Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Game” as Want to Read:
The Game
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Game

3.24 of 5 stars 3.24  ·  rating details  ·  751 ratings  ·  77 reviews
Cassandra is an Oxford don; Julia, her sister, a bestselling novelist. They share a set of disturbing memories of a strange childhood game and of Simon, the handsome young neighbour who loved them both.

Years later Simon re-enters their lives via a television programme on snakes and intrudes into their uneasy compromise of mutual antagonism and distrust. The old, wild emoti
Paperback, 304 pages
Published October 15th 1992 by Vintage (first published 1967)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Game, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Game

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 1,279)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
I now know why this was one of the few books available on my library's list of downloadable audiobooks.(They work like real books in the library, so you can't check one out that someone else already has.) The synopsis was rather misleading (I thought there would be some fantasy involved, but I never got that far). The characters were disagreeable, and seemed to talk to themselves (in interior dialogue) far more than to each other. I made it through about three chapters before falling asleep. I n ...more
This was a strange and gorgeous book. I love Byatt's writing. I wanted to strangle several of the characters, though. One line in "The Game" became my meditation for the results of the 2010 election: "It is always foolish to care about what one can't help. But unfortunately we never know with any certainty what we can't help. And we are not usually capable of not caring."
This is probably the worst book I've ever read, especially disappointing because I heard so much about Possession, highly praised by my friends (although pretty much everyone told me, "I skipped all the poetry."). This badly crafted tale of two sisters' rivalry for the attentions of an arrogant TV star is both irritating and dull, full of overwrought descriptive passages and clumsy attempts to "get into the mind" of the main characters. The plot eventually gets lost in all of the pseudopsycholog ...more
Mariam Odent
I was listening to BBC's Open Book podcast on 20th century women's writing and A.S. Byatt's name came up a lot. So I decided to give her a try. As shallow as it sounds, the book cover for this novel was ugly and it screamed "BORING BOOKS YOU READ IN SCHOOL BUT WOULDN'T TOUCH ON YOUR OWN." And I was right. It emcompasses everything I dread about highly regarded writers in its dry metaphors and self-absorbed characters. It was written in the sixties where I guess it was kind of trendy to write abo ...more
The subject of this novel is not original: stories of devastating sibling rivalries, principally between sisters, abound in fiction but also in real life. I am myself part of such a story and have been since I was born, it seems. And so is A S Byatt actually!
Regardless, it is not surprising that novelists should be drawn to those complex relationships between girls and eventually women, who are intensely codependent and whose tormented, albeit real, love for each other is not a choice but a gene
Joy Walsh
I really liked Possession and loved The Children's Book. The Game, maybe because it is one of Byatt's earlier works, did not live up to them for me, but it was still a good read with some excellent parts.
A story of a very fraught relationship between two sisters, one an Oxford scholar of a monastic disposition, the other a popular novelist. One imagines Byatt's somewhat famously uncordial relationship with her sister Margaret Drabble is a source for the story, though one hopes it not quite so bad as this makes out. The scholarly sister is named Cassandra - I thought I was being rather clever in connecting this choice with Jane Austen's sister, but the character herself muses upon the parallel ab ...more
THE GAME. (1967). A. S. Byatt. ***.
Two sisters, Julia, a successful novelist, and Cassandra, a well-known professor at a university, meet after years of absence at their parent’s home; their father has just had a stroke, and he is dying. Julia, though she is the younger sister, is married – to Thor – and has a young daughter. Cassandra is still unattached, but is happy in her academic career. The two sisters are like night and day. We learn of their differences through internal monologues, all f
Once you’re aware of it it’s impossible to approach this book without assuming that it’s autobiographical, at least in part. Of course there’s a smattering of autobiography in most fiction but when Byatt’s sister read the book she was less than forgiving:
She may not have known what she had done until she had written it. Writers are like that. But it’s a mean-spirited book about sibling rivalry and she sent it to me with a note signed 'With love,’ saying 'I think I owe you an apology’. – ‘Margare
Moira Russell
I sulked terribly after finishing The Shadow of the Sun and had to leave Anna and Henry and Margaret and Caroline (and yes, even Oliver). Just as there is nothing so sweet as getting sucked utterly into a bookworld (surely the Germans have a compound word for that -- Buchwelt? -- ) there is nothing so disheartening as getting kicked out of the unearthly paradise, the little blank page between the last printed one and the back cover like a papery (not flaming!) little sword barring the way back. ...more
Helen Kitson
Simon, with his snakes, is the enduring and uneasy link - even in his long absence - between two sisters, Cassandra the unmarried Oxford don, and Julia, a successful novelist. The game of the title, a game the two sisters played when they were young, is never explained, but is a potent recurring image. As Cassandra notes, "When we were children, we were not quite separate. We shared a common vision, we created a common myth. And this, maybe, contained and resolved our difficulties. This is that ...more
It is the winter of 1963, and when sisters Julia and Cassandra return to Northumberland on the death of their father, they are snowed in. Living once again in such close company, they are forced to re-examine aspects of their childhood, and the causes of the rivalry that has blighted their relationship. Foremost is their relationship with their neighbour, Simon, who is now a leading herpetologist and TV personality. Julia is married to Thor, who retains the Quaker religion that they all once sha ...more
lynne naranek
Buoyed by my Fairy Tales class and subsequent introduction to this author, I picked up this book among a choice of many to try A. S. Byatt in a non-fairy tale setting, and for some reason not wanting to go with her main / famous (although I'd never hard of it till a month ago) book "Possession".

So, "The Game" : an absorbing tale that describes to almost too much detail the dysfunctional relationship between two sisters who had relied on imagination in their childhood, and seemed slaves to it eve
In multiple reader reviews, this early Byatt novel has been unfavorably compared to "Possession" by readers who found Byatt through that novel. I'm among these readers who adored "Possession," but I disagree that this early work is flat in comparison. I found both of the sisters portrayed here both sympathetic and real, and found myself (unfortunately) identifying with each of them. Admittedly, the majority of readers may not share this identification.
Both characters (who, it must be admitted,
I was not as engrossed by this early novel of Byatt's as I was of her later Possession, which I loved. I found the style in this book a bit overwrought - lots of embedded clauses that interrupted the flow of the story, leading to some frustration in following the overall plot of the story. I also found the unfolding of the plot confusing, ambiguous, and, frankly, I found all of the main characters unlikable, unsympathetic. I found I really didn't care what happened to these characters. I have to ...more
Hans Thyssen
But why?

Why is this book called The Game?

There is a game the two sisters played as children, and this game is still important in their later lives. I also know that the one sister needs the other one to weave a web, and that snakes always try to deceive women, but which man is the snake? I further know biting a apple isn't always biting an apple and that bananas often represent something that isn't a fruit.

Byatt seems to love the romantic poets. Nobody can blame her for that, but in this novel
My students are reading a short excerpt from A.S. Byatt's Possession, which I read and loved five years ago. I thought I might check out another book by Byatt instead of rereading all of Possession. While I did like The Game--it offered insights into relationships between women, some beautiful sections of prose ("I keep chasing metaphors. Out of a desire for an impossible unity"), and a great love of Arthurian Romance--it wasn't as good as Possession. So, I may reread Possession after all.
This is the first book I've read by A.S. Byatt, and I can't wait to read more. I love her inter-textuality and the magical way she combines metaphors and associations to convey her characters' experiences of the world. I found a lot of 'truthful dialogue' in this book; words that really struck at me. Her characters in this book are entangled in the over-reflexive worlds of literature academia, metaphor and writing, where they are being tugged between significance and insignificance.

My favourite
Brian Rogers
Byatt, even in this very early work, writes like an angel. The themes here are familiar to anyone who has read her later works - this is clearly a precursor to The Virgin in The Garden, and the other books in that quartet. Despite that familiarity the book is so full of sentences that one must read, and in so reading understand so much. It's brilliant. If you like any of her other works you will most likely enjoy this one.
One of the worst books I've ever read. Had trouble following characters and even being interested in what was happening to them.

I was intrigued by the idea of this book. As girls, Cassandra and Julie created a game based on an alternative world of Arthurian romance. Estranged as adults, they are reunited at the death of their father. At the same time a man they both loved returns to their lives.

There were several lovely passages but overall I thought the plot was difficult to follow. The charact
I slogged through this because I knew this novel was the supposed source of the complete estrangement of Byatt and her sister, Margaret Drabble. Drabble is one of my favorite authors. Byatt is decidedly not.

The younger sister (Margaret?) is just silly and the older sister is so unappealing that I don't understand how the novel could have caused such a rift. Back in the day, Byatt sent it to Drabble with a note of apology.

Fortunately, I have a new to me Drabble book to read next!
Alesha Hubbell
This book was not what I expected from the cover. I always seem to expect something else from Byatt's books, but I'm not sure why. They never pretend to be anything else. I enjoyed the interactions between the sisters but the sections where they were apar were not as enjoyable for me.
Byatt's 2nd novel and while it has some of her signature moves, it lacks her later mastery & finesse. I wanted to hear more about the game itself and I felt like the relationship triangle and the deep connection between Cassandra and Julia both could have been ... clearer, I guess; I suppose there was more telling than showing with both. Still, an interesting read!
Jen Locke
I don't really get it. Relationships can be toxic? Don't live in the past? Those are definitely themes here, but they're executed a bit inelegantly. And maybe my dislike of the narrator hurts my opinion, too. I really wanted to like it. Oh well.
At the very least, this novel establishes a literary type similar to the Eddie character in Elizabeth Bowen's "The Death of the Heart." Both are young men who do not care about the young women who idolize them.
Lorie Owens
Delightful audio version provides verisimilitude in accents, but the main characters nonetheless soar headlong toward their own destruction ... Once there, it is the reader who feels annihilated.
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Typical A.S. Byatt book - eloquent, passionate, but a little tedious and contrived. The typical three start review also applies.
I do not remember reading this, and my notes do not help to jar my memory: As usual, questing, questioning, disconcerting, impelling.
Well, it was A.S. Byatt. You have to be in the mood for a slow, rich read. I "read" the audiobook and I enjoyed it.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 42 43 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Vanessa and Virginia
  • The Pattern in the Carpet: A Personal History with Jigsaws
  • A Portrait Of Jane Austen
  • Cranford & Selected Short Stories
  • First Light
  • Boating for Beginners
  • A Quiet Adjustment: A Novel
  • The Taste of Sorrow
  • Stealing Heaven
  • Pascali's Island
  • The Gift Of Stones
  • Rameau's Niece
  • Miss Hargreaves
  • The Worshipful Lucia (Lucia, #5)
  • City of the Mind
  • Learning to Swim: And Other Stories
  • Jane Austen in Boca
  • Jean Rhys: The Complete Novels (Voyage in the Dark, Quartet, After Leaving Mr Mackenzie, Good Morning, Midnight, Wide Sargasso Sea)
A.S. Byatt (Antonia Susan Byatt) is internationally known for her novels and short stories. Her novels include the Booker Prize winner Possession, The Biographer’s Tale and the quartet, The Virgin in the Garden, Still Life, Babel Tower and A Whistling Woman, and her highly acclaimed collections of short stories include Sugar and Other Stories, The Matisse Stories, The Djinn in the Nightingale’s Ey ...more
More about A.S. Byatt...
Possession The Children's Book Angels and Insects The Djinn in the Nightingale's Eye The Virgin in the Garden

Share This Book

No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »

“He had said she was provocative; so she was, she needed to prove she was there to be seen; but the proof always, contradictorily, drove her to further uncertain agony of guilt and self-distaste.” 5 likes
“There will always be people who will slash open the other cheek when it is turned to them.” 1 likes
More quotes…