Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Sweet Science” as Want to Read:
The Sweet Science
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Sweet Science

4.12 of 5 stars 4.12  ·  rating details  ·  562 ratings  ·  68 reviews
A.J. Liebling's classic New Yorker pieces on the "sweet science of bruising" bring vividly to life the boxing world as it once was. It depicts the great events of boxing's American heyday: Sugar Ray Robinson's dramatic comeback, Rocky Marciano's rise to prominence, Joe Louis's unfortunate decline. Liebling never fails to find the human story behind the fight, and he evokes ...more
Paperback, 267 pages
Published September 29th 2004 by North Point Press (first published January 1949)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Sweet Science, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Sweet Science

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 1,605)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
The Sweet Science ranks number one on the Sports Illustrated best books of all time list. The book collects some of A.J. Liebling's boxing essays from The New Yorker . Liebling writes in a dry and sarcastic style, and even without knowing or caring much about boxing in the pre-Cassius Clay era of the 20th century I could still find the book enjoyable. It's kind of like David Foster Wallace's tennis essays. I don't care about tennis, but the writing brings and enjoyment to a topic that I would no ...more
Peter Derk
You can't go too far into books about fighting without running into this one over and over.

Like a lot of older books, you can feel the vintage on this one. For me, it's about three things: Descriptions of people, descriptions of places, and a careful catalouging of what everybody is eating.

The first serves the book well. Getting a description of the different boxers is helpful, especially because it seems like most descriptions of the time are strongly influenced by whether or not the writer is
I never really thought I would read a book about boxing. It's not a subject I'm very interested in or know much about. In fact, right before I started this book, I did a short review of all of the boxers I know by name and realized that I knew most of them from Billy Joel's "We Didn't Start the Fire". Awesome.

But when I found out that Sports Illustrated named this book as the best American sports book of all time, I figured I had to give it a read. I'm glad I did.

The Sweet Science is a collectio
Tyler Jones
I am far more in love wit the style than I am with the subject, but Liebling does an admirable job of capturing the allure of the sport. More than just a book about boxing it captures the spirit of America at it's post war peak- a cigar chomping, manly America that we will never see again. I loved the sarcastic style. The bar-room smoke filled, beer and mustard stained pages.
David Ranney
Mr. Brown looked at me with placid, obliging condescension. 'He fought the way he fought because Marciano fought the way he fought.' he said. 'Charles come in in a good mental condition, and he started right in to execute--biff!' Mr. Brown here took the stance of a confident standup boxer. 'But Rocky is coming in.' Mr. Brown here stepped back. 'It is very hard to think when you are getting your brains knocked out,' Mr. Brown said. 'So Charles withdraws back to consider the situation.' Mr. Brown
Colonel Stingo, Mush Sallow, Chickie Ferrara, Whitey Bimstein, Tiny Payne, Philadelphia Jack O'Brien, Jimmy Tomato, Bertie Briscoe . . . This book is worth reading just for the names.
Andy Mitchell
Although I'm not a boxing fan, this was a fascinating book.

I especially enjoyed learning a bit more about Rocky. I didn't realize he was a Massachusetts native before listening.

The only reason I didn't give this book 5 stars is because the last quarter or so of the book felt a bit redundant, like I wasn't learning much new.

But that's a small complaint and may be because I don't love the sport. I probably wouldn't have felt the same way if this had been about baseball or basketball or football.

Liebling, A. J. THE SWEET SCIENCE. (1956). ****. If you’re not, or never were a boxing fan, then this book may fall flat on your sensibilities. If you were (or are), however, this book will probably be the best one you will ever read on the sport. Then again, if you’re not, you will at least come to recognize what the average boxing fan sees in the sport and to learn more about the principal players of the early 1950s. Liebling, at the time, was a reporter for the New York Post and a contributor ...more
Sports Illustrated once called this book the “best American sports book of all time.” If one were to rate books based completely on prose and intelligence, you might be able to make that argument. I prefer to make book recommendations based on prose and intelligence certainly, but also on depth and meaning, and on entertainment value and personal appeal (hence my high opinion of The Stolen Child). And on both of those last two points, this book was a profound disappointment to me. The Sweet Scie ...more
I enjoyed this thoroughly despite not knowing much about boxing at all. A collection of boxing essays from A.J. Liebling, a writer for the New Yorker from the first half of the 20th century, that are similar but enjoyable. Somewhat cantankerously narrated and dryly observed, Liebling spends time not only watching fights but visiting training camps, sitting at bars with old-timers, chatting about fighters with the man-on-the-street, and periodically referring to the pugilist culture of 19th centu ...more
Jun 25, 2013 Jeff rated it 4 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: Boxing fans
Keep in mind that Liebling wrote these stories individually without intention of compiling them into a single tome and you'll be able to endure the repetition of his epithets for Pierce Egan (his predecessor whom he unabashedly idolizes).

I enjoyed Liebling's voice and his objective viewpoint. He provides a deep and rich history of the fights he covered by telling us about the people involved and bringing us into the world they inhabit. A full experience of the time that i doubt any reporter nowa
I'm a fan of the sports read - check the rest of my titles if you're a doubter. . .this book is somewhat unassailable - even if it is exclusively about boxing in the 40s and 50s. . .

This is a collection of essays about various boxing matches first published in the New Yorker back when pugilists held more of a cultural sway. I think the last boxer who penetrated the popular imagination was Mike Tyson right? Perhaps for all the wrong reasons - but anyway. . .

To call this "the best sports book of a
Deeply enjoyable read, stacked with metaphors and boxing lore. Ever wonder where a 'double cross' got its name? The more you think about it, however, the more paradoxical the book is. For a gregarious sport, where big talk is as much a spectacle as the fight, the author is mostly alone with his thoughts throughout the book, looking in on the action, going for a drink by himself after the fight, walking around in the midtown streets and stopping in at the Neutral Corner to drink with the regulars ...more
The Sweet Science is not really a book about boxing. Yes, it does talk about boxing and various legends in the sport (Rocky Marciano, Jersey Joe Walcott, Sugar Ray Robinson, etc.), but they are not the real focus here.

The real focus is A.J. Liebling's travels through this world, attending fights and getting into the real mechanics of the sport. Liebling's voice is lively and his prose is both funny and sharp. Most importantly, it becomes clear within 10 pages that Liebling truly loves the sport.
I have a fascination with the rough and tumble sports of earlier days - the old grit and romance of F1, the days when horse racing was a major draw with celebrities such as Bing Crosby owning horses, the six day races and endurance track cycling events in smoke filled velodromes often accompanied by raucous live music. Add pre-television era boxing to that list. Though Liebling's volume spans the transition to the television age, he looks at the present through an antiquated - or, more accuratel ...more
At first Sweet Science disappointed me but it heated up towards the end. Liebling paints a colorful picture of boxing's bygone era, a time where TV was still gaining a cultural foothold and written accounts of fights still held high value. Liebling also dawdles around the trivial details of his experiences - his cab rides, his meals, how he obtained his tickets (did he pay or were they free?). You'll learn more about Liebling's preflight habits than you will about most if the actual fighters or ...more
John Keats
A great book for defining what writers and writing teachers are after when they talk about voice: Liebling creates a personality on the page that is distinct and real and alive. That means, of course, that you might not always like it; you'll just always feel its pulse. And even though I've considered myself a boxing fan for about forty years, he made me realize that I really am a fraud. If you haven't seen a fight live--through the noise of the crowd, around obstructions, and in spite of what t ...more
Andrew Dolbeare
The prose is entertaining, I'm not sure if it's the sentimentality so many of these essays evoke, but it reminded me of Jack Kerouac's writing a little bit. His descriptions of fights are great but I think what's greater are his descriptions of the shift in boxing culture, live event to broadcast, the shrinking pay for amateur bouts, the dwindling number of boxers (I think at some point he estimates that there were 1,000 professional boxers living in New York city). There's a trove of cultural a ...more
Bryce Rausch
This book is old, pre-Cassius Clay, yet Liebling does a fantastic job putting you in the time effortlessly.
Quick review:
The writer goes to all these boxing matches, many times meeting with the fighters ahead of time, and just writes about his experiences. Describes his surroundings, what he does before the fights, after the fights, the best post-fight bars to go to, it all seems very casual.
That being said, I've never read such an articulate sports writer. His last fight with Marciano and Moore
Probably would have been a little more relevant if I was more familiar with guys like Joe Louis and Rocky Marciano, but Liebling is as erudite about the world of boxing as any snoot might be about history or literature, and brings an intellectual eye to the ring. The first-person accounts of the fights from the crowd is archetypal of the sage sports-fan, who knows enough about a game to not get too excited about passing fads, and to sit quietly and observe, rather than jump around and shout at h ...more
This book is a collection of essays that the golden era of boxing, the 1950s- in my opinion, it wasn't much of a golden era. It was interesting because a number of scenarios that an experienced boxing fan is aware of are covered like the slow decline of a fighter who refuses to acknowledge what is happening, although Liebling could get too bogged down in minor details and jargon. Taken as a whole, it was enlightening.
I thought this was slightly overrated. It had some good insights and hints and tips for aspiring boxers and talks about some of the fighters from yesteryear like Robinson, Marciano, Joe Louis, Archie Moore, Patterson and a whole bunch of others. But I found myself skipping chinks of the book when it was talking about fighters that I didn’t recognise. Some of the stories were interesting I guess but didn’t enjoy it as much as I thought I would.
He was fat, droll, liked Paris, food, drink, cigars, and the sweet science -boxing. A newspaperman and writer for the New Yorker in it's hey day, Liebling respected the sport enough to to call a bum a bum, pay special homage to the black fighters of his day, and a fine tuned ear for what was said -from the training camps to the bars, taxis to ring side. He's not always politically correct but, he's never mean spirited, especially when it comes to the little guy. You can have the skill, but boxin ...more
Dec 14, 2014 Bap rated it 5 of 5 stars
Shelves: sports
Rated best sports book of all time by Sports illustrated. An account of boxing in the 1950s. Lieling was a journalist who wrote for the New Yorker. He wrote this book about boxing in the early 1950's when Joe Louis is knocked out by Rocky Marciano. He also writes about sugar Ray Robinson and Archie Moore and dozens of lesser known boxers, their managers, and trainers. This was the golden age of boxing before TV overexposed the sport and drove out most of the boxing clubs that were the incubators ...more
Great description of boxing (and the Northeast in general) during a low ebb for both. Not as cacophonic as McPhee's "A Sense Of Where You Are" but it's great for what it is.
Tom King
Liebling manages to make you feel like you are at each fight, it's incredible. This was the first book I've read of his and definitely won't be the last
A classic of sports writing generally and of boxing specifically. Liebling's first-person, experiential style inspired the so-called New Journalists. Like Hemingway's book about bull-fighting Death in the Afternoon, Liebling's book is about more than boxing -- it's about change, especially that from young to old, champion to the defeated. And it's also about the advent of TV, which was just becoming a must-have household item. Liebling thought it was ruining boxing, but by the final line, he nai ...more
All of the essays about Rocky Marciano are particularly incredible, none more so than the concluding essay about Archie Moore taking on Marciano in a career last stand of sorts.
Perryville Library
A.J. Liebling is one of the best American writers of the 20th Century. The Sweet Science is a classic collection of some of his pieces on boxing as they originally appeared in the New Yorker. You don't need to be a fan of boxing to enjoy this book - only a fan of good writing. It was long out of print and I used to borrow it from the Univ. of Minnesota library to read and re-read it. When it was reissued I bought it immediately. The latest version includes an excellent introduction by Robert Ana ...more
On the cover of my copy, there is a quote from David Remnick that describes A.J. Liebling, his voice and character, as "immensely appealing." This was the thing I took away most from the book - that it would have been great to go to a fight or just have a beer with the author.

The book is a collection of essays, each centered around one main bout but usually providing an account of the undercard matches, as well. Most of the essays follow the same format and are written with the same distinct to
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 53 54 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • On Boxing
  • The Contours of American History
  • The Liberal Imagination: Essays on Literature and Society
  • A Preface to Morals
  • The Fight
  • An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy Vol. 1
  • The Nature and Destiny of Man, Vols 1-2
  • The Strange Death of Liberal England
  • Religion and the Rise of Capitalism
  • Ghosts of Manila: The Fateful Blood Feud Between Muhammad Ali and Joe Frazier
  • Florence Nightingale, 1820-1910
  • King of the World: Muhammad Ali and the Rise of an American Hero
  • The Promise of American Life
  • Samuel Johnson
  • American Language
  • The Taming Of Chance (Ideas in Context)
  • Selected Essays
  • The Gate of Heavenly Peace: The Chinese and Their Revolution

Share This Book

“Boxing has always been a primarily urban pastime (whereas the defining suburban sport is auto-racing, in which the machine and its anonymous mechanics hold far greater importance than the driver). When white Americans left the cities, they left boxing as well.” 0 likes
“I can only surmise about what Liebling would make of today’s pugilistic dark ages. In his era, fighters fought rematches of close fights, even title fights, almost automatically. Ray Robinson and Jake LaMotta met six times, inconceivable for champions today. In the 1950s a quality pro thought himself underemployed if he had only eight or ten bouts a year, and the amateur scene was thriving. Nowadays pros who make a living from boxing are about as common as Yetis, and amateurs can’t get enough fights to learn the rudiments of the craft.” 0 likes
More quotes…