Whiteness of a Different Color: European Immigrants and the Alchemy of Race by Matthew Frye Jacobson

Jan 20, 2013 Michael rated it 4 of 5 stars Recommends it for: American Historians, 19th century historians, historians of race

Recommended to Michael by: David Johnson

Shelves: academic-history

This was one of the books I read in my “Introduction to Graduate History” course, back in the dark mists of time when I was a young and enthusiastic aspiring historian. I found it a useful introduction to then-current thinking about race as a social construction, and a curative for assumptions that concepts such as “race,” “nationality” or “ethnicity” exist as absolutes in the objective world. I found it useful in several other senses: it gives a good introduction to the history of American immi...more This was one of the books I read in my “Introduction to Graduate History” course, back in the dark mists of time when I was a young and enthusiastic aspiring historian. I found it a useful introduction to then-current thinking about race as a social construction, and a curative for assumptions that concepts such as “race,” “nationality” or “ethnicity” exist as absolutes in the objective world. I found it useful in several other senses: it gives a good introduction to the history of American immigration, it works as an introduction to historical debate, and it helps to contextualize the more ultra-nationalist movements I study in the European context as they would have been perceived by contemporaries across the pond. It is written clearly enough to be accessible by advanced undergraduate or educated non-academic readers.

In focusing on “whiteness,” Frye departs from studies of the racial “other” to ask about the less-visible construction of the supposed “norm.” This is not to say that the bulk of the book is really about the secure dominant race, but rather it tends to focus on the racial borderlands, and ask how it is the whiteness has been ascribed and defined to exclude different groups at different times in American (and, by extension, European) history. He provides evidence that, at different times and in different circumstances, many people who would be today accepted as white (Poles, Italians, Jews, Swedes, Germans, Irish) were at one time considered beyond the pale of whiteness. He uses visual as well as documentary sources to find “conventions of physiognomy” which signaled the inclusion or exclusion of new immigrants. Most fascinating to me was the visual evidence that Irish people were once portrayed with dark skin in popular illustrations to emphasize their alien-ness. Frye is also very interested in the language of race, and the changing use of terms such as “Celt,” “Slav,” “Nordic,” and “Iberic” to define certain groups as in or out of the in-group. While this lends itself to a degree of discourse analysis, Frye avoids wandering into post-structuralist abstraction and jargon, keeping his argument grounded in evidence and historical relevance.

Although it attempts a fairly sweeping study of its subject, from colonial times to the civil rights era, the bulk of the book focuses on the late-nineteenth century, when the immigration on a mass scale from many different parts of Europe threw conceptions of the “Yankee” into question. He covers the period from 1860 to the early 1920s (when new laws restricting immigration were passed) in considerable detail, using one chapter to focus in on 1877 as a case study in racial re-definition. Frye is also interested in challenging the slippery ways in which white privilege is studied and critiqued today, making a special case that whiteness is an identity which many academics or educated people find it expedient to repudiate, while still benefitting from inclusion when it suits them. People who have never experienced exclusion themselves still attempt to distance themselves from accusations of white supremacy because their ancestors were inscribed as “non-white,” therefore exculpating them (for instance) from acts of genocide against Native Americans (ignoring the fact that they continue to benefit from the oppression of the same groups as modern-day “whites”). Frye seems to have a particular bone to pick on this score with the writer Michael Novak, but I am unfamiliar with him and cannot comment.

Overall, the book is a useful insight into aspects of American history that often go overlooked in traditional accounts.(less)

like · see review

Sep 30, 2010 Nomi rated it 5 of 5 stars

Shelves: american-studies, nonfiction

How the Irish Became White and Whiteness of a Different Color challenge the biological and static nature of racial categories by demonstrating that race, particularly the white race, is in fact a socially and historically constructed category open to multiple and shifting meanings. Both texts dispel any lingering notions of American idealism that attempt to locate the origins of this country in egalitarianism or color-blind equality by illustrating how in fact, this country’s legal, political an...more How the Irish Became White and Whiteness of a Different Color challenge the biological and static nature of racial categories by demonstrating that race, particularly the white race, is in fact a socially and historically constructed category open to multiple and shifting meanings. Both texts dispel any lingering notions of American idealism that attempt to locate the origins of this country in egalitarianism or color-blind equality by illustrating how in fact, this country’s legal, political and social history is premised on the equation of whiteness with privilege. Noel Ignatiev does this through his case study of Philadelphia Irish in the nineteenth-century, an immigrant group that fled victimization in Ireland. Ignatiev makes the case that the Irish were not perceived as “white” upon arrival in the United States, but had to gain entrance into the white race through a series of choices which most significantly included the oppression of African-Americans. Mathew Frye Jacobson does this through his sweeping historical account of the shifting formulations that whiteness and the superior status it denotes takes from colonial times through the civil rights movement. Analyzing an impressive array of sources ranging from naturalization and immigration law, court cases, novels and writings on eugenics, Jacobson primarily focuses on the transformation of various immigrant groups from nineteenth-century biologically designated white racial others to twentieth-century scientifically sanctioned Caucasians.
In contrast to scholars such as David Roediger and Theodore Allen who have focused on “class and economics as the primary movers of race” (18), Jacobson explores, “national subjectivity and national belonging-as they both inflect and are inflected by racial conceptions of peoplehood, self-possession, fitness for self-government and collective destiny” (21). Whiteness of a Different Color demonstrates the ways in which the meaning of whiteness has been historically contested in the United States, and is organized according to “three great epochs of whiteness”. Jacobson documents cultural shifts from 1790 until the 1960s in which a multi-racial system of white races, defined in opposition to the Anglo-Saxon white race, ultimately are subsumed within the category of Caucasian. He argues that during the nineteenth century a biologically based system of “racialism” prevailed whereby the white ethnic groups of today - Italian, Jewish, Slavic, etc.- were then understood to be distinct races. This system, premised on people’s position within a hierarchy based on perceived inherent differences, was a dominant and organizing ideology governing U.S. political and social relationships.
According to Jacobson the question is not how the Irish or Jews or Italians became white, but how they could be defined as both white and something other than white. For, as he significantly points out, immigrant groups had to somehow approximate the category of white in order to enter the country. Jacobson explains that it was both the inclusivity and the exclusivity of the language of the 1790 Naturalization Law, which limited entrance and citizenship to “free white persons”, that allowed unlimited entrance to European immigrants while denying entrance to Asian immigrants. However, whether or not a particular white racial group possessed the criteria for “fitness for self-government” became highly contested by the 1840s with the Irish Famine Migration and the large growing German immigrant population. At this point Jacobson locates the shift to the second epoch of racism or “whiteness”, “from the unquestioned hegemony of a unified race of “white persons” to a contest over political “fitness” among a now fragmented, hierarchically arranged series of white races” (42-43). During this time of heightened European immigration Jacobson points to the rise in American nativism and its interrogation of whether or not certain white groups should be granted citizenship. He locates the third epoch of whiteness or racism in 1924, when the Johnson Act, a product of the “science” of eugenics, went into effect in order to restrict immigration to Nordic races. Ironically, Jacobson writes, “But in “solving” the immigration problem, the Johnson Act laid the way for a redrawing of racial lines, and so that year does mark the beginning of the ascent of monolithic whiteness” (93). From 1924 to 1965 Jacobson argues that the hierarchy of multiple races was reformulated into three categories: Mongoloid, Negroid and Caucasian. The events precipitating this shift in racial perception included a decrease in immigration due to the Johnson Act, the eugenic policies of Nazi Germany, and significantly, the massive migration of African-Americans to the north and west, and the rise of Jim Crow laws. This new system transformed a system exclusively based on racial hierarchy into a system of ethnicity, whereby white races were now seen as ethnic groups subsumed within the category of Caucasian. The three major racial divisions were now seen as products not of biological difference but of differing cultural and environmental factors. Jacobson points out that these racial shifts don’t mean that one regime or epoch was fully supplanted by the other, often simultaneous racial systems coexisted. Finally, Jacobson concludes that the race politics of the civil rights era further consolidated white people (now white ethnics) under the umbrella of “white” as the nation became polarized over issues of black-white relations.
How the Irish Became White brings the discussion of whiteness back to its connection with class in its case study of working-class Philadelphia Irish in the nineteenth-century. Ignatiev’s study, organized across six chapters, seeks to answer how the Irish, an oppressed group in Ireland came to become an oppressing group in the U.S. He locates the answer in their willingness to choose whiteness and its inextricable privileges at the expense of solidarity with African-Americans. In doing so, Ignatiev seeks to illuminate the subject of race within the context of the New Labor History, arguing that exclusion of African-Americans contributed to the formation of the white working-class. Unlike Jacobson who insists that the Irish, Jews, Italians, etc. were viewed through the lens of a white otherness, Ignatiev makes the point more provocatively that the Irish were in fact not thought of as white at all but had to gain admittance into the white race, a process which emphatically shores up the malleability and constructedness of race itself. An interesting piece of evidence which effectively exemplifies the degree to which Irish were not perceived as “white” comes from his analysis of the situation in the Philadelphia Walnut Street Jail. Ignatiev finds no reference to segregation by color in the minutes of The Board of Directors or the notes of the Prison Society. While the primary inmates of the jail were African-Americans and Irish, he argues that it is very difficult to determine whether or not and how segregation by race may have taken place. Strikingly, while relations between Irish and African-Americans were not positive outside of prison walls, within the jail there were no recorded instances of black/Irish strife. Ignatiev explains that the prison experience points to “the weakness of ‘race’ as a social definition within the prison” (51).
Ignatiev also argues that the policies of the Democratic Party and the practices of labor organizing are primarily what enabled the Irish to assimilate into white America, and not what some scholars believe was their ability to speak English. Prior to the Irish Famine Migration, Ignatiev explains, not all Irish immigrants were poor, Catholic or spoke English. They assimilated, or as Ignatiev argues, became white, because they bought into the white supremacy of the Democratic Party. Unlike the Republican Party’s adherence to American nativist restrictions on voting rights, the Democratic Party, consistently reduced voting restrictions for “white” men, enabling the majority of immigrant men access to the franchise. Through its rejection of the Republican Party’s American nativism, the Democratic Party, “established an acceptable standard for “white behavior” and “created the white vote” (76). In addition, Ignatiev looks at the development of labor and finds that the Irish effectively pushed African-Americans out of work in order to rise within the ranks of white labor. He argues that in order to do this, the Irish had to maintain color-based distinction regarding “black” and “white” man’s work whereby the Irish ensured that no black man could do the same work that they did. Relying on some inconclusive evidence, particularly with regard to his discussion of the Manayunk textile mill, Ignatiev nevertheless concludes that the Irish’s familiarity with the mill system, “their willingness to work for low wages” combined with their refusal to work with African-Americans rendered factories “as ‘white’ preserves” (115). Subsequently, Ignatiev makes the case that labor unions themselves became bastions of “whiteness” where the Irish continued to learn and participate in whiteness, while African-Americans continued to be pushed out of work and were often labeled as strikebreakers, that category of worker anathema to unions.
Jacobson provides us with a much broader overview of the ways in which immigrant groups became white while Ignatiev provides us with a close and focused analysis of one particular immigrant group’s process of becoming white in a particular place. This enables Ignatiev to facilitate a comprehensive accounting of the emigration and immigration of the Irish, in which we learn about the experience of the Irish under the British Penal Laws and the race-based oppression they experienced in Ireland. Jacobson’s scope is wide so we don’t get to know any particular group’s history as richly as Ignatiev’s Irish. However, in the chapter “Looking Jewish Seeing Jews” Jacobson provides if not a case study then a complex analysis of the ways in which Jews have historically been visually apprehended as something other than white. Jacobson, while resisting a class-based approach to race, nevertheless provides a thorough and seemingly all-encompassing understanding of the political and social implications denoted by the absorption of European immigrants by the Caucasian racial category. He does not suggest as Ignatiev does that such a transformation occurred due to the nearly calculated oppression of African-Americans by white ethnics. However in his Epilogue he importantly emphasizes that while in today’s multicultural climate many white ethnics might wish to argue that they “are not really white”, they need to recognize that their whiteness enabled them admission into the U.S. Furthermore, it entitled them to certain legal and economic rights that were consistently denied to African-Americans, Chinese immigrants and Native Americans.
In addition, both authors, while they each chart the rise of whiteness at different historical moments, do attribute much of its monolithic prevalence to circumstances involving African-Americans, such as migration, Jim Crow, and various forms of political and social oppression. They each argue that this resulted in polarizing the nation into essentially two races, black and white, which subsumed all other European immigrants into the category of white, or, as Jacobson would have it, Caucasian. Whiteness of a Different Color and How the Irish Became White importantly address the white supremacist roots of this country and impart an important lesson to their readers in recognizing the historically intimate connection between whiteness and privilege. In telling the story of whiteness and those that chose or were fortunate enough to find themselves gaining admission to the white race, Ignatiev and Jacobson expose race as a fabrication. (less)

like · see review

Jul 29, 2011 T. Smith added it

Very informative about the fluid, in-between status of so-called "white ethnics" - groups who are today considered "white", but who in the past were seen as separate "races". I use the quotation marks to indicate that these terms are social constructions, not biological realities.

Revealing discussion of how the civil rights movement and resulting attention to a binary black-white dynamic actually helped to solidify a monolithic whiteness and erase differences among white ethnic groups - as well...more

like · see review

Apr 21, 2013 Eddy Allen rated it 4 of 5 stars

Shelves: arts-and-historical

America's racial odyssey is the subject of this remarkable work of historical imagination. Matthew Frye Jacobson argues that race resides not in nature but in the contingencies of politics and culture. In ever-changing racial categories we glimpse the competing theories of history and collective destiny by which power has been organized and contested in the United States. Capturing the excitement of the new field of "whiteness studies" and linking it to traditional historical inquiry, Jacobson s...more

like · see review

Nov 12, 2011 Korri marked it as to-read

Shelves: race, american-culture-and-history, immi-emi-mi-gration, paused, whiteout-conditions

Jacobson's work is so thoughtful and replete with interesting information that in the month I've been reading it (9 October - 12 November 2011), I've only progressed 135 pages.

Jacobson focuses on three historical moments in U.S. history:
1) 1790, with its naturalization law limiting citizenship to 'free white persons', which assumes a monolithic whiteness and that whiteness somehow makes people fit for self-government;
2) 1840s - 1924, when mass European immigration helped give rise to a hierarch...more

like · see review

Feb 15, 2011 Tarah rated it 5 of 5 stars

Okay, I'm inspired to rate some of the books I've worked most closely with... or at least the ones that were the most useful. And this was BY FAR the MOST useful for work on issues of race production in turn-of-the-century America. I really can't say enough about this book. Extremely well researched, deftly written, interesting to read, etc. More should be said, but the bottom line is: read this book.

2 likes · like · see review

Jan 04, 2011 Leah rated it 4 of 5 stars

The author is an Evergreen alum. Really fascinating account of the history of racism in America that extends far beyond black and white.

like · see review

Mar 27, 2012 Kristin rated it 5 of 5 stars

A fascinating study of the changing notions of whiteness in America. Beautifully written and stunningly argued. I can see myself using it all over the place in my research and teaching.

like · see review

Apr 21, 2011 Sam Newton rated it 3 of 5 stars

Shelves: 20th-century

Nice argument about how whiteness is "constructed" so that even clearly "white" people have been labeled as non-white. Very tedious to read. Insomniac helper...

like · see review

Aug 16, 2012 Erin rated it 4 of 5 stars

Shelves: non-fiction, anthropology, history

Reminded me of Painter's The History of White People

like · see review

Feb 13, 2011 Caitlin added it

This book is only read in that the class period in which we discussed it is over, and I do not need to finish it.

like · see review

May 03, 2009 Joshua rated it 3 of 5 stars

Interesting. Might all be bunk.

like · see review

Sep 05, 2011 Andrew rated it 3 of 5 stars

read selections

like · see review

May 06, 2008 Janiece rated it 4 of 5 stars

It's all about race. And when there is only one answer there are always problems. Ignoring religion and ethnicity is a definitely a problem, but the book is illuminating none the less. Very thought provoking.

like · see review

May 22, 2010 Sarah rated it 4 of 5 stars

This is an incredibly dense read, but Jacobson's arguments about the shifts the definition of whiteness and the result in the binary opposition between white and black are extremely compelling.

like · see review

Aug 12, 2011 Sean Chick rated it 4 of 5 stars

Excellent book on the fluidity of whiteness in America. Jacobson is a good writer although those without background knowledge can get quite lost.

like · see review

Jun 10, 2008 Katrina Mann rated it 4 of 5 stars

Shelves: non-fiction

Important study of how various European immigrants, over time, became lumped into the category of American "whiteness."

like · see review

Jul 06, 2008 kasia rated it 4 of 5 stars

A fascinting book. Required reading for anyone interested in US history, race, or immigration.

like · see review

Aug 22, 2012 Virginia rated it 4 of 5 stars

I learned a ton and enjoyed doing it. Recommended.

like · see review

Jan 03, 2008 Michelle rated it 5 of 5 stars

Hands down the best history of race in the U.S.

like · see review

Jun 16, 2013 Morgan Sohl marked it as to-read

Jun 15, 2013 bookFANatic rated it 4 of 5 stars

Jun 14, 2013 Marcy rated it 5 of 5 stars

Jun 13, 2013 Cherie Ann marked it as to-read

Jun 09, 2013 Adam DJ Brett added it

Shelves: my-library

Jun 08, 2013 Wilson added it

Jun 08, 2013 Tonya Scott marked it as to-read

Jun 06, 2013 Gabrielle marked it as to-read

Jun 06, 2013 Jordan Peters marked it as to-read

Jun 01, 2013 Michael rated it 2 of 5 stars

title link	preview: Whiteness of a Different Color: European Immigrants and the Alchemy of Race
avg rating	preview: Whiteness of a Different Color: European Immigrants and the Alchemy of Race Goodreads rating: 3.91 (206 ratings)
small image	preview: click here [close]
med image	preview: click here [close]
BBCode	[url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/221702.Whiteness_of_a_Different_Color?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book][img]http://d.gr-assets.com/books/1320805118l/221702.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/221702.Whiteness_of_a_Different_Color?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book]Whiteness of a Different Color: European Immigrants and the Alchemy of Race by Matthew Frye Jacobson[/url]

Whiteness of a Different Color: European Immigrants and the Alchemy of Race

Friend Reviews

Lists with This Book

Community Reviews

new topic
Discuss This Book

combine
Other Editions (1)

Genres

Readers also enjoyed similar books

Books by Matthew Frye Jacobson

Share This Book

Share This Book on Your Website

Trivia About Whiteness of a Di...

Whiteness of a Different Color: European Immigrants and the Alchemy of Race

Friend Reviews

Lists with This Book

Community Reviews

new topicDiscuss This Book

combineOther Editions (1)

Genres

Readers also enjoyed similar books

Books by Matthew Frye Jacobson

Share This Book

Share This Book on Your Website

Trivia About Whiteness of a Di...

new topic
Discuss This Book

combine
Other Editions (1)