graders as well as inappropriate subject matter.

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
D.M. Dutcher
Jul 16, 2012 D.M. Dutcher rated it it was ok
Shelves: my-poor-brain
God my brain. If you read this in the right mood it can be hilarious, but this is one hell of a slog for something that bears little resemblance to modern vampires and doesn't have plot holes, it has plot subways. I'm not even going to try to synopsize this, but just list the characters.

Flora Bannerworth: The chick. Varney wants to suck her blood, then softens to her, and just wants her out of the way so he can get into Bannerworth Hall. Is engaged to Charles Holland and her brother is Henry.

She
...more
Surreysmum
I read this potboiler, in this edition, when I was an undergraduate (a very, very long time ago), and have always had a yen to revisit it. I was pleasantly surprised, and very amused. This facsimile reprint gives ample evidence of how little care was bestowed on the physical production of the novel - it's the 1847 full-length edition that's reproduced, and it's just chock-a-block with bad chapter numbering and pagination, not to mention chunks of type being banged out of alignment or knocked out ...more
Lorraine
Mar 08, 2017 Lorraine rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Very, very poorly structured. Would be better as a collection of short stories. Was very bored after the second 'episode'. Skipped a lot of it. Backstory of vampire insufficiently developed. If you want a backstory, make it proper! Ending unsatisfactory too. Episodes repetitive and annoying. I would say that it had a lot of potential, in terms of psychologising the vampire, but fails to live up to any of it
Adriana
May 18, 2012 Adriana rated it it was ok
I have to admit, upfront, that I didn’t finish this book. I plan to (someday), but right now all I really want is to put as much distance between me and Varney. The breaking point was getting to the end of my kindle version and realizing that, besides the 96 chapters contained in it, I had 124 more to look forward to. 124 more chapters filled with more and more repetitive actions, mindless chatter, and a vampire that instead of looking like this:

description

Is more and more looking like a 19th century versi
...more
James
Sep 23, 2012 James rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Roberta
Mar 28, 2015 Roberta rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: horror-e-gotico
And so it ends, and I'm thankfull.
Don't get me wrong, it's an interesting story dotted with british humour, but there's too much in it. Well, everything is in it! All the clichés: Dracula and Frankenstein, sailors and pirates, gambling and murder, nightime stolling to shallow graves, kidnapping, lies and deceiving... you name it. But in the end all of these plot twists are too much and yes, it does resemble a modern soap-opera.
It's my first attempt at a "penny dreadful" novel: not bad, but not
...more
Suvi
Apr 24, 2015 Suvi rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Evokes gothic atmosphere maybe with three sentences overall (the first chapter is alright). Varney's interesting in theory, as he's a sympathetic vampire and by far the only character who actually has a soul (ha!). The others are like cardboard cutouts. Not that there seems to be any logic to the story itself, anyway. Rymer either forgot every once in a while what his book was about, or he was so broke that he absolutely had to bloat the text by every means necessary, including ministories here ...more
Janet Robel
Aug 05, 2015 Janet Robel rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
A beautifully rendered classic tale of the Vampyre. This Victorian era Penny Dreadful about Varney the Vampyre is a huge tome of a novel but well worth the time and effort to read. This really brought me back to the days when vampire books were all the rage and flying off the shelves at bookstores. True vampire fans will absolutely love this book and the detailed illustrations and want it for their keeper shelves. This is a superb reminder of why paranormal books are still going strong after all ...more
Bettielee
Jan 19, 2012 Bettielee rated it really liked it
Shelves: gothic, horror
I feel weird giving it 4 stars... but I loved the rollicking pace and the authors occasional "asides" - meaning, the little stories thrown in for no reason. But it was a mix of scary and funny, the ridiculous, the sublime. You have to be patient with it and remember you are reading a penny dreadful - this isn't Shakespeare or Bram Stroker, for that matter. It's all about sensationalism. The ending upset me... but I won't ruin it for you.
R.
Mar 05, 2008 R. marked it as to-read
Var-neeey, Varney Vampire; King of the Wild Frontierrrr...
Derek Davis
Oct 03, 2010 Derek Davis rated it liked it
I read a free download, and only because I'd heard it was perhaps the first genuine vampire novel, from the early 19th century. Nobody even seems to be sure who actually wrote it (in those magazine-serialized "penny dreadful" days of pay-by the-word). OK, it's bad. It's really, really, really bad. But if you can download it for free, dip into it now and then, giggle and put it away again. It's, well...friendly. I mean, the vampire isn't a wholly bad guy, the "rational" debunker is a little wacko ...more
Christopher Roth
The bad news is that the Project Gutenberg free ebook version of this I read had only 96 out of 110 or so chapters, so I still don't know how it ends, darnit. The good news is: despite being a "penny dreadful" it holds up extremely well against Bram Stoker's Dracula. It's too long by far, and the dialogue is hilariously stilted, but the latter is also true of Dracula, and Varney is smarter in a lot of ways, including excellent scenes of an angry mob becoming convinced that every neighbor might b ...more
James
Jul 21, 2015 James rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Good grief this was a big book. It took me exactly one month from page 1 to page 1163 of rather small type. BUT it was a really enjoyable read, as the book cover promised. A tad repetitive in terms of narrative action, once you get past the first 400 pages or so of Varney and the Bannerworth family, the pace picks up. Not a lot, but a bit. I'm glad I read this - I can fit at least 5 other books in the space it took up on the shelf.
Wreade1872
This isn't a novel it's the equivalent to a 20 season Boxed Set, if the original story ran every week then it went for at least 4 years. Its long, reallll long.
I'm not sure how many writers there were but i'm sure there was more than one. The writing style becomes much less descriptive and over the top around chapter 30 or so much to its detriment.
The story becomes increasingly inconsistent with at least 3 different origin stories for Varney, however it is possible to link everything together w
...more
Andrew
Apr 16, 2011 Andrew rated it liked it
More than a little long and I can see why some folks didn't persevere..it's a lenghty tome and maybe due to it's serial type status is repetitive to circumstance and dialogue throughout...not to mention diversions and tales that really have nothing to do with the actual story.
That said there is also much to commend it..as a work it does have some humour and is acknowledged as presenting certain aspects to the whole Vampire mythos (Dracula included).
It really gathers pace about half way through..
...more
Charles Tringham
Sep 05, 2012 Charles Tringham rated it it was amazing
A lengthy tale, hard going, and at times incredibly repetitive. It has taken, with a break in between, over the course of two years to read this tyrannosaurian vampire novel; and yet, it has been worth every moment.

As an avid fan of nineteenth century vampire fiction, this penny dreadful encapsulates many of the modern myths of the contemporary vampire. Carmilla and Dracula owe much of their content to Varney: a vampire who is more human than monster, more monster than myth. Truly a great read w
...more
Leah
Jan 10, 2014 Leah rated it liked it
If you read this monstrous serial with an expectation of quality (or even coherency) you will be sorely disappointed. If you want a nonsensical never-ending litany of absurdities mixed up with some interesting conventions of early vampire literature, however, this is your book. There's a suggested scythe duel in a medically sealed darkness chamber, a mob discovering that their accused vampire has transmogrified himself into a brick, the build-up to a mysterious midnight meeting being derailed du ...more
David
May 23, 2016 David added it
Probably the most famous of the classic Penny Dreadfuls you can read in its entirety (with the possible exception of A String of Pearls, the inspiration for Sweeney Todd). My best description is it's like reading a soap opera. Most was just long and rambling. However, there were some moments and ideas that were pretty amazing. I've posted a few of my thoughts at my blog: https://dlsummers.wordpress.com/2016/...
Azziba
Aug 13, 2011 Azziba rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: kobo-read
Undoubtedly one of the worst books I have ever read!! If I could give it a negative rating I would.
Sarah
3/14/17: Putting this aside for now. It's good, but I'm just not in the mood for dense Victoriana ATM, & it's such a long book that forcing it will only make that mood worse. So...back into the unread pile. I shall mark the page & resume at some nebulous future date.
Justin
Dec 04, 2013 Justin rated it really liked it
This review will have to suffice for Volume I only (couldn't seem to find my copy here. It seems there are many versions of these books, some attributed to a different author).

I have to admit, the schlocky, messy cover on my copy (not the one pictured here) was so off putting that I put off reading this book for a very long time. The title, "Varney the Vampire" also somehow strikes the modern reader's ear as trite and campy in the same vein as Howard the Duck or Ming the Merciless. But how wrong
...more
Michael Kelly
I had high hopes for this, one of the earlier examples of vampire literature, originally serialised as a 'penny dreadful'. The first few chapters reinforced my hopes: they were excellent! Sure, they were overwritten and full of frightful melodrama, but that was what I had been expecting from a story of this sort from that time, it was a kind of delicious nostalgia, an indulgence. The description of the vampire's initial attack and the reaction to it is quite superb.

Would that I had stopped readi
...more
Signor Mambrino
Sep 22, 2016 Signor Mambrino rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Montague Summers described Varney the Vampyre as being “far ghostlier than” and “a very serious rival to” Dracula. The book was out of print when he wrote that though, so that might have just been him trying to be the cool guy who liked the less popular work. I definitely wouldn’t go as far as Monty in this case, but I did really enjoy this book. I mean, it’s deeply flawed, but if you take it for what it is, i.e., complete trash, it’s d_____d enjoyable. It’s exceedingly obvious that the author/a ...more
Joel
Jul 13, 2015 Joel rated it really liked it
From what I understand, this is only the first half of the entire novel. The whole thing is appx 660,000 words - way more than can fit in 860 pages. Having said that, while some of the dialog is atrocious, many parts of this is quite amazing, especially when it's talking about the mobs that are trying to destroy the titular vampire. Some of the descriptions are beautifully done.

While this was originally released in small printed pamphlets - penny dreadfuls - which may explain the length of this,
...more
Brook
Nov 09, 2010 Brook rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
i finally finished this book after many weeks and a nice overdue charge at the library... my quest to read the classic vampire novels that started it all is one book closer. it was a strange vampire story, but mostly very very wordy. 3 pages to describe how he ran across a field and many little tangent stories intertwined, but off the plot. i'm not sure how people back in the day talked like this, let alone read like this. i'd get tired of hearing myself. i will however check out the remaining b ...more
Mary
Jan 09, 2014 Mary rated it really liked it
Varney the Vampire is extremely entertaining. I read this over two years ago and I can still picture the beginning scenes. I loved how after Flora screams, the household just stands outside her bedroom, having a panicked conversation, while Varney is inside "slurping" up her lifeblood. In a sparkly vampire obsessed world, this type of quirky vampire story is refreshing.

I don't recommend any extended reading of this book. The sentences/lines go straight across the page, which can get frustrating
...more
Nabilla
Jul 30, 2011 Nabilla rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: vampire, historical
Well I got to the end of this book and I'm still not sure what I think of it. It was not a chore to read like I thought it might be and it was one large story rather than a series of shorter ones like I expected. I say one large story, however more than once the author instead shoehorned in a completely unrelated story with different settings and characters for no apparent reason. The kindle version is minus the illustrations which I wouldn't mind but the kindle keeps reminding you [Illustration ...more
Marko-Michael
Dec 07, 2013 Marko-Michael rated it did not like it
Even as a serialized story this was w a a a y to long. One character (with out explanation) just disappeared about half way through. One of the later chapters did not even appear to have anything to do with the story. I am not sure that I can be made to believe that there was only one writer at work here, if it is true, then he lost track of his original goal - what ever that may have been. The end left unresolved questions about what happened with the main characters, at least in this edition.
Rubén Lorenzo
Dec 01, 2016 Rubén Lorenzo rated it really liked it
Esta clásica novela de vampiros por entregas está siendo publicada en tomos por Pulpture. Después de leer el primer volumen, estoy enganchado a la historia. Varney es un vampiro muy vacilón, y la familia que sufre sus agresiones tienen una forma de hablar rimbombante que, aunque al lector actual le suena raro, tiene un aire a viejo muy atrayente.

Desde luego no da miedo, de hecho es bastante inocente, pero hay momentos de humor y algunas descripciones muy acertadas. Es una obra desigual, pero rec
...more
Stacy Croushorn
Clocking in at 809 pages this is no quick read. However, this was the first real vampire story that was more than just a short story. It is a penny dreadful so it has the problems of inconsistency, typesetting problems, and so on, but it is worth the effort. There is some redundancy, but the last 100 or so pages are well worth the effort. Plus, this edition includes scholarly articles about Varney and other penny dreadfulls that was quite interesting.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
  • The Vampyre and Other Tales of the Macabre
  • The Blood of the Vampire
  • The House by the Churchyard
  • Zofloya
  • The House of the Vampire
  • The Penguin Book of Vampire Stories
  • La Morte Amoureuse
  • The Beetle
  • The Mysterious Warning
  • Wagner the Werewolf
  • Uncanny Stories
  • The Witch Of Prague & Other Stories
  • Three Gothic Novels: The Castle of Otranto, Vathek, The Vampyre, and a Fragment of a Novel
  • The Power of Darkness: Tales of Terror
  • Hauntings and Other Fantastic Tales
  • The Necromancer, or The Tale of the Black Forest
  • Dracula's Guest: A Connoisseur's Collection of Victorian Vampire Stories
  • Dracula's Brood: Neglected Vampire Classics
James Malcolm Rymer was a British nineteenth century writer of penny dreadfuls, and is the probable author of Varney the Vampire, often attributed to fellow writer Thomas Peckett Prest, and co-author (with Prest) of The String of Pearls, in which the notorious villain Sweeney Todd makes his literary debut.

Information about Rymer is sketchy. In the London Directory for 1841 he is listed as a civil
...more
More about James Malcolm Rymer...

Share This Book



“Could I desert her – could I say to her, ‘My dear girl, when you were full of health and beauty, I loved you, but now that sadness is at your heart I leave you?’ Could I tell her that, uncle, and yet call myself a man?” “No!” 2 likes
“Tis strange what a change comes over masses of men as they gaze upon a dead body. It may be that they all know that to that complexion they must come at last. This may be the secret of the respect offered to the dead.” 1 likes
More quotes…