Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Existentialism and Human Emotions” as Want to Read:
Existentialism and Human Emotions
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Existentialism and Human Emotions

3.85  ·  Rating Details ·  3,726 Ratings  ·  134 Reviews
Essay by Jean-Paul Sartre translated in English from French.
Paperback, Philosophical Library, 96 pages
Published December 1st 2000 by Citadel (first published September 1957)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
William Strasse
The short verdict: like panning for gold. I finally made myself read this front to back (I'd previously skipped around it a couple times.) Sartre is tiresome for several reasons to me. It is mostly that he just takes himself so seriously that you have to laugh at times, especially when he starts using terms like the being-in-itself-for-itself-of-itself. At one point, I thought "Jean-Paul, if you say 'a priori' one more time..." Of course, he used it about 100 more times after that. When I got to ...more
Eric Gold
Aug 10, 2011 Eric Gold rated it it was ok
An excellent primer by the father of Existentialist philosophy. Sartre's concept is at the same time simple and radical: man is fully responsible for what happens in the world. No excuses. No cover. No "out." If it happens: we make it happen. On the one hand, it's extraordinarily empowering. We are moral artisans, painting actions on the world's canvas. Yet the existentialist is overwhelmed by anguish (that everything I do essentially sets a standard, since none exist apriori) and despair (that ...more
Michael Roop
Feb 11, 2011 Michael Roop rated it really liked it
Shelves: philosophy
This one is a goodin. Jean-Paul Sartre is one of the greatest free thinkers in modern history. I didn't care much for philosophy until I became curious about it from watching the Big Lebowski. When he said it must be hard being a nihilist, i wondered what that was. Unsure I hit up the book store looking for answers. Though I didn't find dude related help I did find this. Sartre was top of the list at the book store.
This book is a quick enthralling read. For like minded individuals this book wil
Aug 10, 2014 Reid rated it liked it
Recommends it for: only if you don't have Wikipedia
This review is purposely in bad faith. I am two sheets to the wind, and that's my excuse, but zhawn paul says there are no excuses. When I was in college this philosophy seemed important, and it still does to a degree, but will it last? Doesn't it kind of just state the obvious? But it might overstate it. Aren't there extenuating circumstances and good reasons that we're all not ubermen? So we're all responsible for ourselves, fine, but what's the consequence? Did he believe we'd all change our ...more
Jul 24, 2014 Lloyd rated it it was amazing
Shelves: favorites
The chapters "Existentialism" and "Freedom and Responsibility" are a warmly written, natural link between Kierkegaard and Watts.

Short "Desire to Be God" chapters are...meh.

Everything past that is irredeemable garbage. This is a 5-star book, with one small condition: Find the page with the chapter title "Existentialist Psychoanalysis", locate a pair of scissors, and cut it out, along with every page after it. Then you will have a book worth cherishing, and reading over and over again. Don't read
Jack Lindgren
Although I don't entirely agree with his philosophy the main section of this book (which is, I believe, the text of a speech he gave) illustrated Sartre's though in an easily digestible way. The later sections, which are excerpts from the massive Being and Nothingness are almost totally incomprehensible (probably in part because they're taken out of context, but probably also because they're from a massive philosophical tome instead of a speech). Um, but yes, I'm not really qualified to judge th ...more
Gary Patella
Jun 24, 2014 Gary Patella rated it liked it
Some parts I found very interesting, while other part were extremely convoluted. His take on existential psychoanalysis was intriguing, and seemed to revolve around introspection. The last chapter almost seemed like nonsense to me. Fortunately, the entire book is fairly short. This means that all parts, including the ones where Sartre's philosophy seems closer to the rhetoric of Socrates than existentialism, are quickly over.
May 24, 2007 علی rated it it was ok
Shelves: philosophy
این اثر سارتر با نام های مختلف و مترجمان مختلف به فارسی برگردانده شده که به گمان من از همه بهتر "اگزیستانسیالیزم و اصالت بشر" ترجمه ی مصطفی رحیمی ست که در 1344 توسط انتشارات مروارید منتشر شده است

در مورد ژان پل سارتر، مطلبی جداگانه نوشته ام؛
Jan 16, 2010 Jessica rated it it was amazing
Sep 27, 2011 Kristen rated it really liked it
Recommends it for: Philosophy Nutjobs like Me :)
Recommended to Kristen by: Rob Clow
This is another of my Master's degree books. I'd imagine it would only be enjoyable to a fairly limited demographic. And it gets boring, as these tend to, at about the halfway point.

4/2011: Notes/Reflections

Sartre, Existentialism and Human Emotions

I could quote pages out of this book. I’m just constantly like yes - YES!

I love the description of desperate quietism. I couldn’t agree more, as that is often how I feel. I absolutely see myself as an isolated being the majority of the time. And that’
Bob Nichols
Sartre argues that we create our essence. In a way, this is not quite accurate as a description of Sartre's philosophy as outlined in this short book. Our essence is our freedom to choose who we will become (we are always in the process of 'becoming'). We are not determined by an in-born nature (passions; emotions). This for Sartre is a radical freedom. Taking responsibility for our lives, with no excuses, is not for the faint hearted. From this conceptualization, Sartre writes that when we choo ...more
Apr 24, 2009 John rated it it was amazing
If Sartre wanted to endear himself to the masses, he did himself no favors with the cover to Existentialism and Human Emotions, with his pipe-puffing professoriality conveying enough know-it-allness to give most anyone not assigned to read it a hearty guffaw. Which is a shame really, as this 96-page essay serves as an excellent primer for anyone who thinks of existentialism as a ponderous, do-nothing philosophy (If all I am to do is exist, why do anything else?), defining the terms, fielding com ...more
Lacin Tutalar
Jun 08, 2015 Lacin Tutalar rated it it was amazing
This one took me almost a year to finish. I bought it second-hand at a time I was trying to catch every title on emotion for my research causes-a hopeless cause, because things do not work that way-. I started the first couple of pages, and then it was raining heavily one day, the book soaked wet in my bag and it took a few months to dry. Then I moved, and decided to take the book with me. Maybe a feeling of guilt. In my new home,one day I was spending time thinking about free people, and affect ...more
Matt Holmes
Jul 31, 2015 Matt Holmes rated it liked it
I've never read Sartre before. I don't know if I'd say he's my kind of guy, but he's certainly an existentialist. Dry and not particularly engaging, but entirely an existentialist.

This book was divvied up into sections. Some were better than others.

This was good. The first thirty pages or so were Sartre explaining that he wears sunglasses for blocking out the haters, and the remaining twenty were a brief summary of what existentialism is.

Freedom and Responsibility:
A little eight
Nov 28, 2015 Andrew rated it really liked it
Philosophy for a post-religious world. He gets deep into the idea of existence preceding essence, in that man is unique in that he exists before his purpose because he is writing the story of his purpose / essence / value each moment of his life. This is a departure from all religious thought, in which man's essence is assigned my God(s) and man is a tool for a purpose. That's convenient, but untrue. Plato's theory of forms, which is more of a though experiment than an explanation, discusses the ...more
Jon(athan) Nakapalau
One of the more 'approachable' books by JPS. Foundation for “existence precedes essence” is presented and explained. - key to open other 'doors' to JPS complex philosophy.
Wolf Price
I had some serious problems with this book, which I feel the need to address. The first is that it is a collection of writings from two other books, "Existentialism" and "Being and Nothingness". The section taken from "Existentialism" is presented under the same name, and has some wonderful points to say about the subject, although it is far too brief, but since it is an except, what can one expect but for brevity?

The other sections, taken from "Being and Nothingness" are much harder to get thro
Jun 17, 2014 Brandt rated it did not like it
Seriously? Can I even start a review like that? Anyway, the overall theme of the book was good, and in a lot of respects it does do a good job of defining and analyzing human emotions through existentialist thought. However, let's be honest... The way this book is written, and the examples used throughout are trashy. I think that Sartre is very good, extremely good, but I also think that this collection of recyclables is really low quality. I picture Camus and Sartre having a conversation simila ...more
Feb 08, 2015 Dani rated it liked it
Shelves: psych-philosophy
I found the first half of the book to be quite insightful on the topic of existentialism even though I don't completely agree with the notion, however his train of thought takes a nose dive after that. It reads as if he was trying to get reasoning to take him to a predetermined unreasonable conclusion, I wouldn't be surprised if he has confused himself in the process.
Elizabeth Merchant
Apr 05, 2014 Elizabeth Merchant rated it liked it
Shelves: our-library
This was pretty accessible in terms of existentialist philosophy. I definitely got lost a number of times, but it was not an exhausting or frustrating read. The first half convincingly addresses misconceptions about existentialism, and the second explains the difference between Jungian and existentialist psychoanalysis.
Ho Manh
Feb 08, 2015 Ho Manh rated it it was ok
It was a hard read. The thing I feel is the contradiction all the claims made by Satre about freedom of human actions with finding in sciences, typically, neurosciences. It is a good practice for the mind, trying to understand the logic, but still, too much contradiction with my view that freewill does not exist.
Laurène Poret
Aug 03, 2016 Laurène Poret rated it it was amazing
The french title is way better. I really like Sartre's and I think this is is greatest work, along with a really important ideal for this whole period of time.
Dr X
Oct 09, 2008 Dr X rated it liked it
Like a lot of pretentious high schoolers, I picked up a copy of Being and Nothingness, enchanted by the title, and barely understood a word. Since then, I've read a lot of philosophy books, and with the exception of some Eastern pieces (well, mostly takes on Eastern pieces), concluded that philosophy is generally a bunch of crap. I want to like it, I really do, but so much of it seems like nonsense to me. I've tried hard, reading original works as well as great summaries of original works (like ...more
Oct 10, 2016 Shelley rated it liked it
This book is short but dense. There are three good chapters: Existentialism, Freedom and Responsibility, and Existentialist Psychoanalysis. The other four chapters are strange and confusing and not worth reading. I assume they were thrown in there as filler so that the book wasn't even shorter than it already is.

The three good chapters should be considered a pamphlet on basics of existentialism. I could probably edit them down to an even smaller handout on the basics if I had more time...

Keith Michael
Jan 21, 2013 Keith Michael rated it it was ok
i used to think this guy was so smart. i deified him, to be honest. but this book was just a few interesting thoughts in a sea of bland and desperate navel-gazing. the self-importance of this entire project is staggering. according to Sartre, "Existentialism and Human Emotions" exists because a few people (Christians, Marxists and the common people?) have misinterpreted his philosophy, and so he writes to tell them why they're wrong? who gives a shit? the first portion of the book is written in ...more
Roof Beam Reader
Jul 02, 2010 Roof Beam Reader rated it liked it
I can't write a long review on this one, because I just don't feel up to it. I'm not a philosopher but, that being said, Sartre (and the translator) certainly made existentialism, to an extent, accessible to me as someone rather unfamiliar with the concepts. I appreciated a lot of what Sartre says about creating one's self and always being one's self "in production," as it were. "The Hole," however, was pretty absurd. That man lives to fill himself (and that man seeks out woman because she is, e ...more
May 27, 2007 Rob rated it it was amazing
For someone who wants a readable introduction to Existentialism, this is the book to read. Sartre wrote it as a response to the criticism he had received after "Being and Nothingness," his treatise. In "Human Emotions," he lays out all the straw men and red herrings that had arrived in the attack on Existentialism, and he soundly defeats them with a tightly written essay. Existentialism is not a reason to give up on life; it is a way to find meaning in an otherwise meaningless world. It is not a ...more
Apr 24, 2013 Kristin rated it really liked it
The subject of existentialism can be daunting, and the vague information and interpretations that are prevalent may influence one's decision toward avoiding it altogether. For anyone who has even the slightest curiosity, or for anyone who has some knowledge on this subject but feels there are gaps left to be filled regarding even a general understanding, Jean-Paul Sartre's Existentialism and Human Emotions offers a clear, concise definition of the word itself, but a detailed explanation of the i ...more
Jul 21, 2015 Corbin rated it liked it
This is an incredibly accessible book for beginners, and it has all the feel-good bravado of embracing one's own individuality and freedom. Sartre's response to criticisms tends to follow the path of blaming the critics for believing in something false, and then saying they just don't get how awesome freedom really is--some serious question-begging. Despite completely disagreeing with Sartre about the nature of the self and the purpose of psychoanalysis, he at least lays out an alternative that ...more
Chris Comis
Feb 13, 2009 Chris Comis rated it it was ok
Shelves: philosophy
Don't remember much about it. It's that good! Sartre had some interesting insights into the nature of human emotion, given his atheistic existentialism. Interesting in the sense that it makes me that much more thankful that I'm not an atheist, nor an unbelieving existentialist.

It's also quite humorous seeing Sartre try and account for human emotion given his presuppositions. He sees where his existentialist horses are taking him; but he doesn't like heading towards the cliff at break-neck speed,
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre
  • Resistance, Rebellion and Death: Essays
  • Basic Writings of Existentialism
  • The Ethics of Ambiguity
  • The Essential Kierkegaard
  • Irrational Man: A Study in Existential Philosophy
  • Twilight of the Idols/The Anti-Christ
  • Existentialism: A Very Short Introduction
  • Existentialism
  • Basic Writings: Ten Key Essays, plus the Introduction to Being and Time
  • Phenomenology of Perception
  • A Kierkegaard Anthology
  • Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals/On a Supposed Right to Lie Because of Philanthropic Concerns
  • Essential Works of Foucault, Vol 1: Ethics
Jean-Paul Charles Aymard Sartre, normally known simply as Jean-Paul Sartre, was a French existentialist philosopher and pioneer, dramatist and screenwriter, novelist and critic. He was a leading figure in 20th century French philosophy.

He declined the award of the 1964 Nobel Prize in Literature "for his work which, rich in ideas and filled with the spirit of freedom and the quest for truth, has ex
More about Jean-Paul Sartre...

Share This Book

“Man is nothing else but what he makes of himself.” 223 likes
“There is no human nature, since there is no god to conceive it.” 18 likes
More quotes…