Churchill, Hitler and "The Unnecessary War": How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World
by Patrick J. Buchananbook data
49 ratings,
3.94
average rating, 25 reviews
(more data...)
edit
published
May 27th 2008
by Crown
binding
Hardcover, 400 pages
characters
isbn
030740515X
(isbn13: 9780307405159)
description
Were World Wars I and II—which can now be seen as a thirty-year paroxysm of slaughter and destruction—inevitable? Were they necessary wars? Were the b...more
Sign in to Goodreads to see your friends' reviews of this book.
| topics | posts | views | last activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SciFi and Fantasy...: What I'm Also Reading in January 2009 | 58 | 317 | 01/31/2009 12:54PM | |
| The History Book ...: The Histories: Off-topic Cafe | 589 | 17 | 01/03/2009 10:26AM |
friend reviews
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
This book is currently not featured on any Listopia lists.
Add this book to your favorite list »
other reviews (showing 1-20 of 133)
All ratings
|
5 stars (19)
|
4 stars (14)
|
3 stars (12)
|
2 stars (2)
|
1 star (2)
|
avg 3.94
editions: all | this edition
editions: all | this edition
Read in November, 2008
Well argued case that British actions between the two world wars resulted in their fall to a second rate power.
This is not a flattering portrail of Churchill. He is shown to have failed to see the perils of using the Soviet Union to defeat the Nazis.
Buchanan's view is that Britian should have never allied with Poland. By doing so Poland stood up to Hitler instead of accepting overtures of alliance. Buchanan shows that Hitler had no designs on the west was an admirer ...more
This is not a flattering portrail of Churchill. He is shown to have failed to see the perils of using the Soviet Union to defeat the Nazis.
Buchanan's view is that Britian should have never allied with Poland. By doing so Poland stood up to Hitler instead of accepting overtures of alliance. Buchanan shows that Hitler had no designs on the west was an admirer ...more
Like this review?
yes
(2 people liked it)
add a comment
Read in August, 2008
If you love history and politics,pick this book up.When you're done you'll probably say History does repeat itself
Like this review?
yes
(2 people liked it)
add a comment
Read in November, 2008
This book is not mediocre -- it is really good and awful at the same time.
On the good side, the premise is fascinating. The book's idea is that the result of the Second World War -- destuction of the British Empire, Soviet domination of much of Europe, and of course, the human suffering -- was so horrible, that had Britian NOT entered the war, things would have been better for all concerned. Buchanan states that while Britian entered the war to keep Poland and the rest of Europe fr...more
On the good side, the premise is fascinating. The book's idea is that the result of the Second World War -- destuction of the British Empire, Soviet domination of much of Europe, and of course, the human suffering -- was so horrible, that had Britian NOT entered the war, things would have been better for all concerned. Buchanan states that while Britian entered the war to keep Poland and the rest of Europe fr...more
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
Read in September, 2008
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it,
click here.
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
Read in June, 2008
This book should be a real eye-opener for those who have accepted the conventional wisdom regarding WWII. It, like Human Smoke (Nicholas Baker) and a handful of other books, carefully demonstrates that WWII was not "The Good War" but instead an unnecessary blunder which led to 50 million dead and an Iron Curtain behind which Eastern Europe suffered for 50 years.
Buchanan delineates the series of diplomatic mistakes from Versailes to Danzig which led to the war. As in Human ...more
Buchanan delineates the series of diplomatic mistakes from Versailes to Danzig which led to the war. As in Human ...more
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
Buchanan basically says this: Fighting Germany was a mistake. The real enemy was Soviet Russia. While German diplomacy was antagonistic, their demands were quite reasonable (Access railway plus Danzig). The major mistake made by Britain and France was its guarantee to Poland which led to much Polish sword-rattling towards Germany. Britain and France really had no way of backing up their guarantee to Poland.
Not bad but it's all been said before. Death of the West was better.
...more
Not bad but it's all been said before. Death of the West was better.
...more
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
Read in July, 2008
recommends it for:
WWII buffs and Churchill fans who want another viewpoint.
There are so many first-hand accounts of the events leading to both World Wars that it is conceivable that one could locate evidence to prove any theory.
Buchanan has done that with this book, laying the blame for WWI and WWII on the British, who, Buchanan claims, misunderstood the intentions of both the Kaiser and Hitler.
According to Buchanan, Hitler only wanted to control Eastern Europe, and held Great Britain in high admiration.
The best part of the book co...more
Buchanan has done that with this book, laying the blame for WWI and WWII on the British, who, Buchanan claims, misunderstood the intentions of both the Kaiser and Hitler.
According to Buchanan, Hitler only wanted to control Eastern Europe, and held Great Britain in high admiration.
The best part of the book co...more
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
Read in July, 2008
I bought this book on a whim largely because I'd been criticizing it ever since I first heard about it and thought if I actually read it, I could rip it apart all the better. But then something shocking occurred. I actually agreed with the vast majority of it! I still look at the world and Britain / later America's role in it differently than Buchanan but his arguments are very convincing. Basically he says that WWI should never have happened; the settlement of WWI should've been a lot bette...more
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
I enjoyed this book and learned a lot from it, not the least of which is how little we really know about events that may affect our lives greatly. I would highly recommend it as an alternate view of World War 2, which has come to be called "the good war" by many in our present day world. It is also a very unflattering view of Winston Churchill who not only led the English people in that war, but presided over the demise of the British Empire as well. The story of how that came about...more
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
Read in August, 2008
recommends it for:
anybody who enjoys history and WWII
Amazing read, helps the reader who was not alive during WWII (and those who were) to comprehend much of the logic and lack-thereof on the side of the British. Excellent book for the background, a fascinating read, never dull yet filled with the requisite historical background and footnotes.
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
Nothing terribly profound here but even a little bit of wisdom goes a long way nowadays. Some main points: Munich wasn't the mistake, the guarantee to Poland was. The west should have sat out and let the Nazis and Ruskies go at it. Churchill, man of the century?, was an atrocious leader.
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
Read in April, 2009
So while Adolph Hitler was gobbling up Europe, intent on world conquest, England thrust up its greatest son, Sir Winston Churchill, a statesman for the ages, to oppose the evil tyrant, crush him, and save the world.
It is a great story. Pathetic little Winnie grows up to become Man of the Century, the great guardian of civilization against the forces of darkness and depravity. It is the story as I learned it through numerous accounts, and that I accepted and even cherished. The story ...more
It is a great story. Pathetic little Winnie grows up to become Man of the Century, the great guardian of civilization against the forces of darkness and depravity. It is the story as I learned it through numerous accounts, and that I accepted and even cherished. The story ...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Pat Buchanan has written an excellent popular history of how World War 1 and World War 2 started and the consequences. One man played a pivotal role in both wars---Winston Churchill.
In Buchanan's story Churchill is portrayed as a great speech-maker and warlord lacking good judgement. His attack on the Turks at Gallipoli in 1916 cost the Allies some 50000 killed. His lap dog attitude toward Stalin and following appeasement put all of Eastern Europe into Soviet slavery for 50 years. However,...more
In Buchanan's story Churchill is portrayed as a great speech-maker and warlord lacking good judgement. His attack on the Turks at Gallipoli in 1916 cost the Allies some 50000 killed. His lap dog attitude toward Stalin and following appeasement put all of Eastern Europe into Soviet slavery for 50 years. However,...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
03/12/09
Graig
is currently reading it
Read in March, 2009
I am about a third into this and I have to say it is amazing how detailed Buchanan is in citing his facts. The word 'meticulous' comes to mind. So far I have foundthis book both fascinating and boring - I know what sounds lame but I do! For example, it is fascinating to me that the Kaiser was related to the Czar and British Royalty and yet I am bored with the details and lengths to which Buchanan goes to illustrate how Churchill and his political party agitate for war. Maybe I have become accust...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
10/15/08
H ardis
added it
good book for people who want to understand why we are where we are and how fortunes change for men and countrys
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
Very good. Shows Churchill as he really was, rather than the savior of Britain
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
Read in May, 2009
[Audio:] Interesting stuff, really colored my opinion of Churchill. Given Buchanan's politics, I think the basic point behind the book is as a critique of US policies that tie us by alliance to smaller powers. A key quote late in the book is from Billy Hughes, then PM of Australia, asking if the British Empire's policy was to make policy decisions based on what's best for its sovereignty and interests or are such interests to be made by another power? This is Buchanan's criticism of recent US fo...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in March, 2009
I'm not a great fan of Buchanan's religious conservative politics, but I found his views on WW1 & WW2 very much like my own. This is one of those books I wish more Americans could / would read as it gives a very good perspective of what really brought on the great world war that was divided by an intermission from 1918 to 1939 as well as how it effected the cold war and it's aftermath that we are still dealing with in the 21st. century.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in June, 2009
Surprisingly clear history analysis from a well-known conservative. The surprise is personal - I find myself agreeing with a handful of the points presented by the author. I'm glad I stayed on, since the opening paragraph contained sentiments that many people will find disagreeable. And, the tidbit about Katyn is especially jarring.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in March, 2009
A vivid view of WWII from a decidedly alternative viewpoint that describes, in great detail, the blunders that Britain made that led us inexorably towards the great clash of civilizations that was WWII. Great read.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment

























